• In Signed Sworn Affidavit Roy Sansom Truly Calls 2nd Floor Hallway a VE

    From NoTrueFlags Here@21:1/5 to All on Sun Oct 15 11:42:35 2023
    Nyah nyah! https://postimg.cc/75FfJmjJ

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to NoTrueFlags Here on Sun Oct 15 14:09:49 2023
    On Sunday, October 15, 2023 at 2:42:36 PM UTC-4, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    Nyah nyah! https://postimg.cc/75FfJmjJ

    And where is that vestibule? Second floor. Here...

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth337178/

    An interesting question might be why they took so many photographs of the second floor lunchroom on the day of the assassination if nothing sugnificant occurred there.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Mon Oct 16 08:25:53 2023
    On Sun, 15 Oct 2023 14:09:49 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:


    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to Bud on Tue Oct 17 02:53:15 2023
    On Sunday, October 15, 2023 at 5:09:51 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
    An interesting question might be why they took so many photographs of the second floor lunchroom on the day of the assassination if nothing sugnificant occurred there.

    They took photographs of the "Domino Room" too, and nothing significant happened there.
    So what's your point ?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Tue Oct 17 03:34:58 2023
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 5:53:17 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Sunday, October 15, 2023 at 5:09:51 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
    An interesting question might be why they took so many photographs of the second floor lunchroom on the day of the assassination if nothing sugnificant occurred there.
    They took photographs of the "Domino Room" too, and nothing significant happened there.

    They found Oswald`s jacket there.

    So what's your point ?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From robert johnson@21:1/5 to NoTrueFlags Here on Tue Oct 17 04:36:40 2023
    On Sunday, October 15, 2023 at 7:42:36 PM UTC+1, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    Nyah nyah! https://postimg.cc/75FfJmjJ

    More than 8 months after the deed, wahey!!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From robert johnson@21:1/5 to Bud on Tue Oct 17 04:37:40 2023
    On Sunday, October 15, 2023 at 10:09:51 PM UTC+1, Bud wrote:
    On Sunday, October 15, 2023 at 2:42:36 PM UTC-4, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    Nyah nyah! https://postimg.cc/75FfJmjJ

    And where is that vestibule? Second floor. Here...

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth337178/

    An interesting question might be why they took so many photographs of the second floor lunchroom on the day of the assassination if nothing sugnificant occurred there.

    Those pix were NOT taken the day of the assassination, do your homework better buddy.....

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to robert johnson on Tue Oct 17 11:55:07 2023
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 7:37:43 AM UTC-4, robert johnson wrote:
    On Sunday, October 15, 2023 at 10:09:51 PM UTC+1, Bud wrote:
    On Sunday, October 15, 2023 at 2:42:36 PM UTC-4, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    Nyah nyah! https://postimg.cc/75FfJmjJ

    And where is that vestibule? Second floor. Here...

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth337178/

    An interesting question might be why they took so many photographs of the second floor lunchroom on the day of the assassination if nothing sugnificant occurred there.
    Those pix were NOT taken the day of the assassination, do your homework better buddy.....

    Hit the link and hit and look at "Creation Information".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to Bud on Tue Oct 17 13:08:56 2023
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 6:35:00 AM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
    They found Oswald`s jacket there.

    Dear dumbass:

    They took the pictures of the "Domino Room" before they found the jacket.
    So again, what's your point ?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Tue Oct 17 14:05:12 2023
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 4:08:58 PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 6:35:00 AM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
    They found Oswald`s jacket there.
    Dear dumbass:

    They took the pictures of the "Domino Room" before they found the jacket.

    Support that.

    So again, what's your point ?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to All on Tue Oct 17 15:10:54 2023
    On Sunday, October 15, 2023 at 2:42:36 PM UTC-4, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:



    Correct...

    And it was also on the construction blueprint for the Lunch Room entrance enclosure...

    The fact Truly regularly referred to it that way tells you how Oswald heard it and therefore how Holmes heard it...

    The research community has been lied to by Kamp, Parker, and Murphy who lied like children and claimed the "Vestibule" was the Lobby...

    The correct interpretation of Holmes' witnessing is that he overheard Oswald describing two stops by cops...One in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room Vestibule and the other in the Lobby at the Depository front entrance...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Greg Parker@21:1/5 to NoTrueFlags Here on Tue Oct 17 15:58:22 2023
    On Monday, October 16, 2023 at 5:42:36 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    Nyah nyah! https://postimg.cc/75FfJmjJ

    Yep. Oswald correctly identified the vestibule as being just inside the front door. The solution? Pretend it was actually on the 2nd floor.

    I double-dog dare anyone to find another human being in history who places a vestibule on an upper floor of any building.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Greg Parker@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Tue Oct 17 15:55:50 2023
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 8:53:17 PM UTC+11, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Sunday, October 15, 2023 at 5:09:51 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
    An interesting question might be why they took so many photographs of the second floor lunchroom on the day of the assassination if nothing sugnificant occurred there.
    They took photographs of the "Domino Room" too, and nothing significant happened there.
    So what's your point ?

    All that anyone has produced is a link to a single photo. They took photos all over the building.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NoTrueFlags Here@21:1/5 to Bud on Tue Oct 17 16:19:15 2023
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 7:15:43 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 6:58:25 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Monday, October 16, 2023 at 5:42:36 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    Nyah nyah! https://postimg.cc/75FfJmjJ
    Yep. Oswald correctly identified the vestibule as being just inside the front door. The solution? Pretend it was actually on the 2nd floor.

    I double-dog dare anyone to find another human being in history who places a vestibule on an upper floor of any building.
    You mean besides Truly?

    Well, Truly married Fred Korth's Wooky, so he can't be trusted. Not that there was a conspiracy or nuthin, mind you, but I think the gummint oughtta look into it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Greg Parker on Tue Oct 17 16:30:39 2023
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 6:55:51 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 8:53:17 PM UTC+11, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Sunday, October 15, 2023 at 5:09:51 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
    An interesting question might be why they took so many photographs of the second floor lunchroom on the day of the assassination if nothing sugnificant occurred there.
    They took photographs of the "Domino Room" too, and nothing significant happened there.
    So what's your point ?
    All that anyone has produced is a link to a single photo. They took photos all over the building.


    Several "From doorway looking into lunchroom"...

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth338877/m1/1/

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth338877/m1/2/

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth338877/m1/3/

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth338877/m1/4/

    I wonder what of significance happened there.

    Others...

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth49479/

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth49615/

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth49618/

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth339430/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Greg Parker on Tue Oct 17 16:15:41 2023
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 6:58:25 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Monday, October 16, 2023 at 5:42:36 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    Nyah nyah! https://postimg.cc/75FfJmjJ
    Yep. Oswald correctly identified the vestibule as being just inside the front door. The solution? Pretend it was actually on the 2nd floor.

    I double-dog dare anyone to find another human being in history who places a vestibule on an upper floor of any building.

    You mean besides Truly?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Greg Parker on Tue Oct 17 16:32:26 2023
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 7:30:53 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 18, 2023 at 10:15:43 AM UTC+11, Bud wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 6:58:25 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Monday, October 16, 2023 at 5:42:36 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    Nyah nyah! https://postimg.cc/75FfJmjJ
    Yep. Oswald correctly identified the vestibule as being just inside the front door. The solution? Pretend it was actually on the 2nd floor.

    I double-dog dare anyone to find another human being in history who places a vestibule on an upper floor of any building.
    You mean besides Truly?
    Yes, Bud. That's is what "another" indicates.

    We know Truly does, why does anyone else matter?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Greg Parker@21:1/5 to Bud on Tue Oct 17 16:41:41 2023
    On Wednesday, October 18, 2023 at 10:30:41 AM UTC+11, Bud wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 6:55:51 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 8:53:17 PM UTC+11, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Sunday, October 15, 2023 at 5:09:51 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
    An interesting question might be why they took so many photographs of the second floor lunchroom on the day of the assassination if nothing sugnificant occurred there.
    They took photographs of the "Domino Room" too, and nothing significant happened there.
    So what's your point ?
    All that anyone has produced is a link to a single photo. They took photos all over the building.
    Several "From doorway looking into lunchroom"...

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth338877/m1/1/

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth338877/m1/2/

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth338877/m1/3/

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth338877/m1/4/

    I wonder what of significance happened there.

    Do you have Baker Syndrome? Mistaking 2 as 4?

    Truly gave his 1st bullshit account sometime in the evening of Nov 22 to the FBI, so it is possible that the 2 photos were taken because of that statement. It is also possible there were not taken for that reason, but just general shots within the
    building

    Others...

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth49479/

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth49615/

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth49618/

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth339430/

    These are undated. If you want to speculate about them, go ahead.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Greg Parker on Tue Oct 17 17:47:16 2023
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 7:41:42 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 18, 2023 at 10:30:41 AM UTC+11, Bud wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 6:55:51 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 8:53:17 PM UTC+11, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Sunday, October 15, 2023 at 5:09:51 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
    An interesting question might be why they took so many photographs of the second floor lunchroom on the day of the assassination if nothing sugnificant occurred there.
    They took photographs of the "Domino Room" too, and nothing significant happened there.
    So what's your point ?
    All that anyone has produced is a link to a single photo. They took photos all over the building.
    Several "From doorway looking into lunchroom"...

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth338877/m1/1/

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth338877/m1/2/

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth338877/m1/3/

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth338877/m1/4/

    I wonder what of significance happened there.
    Do you have Baker Syndrome? Mistaking 2 as 4?

    Truly gave his 1st bullshit account sometime in the evening of Nov 22 to the FBI, so it is possible that the 2 photos were taken because of that statement. It is also possible there were not taken for that reason, but just general shots within the
    building
    Others...

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth49479/

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth49615/

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth49618/

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth339430/
    These are undated. If you want to speculate about them, go ahead.

    Last one is dated. November 22, 1963.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to Greg Parker on Tue Oct 17 19:15:24 2023
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 6:58:25 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Monday, October 16, 2023 at 5:42:36 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:




    Yep. Oswald correctly identified the vestibule as being just inside the front door. The solution? Pretend it was actually on the 2nd floor.




    Greg just ignores all the proof and ignores in its face that a blueprint exists from the construction of the 2nd Floor Lunch Room enclosure that says "Vestibule"...Greg responds to proof by going in to his blowhard mode and just repeating his trolling
    and lies...Greg argues his bullshit and nothing else...He doesn't respond to proof...

    If I were moderator on this page that would be bye bye Greg and right to moderator cue for post screening...

    Greg is lying above and Oswald never identified the Vestibule as being inside the front door...What Greg is referring to is his bullshit interpretation from his bogus Prayer Man research...Greg just ignores the correct interpretation that Holmes heard
    Oswald describe two stops...One in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room and one in the Lobby...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Von Pein@21:1/5 to Bud on Tue Oct 17 19:54:57 2023
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 8:47:18 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 7:41:42 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 18, 2023 at 10:30:41 AM UTC+11, Bud wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 6:55:51 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 8:53:17 PM UTC+11, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Sunday, October 15, 2023 at 5:09:51 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
    An interesting question might be why they took so many photographs of the second floor lunchroom on the day of the assassination if nothing sugnificant occurred there.
    They took photographs of the "Domino Room" too, and nothing significant happened there.
    So what's your point ?
    All that anyone has produced is a link to a single photo. They took photos all over the building.
    Several "From doorway looking into lunchroom"...

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth338877/m1/1/

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth338877/m1/2/

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth338877/m1/3/

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth338877/m1/4/

    I wonder what of significance happened there.
    Do you have Baker Syndrome? Mistaking 2 as 4?

    Truly gave his 1st bullshit account sometime in the evening of Nov 22 to the FBI, so it is possible that the 2 photos were taken because of that statement. It is also possible there were not taken for that reason, but just general shots within the
    building
    Others...

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth49479/

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth49615/

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth49618/

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth339430/
    These are undated. If you want to speculate about them, go ahead.
    Last one is dated. November 22, 1963.

    I wonder how it's possible for a single photograph to have FOUR (4) sides? Impossible.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Von Pein@21:1/5 to Bud on Tue Oct 17 19:57:18 2023
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 8:47:18 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 7:41:42 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 18, 2023 at 10:30:41 AM UTC+11, Bud wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 6:55:51 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 8:53:17 PM UTC+11, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Sunday, October 15, 2023 at 5:09:51 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
    An interesting question might be why they took so many photographs of the second floor lunchroom on the day of the assassination if nothing sugnificant occurred there.
    They took photographs of the "Domino Room" too, and nothing significant happened there.
    So what's your point ?
    All that anyone has produced is a link to a single photo. They took photos all over the building.
    Several "From doorway looking into lunchroom"...

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth338877/m1/1/

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth338877/m1/2/

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth338877/m1/3/

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth338877/m1/4/

    I wonder what of significance happened there.
    Do you have Baker Syndrome? Mistaking 2 as 4?

    Truly gave his 1st bullshit account sometime in the evening of Nov 22 to the FBI, so it is possible that the 2 photos were taken because of that statement. It is also possible there were not taken for that reason, but just general shots within the
    building
    Others...

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth49479/

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth49615/

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth49618/

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth339430/
    These are undated. If you want to speculate about them, go ahead.
    Last one is dated. November 22, 1963.

    I wonder how a single photograph can have FOUR (4) different sides? Impossible.

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth339430/m1/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Donald Willis@21:1/5 to NoTrueFlags Here on Tue Oct 17 21:12:19 2023
    On Sunday, October 15, 2023 at 11:42:36 AM UTC-7, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    Nyah nyah! https://postimg.cc/75FfJmjJ

    On a related issue... When Fritz & Bookhout have Oswald talk about seeing two Negroes in or around the "lunch room", do they mean the 1st or 2nd floor room? I had always thought first based on Norman's (or Jarman's) testimony re going in the back way,
    but the Fritz/Bookhout refs are unclear. At any rate, I believe that F&B made that up just to catch Oswald in another "lie", which they knew that the two (N&J, that is) would not back him up on.

    dcw

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NoTrueFlags Here@21:1/5 to Donald Willis on Tue Oct 17 21:32:06 2023
    On Wednesday, October 18, 2023 at 12:12:21 AM UTC-4, Donald Willis wrote:
    On Sunday, October 15, 2023 at 11:42:36 AM UTC-7, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    Nyah nyah! https://postimg.cc/75FfJmjJ
    On a related issue... When Fritz & Bookhout have Oswald talk about seeing two Negroes in or around the "lunch room", do they mean the 1st or 2nd floor room? I had always thought first based on Norman's (or Jarman's) testimony re going in the back way,
    but the Fritz/Bookhout refs are unclear. At any rate, I believe that F&B made that up just to catch Oswald in another "lie", which they knew that the two (N&J, that is) would not back him up on.

    dcw
    If Oswald really said that, then it probably would be the 1st floor. That probably was the lunchroom for the warehouse grunts. I think Oswald probably did say that, but it might have been a lie. I don't find Norman and Jarman to be trustworthy, either,
    so this area is all quicksand.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Wed Oct 18 06:58:17 2023
    On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 03:34:58 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:


    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to gjjmail1202@gmail.com on Wed Oct 18 06:58:17 2023
    On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 13:08:56 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
    <gjjmail1202@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 6:35:00?AM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
    They found Oswald`s jacket there.

    Dear dumbass:

    They took the pictures of the "Domino Room" before they found the jacket.
    So again, what's your point ?

    You just educated Chickenshit, he didn't know that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to davevonpein@aol.com on Wed Oct 18 06:58:17 2023
    On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 19:57:18 -0700 (PDT), David Von Pein
    <davevonpein@aol.com> wrote:

    I wonder how a single photograph can have FOUR (4) different sides? Impossible.

    https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth339430/m1/


    This is the problem with morons - they can't reason. Took me all of
    about a minute to figure this out.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to Brian Doyle on Thu Oct 19 06:40:48 2023
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 10:15:26 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 6:58:25 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Monday, October 16, 2023 at 5:42:36 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:



    No response to there being a construction blueprint for the enclosure over the 2nd Floor Lunch Room that said "Vestibule" clearly written on the enclosure...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to Brian Doyle on Sat Oct 21 06:55:41 2023
    On Thursday, October 19, 2023 at 9:40:50 AM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 10:15:26 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 6:58:25 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:




    Parker is obviously a troll who is in contempt of the correct evidence...

    He's an arrogant bastard who thinks he can get away with ignoring fatal counter-evidence (like DiEugenio)...

    Look at Parker trying to get away with ignoring the Depository blueprint for the construction of the 2nd Floor Lunch Room enclosure that clearly said "Vestibule" on it...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Greg Parker@21:1/5 to Brian Doyle on Sat Oct 21 15:20:40 2023
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 12:55:42 AM UTC+11, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Thursday, October 19, 2023 at 9:40:50 AM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 10:15:26 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 6:58:25 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    Parker is obviously a troll who is in contempt of the correct evidence...

    He's an arrogant bastard who thinks he can get away with ignoring fatal counter-evidence (like DiEugenio)...

    Look at Parker trying to get away with ignoring the Depository blueprint for the construction of the 2nd Floor Lunch Room enclosure that clearly said "Vestibule" on it...

    Labelled that after the event for Rubes like you.

    Ask an architect if he ever made plans that included a vestibule on an upper floor. The answer will be no because by definition, they are located at the building entry point.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NoTrueFlags Here@21:1/5 to Greg Parker on Sat Oct 21 15:50:24 2023
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 6:20:42 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 12:55:42 AM UTC+11, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Thursday, October 19, 2023 at 9:40:50 AM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 10:15:26 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 6:58:25 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    Parker is obviously a troll who is in contempt of the correct evidence...

    He's an arrogant bastard who thinks he can get away with ignoring fatal counter-evidence (like DiEugenio)...

    Look at Parker trying to get away with ignoring the Depository blueprint for the construction of the 2nd Floor Lunch Room enclosure that clearly said "Vestibule" on it...
    Labelled that after the event for Rubes like you.

    Ask an architect if he ever made plans that included a vestibule on an upper floor. The answer will be no because by definition, they are located at the building entry point.
    Roy Truly was not an architect. Lee Harvey Oswald was not an architect. Harry Holmes was not an architect. They were not dictionaries, either. Your wacky conspiracy theories require everybody to be architects or dictionaries, and even then they are
    stupid.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Greg Parker@21:1/5 to NoTrueFlags Here on Sat Oct 21 19:06:03 2023
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 9:50:26 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 6:20:42 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 12:55:42 AM UTC+11, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Thursday, October 19, 2023 at 9:40:50 AM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 10:15:26 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 6:58:25 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    Parker is obviously a troll who is in contempt of the correct evidence...

    He's an arrogant bastard who thinks he can get away with ignoring fatal counter-evidence (like DiEugenio)...

    Look at Parker trying to get away with ignoring the Depository blueprint for the construction of the 2nd Floor Lunch Room enclosure that clearly said "Vestibule" on it...
    Labelled that after the event for Rubes like you.

    Ask an architect if he ever made plans that included a vestibule on an upper floor. The answer will be no because by definition, they are located at the building entry point.
    Roy Truly was not an architect. Lee Harvey Oswald was not an architect. Harry Holmes was not an architect. They were not dictionaries, either. Your wacky conspiracy theories require everybody to be architects or dictionaries, and even then they are
    stupid.

    So all these people liked using a word that they did not know the meaning of? And the only person to use the work correctly was the high school dropout? That's what your nasty little campaign has come to?

    And everyone else in Dallas knew how to use it correctly and where it was located in their own buildings including the cops and Sylvia Odio,

    Fuck off. Unfuck yourself and then fuck off again.

    If Oswald never used that term correctly for the 1st floor, Truly would not be using it for the 2nd floor either. How he stopped from blushing with embarrassment in doing it is a mystery in itself.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NoTrueFlags Here@21:1/5 to Greg Parker on Sat Oct 21 22:03:07 2023
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 10:06:05 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 9:50:26 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 6:20:42 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 12:55:42 AM UTC+11, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Thursday, October 19, 2023 at 9:40:50 AM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 10:15:26 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 6:58:25 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    Parker is obviously a troll who is in contempt of the correct evidence...

    He's an arrogant bastard who thinks he can get away with ignoring fatal counter-evidence (like DiEugenio)...

    Look at Parker trying to get away with ignoring the Depository blueprint for the construction of the 2nd Floor Lunch Room enclosure that clearly said "Vestibule" on it...
    Labelled that after the event for Rubes like you.

    Ask an architect if he ever made plans that included a vestibule on an upper floor. The answer will be no because by definition, they are located at the building entry point.
    Roy Truly was not an architect. Lee Harvey Oswald was not an architect. Harry Holmes was not an architect. They were not dictionaries, either. Your wacky conspiracy theories require everybody to be architects or dictionaries, and even then they are
    stupid.
    So all these people liked using a word that they did not know the meaning of? And the only person to use the work correctly was the high school dropout? That's what your nasty little campaign has come to?

    And everyone else in Dallas knew how to use it correctly and where it was located in their own buildings including the cops and Sylvia Odio,

    Fuck off. Unfuck yourself and then fuck off again.

    If Oswald never used that term correctly for the 1st floor, Truly would not be using it for the 2nd floor either. How he stopped from blushing with embarrassment in doing it is a mystery in itself.
    Apparently, Parker overestimates the intelligence of 1963 Dallas men...all except JD Tippit, of course, whom he deems to be a moron. In Greg Parker's world, all characters assume the characteristics required to convince us that Lee Harvey Oswald is the
    fat old lady in the Weigman film.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to Greg Parker on Sun Oct 22 06:12:20 2023
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 6:20:42 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 12:55:42 AM UTC+11, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Thursday, October 19, 2023 at 9:40:50 AM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:





    Look at Parker trying to get away with ignoring the Depository blueprint for the construction of the 2nd Floor Lunch Room enclosure that clearly said "Vestibule" on it...


    Labelled that after the event for Rubes like you.


    Ask an architect if he ever made plans that included a vestibule on an upper floor. The answer will be no because by definition, they are located at the building entry point.



    This is how sick the JFK internet has become...Parker feels safe coming in and lying like a 4 year old that the "Vestibule" seen on the blueprint for the 2nd Floor Lunch Room enclosure was forged in there later by people creating a highly complex
    conspiracy where they needed to cover-up Oswald's obscure reference to the "Vestibule"...This right here is a prime example of the rotten double standard practiced on the JFK internet because anyone else would be laughed out of the room for even daring
    attempt such a feeble-minded excuse...Here is Greg Parker actually daring in public to say the "Vestibule" label seen printed on the Lunch Room enclosure on the construction blueprint was forged in there by plotters trying to create a Lunch Room
    Encounter hoax...

    You can see the deviant psychology of psychopath Greg Parker coming through in this...Greg actually thinks that his blowhard pronouncements come before reality and you can see him trying to fool himself with his own bullshit in order to shield himself
    from the obvious truth...THIS RIGHT HERE is how the Prayer Man theory came to be - from Greg Parker's crazy evidence fantasies...Greg is trying to force his way by saying Vestibules are never on the 2nd Floor however in this case we have proof they were
    as indicated on the construction blueprint for the Lunch Room enclosure...The validity of that blueprint is easily checked-out so Greg attempts a pretty stupid deception here that he knows will be automatically supported by the assholes he depends on out
    there on the JFK internet...It is more than obvious that the reason Oswald said "Vestibule" is because he heard Truly refer to it that way because Truly was in charge of that blueprint...We know it was the 2nd Floor because Oswald said he then came
    downstairs from there...

    Greg is a agent provocateur troll and you can see him doing his duty to prevent the correct solution to the Conspiracy here...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Greg Parker@21:1/5 to NoTrueFlags Here on Sun Oct 22 16:58:40 2023
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 4:03:09 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 10:06:05 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 9:50:26 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 6:20:42 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 12:55:42 AM UTC+11, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Thursday, October 19, 2023 at 9:40:50 AM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 10:15:26 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 6:58:25 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    Parker is obviously a troll who is in contempt of the correct evidence...

    He's an arrogant bastard who thinks he can get away with ignoring fatal counter-evidence (like DiEugenio)...

    Look at Parker trying to get away with ignoring the Depository blueprint for the construction of the 2nd Floor Lunch Room enclosure that clearly said "Vestibule" on it...
    Labelled that after the event for Rubes like you.

    Ask an architect if he ever made plans that included a vestibule on an upper floor. The answer will be no because by definition, they are located at the building entry point.
    Roy Truly was not an architect. Lee Harvey Oswald was not an architect. Harry Holmes was not an architect. They were not dictionaries, either. Your wacky conspiracy theories require everybody to be architects or dictionaries, and even then they are
    stupid.
    So all these people liked using a word that they did not know the meaning of? And the only person to use the work correctly was the high school dropout? That's what your nasty little campaign has come to?

    And everyone else in Dallas knew how to use it correctly and where it was located in their own buildings including the cops and Sylvia Odio,

    Fuck off. Unfuck yourself and then fuck off again.

    If Oswald never used that term correctly for the 1st floor, Truly would not be using it for the 2nd floor either. How he stopped from blushing with embarrassment in doing it is a mystery in itself.
    Apparently, Parker overestimates the intelligence of 1963 Dallas men...all except JD Tippit, of course, whom he deems to be a moron. In Greg Parker's world, all characters assume the characteristics required to convince us that Lee Harvey Oswald is the
    fat old lady in the Weigman film.

    You're the one claiming truly was using a word he did not know the meaning of and that the building architect did not know that a vestibule is on the ground floor.

    On the other hand, I am perfectly satisfied that Truly knew where a vestibule is supposed to be situated and that his claiming it was on the second floor had nothing to do with him being stupido.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Greg Parker@21:1/5 to Brian Doyle on Sun Oct 22 17:01:59 2023
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 12:12:21 AM UTC+11, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 6:20:42 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 12:55:42 AM UTC+11, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Thursday, October 19, 2023 at 9:40:50 AM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:





    Look at Parker trying to get away with ignoring the Depository blueprint for the construction of the 2nd Floor Lunch Room enclosure that clearly said "Vestibule" on it...


    Labelled that after the event for Rubes like you.


    Ask an architect if he ever made plans that included a vestibule on an upper floor. The answer will be no because by definition, they are located at the building entry point.
    This is how sick the JFK internet has become...Parker feels safe coming in and lying like a 4 year old that the "Vestibule" seen on the blueprint for the 2nd Floor Lunch Room enclosure was forged in there later by people creating a highly complex
    conspiracy where they needed to cover-up Oswald's obscure reference to the "Vestibule"...This right here is a prime example of the rotten double standard practiced on the JFK internet because anyone else would be laughed out of the room for even daring
    attempt such a feeble-minded excuse...Here is Greg Parker actually daring in public to say the "Vestibule" label seen printed on the Lunch Room enclosure on the construction blueprint was forged in there by plotters trying to create a Lunch Room
    Encounter hoax...

    You can see the deviant psychology of psychopath Greg Parker coming through in this...Greg actually thinks that his blowhard pronouncements come before reality and you can see him trying to fool himself with his own bullshit in order to shield himself
    from the obvious truth...THIS RIGHT HERE is how the Prayer Man theory came to be - from Greg Parker's crazy evidence fantasies...Greg is trying to force his way by saying Vestibules are never on the 2nd Floor however in this case we have proof they were
    as indicated on the construction blueprint for the Lunch Room enclosure...The validity of that blueprint is easily checked-out so Greg attempts a pretty stupid deception here that he knows will be automatically supported by the assholes he depends on out
    there on the JFK internet...It is more than obvious that the reason Oswald said "Vestibule" is because he heard Truly refer to it that way because Truly was in charge of that blueprint...We know it was the 2nd Floor because Oswald said he then came
    downstairs from there...

    Greg is a agent provocateur troll and you can see him doing his duty to prevent the correct solution to the Conspiracy here...

    Brian, please know that I have genuine sympathy for you. You didn't create the person you are.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NoTrueFlags Here@21:1/5 to Greg Parker on Sun Oct 22 19:06:34 2023
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 7:58:42 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 4:03:09 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 10:06:05 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 9:50:26 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 6:20:42 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 12:55:42 AM UTC+11, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Thursday, October 19, 2023 at 9:40:50 AM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 10:15:26 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 6:58:25 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    Parker is obviously a troll who is in contempt of the correct evidence...

    He's an arrogant bastard who thinks he can get away with ignoring fatal counter-evidence (like DiEugenio)...

    Look at Parker trying to get away with ignoring the Depository blueprint for the construction of the 2nd Floor Lunch Room enclosure that clearly said "Vestibule" on it...
    Labelled that after the event for Rubes like you.

    Ask an architect if he ever made plans that included a vestibule on an upper floor. The answer will be no because by definition, they are located at the building entry point.
    Roy Truly was not an architect. Lee Harvey Oswald was not an architect. Harry Holmes was not an architect. They were not dictionaries, either. Your wacky conspiracy theories require everybody to be architects or dictionaries, and even then they
    are stupid.
    So all these people liked using a word that they did not know the meaning of? And the only person to use the work correctly was the high school dropout? That's what your nasty little campaign has come to?

    And everyone else in Dallas knew how to use it correctly and where it was located in their own buildings including the cops and Sylvia Odio,

    Fuck off. Unfuck yourself and then fuck off again.

    If Oswald never used that term correctly for the 1st floor, Truly would not be using it for the 2nd floor either. How he stopped from blushing with embarrassment in doing it is a mystery in itself.
    Apparently, Parker overestimates the intelligence of 1963 Dallas men...all except JD Tippit, of course, whom he deems to be a moron. In Greg Parker's world, all characters assume the characteristics required to convince us that Lee Harvey Oswald is
    the fat old lady in the Weigman film.
    You're the one claiming truly was using a word he did not know the meaning of and that the building architect did not know that a vestibule is on the ground floor.

    On the other hand, I am perfectly satisfied that Truly knew where a vestibule is supposed to be situated and that his claiming it was on the second floor had nothing to do with him being stupido.

    You lie, Greg Parker. I did not claim to read Truly's mind. You always lie.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Greg Parker@21:1/5 to NoTrueFlags Here on Sun Oct 22 19:25:44 2023
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 1:06:36 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 7:58:42 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 4:03:09 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 10:06:05 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 9:50:26 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 6:20:42 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 12:55:42 AM UTC+11, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Thursday, October 19, 2023 at 9:40:50 AM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 10:15:26 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 6:58:25 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    Parker is obviously a troll who is in contempt of the correct evidence...

    He's an arrogant bastard who thinks he can get away with ignoring fatal counter-evidence (like DiEugenio)...

    Look at Parker trying to get away with ignoring the Depository blueprint for the construction of the 2nd Floor Lunch Room enclosure that clearly said "Vestibule" on it...
    Labelled that after the event for Rubes like you.

    Ask an architect if he ever made plans that included a vestibule on an upper floor. The answer will be no because by definition, they are located at the building entry point.
    Roy Truly was not an architect. Lee Harvey Oswald was not an architect. Harry Holmes was not an architect. They were not dictionaries, either. Your wacky conspiracy theories require everybody to be architects or dictionaries, and even then they
    are stupid.
    So all these people liked using a word that they did not know the meaning of? And the only person to use the work correctly was the high school dropout? That's what your nasty little campaign has come to?

    And everyone else in Dallas knew how to use it correctly and where it was located in their own buildings including the cops and Sylvia Odio,

    Fuck off. Unfuck yourself and then fuck off again.

    If Oswald never used that term correctly for the 1st floor, Truly would not be using it for the 2nd floor either. How he stopped from blushing with embarrassment in doing it is a mystery in itself.
    Apparently, Parker overestimates the intelligence of 1963 Dallas men...all except JD Tippit, of course, whom he deems to be a moron. In Greg Parker's world, all characters assume the characteristics required to convince us that Lee Harvey Oswald is
    the fat old lady in the Weigman film.
    You're the one claiming truly was using a word he did not know the meaning of and that the building architect did not know that a vestibule is on the ground floor.

    On the other hand, I am perfectly satisfied that Truly knew where a vestibule is supposed to be situated and that his claiming it was on the second floor had nothing to do with him being stupido.
    You lie, Greg Parker. I did not claim to read Truly's mind. You always lie.

    I never claimed you could read his mind. I said you are the one saying he must have been stupido. This is what you said YesTrueFlog Here.

    "Roy Truly was not an architect. Lee Harvey Oswald was not an architect. Harry Holmes was not an architect. They were not dictionaries, either. Your wacky conspiracy theories require everybody to be architects or dictionaries, and even then they are
    stupid."

    To which I replied in essence that I don't think he was stupid. I think he was smart enough to know where a vestibule is really located and that stupidity had nothing to do weith his attempt to move it up a floor.

    PS
    so glad you finally settled on a name that suits.
    -------------------------
    The word flog is a derogatory term to describe a person considered to be pretentious, conceited or foolish, and evidence suggests it is Australian. One of
    the earliest examples of this sense of flog occurs in a 2006 posting on the online
    site Urban Dictionary. A contributor lists a number of meanings for flog, including
    this one with an illustrative sentence: ‘flog … (noun) a poser, someone who likes
    to big-note themselves ... Look at that wanker in the Porsche talking on his car
    phone. What a flog.’
    The contributor’s comments suggests the new sense of flog is related to the verb
    flog meaning ‘to masturbate’. The ‘masturbate’ sense of flog can be traced back
    to the early 1940s, with its corresponding agent noun flogger emerging later. These terms are synonymous with wank and wanker, with roughly the same mid20th century dates of first usage. In Australian usage, the noun wank means ‘a
    pretentious person or thing; pretentiousness’. Flog has evolved with a similar
    emphasis on pretentiousness.
    Flog is often found on online sporting forums and comments pages, particularly in
    the context of AFL and Rugby League. https://www.oup.com.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/131051/WOTM-December-2018.pdf
    _______________
    We can finally agree on something. You are indeed, a true flog.

    In fact my Aussie dictionary just shows this under "flog" https://yt3.googleusercontent.com/ytc/APkrFKaEaUNSJygoNDh9n6PP72Otor1pGKzVBiuo2NsMWQ=s176-c-k-c0x00ffffff-no-rj

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NoTrueFlags Here@21:1/5 to Greg Parker on Sun Oct 22 19:28:36 2023
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 10:25:46 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 1:06:36 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 7:58:42 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 4:03:09 PM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 10:06:05 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 9:50:26 AM UTC+11, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 6:20:42 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 12:55:42 AM UTC+11, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Thursday, October 19, 2023 at 9:40:50 AM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 10:15:26 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 6:58:25 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    Parker is obviously a troll who is in contempt of the correct evidence...

    He's an arrogant bastard who thinks he can get away with ignoring fatal counter-evidence (like DiEugenio)...

    Look at Parker trying to get away with ignoring the Depository blueprint for the construction of the 2nd Floor Lunch Room enclosure that clearly said "Vestibule" on it...
    Labelled that after the event for Rubes like you.

    Ask an architect if he ever made plans that included a vestibule on an upper floor. The answer will be no because by definition, they are located at the building entry point.
    Roy Truly was not an architect. Lee Harvey Oswald was not an architect. Harry Holmes was not an architect. They were not dictionaries, either. Your wacky conspiracy theories require everybody to be architects or dictionaries, and even then
    they are stupid.
    So all these people liked using a word that they did not know the meaning of? And the only person to use the work correctly was the high school dropout? That's what your nasty little campaign has come to?

    And everyone else in Dallas knew how to use it correctly and where it was located in their own buildings including the cops and Sylvia Odio,

    Fuck off. Unfuck yourself and then fuck off again.

    If Oswald never used that term correctly for the 1st floor, Truly would not be using it for the 2nd floor either. How he stopped from blushing with embarrassment in doing it is a mystery in itself.
    Apparently, Parker overestimates the intelligence of 1963 Dallas men...all except JD Tippit, of course, whom he deems to be a moron. In Greg Parker's world, all characters assume the characteristics required to convince us that Lee Harvey Oswald
    is the fat old lady in the Weigman film.
    You're the one claiming truly was using a word he did not know the meaning of and that the building architect did not know that a vestibule is on the ground floor.

    On the other hand, I am perfectly satisfied that Truly knew where a vestibule is supposed to be situated and that his claiming it was on the second floor had nothing to do with him being stupido.
    You lie, Greg Parker. I did not claim to read Truly's mind. You always lie.
    I never claimed you could read his mind. I said you are the one saying he must have been stupido. This is what you said YesTrueFlog Here.
    "Roy Truly was not an architect. Lee Harvey Oswald was not an architect. Harry Holmes was not an architect. They were not dictionaries, either. Your wacky conspiracy theories require everybody to be architects or dictionaries, and even then they are
    stupid."
    To which I replied in essence that I don't think he was stupid. I think he was smart enough to know where a vestibule is really located and that stupidity had nothing to do weith his attempt to move it up a floor.

    PS
    so glad you finally settled on a name that suits.
    -------------------------
    The word flog is a derogatory term to describe a person considered to be pretentious, conceited or foolish, and evidence suggests it is Australian. One of
    the earliest examples of this sense of flog occurs in a 2006 posting on the online
    site Urban Dictionary. A contributor lists a number of meanings for flog, including
    this one with an illustrative sentence: ‘flog … (noun) a poser, someone who likes
    to big-note themselves ... Look at that wanker in the Porsche talking on his car
    phone. What a flog.’
    The contributor’s comments suggests the new sense of flog is related to the verb
    flog meaning ‘to masturbate’. The ‘masturbate’ sense of flog can be traced back
    to the early 1940s, with its corresponding agent noun flogger emerging later.
    These terms are synonymous with wank and wanker, with roughly the same mid20th century dates of first usage. In Australian usage, the noun wank means ‘a
    pretentious person or thing; pretentiousness’. Flog has evolved with a similar
    emphasis on pretentiousness.
    Flog is often found on online sporting forums and comments pages, particularly in
    the context of AFL and Rugby League. https://www.oup.com.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/131051/WOTM-December-2018.pdf
    _______________
    We can finally agree on something. You are indeed, a true flog.

    In fact my Aussie dictionary just shows this under "flog" https://yt3.googleusercontent.com/ytc/APkrFKaEaUNSJygoNDh9n6PP72Otor1pGKzVBiuo2NsMWQ=s176-c-k-c0x00ffffff-no-rj
    Every breath you take is a lie.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Greg Parker@21:1/5 to Brian Doyle on Sun Oct 22 19:39:55 2023
    On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 12:12:21 AM UTC+11, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 6:20:42 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 12:55:42 AM UTC+11, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Thursday, October 19, 2023 at 9:40:50 AM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:





    Look at Parker trying to get away with ignoring the Depository blueprint for the construction of the 2nd Floor Lunch Room enclosure that clearly said "Vestibule" on it...


    Labelled that after the event for Rubes like you.


    Ask an architect if he ever made plans that included a vestibule on an upper floor. The answer will be no because by definition, they are located at the building entry point.
    This is how sick the JFK internet has become...Parker feels safe coming in and lying like a 4 year old that the "Vestibule" seen on the blueprint for the 2nd Floor Lunch Room enclosure was forged

    Never said it was forged. It is clearly something that was made though, post assassination. If it exists at all outside your mind.

    Here is what I found https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=62307#relPageId=29

    The label used is "lunchroom lobby". It is number 23.

    You can then scroll to the plan itself here and see the specific location of the lobby
    https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=62307#relPageId=52

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)