• Parker Is On ROKC Saying The Neckline Is Forged

    From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to All on Fri Oct 27 07:00:19 2023
    Predictably Greg Parker is on ROKC desperately trying to do damage control for this new dagger in the heart of Prayer Man in the form of the woman's dress neckline seen in Darnell...Greg is on there saying the image looks manipulated...

    Greg is a fool because the original Darnell film will prove that the clearly-seen woman's dress neckline is a firm part of the original image...Only an idiot would not realize that and try to get away with the level of analysis of a 12 year old Greg
    offers...What you are seeing here is the trolling level of personal character that was the source of Prayer Man in the first place...

    Just the image itself, that came from Bart Kamp by the way, is obviously legitimate and not altered in any way...Greg is such an idiot that he fails to realize the source itself is Bart Kamp so if it was forged it was his partner Kamp who did it...Talk
    about dumb and chasing his own already-discredited troll tail in public...

    Time to remove these fools (and their proxies) from the research community...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Greg Parker@21:1/5 to Brian Doyle on Sat Oct 28 21:56:54 2023
    On Saturday, October 28, 2023 at 1:00:21 AM UTC+11, Brian Doyle wrote:
    Predictably Greg Parker is on ROKC desperately trying to do damage control for this new dagger in the heart of Prayer Man in the form of the woman's dress neckline seen in Darnell...Greg is on there saying the image looks manipulated...

    Predictably you have it all wrong. The PM thesis needs no damage control. Facts never do. What needs control is the damage done by the misinformation and deranged attempts to alter perception of the facts.

    I forgive you. You have an excuse.

    Mr. Ford has none.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to Greg Parker on Sun Oct 29 08:46:41 2023
    On Sunday, October 29, 2023 at 12:56:55 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Saturday, October 28, 2023 at 1:00:21 AM UTC+11, Brian Doyle wrote:




    As his posts reveal to any normal person with serious research interests, Greg Parker is a troll who is not here for serious research purposes...He justifies his trolling by going back to his censorship-protected website and declaring that he is giving
    the non-serious answers that the people he is addressing deserve - but any person of average intelligence can see from the material that Greg is evading that he is dodging evidence he knows he can't answer...If we cut to the chase we ask why the research
    community doesn't take measures to exclude Parker and the reason is he has an insidious group of proxies who back his crazy claims...This is crowned by Jim DiEugenio who gets away with the murder of endorsing this undermining troll Parker without ever
    having to justify it at a credible research level...DiEugenio lays in wait and stays quiet only to pop up at the right moment and give Parker his endorsement...This corruption of the JFK internet has virtually destroyed credible JFK conspiracy research
    and replaced it with a group of unqualified idiots who have taken over the UK-based JFK research websites...This swarm trolling attack has managed to obscure the fact that the unserious troll Greg Parker is the original source of the bogus Prayer Man
    theory...

    Because UK-based operators are used to cowardly censorship the UK-based ROKC, Education Forum, and JFK Assassination Forum have managed to use banning and censorship to create a false sense of research and evidence that is limited to a handful of regular
    members...The best and brightest have been deselected and removed by the criminals who are callling themselves moderators on those websites...Those who are capable of debunking the Prayer Man theory have been removed by moderators who abuse their power
    and lie about the reason for their banning...The Prayer Man theory is a direct product of wicked dishonesty, corruption, and censorship...The people promoting it know it has been refuted only they are now making their corruption pay off by supporting it
    anyway in order to consolidate their power...

    The latest scoop neckline evidence is totally valid and is legitimate film evidence that does accurately portray the neckline on Prayer Man's garment...The Prayer Man people are currently abusing their censorship-gained privilege and trying an end around
    in order to force the false suggestion that the scoop neckline is somehow manipulated...Jim DiEugenio assumes the entitled privilege of making absolute pronouncements without ever providing any technical explanation that would be required of anyone else..
    .Jim is doing his usual bullshit and trying to rescue the Prayer Man trolls...However the technical evidence that the crook Gordon excluded from his website by means of dirty banning won't let DiEugenio get away with it...

    The Prayer Man idiots are trying to get away with ignoring that the original Darnell film will produce the exact same scoop neckline as seen in Kamp's image...Jim DiEugenio is lying...This will be proven once the original Darnell film is scanned and
    produces the exact same image - proving that the neckline has not been manipulated and Kamp's frame is accurate...The Prayer Man cultists are delusional if they think they can get away with just ignoring this...They are trying to use swarm trolling to
    avoid the obvious...That Kamp's new frame is damning proof that Prayer Man is Stanton...Dirty Jim knows what his job is...By the way, the original Wiegman celluloid will also produce Davidson's woman's face exactly - also confirming that Davidson was
    totally accurate and serves as credible proof that Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...

    If you go to the best enlargements of the previous Darnell image of Prayer Man you can see that the skin area seen in the scoop neckline is present in that image in exact proportion to Kamp's clear frame...The original Prayer Man frame was more blurry
    than Kamp's new frame, however it was of clear enough resolution that it shows the proportion of white skin to clothing and you can see the exact proportion of skin seen in the scoop neckline image is present in that previous image...This is confirming
    proof that Kamp's scoop neckline frame is totally accurate and credible and is not manipulated as the Prayer Man people are desperately claiming...They are just ignoring the most intelligent analyses that disprove them...They are lying and trying to
    ignore that Kamp's new frame is sharper because Darnell's camera was still (despite their lies trying to say the opposite)...Stancak is trying to get away with ignoring that Kamp's new frame is sharper because Darnell's camera stopped sweeping and
    therefore took a sharp frame...This is the simple obvious that the Education Forum allows Stancak to avoid by posting lengthy pseudo-science bullshit that then gets armchair praise from the useful idiots who know what their job is...Stancak is
    dishonestly trying to avoid admitting that the previous Blue-Ray version was blurry and Kamp's new frame is sharp and therefore depicts Prayer Man's neckline more accurately...The Education Forum is organized and dedicated dishonesty based on stupid
    censorship...Backwards dumb-down moderation...

    This proof needs to be shown on the Education Forum and the Prayer Man people need to be forced to answer it...Only that is being prevented by one UK-based cyber criminal named James Gordon...Greg Parker will ignore all this and troll and his useful
    idiot proxies on the Education Forum will ignore it...However it is still credible proof that proves Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...The Education Forum is also trying to get away with the murder of ignoring that Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton's exact 5 foot
    4 height and possesses her elbow-length sleeve as seen in Owens...



    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to Brian Doyle on Mon Oct 30 08:38:52 2023
    On Sunday, October 29, 2023 at 11:46:43 AM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Sunday, October 29, 2023 at 12:56:55 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Saturday, October 28, 2023 at 1:00:21 AM UTC+11, Brian Doyle wrote:




    Parker's not man enough to come back and give a serious response to this...


    There is nothing wrong with Bart Kamp's clear Darnell frame that shows a woman's dress neckline on Prayer Man...It is technically valid and proves Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...It will be scientifically verified by reproducing it from the original
    Darnell celluloid...


    It just shows what clowns the idiots who have forced their way in to control of the JFK internet are...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)