https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/evidence-proves-one-of-the-most-impactful-events-in-history-was-a-lie/ar-AA1hJyOv?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=c286cb42264b4eccbe314305a3cdb6f3&ei=21
Some assclowns claim that the fact Armstrong's and Aldrin's boots don't match the photos of their lunar footprints is proof the moon landings were a hoax. It's the classic conspiracist tactic of looking at evidence in isolation
and offering up whataboutism. The simple truth of the matter, as explained in the article, is that during the trek on the moon, the astronauts wore overshoes which left footprints different from their main boots. Those overshoes and a lot of other materials were left behind on the moon because they were not needed on the return voyage and weight had to be reduced to allow lunar soil and rock samples to be gathered and still leave the LEM light
enough to take off from the surface of the moon.
Conspiracy hobbyists never want to find answers to their asinine questions. They think they can make their point simply by raising the questions without finding out what the answers are. It's a silly hobby no matter what the subject
is.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/evidence-proves-one-of-the-most-impactful-events-in-history-was-a-lie/ar-AA1hJyOv?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=c286cb42264b4eccbe314305a3cdb6f3&ei=21
Some assclowns claim that the fact Armstrong's and Aldrin's boots don't match the photos of their lunar footprints is proof the moon landings were a hoax. It's the classic conspiracist tactic of looking at evidence in isolation
and offering up whataboutism. The simple truth of the matter, as explained in the article, is that during the trek on the moon, the astronauts wore overshoes which left footprints different from their main boots. Those overshoes and a lot of other materials were left behind on the moon because they were not needed on the return voyage and weight had to be reduced to allow lunar soil and rock samples to be gathered and still leave the LEM light
enough to take off from the surface of the moon.
Conspiracy hobbyists never want to find answers to their asinine questions. They think they can make their point simply by raising the questions without finding out what the answers are. It's a silly hobby no matter what the subject
is.
On Saturday, October 7, 2023 at 10:30:29 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:desperate to find "clues" to support what they want to believe. Then someone else has the burden to set things right. You see this with the 9-11 Truthers, there isn`t a single photo or video that a conspiracy fanatic can`t find something fishy, some clue
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/evidence-proves-one-of-the-most-impactful-events-in-history-was-a-lie/ar-AA1hJyOv?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=c286cb42264b4eccbe314305a3cdb6f3&ei=21
Some assclowns claim that the fact Armstrong's and Aldrin's boots don't match the photos of their lunar footprints is proof the moon landings were a
hoax. It's the classic conspiracist tactic of looking at evidence in isolation
and offering up whataboutism. The simple truth of the matter, as explained in the article, is that during the trek on the moon, the astronauts wore overshoes which left footprints different from their main boots. Those overshoes and a lot of other materials were left behind on the moon because
they were not needed on the return voyage and weight had to be reduced to allow lunar soil and rock samples to be gathered and still leave the LEM light
enough to take off from the surface of the moon.
Conspiracy hobbyists never want to find answers to their asinine questions.Yes, I would have never caught that discrepancy in a million years (and if I did, "different shoes" would have been the most obvious possibility, far outweighing the idea of a massive conspiracy and coverup). It takes the hunt conducted by a hobbyist
They think they can make their point simply by raising the questions without
finding out what the answers are. It's a silly hobby no matter what the subject
is.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/evidence-proves-one-of-the-most-impactful-events-in-history-was-a-lie/ar-AA1hJyOv?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=c286cb42264b4eccbe314305a3cdb6f3&ei=21
Some assclowns claim that the fact Armstrong's and Aldrin's boots don't
match the photos of their lunar footprints is proof the moon landings were a >hoax. It's the classic conspiracist tactic of looking at evidence in isolation >and offering up whataboutism. The simple truth of the matter, as explained
in the article, is that during the trek on the moon, the astronauts wore >overshoes which left footprints different from their main boots. Those >overshoes and a lot of other materials were left behind on the moon because >they were not needed on the return voyage and weight had to be reduced to allow lunar soil and rock samples to be gathered and still leave the LEM light
enough to take off from the surface of the moon.
Conspiracy hobbyists never want to find answers to their asinine questions. >They think they can make their point simply by raising the questions without >finding out what the answers are. It's a silly hobby no matter what the subject
is.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 297 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 121:39:45 |
Calls: | 6,662 |
Files: | 12,212 |
Messages: | 5,334,491 |