• Re: Questions for the self-proclaimed "more knowledgeable" one, Hank Si

    From John Corbett@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Mon Oct 23 04:54:25 2023
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 7:02:52 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    It has been said ( by John Corbett ) that "there is DOCUMENTATION that spells out every person who handled the evidence. Who found it.
    Whom they gave it to. Whom that person gave it to and so on." https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/6XMI-cxztKo/m/ETkARmrNAwAJ

    Would you post that documentation that proves this statement correct ?

    You deleted the post I made regarding this issue. That doesn't entitle you to another response.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NoTrueFlags Here@21:1/5 to John Corbett on Mon Oct 23 05:11:06 2023
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 7:54:27 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 7:02:52 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    It has been said ( by John Corbett ) that "there is DOCUMENTATION that spells out every person who handled the evidence. Who found it.
    Whom they gave it to. Whom that person gave it to and so on." https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/6XMI-cxztKo/m/ETkARmrNAwAJ

    Would you post that documentation that proves this statement correct ?
    You deleted the post I made regarding this issue. That doesn't entitle you to another response.
    Yet you give him another response anyway. It must be love!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to geowright1963@gmail.com on Mon Oct 23 06:14:15 2023
    On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 04:54:25 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett <geowright1963@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 7:02:52?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    It has been said ( by John Corbett ) that "there is DOCUMENTATION that spells out every person who handled the evidence. Who found it.
    Whom they gave it to. Whom that person gave it to and so on."
    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/6XMI-cxztKo/m/ETkARmrNAwAJ >>
    Would you post that documentation that proves this statement correct ?

    You deleted the post I made regarding this issue.


    It's impossible for Gil to delete someone else's post.

    You refuse to answer... You refuse to cite your alleged prior answer,
    you refuse to repost your alleged prior answer...

    You're clearly a liar.


    That doesn't entitle you to another response.


    It's your burden. CARRY YOUR BURDEN!!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to gjjmail1202@gmail.com on Mon Oct 23 06:14:15 2023
    On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 04:07:33 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
    <gjjmail1202@gmail.com> wrote:

    Fifty-one witnesses held the shots sounded as if the came from west of the Depository, the area of the grassy knoll on Elm Street, the area directly on the right of the President's car when the bullets struck. Yet the Warren Commission concluded that "
    no credible evidence" existed that any shots were fired from anywhere but the Texas School Book Depository.

    Question # 4: Can you name another murder case where the testimony of 51 witnesses was dismissed as "no credible evidence"?


    It would be quite difficult indeed. No judge in his right mind would
    make such a ruling.


    You'll only get dead silence from the cowards in this forum. They
    cannot admit that the WC simply lied.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Tue Oct 24 01:57:07 2023
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 9:14:24 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    You'll only get dead silence from the cowards in this forum. They cannot admit that the WC simply lied.

    You may be right. Not one question has been answered to any satisfaction.

    I've posted my first 10 questions. It seems that all of the Merry Morons with the exception of the absent-minded professor have
    put their two cents in. No response yet from the "more knowledgeable" one.

    I'll be posting 5 questions per day until the series is finished.
    That'll give us about a week to watch them squirm as they get their panties all twisted up.
    Can Hank hide that long ?
    Will Corbett find Jesus and repent from lying ?
    Will Bud finally buy a dictionary ?
    Inquiring minds want to know. Stay tuned, lurkers.

    Who says they're the only ones being entertained ?
    ROFLMAO

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Tue Oct 24 03:02:43 2023
    On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 4:57:09 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 9:14:24 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    You'll only get dead silence from the cowards in this forum. They cannot admit that the WC simply lied.
    You may be right. Not one question has been answered to any satisfaction.

    Who`s satisfaction?

    Who were these 51 witnesses, and what exactly did they say?

    Did they represent that they knew where the shots came from?

    You refuse to look at the information correctly. We can`t make you.

    I've posted my first 10 questions. It seems that all of the Merry Morons with the exception of the absent-minded professor have
    put their two cents in. No response yet from the "more knowledgeable" one.

    I'll be posting 5 questions per day until the series is finished.
    That'll give us about a week to watch them squirm as they get their panties all twisted up.
    Can Hank hide that long ?
    Will Corbett find Jesus and repent from lying ?
    Will Bud finally buy a dictionary ?

    Does "reasoning" mean "speculation", stupid?

    Inquiring minds want to know. Stay tuned, lurkers.

    Who says they're the only ones being entertained ?
    ROFLMAO

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Tue Oct 24 03:00:20 2023
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 9:14:24 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 04:07:33 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
    <gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Fifty-one witnesses held the shots sounded as if the came from west of the Depository, the area of the grassy knoll on Elm Street, the area directly on the right of the President's car when the bullets struck. Yet the Warren Commission concluded that "
    no credible evidence" existed that any shots were fired from anywhere but the Texas School Book Depository.

    Question # 4: Can you name another murder case where the testimony of 51 witnesses was dismissed as "no credible evidence"?


    It would be quite difficult indeed. No judge in his right mind would
    make such a ruling.


    You'll only get dead silence from the cowards in this forum. They
    cannot admit that the WC simply lied.

    You refuse to look at the information correctly. We can`t make you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Corbett@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Tue Oct 24 03:38:37 2023
    On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 4:57:09 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 9:14:24 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    You'll only get dead silence from the cowards in this forum. They cannot admit that the WC simply lied.
    You may be right. Not one question has been answered to MY satisfaction.

    There. I fixed that for you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Corbett@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Tue Oct 24 03:44:06 2023
    On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 4:57:09 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 9:14:24 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    You'll only get dead silence from the cowards in this forum. They cannot admit that the WC simply lied.
    You may be right. Not one question has been answered to any satisfaction.

    I've posted my first 10 questions. It seems that all of the Merry Morons with the exception of the absent-minded professor have
    put their two cents in. No response yet from the "more knowledgeable" one.

    I'll be posting 5 questions per day until the series is finished.

    That's good because the only thing you are good for is raising questions. You aren't worth a shit
    at finding answers to your inane questions. Your question about where Oswald purchased his
    .38 Special ammo was a real doozy. It could have been at just about any gun store in the country
    because that's how common that ammo is. Do you think it is necessary to prove where a
    murderer purchased his ammo in order to prove he is a murderer?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Tue Oct 24 05:42:08 2023
    On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 03:00:20 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:


    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Tue Oct 24 05:41:55 2023
    On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 03:02:43 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:


    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to geowright1963@gmail.com on Tue Oct 24 05:43:05 2023
    On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 03:38:37 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett <geowright1963@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 4:57:09?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 9:14:24?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    You'll only get dead silence from the cowards in this forum. They cannot admit that the WC simply lied.
    You may be right. Not one question has been answered to any satisfaction.

    Logical fallacy deleted.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to geowright1963@gmail.com on Tue Oct 24 05:46:14 2023
    On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 03:44:06 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett <geowright1963@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 4:57:09?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 9:14:24?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    You'll only get dead silence from the cowards in this forum. They cannot admit that the WC simply lied.
    You may be right. Not one question has been answered to any satisfaction.

    I've posted my first 10 questions. It seems that all of the Merry Morons with the exception of the absent-minded professor have
    put their two cents in. No response yet from the "more knowledgeable" one. >>
    I'll be posting 5 questions per day until the series is finished.

    That's good because the only thing you are good for is raising questions.


    And the only thing you're good for is a good laugh.

    You can't defend what you believe...

    You can't answer relevant questions about the evidence...

    You can't even be honest in your posting...


    Your question about where Oswald purchased his
    .38 Special ammo was a real doozy. It could have been at just about any gun store in the country
    because that's how common that ammo is. Do you think it is necessary to prove where a
    murderer purchased his ammo in order to prove he is a murderer?


    Amusingly, this moron can't tell us where Oswald purchased the 6.5mm
    ammo... and he KNOWS that it's an issue.

    But he can't carry his burden.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Tue Oct 24 16:30:04 2023
    On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 8:46:19 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 03:44:06 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
    <geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 4:57:09?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 9:14:24?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    You'll only get dead silence from the cowards in this forum. They cannot admit that the WC simply lied.
    You may be right. Not one question has been answered to any satisfaction. >>
    I've posted my first 10 questions. It seems that all of the Merry Morons with the exception of the absent-minded professor have
    put their two cents in. No response yet from the "more knowledgeable" one.

    I'll be posting 5 questions per day until the series is finished.

    That's good because the only thing you are good for is raising questions. And the only thing you're good for is a good laugh.

    You can't defend what you believe...

    You can't answer relevant questions about the evidence...

    You can't even be honest in your posting...
    Your question about where Oswald purchased his
    .38 Special ammo was a real doozy. It could have been at just about any gun store in the country
    because that's how common that ammo is. Do you think it is necessary to prove where a
    murderer purchased his ammo in order to prove he is a murderer?
    Amusingly, this moron can't tell us where Oswald purchased the 6.5mm
    ammo... and he KNOWS that it's an issue.

    You refuse to show that it is an issue.

    But he can't carry his burden.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Wed Oct 25 06:06:29 2023
    On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 16:30:04 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)