1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. ALT.CONSPIRACY.JFK

  • Bud answers all of Gil's irrelevant questions

    From John Corbett@21:1/5 to All on Thu Oct 26 16:23:41 2023
    Bud demonstrated the irrelevancy of Gil's questions simply by giving a
    direct answer to every one of them. I made the mistake of trying to reason
    with Gil about how pointless his questions were. I realize now that there
    was no point to trying to reason with Gil. The process is foreign to him.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to All on Fri Oct 27 02:07:23 2023
    On Thursday, October 26, 2023 at 7:23:43 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
    < more useless comments, lies and insults >

    Bud's idiotic "answers" could only be seen as answers by another idiot.
    It's all a big joke to people like the chickenshit coward "Bud" and you, people with no moral compass.

    Shame on him and you for making light of the most gruesome assassination of a US President in history.
    You make light of this murder by either refusing to answer questions that need to be resolved, or by "answering" them in idiotic fashion.
    You can't even give an honest answer to a simple "yes or no" question.
    You people just can't take it seriously, can you ?

    It's all a big joke to you.

    It says something about your character when you come on line and take this subject as some kind of a joke from which you "entertain" yourselves.
    This isn't entertainment.

    But then again, honesty, decency and truth was never your strong point, as I, and others have exposed in the past.

    You people are nothing more than dogshit, you prove it every day.
    And we all know what eventually happens to dogshit. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58sP8azcHfQ

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to All on Fri Oct 27 01:56:42 2023
    On Thursday, October 26, 2023 at 7:23:43 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
    < the usual useless comments >


    Bud's idiotic "answers" could only be seen as answers by another idiot.
    It's all a big joke to people like the chickenshit coward "Bud" and you, people with no moral compass.

    Shame on him and you for making light of the most gruesome assassination of a US President in history.
    You make light of this murder by turning a blind eye from questions that need to be resolved and by "answering" them in idiotic fashion.
    You people just can't take it seriously, can you ?

    It says something about your character when you come on line and take this subject as some kind of a joke from which you "entertain" yourselves.
    This isn't entertainment.
    Kennedy's brains were blown all over Main St.

    But then again, honesty, decency and truth was never your strong point, as I, and others have exposed in the past.

    You people are nothing more than dogshit, and you prove it every day. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58sP8azcHfQ

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Fri Oct 27 03:10:37 2023
    On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 5:07:24 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Thursday, October 26, 2023 at 7:23:43 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
    < more useless comments, lies and insults >

    Bud's idiotic "answers" could only be seen as answers by another idiot.

    What specifically is wrong with the answers I gave?

    Every one is undoubtedly true, you just hate the truth.

    It's all a big joke to people like the chickenshit coward "Bud" and you, people with no moral compass.

    You set up a rigged, crooked game and then cry when the game is exposed.

    Your questions are loaded with assumptions that you have failed to show are valid. It is shifting the burden, where your implied (but not supported) ideas are the default that must be "refuted".

    Shame on him and you for making light of the most gruesome assassination of a US President in history.

    I`m making light of you. You and you ideas about this event are not worthy of giving any weight to.

    You make light of this murder by either refusing to answer questions that need to be resolved, or by "answering" them in idiotic fashion.

    How are my answers idiotic. You ask if photos were taken of the bullet fragments in the limo. I answer "No" (or "None that I know of"). Are you saying photos were taken and I am wrong?

    If you want better answers ask better questions.

    You can't even give an honest answer to a simple "yes or no" question.

    I gave honest answers to your questions, some were "yes or no" answers.

    You people just can't take it seriously, can you ?

    Quit your crying. Kennedy has been dead for a long time, and so has the person who killed him. You can quit wringing your hands over it, JFK ain`t coming back.

    It's all a big joke to you.

    You are a big joke to us.

    It says something about your character when you come on line and take this subject as some kind of a joke from which you "entertain" yourselves.
    This isn't entertainment.

    That is exactly what it is.

    But then again, honesty, decency and truth was never your strong point, as I, and others have exposed in the past.

    You`ve made a hobby out of calling honest, decent people liars and criminals, which makes you the scumbag.

    You people are nothing more than dogshit, you prove it every day.
    And we all know what eventually happens to dogshit. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58sP8azcHfQ

    Poor Gil, someone exposed his crooked game and he is very unhappy about it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Corbett@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Fri Oct 27 03:56:17 2023
    On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 5:07:24 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Thursday, October 26, 2023 at 7:23:43 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
    < more useless comments, lies and insults >

    Bud's idiotic "answers" could only be seen as answers by another idiot.
    It's all a big joke to people like the chickenshit coward "Bud" and you, people with no moral compass.

    Shame on him and you for making light of the most gruesome assassination of a US President in history.

    You make a mockery of it every day by trying to exonerate his killer so spare me the righteous
    indignation.

    You make light of this murder by either refusing to answer questions that need to be resolved, or by "answering" them in idiotic fashion.

    Bud has answered everyone of your silly ass questions and the simplicity of his answers
    demonstrated the ridiculousness of your questions.

    You can't even give an honest answer to a simple "yes or no" question.

    As if you've ever addressed mine. You come in here, make your drive-by posts, then run like hell
    when you get challenged.

    You people just can't take it seriously, can you ?

    We can't take you seriously.

    It's all a big joke to you.

    Yes, you are.

    It says something about your character when you come on line and take this subject as some kind of a joke from which you "entertain" yourselves.

    The subject is not a joke. Your treatment of it is.

    This isn't entertainment.

    But you are.

    But then again, honesty, decency and truth was never your strong point, as I, and others have exposed in the past.

    Those three things are strangers to you.

    You people are nothing more than dogshit, you prove it every day.
    And we all know what eventually happens to dogshit. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58sP8azcHfQ

    Keep pretending you are accomplishing something with your silly ass hobby.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Fri Oct 27 06:18:18 2023
    On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 03:10:37 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:


    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to geowright1963@gmail.com on Fri Oct 27 06:18:18 2023
    On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 16:23:41 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett <geowright1963@gmail.com> wrote:

    Bud demonstrated the irrelevancy of Gil's questions simply by giving a
    direct answer to every one of them.


    You're lying again, Corbutt. Indeed, the very first one I saw this
    morning was a QUESTION from Chickenshit in response to the question...
    it was CERTAINLY not a "direct answer."

    Of course, we already know you're a proven liar.


    I made the mistake of trying to reason
    with Gil about how pointless his questions were.


    Of course, they aren't pointless at all. They demonstrate that
    believers NEED to run from the evidence in this case.


    I realize now...

    That you don't know the answers?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Fri Oct 27 10:56:07 2023
    On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 9:18:25 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 16:23:41 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
    <geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Bud demonstrated the irrelevancy of Gil's questions simply by giving a >direct answer to every one of them.
    You're lying again, Corbutt. Indeed, the very first one I saw this
    morning was a QUESTION from Chickenshit in response to the question...

    The answer to my question answers Gil`s question.

    If they didn`t give an explanation for why they did what they did, then no explanation is available.

    it was CERTAINLY not a "direct answer."

    Of course, we already know you're a proven liar.
    I made the mistake of trying to reason
    with Gil about how pointless his questions were.
    Of course, they aren't pointless at all. They demonstrate that
    believers NEED to run from the evidence in this case.


    I realize now...

    That you don't know the answers?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Fri Oct 27 12:07:08 2023
    On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 10:56:07 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:


    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to John Corbett on Sat Oct 28 04:33:22 2023
    On Thursday, October 26, 2023 at 7:23:43 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
    Bud demonstrated the irrelevancy of Gil's questions simply by giving a direct answer to every one of them. I made the mistake of trying to reason with Gil about how pointless his questions were. I realize now that there was no point to trying to reason with Gil. The process is foreign to him.

    Liar.

    He never even responded to question 3. https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/_IWVwgl9VG0

    You lie about everything.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Corbett@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Sat Oct 28 05:59:24 2023
    On Saturday, October 28, 2023 at 7:33:24 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Thursday, October 26, 2023 at 7:23:43 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
    Bud demonstrated the irrelevancy of Gil's questions simply by giving a direct answer to every one of them. I made the mistake of trying to reason with Gil about how pointless his questions were. I realize now that there was no point to trying to reason with Gil. The process is foreign to him.
    Liar.

    He never even responded to question 3.

    OK, Bud. Go stand in the corner. Naughty boy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to geowright1963@gmail.com on Mon Oct 30 06:19:37 2023
    On Sat, 28 Oct 2023 05:59:24 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett <geowright1963@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Saturday, October 28, 2023 at 7:33:24?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Thursday, October 26, 2023 at 7:23:43?PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
    Bud demonstrated the irrelevancy of Gil's questions simply by giving a
    direct answer to every one of them. I made the mistake of trying to reason >>> with Gil about how pointless his questions were. I realize now that there >>> was no point to trying to reason with Gil. The process is foreign to him. >> Liar.

    He never even responded to question 3.

    Logical fallacy deleted.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to gjjmail1202@gmail.com on Mon Oct 30 06:19:37 2023
    On Sat, 28 Oct 2023 04:33:22 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
    <gjjmail1202@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Thursday, October 26, 2023 at 7:23:43?PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
    Bud demonstrated the irrelevancy of Gil's questions simply by giving a
    direct answer to every one of them. I made the mistake of trying to reason >> with Gil about how pointless his questions were. I realize now that there
    was no point to trying to reason with Gil. The process is foreign to him.

    Liar.

    He never even responded to question 3. >https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/_IWVwgl9VG0

    You lie about everything.

    Indeed true... it would not be an easy task to pick out any truth from Chickenshit's posts.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)