1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. ALT.CONSPIRACY.JFK

  • Greg Parker Has Said That He Would Be A Nutter If This Is Not Lee Harve

    From NoTrueFlags Here@21:1/5 to All on Sun Oct 22 03:11:10 2023
    That's what he said. https://postimg.cc/fks1StGN

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to All on Sun Oct 22 05:34:13 2023
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 6:11:12 AM UTC-4, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:



    There you have it...The clearly seen scoop dress neckline in this image is being collectively ignored by the Prayer Man-hijacked research community under Larsen and Gordon with those who demand a credible answer to this refuting evidence being censored
    by that criminal scumbag Gordon...Davidson is too lacking in testicals to confront that gang with his own evidence...The JFK internet is not run by evidence...It is run by gangs of assholes who decide what evidence they will allow and what evidence they
    will flagrantly censor...

    Greg is an asshole who is just out to get attention for his crazy evidence-fucking and long-winded crazy renderings of the evidence...Damning proof like the scoop dress neckline isn't good enough for those assholes as long and they can bathe in the false
    praise they generate on their censorship-protected websites...I mean why involve the best damning evidence in your arguments if you can just argue offhand armchair bullshit for years on end under an ignorant asshole moderator?...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Greg Parker@21:1/5 to NoTrueFlags Here on Sun Oct 22 06:12:44 2023
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 9:11:12 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    That's what he said. https://postimg.cc/fks1StGN

    I don't think so. What I have said in the past is if it was not for being able to validate Oswald's alibi, I would probably be a nutter. And that would be by default.

    His alibi does not depend on the photo. The research and validation of his alibi came long before Sean found the PM image. That's just icing on the cake.

    ps

    do I detect a budding Bromance developing between you and Brian? I think that is wonderful.
    https://youtu.be/EJVt8kUAm9Q?si=RzcOkWnjuFPun7QP

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NoTrueFlags Here@21:1/5 to Greg Parker on Sun Oct 22 06:21:06 2023
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 9:12:46 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 9:11:12 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    That's what he said. https://postimg.cc/fks1StGN
    I don't think so. What I have said in the past is if it was not for being able to validate Oswald's alibi, I would probably be a nutter. And that would be by default.

    His alibi does not depend on the photo. The research and validation of his alibi came long before Sean found the PM image. That's just icing on the cake.

    ps

    do I detect a budding Bromance developing between you and Brian? I think that is wonderful.
    https://youtu.be/EJVt8kUAm9Q?si=RzcOkWnjuFPun7QP
    Greg Parker said, "Fact is, I may have joined you as nutter, if not for my 99.9% certainty that the figure in question (Prayer Woman) is Oswald and that the associated evidence also points to a frame in place by Dallas police - now infamous for the
    number of innocent people they have locked up over the many decades of the Wade/Fritz/Decker eras."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to NoTrueFlags Here on Sun Oct 22 07:03:51 2023
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 9:21:07 AM UTC-4, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 9:12:46 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:




    Greg is using his usual bullshit to avoid admitting that most of his evidence vandalism backs the Lone Nutter camp...


    He is very useful to the Lone Nutters with his sabotaging of the Conspiracy cause with his bullshit Prayer Man theory that even he doesn't believe...


    Greg's ROKC troll farm hosts many hard core Lone Nutters like Jonathan Cohen etc...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to Greg Parker on Sun Oct 22 07:11:55 2023
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 9:12:46 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 9:11:12 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:





    His alibi does not depend on the photo. The research and validation of his alibi came long before Sean found the PM image. That's just icing on the cake.



    Yeah, why let something like the image of Sarah Stanton's face being seen on Prayer Man in Wiegman get in the way of Parker's bullshit?...Or a woman's scoop dress neckline in Darnell...Makes sense to me...

    What Greg is dishonestly referring to as "research and validation" is cherry-picked distortion like his Lumpkin claim...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Greg Parker@21:1/5 to NoTrueFlags Here on Sun Oct 22 16:32:57 2023
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 12:21:07 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 9:12:46 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 9:11:12 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    That's what he said. https://postimg.cc/fks1StGN
    I don't think so. What I have said in the past is if it was not for being able to validate Oswald's alibi, I would probably be a nutter. And that would be by default.

    His alibi does not depend on the photo. The research and validation of his alibi came long before Sean found the PM image. That's just icing on the cake.

    ps

    do I detect a budding Bromance developing between you and Brian? I think that is wonderful.
    https://youtu.be/EJVt8kUAm9Q?si=RzcOkWnjuFPun7QP
    Greg Parker said, "Fact is, I may have joined you as nutter, if not for my 99.9% certainty that the figure in question is Oswald and that the associated evidence also points to a frame in place by Dallas police - now infamous for the number of innocent
    people they have locked up over the many decades of the Wade/Fritz/Decker eras."

    Yep. Note there are two parts to it, not just the photo. You lied.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Corbett@21:1/5 to Greg Parker on Sun Oct 22 16:58:23 2023
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 7:32:59 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 12:21:07 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 9:12:46 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 9:11:12 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    That's what he said. https://postimg.cc/fks1StGN
    I don't think so. What I have said in the past is if it was not for being able to validate Oswald's alibi, I would probably be a nutter. And that would be by default.

    His alibi does not depend on the photo. The research and validation of his alibi came long before Sean found the PM image. That's just icing on the cake.

    ps

    do I detect a budding Bromance developing between you and Brian? I think that is wonderful.
    https://youtu.be/EJVt8kUAm9Q?si=RzcOkWnjuFPun7QP
    Greg Parker said, "Fact is, I may have joined you as nutter, if not for my 99.9% certainty that the figure in question is Oswald and that the associated evidence also points to a frame in place by Dallas police - now infamous for the number of
    innocent people they have locked up over the many decades of the Wade/Fritz/Decker eras."

    Yep. Note there are two parts to it, not just the photo. You lied.

    How can you charge the DPD with framing Oswald when he died two days after killing Kennedy?
    Why would they bother to frame a dead guy?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Greg Parker@21:1/5 to John Corbett on Sun Oct 22 17:04:42 2023
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 10:58:24 AM UTC+11, John Corbett wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 7:32:59 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 12:21:07 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 9:12:46 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 9:11:12 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    That's what he said. https://postimg.cc/fks1StGN
    I don't think so. What I have said in the past is if it was not for being able to validate Oswald's alibi, I would probably be a nutter. And that would be by default.

    His alibi does not depend on the photo. The research and validation of his alibi came long before Sean found the PM image. That's just icing on the cake.

    ps

    do I detect a budding Bromance developing between you and Brian? I think that is wonderful.
    https://youtu.be/EJVt8kUAm9Q?si=RzcOkWnjuFPun7QP
    Greg Parker said, "Fact is, I may have joined you as nutter, if not for my 99.9% certainty that the figure in question is Oswald and that the associated evidence also points to a frame in place by Dallas police - now infamous for the number of
    innocent people they have locked up over the many decades of the Wade/Fritz/Decker eras."

    Yep. Note there are two parts to it, not just the photo. You lied.
    How can you charge the DPD with framing Oswald when he died two days after killing Kennedy?
    Why would they bother to frame a dead guy?

    OMG. It's the evidence, stupid. Appeals to faux incredulity don''t negate evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NoTrueFlags Here@21:1/5 to Greg Parker on Sun Oct 22 19:03:40 2023
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 7:32:59 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 12:21:07 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 9:12:46 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 9:11:12 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    That's what he said. https://postimg.cc/fks1StGN
    I don't think so. What I have said in the past is if it was not for being able to validate Oswald's alibi, I would probably be a nutter. And that would be by default.

    His alibi does not depend on the photo. The research and validation of his alibi came long before Sean found the PM image. That's just icing on the cake.

    ps

    do I detect a budding Bromance developing between you and Brian? I think that is wonderful.
    https://youtu.be/EJVt8kUAm9Q?si=RzcOkWnjuFPun7QP
    Greg Parker said, "Fact is, I may have joined you as nutter, if not for my 99.9% certainty that the figure in question is Oswald and that the associated evidence also points to a frame in place by Dallas police - now infamous for the number of
    innocent people they have locked up over the many decades of the Wade/Fritz/Decker eras."

    Yep. Note there are two parts to it, not just the photo. You lied.
    I did not lie, Shit Bag. You lie with every breath you take.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to geowright1963@gmail.com on Mon Oct 23 06:14:15 2023
    On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 16:58:23 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett <geowright1963@gmail.com> wrote:

    How can you charge the DPD with framing Oswald when he died two days after killing Kennedy?
    Why would they bother to frame a dead guy?


    It takes a moron to fail to understand that a dead person is the
    SAFEST one to frame. They can't defend themselves.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Greg Parker@21:1/5 to NoTrueFlags Here on Mon Oct 23 06:36:45 2023
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 1:03:41 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 7:32:59 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 12:21:07 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 9:12:46 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 9:11:12 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    That's what he said. https://postimg.cc/fks1StGN
    I don't think so. What I have said in the past is if it was not for being able to validate Oswald's alibi, I would probably be a nutter. And that would be by default.

    His alibi does not depend on the photo. The research and validation of his alibi came long before Sean found the PM image. That's just icing on the cake.

    ps

    do I detect a budding Bromance developing between you and Brian? I think that is wonderful.
    https://youtu.be/EJVt8kUAm9Q?si=RzcOkWnjuFPun7QP
    Greg Parker said, "Fact is, I may have joined you as nutter, if not for my 99.9% certainty that the figure in question is Oswald and that the associated evidence also points to a frame in place by Dallas police - now infamous for the number of
    innocent people they have locked up over the many decades of the Wade/Fritz/Decker eras."

    Yep. Note there are two parts to it, not just the photo. You lied.
    I did not lie, Shit Bag. You lie with every breath you take.

    More lies spoken like a TrueFlog.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NoTrueFlags Here@21:1/5 to Greg Parker on Mon Oct 23 08:13:45 2023
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 9:36:47 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 1:03:41 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 7:32:59 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 12:21:07 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 9:12:46 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 9:11:12 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    That's what he said. https://postimg.cc/fks1StGN
    I don't think so. What I have said in the past is if it was not for being able to validate Oswald's alibi, I would probably be a nutter. And that would be by default.

    His alibi does not depend on the photo. The research and validation of his alibi came long before Sean found the PM image. That's just icing on the cake.

    ps

    do I detect a budding Bromance developing between you and Brian? I think that is wonderful.
    https://youtu.be/EJVt8kUAm9Q?si=RzcOkWnjuFPun7QP
    Greg Parker said, "Fact is, I may have joined you as nutter, if not for my 99.9% certainty that the figure in question is Oswald and that the associated evidence also points to a frame in place by Dallas police - now infamous for the number of
    innocent people they have locked up over the many decades of the Wade/Fritz/Decker eras."

    Yep. Note there are two parts to it, not just the photo. You lied.
    I did not lie, Shit Bag. You lie with every breath you take.
    More lies spoken like a TrueFlog.
    Did I hurt you widdle feewings?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Greg Parker@21:1/5 to NoTrueFlags Here on Mon Oct 23 14:15:28 2023
    On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 2:13:46 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 9:36:47 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 1:03:41 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 7:32:59 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 12:21:07 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 9:12:46 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 9:11:12 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    That's what he said. https://postimg.cc/fks1StGN
    I don't think so. What I have said in the past is if it was not for being able to validate Oswald's alibi, I would probably be a nutter. And that would be by default.

    His alibi does not depend on the photo. The research and validation of his alibi came long before Sean found the PM image. That's just icing on the cake.

    ps

    do I detect a budding Bromance developing between you and Brian? I think that is wonderful.
    https://youtu.be/EJVt8kUAm9Q?si=RzcOkWnjuFPun7QP
    Greg Parker said, "Fact is, I may have joined you as nutter, if not for my 99.9% certainty that the figure in question is Oswald and that the associated evidence also points to a frame in place by Dallas police - now infamous for the number of
    innocent people they have locked up over the many decades of the Wade/Fritz/Decker eras."

    Yep. Note there are two parts to it, not just the photo. You lied.
    I did not lie, Shit Bag. You lie with every breath you take.
    More lies spoken like a TrueFlog.
    Did I hurt you widdle feewings?


    TrueFlog*, you're about as capable of hurting my feelings as Brian is. Or Norman Bates is of killing a fly....

    * https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Flog

    Your new moniker is the gift that is just gonna keep on giving. Thank you!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to Greg Parker on Mon Oct 23 15:51:49 2023
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 5:15:30 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 2:13:46 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 9:36:47 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 1:03:41 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:



    Greg isn't answering the point...

    His Trolling/Disinformation campaign is an overall negative for conspiracy research and does more for the Lone Nutter cause than anything else...

    He's an evidence troll...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Greg Parker@21:1/5 to Brian Doyle on Mon Oct 23 16:03:34 2023
    On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 9:51:50 AM UTC+11, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 5:15:30 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 2:13:46 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 9:36:47 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 1:03:41 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    Greg isn't answering the point...

    His Trolling/Disinformation campaign is an overall negative for conspiracy research and does more for the Lone Nutter cause than anything else...

    He's an evidence troll...

    Don't worry, Brian. TrueFlog could never replace you. At least not until he posts a car wash vid.

    Although I may settle for an air guitar vid. But until then, Brian, you da man.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to NoTrueFlags Here on Mon Oct 23 21:07:40 2023
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 11:40:00 PM UTC-4, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 5:15:30 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 2:13:46 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:




    It is fairly obvious that Parker is not here to figure out the correct conspiracy evidence...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NoTrueFlags Here@21:1/5 to Greg Parker on Mon Oct 23 20:39:58 2023
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 5:15:30 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 2:13:46 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 9:36:47 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 1:03:41 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 7:32:59 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 12:21:07 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 9:12:46 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 9:11:12 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    That's what he said. https://postimg.cc/fks1StGN
    I don't think so. What I have said in the past is if it was not for being able to validate Oswald's alibi, I would probably be a nutter. And that would be by default.

    His alibi does not depend on the photo. The research and validation of his alibi came long before Sean found the PM image. That's just icing on the cake.

    ps

    do I detect a budding Bromance developing between you and Brian? I think that is wonderful.
    https://youtu.be/EJVt8kUAm9Q?si=RzcOkWnjuFPun7QP
    Greg Parker said, "Fact is, I may have joined you as nutter, if not for my 99.9% certainty that the figure in question is Oswald and that the associated evidence also points to a frame in place by Dallas police - now infamous for the number
    of innocent people they have locked up over the many decades of the Wade/Fritz/Decker eras."

    Yep. Note there are two parts to it, not just the photo. You lied.
    I did not lie, Shit Bag. You lie with every breath you take.
    More lies spoken like a TrueFlog.
    Did I hurt you widdle feewings?
    TrueFlog*, you're about as capable of hurting my feelings as Brian is. Or Norman Bates is of killing a fly....

    * https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Flog

    Your new moniker is the gift that is just gonna keep on giving. Thank you!
    Poor widdow Nutter Gweggy! He can only win arguments on his ROKC sock puppet farm, where he is worshiped as a god. But he's no god here.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Greg Parker@21:1/5 to NoTrueFlags Here on Tue Oct 24 17:23:31 2023
    On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 2:40:00 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 5:15:30 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 2:13:46 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 9:36:47 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 1:03:41 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 7:32:59 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 12:21:07 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 9:12:46 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 9:11:12 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    That's what he said. https://postimg.cc/fks1StGN
    I don't think so. What I have said in the past is if it was not for being able to validate Oswald's alibi, I would probably be a nutter. And that would be by default.

    His alibi does not depend on the photo. The research and validation of his alibi came long before Sean found the PM image. That's just icing on the cake.

    ps

    do I detect a budding Bromance developing between you and Brian? I think that is wonderful.
    https://youtu.be/EJVt8kUAm9Q?si=RzcOkWnjuFPun7QP
    Greg Parker said, "Fact is, I may have joined you as nutter, if not for my 99.9% certainty that the figure in question is Oswald and that the associated evidence also points to a frame in place by Dallas police - now infamous for the number
    of innocent people they have locked up over the many decades of the Wade/Fritz/Decker eras."

    Yep. Note there are two parts to it, not just the photo. You lied.
    I did not lie, Shit Bag. You lie with every breath you take.
    More lies spoken like a TrueFlog.
    Did I hurt you widdle feewings?
    TrueFlog*, you're about as capable of hurting my feelings as Brian is. Or Norman Bates is of killing a fly....

    * https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Flog

    Your new moniker is the gift that is just gonna keep on giving. Thank you!
    Poor widdow Nutter Gweggy! He can only win arguments on his ROKC sock puppet farm, where he is worshiped as a god. But he's no god here.

    You got it assbackwards as usual, TrueFlog*

    * Flog
    To beat your penis, for example
    Talk later bro I’m goin to flog myself https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Flog

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Greg Parker@21:1/5 to Brian Doyle on Tue Oct 24 17:28:14 2023
    On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 3:07:41 PM UTC+11, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 11:40:00 PM UTC-4, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 5:15:30 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 2:13:46 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    It is fairly obvious that Parker is not here to figure out the correct conspiracy evidence..

    Only "fairly"?

    Brian, I know genius detectiving detectives have to tread carefully and be conservative with their language lest they cause alarm and panic their public, but :fairly" is taking that conservatism to brave new heights. I salute you, sir for your
    thoughtfulness and integrity!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NoTrueFlags Here@21:1/5 to Greg Parker on Tue Oct 24 19:40:35 2023
    On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 8:23:33 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 2:40:00 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 5:15:30 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 2:13:46 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 9:36:47 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 1:03:41 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 7:32:59 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 12:21:07 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 9:12:46 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 9:11:12 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    That's what he said. https://postimg.cc/fks1StGN
    I don't think so. What I have said in the past is if it was not for being able to validate Oswald's alibi, I would probably be a nutter. And that would be by default.

    His alibi does not depend on the photo. The research and validation of his alibi came long before Sean found the PM image. That's just icing on the cake.

    ps

    do I detect a budding Bromance developing between you and Brian? I think that is wonderful.
    https://youtu.be/EJVt8kUAm9Q?si=RzcOkWnjuFPun7QP
    Greg Parker said, "Fact is, I may have joined you as nutter, if not for my 99.9% certainty that the figure in question is Oswald and that the associated evidence also points to a frame in place by Dallas police - now infamous for the
    number of innocent people they have locked up over the many decades of the Wade/Fritz/Decker eras."

    Yep. Note there are two parts to it, not just the photo. You lied.
    I did not lie, Shit Bag. You lie with every breath you take.
    More lies spoken like a TrueFlog.
    Did I hurt you widdle feewings?
    TrueFlog*, you're about as capable of hurting my feelings as Brian is. Or Norman Bates is of killing a fly....

    * https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Flog

    Your new moniker is the gift that is just gonna keep on giving. Thank you!
    Poor widdow Nutter Gweggy! He can only win arguments on his ROKC sock puppet farm, where he is worshiped as a god. But he's no god here.
    You got it assbackwards as usual, TrueFlog*

    * Flog
    To beat your penis, for example
    Talk later bro I’m goin to flog myself https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Flog
    Poor widow Parker! Flogging yourself when Brian is right here to flog you as much as you could possibly want.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to Greg Parker on Wed Oct 25 14:28:02 2023
    On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 8:28:15 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 3:07:41 PM UTC+11, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 11:40:00 PM UTC-4, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 5:15:30 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:



    Greg uses trolling as a crude tool...

    If you observe ROKC you'll find that they troll and ridicule as an out to escape answering for the flaws in their arguments...

    Greg uses dirty moderation and censorship to make sure that every time him and his trolls are cornered by the evidence that they have a convenient escape route in the form of trolling so they don't have to answer for the evidence that they are failing to
    account for...

    We can take Alan Ford's showing of the scoop neckline on the Education Forum...In a credible research community that would end the Prayer Man issue alone and by itself...In the Greg Parker-corrupted research community it gets no credible answer and gets
    ignored...Then that asshole DiEugenio comes in and gives it his approval after staying out of all the hard work of evidence discussion that is obviously over his head...

    Greg also gets away with childishly mocking the woman's face Davidson brought out on Prayer Man in Wiegman...Greg trolls that it is a Frankenstein face and therefore side-steps the Peer Review and scientific verification that Davidson's image never
    received...The woman face is scientifically provable by getting the original film and reproducing the same image...Once done that verifies the clearly female face Davidson exposed...There is no credible researcher who could review Davidson and ever
    reconcile the face being Lee Harvey Oswald...But that's where Greg's Clockwork Orange hooligans come in handly in avoiding credible analysis...James Gordon also helps by censoring the best and brightest and their correct solution so he can make room for
    Duncan't nuts like Alan Ford...And don't forget Sandy Larsen and Lovelady's arm (Nutville)...

    Alan Ford is a loon because Prayer Man cannot possibly be two different people from Wiegman to Danrell...He is a nut whose fevered luncacy fails to register that Prayer Man is the exact same height in Wiegman and Darnell and has their hands in the same
    praying posture...Gordon and Larsen are hosting one of Duncan's nuts and the fools on that website are hailing his work and taking him seriously...To measure what a crazy Ford is he calls Prayer Man Pauline Sanders without reconciling that Sanders was
    off to the east of the glass door...The only remaining candidate is, indeed, Sarah Stanton - which is the correct identity of the woman with the scoop dress neckline...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to Brian Doyle on Thu Oct 26 15:21:24 2023
    On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 5:28:03 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 8:28:15 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:




    Greg never came back to honestly own up to the fact the scoop neckline seen on Prayer Man in Darnell proves Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Greg Parker@21:1/5 to Brian Doyle on Fri Oct 27 05:15:03 2023
    On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 9:21:26 AM UTC+11, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 5:28:03 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 8:28:15 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    Greg never came back to honestly own up to the fact the scoop neckline seen on Prayer Man in Darnell proves Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...

    According to Alan Ford, it proves it is Pauline Sanders,

    You conspiracy nuts can't agree on anything.

    Meanwhile it is unanimous on the only forum where reality rules - it is almost certainly a male named Lee Oswald.

    Brian, a question if i May.

    One of your many fans at ROKC wants to know if it is hard being you?

    A simple yes or no will do. At least for now.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to Greg Parker on Fri Oct 27 06:03:09 2023
    On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 8:15:05 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 9:21:26 AM UTC+11, Brian Doyle wrote:





    You conspiracy nuts can't agree on anything.


    So you are openly admitting that you identify as a Lone Nutter?...That would be understandable since the undermining of credible research you do with your evidence hacking does serve the Lone Nutter cause more than anything...



    Meanwhile it is unanimous on the only forum where reality rules - it is almost certainly a male named Lee Oswald.



    This is the same mealy-mouthed Parker who went on ROKC yesterday with a weaseling half-admission that he always said Prayer Man might not be Oswald...That is the same thing Parker did 7 years ago when the Davidson image came out...Parker went on my
    Facebook Prayer Woman page and admitted that Kamp was a junkyard dog they kept chained and tolerated...Parker then went back and deleted that comment...

    The Prayer Man people are delusional because the scoop dress neckline is a real and provable feature that is only going to become more proven with time...It is visible because Darnell's camera stopped still and got a sharp shot...In combination with
    Davidson in Wiegman it becomes conclusive photographic evidence that Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...The Prayer Man idiots never did find Stanton to Frazier's left in Altgens, nor did Gordon ever ask them to...

    The Education Forum moderator Sandy Larsen is like a servant boy for ROKC who goes there and asks for help from Parker's trolls...He has yet to realize that you cannot recover from the scoop neckline in Darnell and it is a real feature in Darnell's film
    that proves Sarah Stanton's dress neckline on Prayer Man...This is a dirty group who has hijacked the forum and JFK internet under that nincompoop Gordon who falsely banned me for proving what Ford is proving 7 years ago...No apology from that cowardly
    piece of shit Gordon who banned me for "Not following the rules of evidence when told" (Which is exactly what him and his favorites are guilty of in failing to recognize this evidence then and now)...You can also see Stanton's wide hips in this new
    Darnell image that the Prayer Man people are not honest enough to admit while Gordon bans the innocent...

    Parker is a troll...He's not a serious researcher and the Prayer Man theory came from him...

    Again, Gordon will avoid Peer Review on this new Darnell image and its obvious woman's dress neckline...And he will also honor this new lunatic Ford who is calling Lovelady Oswald just like Cinque...And who is ignoring the praying posture and height of
    Prayer Man in both Wiegman and Darnell and saying they are two different people, while none of the idiots on the Education Forum call him on it...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)