• Gordon Protects Stancak's Wrong Claims On Education Forum

    From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to All on Sat Oct 7 08:48:18 2023
    Stancak wrote:


    "Pauline Sanders was where she told the FBI she was: in the east part of the doorway, close to the glass window. She cannot be seen in Altgens6 because her figure is masked by the figure of a man wearing dark suit and tie. Sanders can be seen in one
    frame of Darnell (shown in my video). I have made the height estimate using 3D modelling, and she indeed was tiny - 4'11''. This height estimate was verified by an independent method using a group photograph, discovered by Linda Zambanini. In that group
    photograph, Sanders's tip of the nose is about 2 inches below the avererage height of the level of tips of noses of all ladies. As the average body height of ladies of Sanders's age in was 5'2'' in 1963, her body estimate comes to about 5', close to my
    estimate of 4'11'. Sanders wore a specific dark hat both in the group photograph and in Darnell frame which also helps in her identification. "


    My Response:

    Stancak has yet to admit to himself that he found Pauline Sanders as the Tiny Face between Lovelady & Shelley...This identification is correct and it helps prove that Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...So therefore we do not need to keep repeating the same
    false evidence for years like Stancak is doing here...Because the Education Forum is run by a criminal incompetent and fool, James Gordon, the simple fact that Stancak has identified Sanders as Tiny Face has not been confirmed...Stancak is too biased
    towards proving Oswald to be Prayer Man...Because that bias affects his judgment he refuses to process that Altgens' telephoto lens makes Sanders appear closer than she is and Tiny Face is in that position to the east of the front door that Stancak posts.
    ..Stancak refuses to admit that he has found Sanders and she is Tiny Face...And once you find Sanders the rest of the Prayer Man evidence automatically makes Prayer Man Stanton...

    The second mistake Stancak makes is he says Sanders is seen in Darnell...Alan Ford showed all the Darnell frames in motion on Duncan's nut forum...Even though Ford himself is a nut like MacRae (and probably is MacRae posting under an alias), he did
    credibly show that what is being called Sanders in Darnell is actually a photo glitch that only appears in one frame...Stancak should check it out but that won't happen because that asshole Gordon has made the JFK internet a place of non-cooperation and
    dysfunction...A good example of Stancak's notorious pseudo-analysis is seen in his technical examination of what now turns out to be a glitch in Darnell he is calling Sanders...He doesn't need to examine that glitch...Stancak has already found Sanders in
    Tiny Face...


    Stancak wrote:


    "Sarah Stanton's location was on the top landing, and to the left of Wesley Frazier. He confirmed her location at least twice in interviews, also linked in my video. She was a huge lady, and she needed a large platform to stand on, not only an area of
    one step. She was tall (but she did not wear any 3-inch heels - verified by me in an email exchange with a family member) and had dense, light coloured hair. Unfortunately, as she stood at the back of the top landing and behind some other people, an area
    covered by shadow, none of the photographs shows enough of her figure. However, it is possible to infer on her presence from a light-coloured spot at the height of 5'7'' above the level of the top landing. Such a light-coloured blob can be seen both in
    Darnell and Wiegman, and some patches of her hair can also be seen in one version of Algens6 which shows enough details (shown in my video)."


    My Response:

    Stancak isn't honest because he is on record on the Education Forum saying that if Prayer Man was standing on the top landing platform that Prayer Man would be too short to be Oswald...Now, in 2023, we have Stancak entering that Stanton was a large woman
    who needed the space of the top platform to stand on...This is how goofy Stancak and the Education Forum are because Stancak is hanging himself by his own words but no one is honest enough to call him on it...This is the stupidity that they are passing
    off as the current JFK research community...

    To further this crazy-ness Stancak then enters that the 5 foot 4 Stanton was "tall"...We know Stanton wasn't tall because we can see her next to Frazier as Prayer Man and she only comes up to Frazier's chin...We can also see she isn't tall in Owens...
    Stancak makes no effort to use his pseudo-analysis to compare Stanton's height in Owens to that of Prayer Man because he knows what he'll find...And no one asks him too either - which is incredibly dishonest and is the type of "research" Gordon prefers...
    Remember, Gordon bans for life for failing to follow correct evidence procedure when told...When Davidson matched Stanton in Owens to Prayer Man's height Gordon and Stancak ignored it...

    Stancak is also dishonestly ignoring that both Lovelady & Frazier placed Stanton in the Prayer Man spot at the time of the Prayer Man photography...Lovelady said Stanton was next to him to the right of Frazier when the limousine passed and Frazier said
    he was standing and staring at Stanton after Calvery told them the president was shot...It is a pure act of intentional dishonesty for Stancak to ignore that Couch/Darnell is the exact moment Frazier was describing and he is clearly facing Prayer Man who
    pivoted towards him to tell him what Calvery had said...Stancak and Gordon contemptuously ignore that pivot - that is proof beyond any doubt, for the level of researcher they pretend to be, that Stanton is Prayer Man...

    Stancak is trying to get away with placing Stanton back in the shadows to the left of Frazier while ignoring Davidson that clearly showed Stanton's face on Prayer Man as well as a woman's Scoop Dress Neckline...

    This is all overseen by the moderator criminal Gordon...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From robert johnson@21:1/5 to All on Sat Oct 7 11:13:42 2023
    A MORONIC REVIEW BY A FANTASIZING IDIOT

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to All on Mon Oct 9 10:25:23 2023
    On Saturday, October 7, 2023 at 11:48:19 AM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:



    The Education Forum continues to embarrass itself by not allowing anyone to point-out the basic fact that Stancak is calling Pauline Sanders Stanton in Altgens 6...The Education Forum continues to stand credible research on its head by refusing to point-
    out to Stancak that the Tiny Face he located between Lovelady & Shelley in Altgens 6 is Sanders...Stancak is lying, and trying to make the evidence fit his theory, when he calls that Tiny Face Stanton...He's doing that because he is aware that once you
    admit Tiny Face is Sanders then you have to concede that the evidence therefore forces Prayer Man to be Stanton...

    Stancak is a shitty researcher because he doesn't realize that his own graphic posted on the Education Forum shows a scientific line of transit from Altgens' camera to Sanders that places Sanders exactly in the spot for Tiny Face...It is pretty dumb to
    show scientific proof that Tiny Face is Sanders and then try to force it to be Stanton...

    Stancak is being allowed to get away with the false claim that Stanton is in the position behind Lovelady & Shelley that he shows in his graphic...He's being allowed to ignore that if Stanton were in that position she would be visible plain as day in
    Altgens 6...Stancak is being allowed to get away with the false claim that the convenient shadows would prevent Stanton from being seen in that position...That is simply not so and Altgens shows everything on the portal forward of the glass...He's lying
    and if Stanton were in that position she would be entirely visible...Stancak also stupidly ignores that if Stanton were in that position she would be seen in Wiegman...One look at Wiegman shows an empty space where Stancak places Stanton...The Education
    Forum forfeits credibility by not letting this be posted...

    The Education Forum is protecting easily-disproven garbage and is censoring the best and brightest with the correct evidence...Hacks like Stancak are just wishing the evidence the way they want it with the full assistance of the uncredible Education
    Forum...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From robert johnson@21:1/5 to All on Mon Oct 9 23:05:51 2023
    MORE MORONIC DIATRIBES FROM THE VILLAGE IDIOT AKA THE SHIT POSTER!!!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to All on Tue Oct 10 06:38:21 2023
    On Tuesday, October 10, 2023 at 2:05:53 AM UTC-4, robert johnson wrote:



    Mark Knight is a fraud and a crook because he sides with the crowd in order to gain their favor and doesn't answer to the serious research malfeasance that is committed under him on the Education Forum...

    As long as the DiEugenio-led social media clique is happy Knight is too...He doesn't care if Stancak is allowed to lower the site's quality by posting garbage unopposed...

    If someone protests Knight just calls him a "Shit-Poster" and bans him and his correct evidence and calls it moderation...

    And the Prayer Man people like it that way...

    They only post where dirty moderators protect their bad arguments of evidence...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From robert johnson@21:1/5 to All on Tue Oct 10 07:07:13 2023
    BRIAN DOYLE THE LYING DELUSIONAL SHIT POSTER

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to robert johnson on Thu Oct 12 03:35:38 2023
    On Tuesday, October 10, 2023 at 10:07:15 AM UTC-4, robert johnson wrote:
    BRIAN DOYLE THE LYING DELUSIONAL SHIT POSTER

    Don't forget, Charles Blackmon's "Disinformation Agent".
    He loves that one.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Thu Oct 12 07:11:05 2023
    On Thursday, October 12, 2023 at 6:35:39 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 10, 2023 at 10:07:15 AM UTC-4, robert johnson wrote:



    Gordon is still registered as an Administrator of the Education Forum...

    When he pulled back from oversight because he stole close to a year's worth of members dues he said he would stay on strictly in the capacity of membership/moderation issues...Head executioner in other words...

    Because of this Stancak is not made to confront his provably false claims that Gordon refuses to take any responsibility for...

    Because of this the Education Forum continues to be a place where ROKC shills are allowed to suggest Sarah Stanton is Oswald while ignoring the evidence that more than shows otherwise...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From robert johnson@21:1/5 to All on Thu Oct 12 11:35:54 2023
    THE DAY YOU WAKE UP AND GET WITH THE PROGRAM WILL BECOME A NATIONAL HOLIDAY. NOT THAT THAT WILL HAPPEN SINCE A HOLOCAUST DENIER LIKE YOU ARE NOT JUST DELUSIONAL, BUT ALSO IN COMPLETE DENIAL.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)