Mr. Scott, perhaps you should be aware of Greg Parker's stupidity. In the link below see the example of Greg Parker "proving" that the boy with Oswald seen by Clifton Shasteen was actually Billy Hootkins, known affectionately by his fans as "That FatGuy In Star Wars." Shasteen said that the boy did not have a fat round face. And Parker provides a photo of a round fat-faced Hootkins gleefully declaring that the round face is evident, the round face that Shasteen said the boy did not have. Is it real
On Friday, October 20, 2023 at 4:25:33 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:Guy In Star Wars." Shasteen said that the boy did not have a fat round face. And Parker provides a photo of a round fat-faced Hootkins gleefully declaring that the round face is evident, the round face that Shasteen said the boy did not have. Is it real
Mr. Scott, perhaps you should be aware of Greg Parker's stupidity. In the link below see the example of Greg Parker "proving" that the boy with Oswald seen by Clifton Shasteen was actually Billy Hootkins, known affectionately by his fans as "That Fat
Scott is well aware of my my work and gives it the thumbs up. But thanks for thinking of me.https://postlmg.cc/ppjFmWhw
It seems to me you are lost in regard to geometry.
Shasteen said not a round face... a wide one.
So let me help you out...
A round-faced actor https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-52df7dd2df2e215de8af0972a0aece34-lq
A wide-faced actor https://image.tmdb.org/t/p/w500/dav2i86GN0UvYIyoTwQmGE8Nweg.jpg
Round shape https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/61vFbC0eh7L._AC_UF894,1000_QL80_.jpg
Oval/egg/wide shape https://i.pinimg.com/736x/ea/c1/e3/eac1e39e6bc128fe318123418be6a236.jpg
You may win some type of award though for the worst symantical argument in history.
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 9:30:17 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
On Friday, October 20, 2023 at 4:25:33 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 9:34:59 AM UTC-4, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 9:30:17 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:Ralph Cinque got praises from well-known research figures who were obviously not paying attention...
On Friday, October 20, 2023 at 4:25:33 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
Parker is part of a high destructive trend on the JFK internet where flakes and crazies are taking advantage of the internet to accept undeserved credit for what is basically research trolling...
On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 12:50:22 AM UTC+11, Brian Doyle wrote:Ralph Cinque, if you can believe it, had this wacky conspiracy theory about Oswald being in the TSBD doorway! How could anybody be so stupid?
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 9:34:59 AM UTC-4, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:No he didn't. He falsely used their names on his website falsely claiming they endorsed him.
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 9:30:17 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:Ralph Cinque got praises from well-known research figures who were obviously not paying attention...
On Friday, October 20, 2023 at 4:25:33 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
Parker is part of a high destructive trend on the JFK internet where flakes and crazies are taking advantage of the internet to accept undeserved credit for what is basically research trolling...You sound upset, Brian, Are you okay? How's your blood pressure. Look after yourself, mate. You owe it to your loved ones.
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 6:23:53 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 12:50:22 AM UTC+11, Brian Doyle wrote:
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 9:34:59 AM UTC-4, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:No he didn't. He falsely used their names on his website falsely claiming they endorsed him.
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 9:30:17 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:Ralph Cinque got praises from well-known research figures who were obviously not paying attention...
On Friday, October 20, 2023 at 4:25:33 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
Parker is part of a high destructive trend on the JFK internet where flakes and crazies are taking advantage of the internet to accept undeserved credit for what is basically research trolling...You sound upset, Brian, Are you okay? How's your blood pressure. Look after yourself, mate. You owe it to your loved ones.
Ralph Cinque, if you can believe it, had this wacky conspiracy theory about Oswald being in the TSBD doorway! How could anybody be so stupid?
On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 10:11:09 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 6:23:53 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 12:50:22 AM UTC+11, Brian Doyle wrote:
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 9:34:59 AM UTC-4, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:No he didn't. He falsely used their names on his website falsely claiming they endorsed him.
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 9:30:17 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:Ralph Cinque got praises from well-known research figures who were obviously not paying attention...
On Friday, October 20, 2023 at 4:25:33 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
Parker is part of a high destructive trend on the JFK internet where flakes and crazies are taking advantage of the internet to accept undeserved credit for what is basically research trolling...You sound upset, Brian, Are you okay? How's your blood pressure. Look after yourself, mate. You owe it to your loved ones.
Ralph Cinque, if you can believe it, had this wacky conspiracy theory about Oswald being in the TSBD doorway! How could anybody be so stupid?Hardly Ralph's idea. It was one of the earliest theories because of published pic.
But it was proved back then that it was Lovelady. This has nothing to do with that. As you know,
What we CAN learn from it is this: the FBI panicked about the claim Oswald could be seen on the steps and rushed to get Loveday to confirm it was him.
Why the panic? They had fuck all evidence that Oswald was the shooter. They also had Oswald saying in interrogations that he was out front. They actually feared this might prove it. They got lucky. Wrong pic. This one really was Lovelady.
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 7:22:37 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 10:11:09 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 6:23:53 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 12:50:22 AM UTC+11, Brian Doyle wrote:
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 9:34:59 AM UTC-4, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:No he didn't. He falsely used their names on his website falsely claiming they endorsed him.
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 9:30:17 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:Ralph Cinque got praises from well-known research figures who were obviously not paying attention...
On Friday, October 20, 2023 at 4:25:33 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
Parker is part of a high destructive trend on the JFK internet where flakes and crazies are taking advantage of the internet to accept undeserved credit for what is basically research trolling...You sound upset, Brian, Are you okay? How's your blood pressure. Look after yourself, mate. You owe it to your loved ones.
Ralph Cinque, if you can believe it, had this wacky conspiracy theory about Oswald being in the TSBD doorway! How could anybody be so stupid?Hardly Ralph's idea. It was one of the earliest theories because of published pic.
But it was proved back then that it was Lovelady. This has nothing to do with that. As you know,
What we CAN learn from it is this: the FBI panicked about the claim Oswald could be seen on the steps and rushed to get Loveday to confirm it was him.
Why the panic? They had fuck all evidence that Oswald was the shooter. They also had Oswald saying in interrogations that he was out front. They actually feared this might prove it. They got lucky. Wrong pic. This one really was Lovelady.Oh, yeah! It took the conspiracy theorists 40 years of squinting to see Oswald in the Weigman film! Too bad the Fat Old Lady is too dead to say they're wrong!
On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 10:31:13 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:folded.
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 7:22:37 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 10:11:09 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 6:23:53 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 12:50:22 AM UTC+11, Brian Doyle wrote:
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 9:34:59 AM UTC-4, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:No he didn't. He falsely used their names on his website falsely claiming they endorsed him.
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 9:30:17 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:Ralph Cinque got praises from well-known research figures who were obviously not paying attention...
On Friday, October 20, 2023 at 4:25:33 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
Parker is part of a high destructive trend on the JFK internet where flakes and crazies are taking advantage of the internet to accept undeserved credit for what is basically research trolling...You sound upset, Brian, Are you okay? How's your blood pressure. Look after yourself, mate. You owe it to your loved ones.
Ralph Cinque, if you can believe it, had this wacky conspiracy theory about Oswald being in the TSBD doorway! How could anybody be so stupid?Hardly Ralph's idea. It was one of the earliest theories because of published pic.
But it was proved back then that it was Lovelady. This has nothing to do with that. As you know,
What we CAN learn from it is this: the FBI panicked about the claim Oswald could be seen on the steps and rushed to get Loveday to confirm it was him.
The fat old lady with a wig worn for professional reasons, no boobies and a face like Frankenstein from all the er "flittering"...?Why the panic? They had fuck all evidence that Oswald was the shooter. They also had Oswald saying in interrogations that he was out front. They actually feared this might prove it. They got lucky. Wrong pic. This one really was Lovelady.Oh, yeah! It took the conspiracy theorists 40 years of squinting to see Oswald in the Weigman film! Too bad the Fat Old Lady is too dead to say they're wrong!
The girth - which in any case, is still nowhere Stanton proportions, is an optical illusion cause by part of him being reflected in the glass behind him. Cover the reflection up and it becomes clear it is a skinny dude leaning against the way with arms
But in nofuckinflagsanddowleland, I guess glass does not reflect. Luckily I deal with the real world where science rules. Not faith. Not wishful thinking.use, the reflection will be easily discernible from the real figure.
Imagine this dude if he was facing out to the street and he was photographed from the front at a certain. angle. What you would see is him, with part of his reflection joined onto him - except that given it is day and we have a modern still camera in
https://c8.alamy.com/comp/DADD94/businessman-looking-through-glass-wall-with-reflection-DADD94.jpgParker Science must use pictures of pretty boys to convince us that the fat old lady is Oswald because the real photography just doesn't do it. But yes, your link does show a slim young man. Congratulations. At least you do know what they look like.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 128:51:02 |
| Calls: | 6,663 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,212 |
| Messages: | 5,335,293 |
