1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. ALT.CONSPIRACY.JFK

  • Cecil McWatters Should Have Known Milton Jones From Day One If He Was A

    From NoTrueFlags Here@21:1/5 to All on Fri Oct 20 22:59:17 2023
    Nothing is crystal clear in the McWatters story, but if Milton Jones had been a regular rider prior to the assassination, then there should have been no question in McWatters' mind about it at the time of the McWatters lineup identification. And Jones
    should have been a regular if he had been attending the fall session at Crozier Tech. He should have a regular rider on that bus for at least two months prior to the assassination. Yet McWatters doesn't seem to know him until the Monday after the
    assassination. The Lurker should bear this in mind while considering the questions about the McWatters bus episode.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to NoTrueFlags Here on Sat Oct 21 04:02:51 2023
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 1:59:19 AM UTC-4, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    Nothing is crystal clear in the McWatters story, but if Milton Jones had been a regular rider prior to the assassination, then there should have been no question in McWatters' mind about it at the time of the McWatters lineup identification. And Jones
    should have been a regular if he had been attending the fall session at Crozier Tech. He should have a regular rider on that bus for at least two months prior to the assassination. Yet McWatters doesn't seem to know him until the Monday after the
    assassination. The Lurker should bear this in mind while considering the questions about the McWatters bus episode.

    Jones was interviewed by the FBI on March 30, 1964 and told them that he couldn't identify Oswald as the man on the bus. ( 25 H 899-900 )
    As a result, he was never called to give testimony.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NoTrueFlags Here@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Sat Oct 21 04:58:12 2023
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 7:02:52 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 1:59:19 AM UTC-4, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    Nothing is crystal clear in the McWatters story, but if Milton Jones had been a regular rider prior to the assassination, then there should have been no question in McWatters' mind about it at the time of the McWatters lineup identification. And
    Jones should have been a regular if he had been attending the fall session at Crozier Tech. He should have a regular rider on that bus for at least two months prior to the assassination. Yet McWatters doesn't seem to know him until the Monday after the
    assassination. The Lurker should bear this in mind while considering the questions about the McWatters bus episode.
    Jones was interviewed by the FBI on March 30, 1964 and told them that he couldn't identify Oswald as the man on the bus. ( 25 H 899-900 )
    As a result, he was never called to give testimony.
    They probably didn't want too much scrutiny applied to Milton Jones. Identifying Oswald would have required more scrutiny. His story has enough problems without it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Greg Parker@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Sat Oct 21 05:13:41 2023
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 10:02:52 PM UTC+11, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 1:59:19 AM UTC-4, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    Nothing is crystal clear in the McWatters story, but if Milton Jones had been a regular rider prior to the assassination, then there should have been no question in McWatters' mind about it at the time of the McWatters lineup identification. And
    Jones should have been a regular if he had been attending the fall session at Crozier Tech. He should have a regular rider on that bus for at least two months prior to the assassination. Yet McWatters doesn't seem to know him until the Monday after the
    assassination. The Lurker should bear this in mind while considering the questions about the McWatters bus episode.
    Jones was interviewed by the FBI on March 30, 1964 and told them that he couldn't identify Oswald as the man on the bus. ( 25 H 899-900 )
    As a result, he was never called to give testimony.

    Nothing is crystal clear when you have t=your closed and ears covered.

    Here is the Jones interview. www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=62326#relPageId=45

    Jones recognized McWatters as the regular driver. McWatters had no reason to take any notice of Jones until Nov 22, after which he took a keen interest in identifying and remembering him.

    But the real issues is that it makes no difference at all to what happened. Whether he recognized Jones or not doesn't change the fact that he thought he was there to identify Jones, and picked Oswald as the man closest in age and height to the 17 year
    old 5' 2" student.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NoTrueFlags Here@21:1/5 to Greg Parker on Sat Oct 21 06:10:31 2023
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 8:13:43 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 10:02:52 PM UTC+11, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 1:59:19 AM UTC-4, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    Nothing is crystal clear in the McWatters story, but if Milton Jones had been a regular rider prior to the assassination, then there should have been no question in McWatters' mind about it at the time of the McWatters lineup identification. And
    Jones should have been a regular if he had been attending the fall session at Crozier Tech. He should have a regular rider on that bus for at least two months prior to the assassination. Yet McWatters doesn't seem to know him until the Monday after the
    assassination. The Lurker should bear this in mind while considering the questions about the McWatters bus episode.
    Jones was interviewed by the FBI on March 30, 1964 and told them that he couldn't identify Oswald as the man on the bus. ( 25 H 899-900 )
    As a result, he was never called to give testimony.
    Nothing is crystal clear when you have t=your closed and ears covered.

    Here is the Jones interview. www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=62326#relPageId=45

    Jones recognized McWatters as the regular driver. McWatters had no reason to take any notice of Jones until Nov 22, after which he took a keen interest in identifying and remembering him.

    But the real issues is that it makes no difference at all to what happened. Whether he recognized Jones or not doesn't change the fact that he thought he was there to identify Jones, and picked Oswald as the man closest in age and height to the 17 year
    old 5' 2" student.
    It makes a difference to the credibility of Jones as a witness. If he rode that bus 5 days a week for 10 weeks, then that bus driver would recognize him on sight. But this sort of recognition does not seem to have happened until after the assassination.
    Was Jones really on the bus on the day of the assassination? This is not nearly so wacky as your Hootkins scenario.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Greg Parker@21:1/5 to NoTrueFlags Here on Sat Oct 21 06:45:41 2023
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 12:10:33 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 8:13:43 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 10:02:52 PM UTC+11, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 1:59:19 AM UTC-4, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    Nothing is crystal clear in the McWatters story, but if Milton Jones had been a regular rider prior to the assassination, then there should have been no question in McWatters' mind about it at the time of the McWatters lineup identification. And
    Jones should have been a regular if he had been attending the fall session at Crozier Tech. He should have a regular rider on that bus for at least two months prior to the assassination. Yet McWatters doesn't seem to know him until the Monday after the
    assassination. The Lurker should bear this in mind while considering the questions about the McWatters bus episode.
    Jones was interviewed by the FBI on March 30, 1964 and told them that he couldn't identify Oswald as the man on the bus. ( 25 H 899-900 )
    As a result, he was never called to give testimony.
    Nothing is crystal clear when you have t=your closed and ears covered.

    Here is the Jones interview. www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=62326#relPageId=45

    Jones recognized McWatters as the regular driver. McWatters had no reason to take any notice of Jones until Nov 22, after which he took a keen interest in identifying and remembering him.

    But the real issues is that it makes no difference at all to what happened. Whether he recognized Jones or not doesn't change the fact that he thought he was there to identify Jones, and picked Oswald as the man closest in age and height to the 17
    year old 5' 2" student.
    It makes a difference to the credibility of Jones as a witness. If he rode that bus 5 days a week for 10 weeks, then that bus driver would recognize him on sight. But this sort of recognition does not seem to have happened until after the assassination.
    Was Jones really on the bus on the day of the assassination? This is not nearly so wacky as your Hootkins scenario.

    Whatever. You're boring the shit out of me with your ill-advised attempts to find nits to pick.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NoTrueFlags Here@21:1/5 to Greg Parker on Sat Oct 21 06:50:39 2023
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 9:45:43 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 12:10:33 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 8:13:43 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 10:02:52 PM UTC+11, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 1:59:19 AM UTC-4, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    Nothing is crystal clear in the McWatters story, but if Milton Jones had been a regular rider prior to the assassination, then there should have been no question in McWatters' mind about it at the time of the McWatters lineup identification.
    And Jones should have been a regular if he had been attending the fall session at Crozier Tech. He should have a regular rider on that bus for at least two months prior to the assassination. Yet McWatters doesn't seem to know him until the Monday after
    the assassination. The Lurker should bear this in mind while considering the questions about the McWatters bus episode.
    Jones was interviewed by the FBI on March 30, 1964 and told them that he couldn't identify Oswald as the man on the bus. ( 25 H 899-900 )
    As a result, he was never called to give testimony.
    Nothing is crystal clear when you have t=your closed and ears covered.

    Here is the Jones interview. www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=62326#relPageId=45

    Jones recognized McWatters as the regular driver. McWatters had no reason to take any notice of Jones until Nov 22, after which he took a keen interest in identifying and remembering him.

    But the real issues is that it makes no difference at all to what happened. Whether he recognized Jones or not doesn't change the fact that he thought he was there to identify Jones, and picked Oswald as the man closest in age and height to the 17
    year old 5' 2" student.
    It makes a difference to the credibility of Jones as a witness. If he rode that bus 5 days a week for 10 weeks, then that bus driver would recognize him on sight. But this sort of recognition does not seem to have happened until after the
    assassination. Was Jones really on the bus on the day of the assassination? This is not nearly so wacky as your Hootkins scenario.
    Whatever. You're boring the shit out of me with your ill-advised attempts to find nits to pick.
    Well, you fucking idiot, sometimes you have to understand something before you know what questions to ask. Why is it that Milton Jones walked into this story? Maybe Billy Hootkins was really the teenager on the bus, and Milton Jones has been substituted
    to cover his fat ass. Or something like that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to NoTrueFlags Here on Sat Oct 21 07:02:17 2023
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 9:50:41 AM UTC-4, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 9:45:43 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 12:10:33 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:




    The authorities had a problem with two Oswalds making two exits so you cannot quote the testimony of Oswald on the bus witnesses straight like you attempt to do...Just like you can't quote Frazier's denials straight...

    Harvey was on the Bus and Lee was in the Station Wagon...The authorities had a lot of trouble covering it up but now they have Judas Greg Parker shilling for them with his crazy fake evidence obfuscation...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NoTrueFlags Here@21:1/5 to Brian Doyle on Sat Oct 21 07:34:14 2023
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 10:02:18 AM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 9:50:41 AM UTC-4, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 9:45:43 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 12:10:33 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    The authorities had a problem with two Oswalds making two exits so you cannot quote the testimony of Oswald on the bus witnesses straight like you attempt to do...Just like you can't quote Frazier's denials straight...

    Harvey was on the Bus and Lee was in the Station Wagon...The authorities had a lot of trouble covering it up but now they have Judas Greg Parker shilling for them with his crazy fake evidence obfuscation...
    Isn't there somebody else you could go harangue?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Donald Willis@21:1/5 to Brian Doyle on Sat Oct 21 14:38:30 2023
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 7:02:18 AM UTC-7, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 9:50:41 AM UTC-4, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 9:45:43 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 12:10:33 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    The authorities had a problem with two Oswalds making two exits so you cannot quote the testimony of Oswald on the bus witnesses straight like you attempt to do...Just like you can't quote Frazier's denials straight...

    Harvey was on the Bus and Lee was in the Station Wagon...The authorities had a lot of trouble covering it up but now they have Judas Greg Parker shilling for them with his crazy fake evidence obfuscation...

    I'm beginning to see how these Two Oswald stories get started. At the Tippit scene, one imposter runs past the Abundant Life Temple, the other runs down Jefferson past the Texaco station (but not into the parking lot). Okay--two Oswald imposters. But
    then who was driving the red Ford that picked up the ALT imposter after the latter passed the temple? (Hint: It wasn't Jack Tatum!) The plot began to go haywire when the ALT imposter was seen by Benavides & Scoggins--he didn't disappear fast enough.
    Whereas the Jefferson imposter was supposed to be seen. I'm thinking that the ALT imposter did not even have to look like Oswald. Caveat: Yes, this involves some little speculation! But it'll have to do until the 11/22/63 FBI report & police
    affidavit of Benavides' show up, sometime after hell freezes over...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Donald Willis@21:1/5 to NoTrueFlags Here on Sat Oct 21 14:44:48 2023
    On Friday, October 20, 2023 at 10:59:19 PM UTC-7, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    Nothing is crystal clear in the McWatters story, but if Milton Jones had been a regular rider prior to the assassination, then there should have been no question in McWatters' mind about it at the time of the McWatters lineup identification

    Good point which should have been made by someone long ago. 15 or 20 rides on McWatters' bus should have put Jones in McW's memory bank, if only peripherally. And the "no question" means (all together now) that McW knew who he was seeing when he ID'd
    Oswald in the lineup on 11/22 and affidavited that he took him all the way to Oak Cliff by, say, 1:20 or so, which means...

    dcw

    . And Jones should have been a regular if he had been attending the fall session at Crozier Tech. He should have a regular rider on that bus for at least two months prior to the assassination. Yet McWatters doesn't seem to know him until the Monday after
    the assassination. The Lurker should bear this in mind while considering the questions about the McWatters bus episode.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Greg Parker@21:1/5 to Donald Willis on Sat Oct 21 15:09:22 2023
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 8:44:49 AM UTC+11, Donald Willis wrote:
    On Friday, October 20, 2023 at 10:59:19 PM UTC-7, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    Nothing is crystal clear in the McWatters story, but if Milton Jones had been a regular rider prior to the assassination, then there should have been no question in McWatters' mind about it at the time of the McWatters lineup identification
    Good point which should have been made by someone long ago. 15 or 20 rides on McWatters' bus should have put Jones in McW's memory bank, if only peripherally. And the "no question" means (all together now) that McW knew who he was seeing when he ID'd
    Oswald in the lineup on 11/22 and affidavited that he took him all the way to Oak Cliff by, say, 1:20 or so, which means...

    dcw
    . And Jones should have been a regular if he had been attending the fall session at Crozier Tech. He should have a regular rider on that bus for at least two months prior to the assassination. Yet McWatters doesn't seem to know him until the Monday
    after the assassination. The Lurker should bear this in mind while considering the questions about the McWatters bus episode.

    There is zero evidence he was a regular passenger on that bus prior to 11/22. He may have had a car for a short while, or he may have been getting a ride in another car that was no longer available, or his study/work schedule may have been slightly
    different. Regardless, McWatters had no reason to commit him to memory before 11/22. He also gives an account of the bus being stopped and passengers being questioned by the cops, which is oddly missing from the McWatters account. If he had been some
    plant or other for some idiotic reason being imagined 60 years later, he would not be giving that story UNL:ESS THE PERPS WANTED THAT FUCKING STORY AS PART OF THE NARRATIVE. In fact, the opposite appears to be true. The story is damaging to their
    narrative because it indicates they would have come across Oswald during that time so it is discouraged in the McWatters and Bledsoe accounts. It shows Oswald was not on that bus.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NoTrueFlags Here@21:1/5 to Greg Parker on Sat Oct 21 16:03:21 2023
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 6:09:24 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 8:44:49 AM UTC+11, Donald Willis wrote:
    On Friday, October 20, 2023 at 10:59:19 PM UTC-7, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    Nothing is crystal clear in the McWatters story, but if Milton Jones had been a regular rider prior to the assassination, then there should have been no question in McWatters' mind about it at the time of the McWatters lineup identification
    Good point which should have been made by someone long ago. 15 or 20 rides on McWatters' bus should have put Jones in McW's memory bank, if only peripherally. And the "no question" means (all together now) that McW knew who he was seeing when he ID'd
    Oswald in the lineup on 11/22 and affidavited that he took him all the way to Oak Cliff by, say, 1:20 or so, which means...

    dcw
    . And Jones should have been a regular if he had been attending the fall session at Crozier Tech. He should have a regular rider on that bus for at least two months prior to the assassination. Yet McWatters doesn't seem to know him until the Monday
    after the assassination. The Lurker should bear this in mind while considering the questions about the McWatters bus episode.
    There is zero evidence he was a regular passenger on that bus prior to 11/22. He may have had a car for a short while, or he may have been getting a ride in another car that was no longer available, or his study/work schedule may have been slightly
    different. Regardless, McWatters had no reason to commit him to memory before 11/22. He also gives an account of the bus being stopped and passengers being questioned by the cops, which is oddly missing from the McWatters account. If he had been some
    plant or other for some idiotic reason being imagined 60 years later, he would not be giving that story UNL:ESS THE PERPS WANTED THAT FUCKING STORY AS PART OF THE NARRATIVE. In fact, the opposite appears to be true. The story is damaging to their
    narrative because it indicates they would have come across Oswald during that time so it is discouraged in the McWatters and Bledsoe accounts. It shows Oswald was not on that bus.
    There's Parker Logic for you! Because Milton Jones said something about the bus ride that was impossible, that means he had to be on the bus! Parker should never have 69'd that rabid wallaby!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Greg Parker@21:1/5 to NoTrueFlags Here on Sat Oct 21 18:56:26 2023
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 10:03:23 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 6:09:24 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 8:44:49 AM UTC+11, Donald Willis wrote:
    On Friday, October 20, 2023 at 10:59:19 PM UTC-7, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    Nothing is crystal clear in the McWatters story, but if Milton Jones had been a regular rider prior to the assassination, then there should have been no question in McWatters' mind about it at the time of the McWatters lineup identification
    Good point which should have been made by someone long ago. 15 or 20 rides on McWatters' bus should have put Jones in McW's memory bank, if only peripherally. And the "no question" means (all together now) that McW knew who he was seeing when he ID'
    d Oswald in the lineup on 11/22 and affidavited that he took him all the way to Oak Cliff by, say, 1:20 or so, which means...

    dcw
    . And Jones should have been a regular if he had been attending the fall session at Crozier Tech. He should have a regular rider on that bus for at least two months prior to the assassination. Yet McWatters doesn't seem to know him until the Monday
    after the assassination. The Lurker should bear this in mind while considering the questions about the McWatters bus episode.
    There is zero evidence he was a regular passenger on that bus prior to 11/22. He may have had a car for a short while, or he may have been getting a ride in another car that was no longer available, or his study/work schedule may have been slightly
    different. Regardless, McWatters had no reason to commit him to memory before 11/22. He also gives an account of the bus being stopped and passengers being questioned by the cops, which is oddly missing from the McWatters account. If he had been some
    plant or other for some idiotic reason being imagined 60 years later, he would not be giving that story UNL:ESS THE PERPS WANTED THAT FUCKING STORY AS PART OF THE NARRATIVE. In fact, the opposite appears to be true. The story is damaging to their
    narrative because it indicates they would have come across Oswald during that time so it is discouraged in the McWatters and Bledsoe accounts. It shows Oswald was not on that bus.
    There's Parker Logic for you! Because Milton Jones said something about the bus ride that was impossible, that means he had to be on the bus! Parker should never have 69'd that rabid wallaby!

    His timing was impossible. Experiments show most people suck at estimating time. What he said happened was not. Moreover, he had zero reason to make it up.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NoTrueFlags Here@21:1/5 to Greg Parker on Sat Oct 21 21:57:57 2023
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 9:56:28 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 10:03:23 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 6:09:24 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 8:44:49 AM UTC+11, Donald Willis wrote:
    On Friday, October 20, 2023 at 10:59:19 PM UTC-7, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    Nothing is crystal clear in the McWatters story, but if Milton Jones had been a regular rider prior to the assassination, then there should have been no question in McWatters' mind about it at the time of the McWatters lineup identification
    Good point which should have been made by someone long ago. 15 or 20 rides on McWatters' bus should have put Jones in McW's memory bank, if only peripherally. And the "no question" means (all together now) that McW knew who he was seeing when he
    ID'd Oswald in the lineup on 11/22 and affidavited that he took him all the way to Oak Cliff by, say, 1:20 or so, which means...

    dcw
    . And Jones should have been a regular if he had been attending the fall session at Crozier Tech. He should have a regular rider on that bus for at least two months prior to the assassination. Yet McWatters doesn't seem to know him until the
    Monday after the assassination. The Lurker should bear this in mind while considering the questions about the McWatters bus episode.
    There is zero evidence he was a regular passenger on that bus prior to 11/22. He may have had a car for a short while, or he may have been getting a ride in another car that was no longer available, or his study/work schedule may have been slightly
    different. Regardless, McWatters had no reason to commit him to memory before 11/22. He also gives an account of the bus being stopped and passengers being questioned by the cops, which is oddly missing from the McWatters account. If he had been some
    plant or other for some idiotic reason being imagined 60 years later, he would not be giving that story UNL:ESS THE PERPS WANTED THAT FUCKING STORY AS PART OF THE NARRATIVE. In fact, the opposite appears to be true. The story is damaging to their
    narrative because it indicates they would have come across Oswald during that time so it is discouraged in the McWatters and Bledsoe accounts. It shows Oswald was not on that bus.
    There's Parker Logic for you! Because Milton Jones said something about the bus ride that was impossible, that means he had to be on the bus! Parker should never have 69'd that rabid wallaby!
    His timing was impossible. Experiments show most people suck at estimating time. What he said happened was not. Moreover, he had zero reason to make it up.
    Here, Mr. Science Of The Outback, Greg Parker, pretends that he can know all the possible motivations of some guy who allegedly talked to the FBI. That's all there is. An FBI report. And Parker knows all there is to know about Milton Jones. That is
    Parker Science.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)