Proof that Duncan MacRae is mentally ill is seen in his regular poster "Alan Ford" going on to the Education Forum and claiming Lovelady in Hughes is actually Oswald...We haven't seen this type of crazy claim since Cinque and Fetzer were posting...

Alan is a true nut whose claims change from day to day on Duncan's website...Which means that fool James Gordon gives him full access to the Education Forum where moderator Larsen also claims Lovelady is not Lovelady...

The Education Forum is so goofy and uncredible that they'll probably take Ford seriously...

Lovelady never sat down on the steps like the nut Ford is claiming...He couldn't have if he is seen standing in Hughes and tracking the limousine in Altgens...

You will see zero accountability for this from the idiots who get away with calling themselves moderators Knight, Gordon, and Larsen...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Alan Ford is a nut who is a regular at Duncan MacRae's nut site...

Because he's a nut and Euro he gets preferrential treatment from the idiotic moderation at the Education Forum under James Gordon...

I believe Ford is about to crush Stancak because even though Ford is a nut who posts crazy photo evidence at Duncan's he is posting some things that the Prayer Man nuts were trying to ignore...

I think Ford is about to hand Stancak his ass by showing the figure of Pauline Sanders Stancak is showing is actually a photo glitch that only appears in one frame of Darnell...Ford is a genuine nut like Duncan, however he is correct on this one as he is
probably about to show...

Hopefully Ford will post the women's scoop dress neckline on Prayer Man in Darnell that the dishonest bastards on the Education Forum were trying to ignore...It literally takes 7 years and banning to get around the stupidity and incompetence of moderator
Gordon but maybe, finally, someone is about to do it...

I think Ford is wrong about Lovelady waving something...I think that is someone down on the sidewalk and Bell's film and camera don't capture Lovelady...Just one example of Ford's nutty claims...Ford dishonestly omits that Lovelady said Stanton was next
to him to the far right of the entranceway in Hughes (which would make Stanton to Frazier's right)...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 1:14:00 AM UTC+11, Brian Doyle wrote:

Proof that Duncan MacRae is mentally ill is seen in his regular poster "Alan Ford" going on to the Education Forum and claiming Lovelady in Hughes is actually Oswald...We haven't seen this type of crazy claim since Cinque and Fetzer were posting...

Alan is a true nut whose claims change from day to day on Duncan's website...Which means that fool James Gordon gives him full access to the Education Forum where moderator Larsen also claims Lovelady is not Lovelady...

The Education Forum is so goofy and uncredible that they'll probably take Ford seriously...

Lovelady never sat down on the steps like the nut Ford is claiming...He couldn't have if he is seen standing in Hughes and tracking the limousine in Altgens...

You will see zero accountability for this from the idiots who get away with calling themselves moderators Knight, Gordon, and Larsen...

You can see anything you want in those frames. Kinda like you see a Female Frankenstein's Monster in the manipulated images produced by a couple of assclowns.

One example from the images he Ford posted - In the one where he claims a lady is holding THE bag outside...

1. It looks far too long.
2. I see a small boy looking through a telescope in front of her.
3. I see a crocodile in front of the boy with his tail turned at right angles to his head. A normal attack position for a croc.

Two and three aren't really there of course - and the bag... well, who knows if it is a bag or something else, or how long it actually is.

It would help his credibility if he got the backstory right.

He posted, "But the controversy over that question meant that the occupants of the front doorway never left the consciousness of the research community for long. And---------------as a result---------------some interesting ideas were generated. Not least.
................. the 'Prayer Man' theory, which exploded ten years ago."

PM had FUCK ALL to do with the Altgens controversy. Putting aside Bernabei for a second because no one knew about him 15 years ago, it started as a search by Sean Murphy for photographic evidence to support my research on Oswald's alibi. And that
research started the minute I read Baker's affidavit going back a further 5 or 6 years.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 7:00:59 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:

On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 1:14:00 AM UTC+11, Brian Doyle wrote:

You can see anything you want in those frames. Kinda like you see a Female Frankenstein's Monster in the manipulated images produced by a couple of assclowns.

Davidson's face is clearly the chubby-cheeked female face of Sarah Stanton...There is no credible researcher who could review all that was involved with Davidson and ever reconcile the face as being that of Lee Harvey Oswald...Sarah is looking down in to
her purse in Davidson...Greg is just trying to save face by lying because he is trying to avoid the embarrassment that I handed him his ass and showed what idiots ROKC are by betting their entire website on Prayer Man...It just shows you what a cheap
buffoon Greg Parker is that he would lie to the public in order to save face...It shows how goofy his research is...

Greg is ignoring the fact that we could take the original Wiegman celluloid and reproduce Davidson's face exactly...What that would prove is that the face is real and does show Sarah Stanton's face on Prayer Man...This is scientific Peer Review...Greg
and his website of trolls are desperate to deny it because it shows what fools they are and how they don't know what they are doing research-wise...Scientific reproducability is proof and Greg doesn't want to answer this as long as he can avoid it with
trolling...That scumbag Gordon is also in contempt of the best evidence and, like the crook he is, solves everything with the banning button...

Greg is using dishonest wording when he says "manipulated"...What Greg is doing there is suggesting Davidson altered the woman's face...Davidson already showed that all he did was adjust for brightness and contrast - which does nothing to alter or
distort the original image in any manner...This will be proven by reproducing the exact same woman's face in the original filmstock...Greg is lying...There was zero manipulation of the original film image in Davidson...The evidence-hacker and charlatan
Greg Parker will never give a straight answer to this nor will his trolls on his troll farm...The reason for that is because it is a water-tight scientific argument that Greg knows he can't get around...Once combined with the scoop dress neckline all you
have left is silly trolls not admitting the already-proven...Trolls who are given preference by that asshole Gordon...

One example from the images he Ford posted - In the one where he claims a lady is holding THE bag outside...

1. It looks far too long.
2. I see a small boy looking through a telescope in front of her.
3. I see a crocodile in front of the boy with his tail turned at right angles to his head. A normal attack position for a croc.

Ford is a nut and whatever that object is it has nothing to do with anything...It just goes to show what loons Duncan and Ford are that they say it is the paper gun bag...Ford's fake politeness is a good clue to what a nutter he is...He talks in bullshit
politeness which is common amongst lunatics and trolls...



--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 5:48:56 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:

On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 7:00:59 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:

On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 1:14:00 AM UTC+11, Brian Doyle wrote:

The best way to judge Alan Ford is to realize that he never mentions Chris Davidson's enhancement of the Wiegman film that brought out Sarah Stanton's face on Prayer Man...Ford is trying to get away with conducting a non reality of never mentioning
Davidson's enhancement of Wiegman or myself...That isn't honest and it tells you a lot about Ford and his motivations...As if you could get away with ignoring such an important piece of evidence...And true to the nutty world of JFK research, Davidson
himself never mentions his own discovery...Instead Davidson enters a bizarre set of weird gifs and photo comparisons that don't really have anything to do with the damning evidence Ford is posting...

The nutter Ford has presented the damning image of Stanton with a woman's scoop dress neckline in Darnell...Larsen and the non-entity Jake Sykes are doing their best to deny it but the horse is out of the barn and off to the races as far as that image...
The Prayer Man theory is dead and buried...Larsen and Sykes are in sheer denial and are refusing to recognize that the image is valid and does show Stanton's dress neckline on Prayer Man...

This controversy was settled 7 years ago when Davidson brought out Stanton's chubby-cheeked face on Prayer Man in Wiegman...Only at the time the stupid suckers who fell for the Parker-Murphy Prayer Man hoax were in such a majority that it was easy for
their dirty moderator Gordon to ban those who called bullshit and ignore the proof...Davidson already solved this in 2016 when he brought out Stanton's face on Prayer Man...However that didn't stop the idiots who support the Prayer Man theory from
manipulating their crooked mod Gordon and hijacking the JFK internet...Davidson was just as correct then as he is now - only now we have reinforcing evidence in Darnell that is irrefutable...Pathetic as they are the Prayer Man people under that low
intelligence fool Larsen are still trying to make up excuses and get around this new evidence...This is nothing new for them and nothing is too stupid or too low for them in their desperation to make Oswald Prayer Man...But their day is over and there is
no escaping that this new Darnell frame will pass Peer Review and will be judged an accurate image of Prayer Man's neckline in Darnell...In combination with the Davidson enhancement, that neckline is confirming proof and conclusively proves Prayer Man is
Sarah Stanton (despite the pathetic efforts of some laughable hacks to make it otherwise)...Peer Review dictates that this new Darnell frame is 100% authentic and does represent a clear still frame from Darnell's camera that made Prayer Man's dress
neckline obvious...Since we already knew Prayer Man was Stanton from Davidson's enhancement, this is only further proof of what we already knew...The only difference is a bunch of laughable morons prentending to be a credible research community who are
stupid enough to ban the best and brightest who tried to show them the correct evidence who then add insult to injury by still denying the proof even when it is undeniable at a credible, intelligent, scientific level...It just doesn't get dumber than
that - and there you have the Education Forum under Sandy Larsen and James Gordon, as well as ROKC with that world class retard and punk Bart Kamp...Larsen is dumb enough that he still doesn't realize it would be impossible to have that dress neckline in
the image and it not be anything other than real...It is impossible for it to be from distortion because distortion is scientifically incapable of rendering such an image...Larsen is in moronic denial that the image is real and accurate and does show
Sarah Stanton's woman's dress scoop neckline on Prayer Man...How did that fool ever become a moderator?...

So if you assholes are finished misleading the research community with your idiotic hoaxes we would like our credible research community back...

Look at that asshole Jim DiEugenio (Mr "Sarah Stanton is not Prayer Man") thinking he's getting away with being quiet here...

Alan Ford is a genuine nut from Duncan's troll site so he's still trying to say Oswald was out there on the front steps (just to make the total insanity of the JFK research community on the Education Forum complete)...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thursday, October 26, 2023 at 9:12:18 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:

On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 5:48:56 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:

On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 7:00:59 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:

On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 1:14:00 AM UTC+11, Brian Doyle wrote:

Ford is ignoring Davidson's original enhancement of Wiegman that brought out Stanton's face on Prayer Man...

That tells you all you need to know about the Duncan MacRae nut farm troll Ford and his dishonest, nutty agenda...

His scoop neckline evidence is legitimate however and does prove Prayer Man is Stanton...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 9:37:54 AM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:

On Thursday, October 26, 2023 at 9:12:18 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:

On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 5:48:56 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:

On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 7:00:59 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:

Ford is a nut whom Gordon is allowing to import lunatic material from Duncan's website...He has now drawn the low ability members of the Education Forum in to a crazy discussion over demented claims like the shadow on Lovelady and the paper bag...There
is only one thing Ford should be pressing in that thread...The scoop neckline that was discovered in a clear copy of Darnell is all he should be discussing because it is further damning proof that Prayer Man is Stanton...Jim DiEugenio has come in and
made a papal pronouncement that the scoop neckline has been manipulated in order to bail out the Prayer Man trolls and that ignorant asshole James Gordon sits by silent while his forum is turned in to a Fetzer/Cinque farce...Credible moderation that
actually cared about the integrity of JFK research would demand that DiEugenio answer the fact that the original Darnell celluloid will possess the exact same image of the woman's neckline and prove that the image is not altered in any way and does
represent Prayer Man's neckline...Just like the Davidson enhancement 7 years ago, this new evidence is further conclusive proof that Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...Jim D is lying and James Gordon is letting him...If you examine the farcial fake expertise
in that thread please take care to notice that none of them are mentioning Prayer Man's 5 foot 4 height...Those crooks have normalized dishonest censorship and ignoring of highly credible analysis by banning...By means of those two idiots Gordon and
Larsen...Ford's lunatic claims, like Lovelady being Oswald and his shadow, have now been used to change the subject from the woman's neckline...Another thing that is totally dishonest is people can see the plaid pattern in Lovelady's sleeve in Altgens
only they are not speaking up and telling Larsen he's full of it and is ignoring visible proof all so he can back up Murphy's bullshit...Those dishonest bums can see the plaid in Lovelady's sleeve as well as I can but they stay dishonestly quiet in order
to enforce the dirty clique...Jim D has made a provably false claim that the woman's neckline is the result of manipulation...There is no challenge of it because that asshole Gordon banned everyone who would...Credible research is being held hostage by
the Prayer Man gang...

There is nothing wrong with the woman's neckline seen in Darnell...Kamp's clear copy of Darnell made visible Sarah Stanton's woman's dress scoop neckline...That neckline is present in the previous blurry version of Prayer Man in Darnell if you look
closely...Very simply, the clear version of Darnell Kamp managed to get just straight out shows Prayer Man's neckline in better clarity...That clear image managed to make visible Sarah Stanton's woman's dress neckline...In combination with the Davidson
enhancement of Wiegman that showed Sarah Stanton's female face (that Ford is trying to ignore), this new evidence is only further confirming proof that Prayer Man is Stanton...All you are presently seeing at this point is some world class dirty operators
trying to save face by ignoring it and lying that it is somehow not valid...There is no credible moderation or Peer Review on the JFK internet...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Monday, October 30, 2023 at 11:17:25 AM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:

On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 9:37:54 AM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:

Alt.Conspiracy.com appears to have been scrubbed....

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)