1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. ALT.CONSPIRACY.JFK

  • What is the point of Gil's silly questions?

    From John Corbett@21:1/5 to All on Wed Oct 25 08:02:31 2023
    Among his recent questions, Gil has asked:

    Where did Oswald buy his .38 Special ammo?

    Where did Oswald buy 6.5mm Carcano ammo?

    What USPS employee handed Oswald the Carcano rifle he ordered?

    What REA employee handed Oswald the revolver he ordered?

    Does Gil think records of any of these things are kept? Does he think the fact the answers to these questions are unknown and unknowable in any way
    exonerates Oswald? Does he think proving any of these issues is necessary
    to proving Oswald was a double murderer?

    This is all just Gil's way of diverting attention away from the real evidence by
    asking irrelevant questions. Gil knows that if one focuses on the real evidence,
    there can be no doubt Oswald killed two men and seriously wounded another
    on 11/22/1963.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to geowright1963@gmail.com on Wed Oct 25 08:30:07 2023
    On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 08:02:31 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett <geowright1963@gmail.com> wrote:

    Among his recent questions, Gil has asked:

    Where did Oswald buy his .38 Special ammo?

    Where did Oswald buy 6.5mm Carcano ammo?

    What USPS employee handed Oswald the Carcano rifle he ordered?

    What REA employee handed Oswald the revolver he ordered?

    Does Gil think records of any of these things are kept? Does he think the fact >the answers to these questions are unknown and unknowable in any way >exonerates Oswald? Does he think proving any of these issues is necessary
    to proving Oswald was a double murderer?

    This is all just Gil's way of diverting attention away from the real evidence by
    asking irrelevant questions. Gil knows that if one focuses on the real evidence,
    there can be no doubt Oswald killed two men and seriously wounded another
    on 11/22/1963.


    "Real evidence" you've repeatedly refused to cite.

    What does THAT fact tell the lurkers?


    And if you don't understand Gil's point in raising these questions,
    don't fear... lurkers do.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BT George@21:1/5 to John Corbett on Wed Oct 25 08:33:20 2023
    On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 10:02:33 AM UTC-5, John Corbett wrote:
    Among his recent questions, Gil has asked:

    Where did Oswald buy his .38 Special ammo?

    Where did Oswald buy 6.5mm Carcano ammo?

    What USPS employee handed Oswald the Carcano rifle he ordered?

    What REA employee handed Oswald the revolver he ordered?

    Does Gil think records of any of these things are kept? Does he think the fact
    the answers to these questions are unknown and unknowable in any way exonerates Oswald? Does he think proving any of these issues is necessary
    to proving Oswald was a double murderer?

    This is all just Gil's way of diverting attention away from the real evidence by
    asking irrelevant questions. Gil knows that if one focuses on the real evidence,
    there can be no doubt Oswald killed two men and seriously wounded another
    on 11/22/1963.

    It is simply the function of a defense lawyer to ask *every* question with an unknown or unclear answer---ESPECIALLY if irrelevant or inane. These guys don't care much what *really* happened as proving that we (LN's) don't know what really happened
    either. They are well happy when anyone throws up their hands on the whole case and says "I don't know, so *you* fill in the blanks for me!" That way they can stay the center of attention and tell others what to think.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BT George@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Wed Oct 25 08:34:01 2023
    On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 10:30:14 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 08:02:31 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
    <geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Among his recent questions, Gil has asked:

    Where did Oswald buy his .38 Special ammo?

    Where did Oswald buy 6.5mm Carcano ammo?

    What USPS employee handed Oswald the Carcano rifle he ordered?

    What REA employee handed Oswald the revolver he ordered?

    Does Gil think records of any of these things are kept? Does he think the fact
    the answers to these questions are unknown and unknowable in any way >exonerates Oswald? Does he think proving any of these issues is necessary >to proving Oswald was a double murderer?

    This is all just Gil's way of diverting attention away from the real evidence by
    asking irrelevant questions. Gil knows that if one focuses on the real evidence,
    there can be no doubt Oswald killed two men and seriously wounded another >on 11/22/1963.
    "Real evidence" you've repeatedly refused to cite.

    What does THAT fact tell the lurkers?


    And if you don't understand Gil's point in raising these questions,
    don't fear... lurkers do.

    So bebs thinks any lurkers are just as insane as he is!?!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to All on Wed Oct 25 09:01:33 2023
    On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 11:02:33 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
    < his usual worthless bullshit commentary >

    The bigger question is why do these questions upset you so much ?
    They're not even directed to you.

    SMH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to gjjmail1202@gmail.com on Wed Oct 25 09:06:33 2023
    On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 09:01:33 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
    <gjjmail1202@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 11:02:33?AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
    < his usual worthless bullshit commentary >

    The bigger question is why do these questions upset you so much ?
    They're not even directed to you.

    SMH


    That's a good thing... he hasn't answered them either...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Wed Oct 25 12:41:13 2023
    On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 12:06:37 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 09:01:33 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
    <gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 11:02:33?AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
    < his usual worthless bullshit commentary >

    The bigger question is why do these questions upset you so much ?
    They're not even directed to you.

    SMH
    That's a good thing... he hasn't answered them either...

    They can't answer a simple "yes" or "no" question.
    That's how much in denial they are.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to gjjmail1202@gmail.com on Wed Oct 25 13:16:14 2023
    On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 12:41:13 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
    <gjjmail1202@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 12:06:37?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 09:01:33 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
    <gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 11:02:33?AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote: >>>< his usual worthless bullshit commentary >

    The bigger question is why do these questions upset you so much ?
    They're not even directed to you.

    SMH
    That's a good thing... he hasn't answered them either...

    They can't answer a simple "yes" or "no" question.
    That's how much in denial they are.


    And they don't seem to realize just how bad that is. It's basically
    an admission that THEY know how weak their case is.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Corbett@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Wed Oct 25 13:22:13 2023
    On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 3:41:14 PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 12:06:37 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 09:01:33 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
    <gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 11:02:33?AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote: >< his usual worthless bullshit commentary >

    The bigger question is why do these questions upset you so much ? >They're not even directed to you.

    SMH
    That's a good thing... he hasn't answered them either...
    They can't answer a simple "yes" or "no" question.
    That's how much in denial they are.

    None of the four questions I referred to was a simple "yes" or "no" question. They were "who"
    and "where" questions, as if anyone would have kept a record of such things.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to geowright1963@gmail.com on Thu Oct 26 06:18:31 2023
    On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 13:22:13 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett <geowright1963@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 3:41:14?PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 12:06:37?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 09:01:33 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
    <gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 11:02:33?AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote: >>>>< his usual worthless bullshit commentary >

    The bigger question is why do these questions upset you so much ? >>>>They're not even directed to you.

    SMH
    That's a good thing... he hasn't answered them either...
    They can't answer a simple "yes" or "no" question.
    That's how much in denial they are.

    None of the four questions I referred to was a simple "yes" or "no" question. They were "who"
    and "where" questions, as if anyone would have kept a record of such things.

    HEY STUPID!!! You don't get to decide what questions Gil was
    referring to... it's a FACT that you've refused to answer questions
    that have a simple "yes" or "no" answer.

    So this is just another lie on your part.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)