If the FBI Summary Report is accepted, there is no such thing as an SBT -
If the FBI Summary Report is accepted, there is no such thing as an
SBT - Corbutt can't seem to understand that simple fact.
And since he was terrified of having to defend Bugliosi, and ran away,
he pretends he doesn't need to answer me.
But his lies are posted for all to see, AND NOT ONE SINGLE BELIEVER
DARES TO TRY TO DEFEND CORBUTT'S LIE.
On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 3:52:30?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
If the FBI Summary Report is accepted, there is no such thing as an SBT -
It says it on the very first page:
"....three shots were fired. Two struck President Kennedy and one wounded Governor Connally." ( CD 1, pg. 1 )
Of course the idiot trolls either can't comprehend what is being said here.
The FBI didn't say that two shots hit Kennedy and one of these shots also hit Connally.
And then avoided saying where the third shot ended up.
This is what the trolls interpret it to mean.
But as usual, their interpretation is wrong.
The FBI gave a total number of shots fired, then broke them down:
3 shots fired
2 hit Kennedy
1 wounded Connally
-----------------------------------
That totals 3.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/page-1.png
No mention of a missed shot or a bullet splitting or any other nonsense.
3 shots,
2 hit the President,
1 wounded the governor
3 shots
The trolls claim that this doesn't preclude the SBT. It most certainly does.
These trolls time and time again misinterpret what the evidence says.
As far as Corbett goes, every time he posts something, you can believe it's a lie, especially when he doesn't back it up with evidence.
On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 3:52:30 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
If the FBI Summary Report is accepted, there is no such thing as an SBT -It says it on the very first page:
"....three shots were fired. Two struck President Kennedy and one wounded Governor Connally." ( CD 1, pg. 1 )
Of course the idiot trolls either can't comprehend what is being said here.
The FBI didn't say that two shots hit Kennedy and one of these shots also hit Connally.
And then avoided saying where the third shot ended up.
This is what the trolls interpret it to mean.
But as usual, their interpretation is wrong.
The FBI gave a total number of shots fired, then broke them down:
3 shots fired
2 hit Kennedy
1 wounded Connally
-----------------------------------
That totals 3.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/page-1.png
No mention of a missed shot or a bullet splitting or any other nonsense.
3 shots,
2 hit the President,
1 wounded the governor
3 shots
The trolls claim that this doesn't preclude the SBT. It most certainly does.
These trolls time and time again misinterpret what the evidence says.
As far as Corbett goes, every time he posts something, you can believe it's a lie, especially when he doesn't back it up with evidence.
On Fri, 6 Oct 2023 14:04:36 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
<gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 3:52:30?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
If the FBI Summary Report is accepted, there is no such thing as an SBT -
It says it on the very first page:
"....three shots were fired. Two struck President Kennedy and one wounded Governor Connally." ( CD 1, pg. 1 )
Of course the idiot trolls either can't comprehend what is being said here.
The FBI didn't say that two shots hit Kennedy and one of these shots also hit Connally.
And then avoided saying where the third shot ended up.
This is what the trolls interpret it to mean.
But as usual, their interpretation is wrong.
The FBI gave a total number of shots fired, then broke them down:
3 shots fired
2 hit Kennedy
1 wounded Connally
-----------------------------------
That totals 3.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/page-1.png
No mention of a missed shot or a bullet splitting or any other nonsense.
3 shots,
2 hit the President,
1 wounded the governor
3 shots
The trolls claim that this doesn't preclude the SBT. It most certainly does.
These trolls time and time again misinterpret what the evidence says.The FBI report also makes it crystal clear that the shot hitting JFK
As far as Corbett goes, every time he posts something, you can believe it's a lie, especially when he doesn't back it up with evidence.
in the back only went in a short distance - IT DID NOT TRANSIT.
Morons are those who simply make up things, and can't support them
with citations to the evidence.
Corbutt is one such moron, but he isn't the only one - watch as not a
SNGLE other believer is willing to correct Corbutt's lie.
On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 3:52:30 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
If the FBI Summary Report is accepted, there is no such thing as an SBT -It says it on the very first page:
"....three shots were fired. Two struck President Kennedy and one wounded Governor Connally." ( CD 1, pg. 1 )
Of course the idiot trolls either can't comprehend what is being said here.
The FBI didn't say that two shots hit Kennedy and one of these shots also hit Connally.
And then avoided saying where the third shot ended up.
This is what the trolls interpret it to mean.
But as usual, their interpretation is wrong.
The FBI gave a total number of shots fired, then broke them down:
3 shots fired
2 hit Kennedy
1 wounded Connally
-----------------------------------
That totals 3.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/page-1.png
No mention of a missed shot or a bullet splitting or any other nonsense.
3 shots,
2 hit the President,
1 wounded the governor
3 shots
The trolls claim that this doesn't preclude the SBT. It most certainly does.
These trolls time and time again misinterpret what the evidence says.
As far as Corbett goes, every time he posts something, you can believe it's a lie, especially when he doesn't back it up with evidence.
On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 5:04:37?PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 3:52:30?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
If the FBI Summary Report is accepted, there is no such thing as an SBT - >> It says it on the very first page:
"....three shots were fired. Two struck President Kennedy and one wounded Governor Connally." ( CD 1, pg. 1 )
Of course the idiot trolls either can't comprehend what is being said here. >>
The FBI didn't say that two shots hit Kennedy and one of these shots also hit Connally.
And then avoided saying where the third shot ended up.
This is what the trolls interpret it to mean.
But as usual, their interpretation is wrong.
The FBI gave a total number of shots fired, then broke them down:
3 shots fired
2 hit Kennedy
1 wounded Connally
-----------------------------------
That totals 3.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/page-1.png
No mention of a missed shot or a bullet splitting or any other nonsense.
3 shots,
2 hit the President,
1 wounded the governor
3 shots
The trolls claim that this doesn't preclude the SBT. It most certainly does. >>
These trolls time and time again misinterpret what the evidence says.
As far as Corbett goes, every time he posts something, you can believe it's a lie, especially when he doesn't back it up with evidence.
I'll ask you a hypothetical question, Gil.
Person A and Person B are in a direct line with Person C.
Person C fires a shot at Person A and misses both Person A and Person B. >Person C fires another shot at Person A which goes through him and strikes Person B.
Person C fires another shot at Person A which also goes through him but misses Person B who
has already fallen to the ground.
How many shots did Person C fire?
How many shots hit Person A?
How many shots hit Person B?
Take your time. These are toughies.
On Fri, 6 Oct 2023 15:41:26 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 5:04:37?PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 3:52:30?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
If the FBI Summary Report is accepted, there is no such thing as an SBT -It says it on the very first page:
"....three shots were fired. Two struck President Kennedy and one wounded Governor Connally." ( CD 1, pg. 1 )
Of course the idiot trolls either can't comprehend what is being said here.
The FBI didn't say that two shots hit Kennedy and one of these shots also hit Connally.
And then avoided saying where the third shot ended up.
This is what the trolls interpret it to mean.
But as usual, their interpretation is wrong.
The FBI gave a total number of shots fired, then broke them down:
3 shots fired
2 hit Kennedy
1 wounded Connally
-----------------------------------
That totals 3.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/page-1.png
No mention of a missed shot or a bullet splitting or any other nonsense. >> 3 shots,
2 hit the President,
1 wounded the governor
3 shots
The trolls claim that this doesn't preclude the SBT. It most certainly does.
These trolls time and time again misinterpret what the evidence says.
As far as Corbett goes, every time he posts something, you can believe it's a lie, especially when he doesn't back it up with evidence.
I'll ask you a hypothetical question, Gil.
Person A and Person B are in a direct line with Person C.
Person C fires a shot at Person A and misses both Person A and Person B. >Person C fires another shot at Person A which goes through him and strikes Person B.
Person C fires another shot at Person A which also goes through him but misses Person B who
has already fallen to the ground.
How many shots did Person C fire?
How many shots hit Person A?
How many shots hit Person B?
Take your time. These are toughies.NO STUPID!!! We don't need your hypothetical questions...
What we *NEED* is a citation for your claim that the FBI Summary
Report doesn't rule out the SBT.
If the FBI Summary Report is accepted, there is no such thing as an
SBT - Corbutt can't seem to understand that simple fact.
And since he was terrified of having to defend Bugliosi, and ran away,
he pretends he doesn't need to answer me.
But his lies are posted for all to see, AND NOT ONE SINGLE BELIEVER
DARES TO TRY TO DEFEND CORBUTT'S LIE.
On Fri, 06 Oct 2023 12:52:28 -0700, Ben Holmes <Ad...@ConspiracyJFKForum.com> wrote:
If the FBI Summary Report is accepted, there is no such thing as an
SBT - Corbutt can't seem to understand that simple fact.
And since he was terrified of having to defend Bugliosi, and ran away,
he pretends he doesn't need to answer me.
But his lies are posted for all to see, AND NOT ONE SINGLE BELIEVERNothing has changed...
DARES TO TRY TO DEFEND CORBUTT'S LIE.
Corbutt refuses to cite for his claim, and
Chickenshit refuses to defend or refute Corbutt either.
No-one has stepped up to the plate to defend Corbutt's lie.
The FBI Report of 12/9/63 did definitely determine (incorrectly, of course) that each of the 3 bullets fired by Oswald hit a victim (either JFK or Connally). This FBI conclusion is confirmed on Page 18 of the 12/9/63 FBI Report [linked below], whichsays (incorrectly, of course) that the bullet which entered Kennedy's upper back had "no point of exit"....
https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=10402#relPageId=25
The silly FBI men (as of early December 1963 at any rate) evidently hadn't even bothered to read the official JFK Autopsy Report, which says, plain as day, that the bullet that entered JFK's back "made its exit" at the front of the neck.
I talk about the various errors in the FBI Report here:
http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2010/06/12-9-63-fbi-report.html
On Saturday, October
I was merely pointing out to Gil that his highlighted passage was perfectly compatible with the SBT.
On Saturday, October 7, 2023 at 8:42:40 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Saturday, OctoberWell, no, not really. Unless you want to just totally ignore what the VERY SAME FBI REPORT said on page 18 of that SAME report, which states (incorrectly) that the upper-back bullet had "no point of exit" on JFK's body.
I was merely pointing out to Gil that his highlighted passage was perfectly compatible with the SBT.
https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=10402#relPageId=25
On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 3:52:30 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
If the FBI Summary Report is accepted, there is no such thing as an SBT -It says it on the very first page:
"....three shots were fired. Two struck President Kennedy and one wounded Governor Connally." ( CD 1, pg. 1 )
Of course the idiot trolls either can't comprehend what is being said here.
The FBI didn't say that two shots hit Kennedy and one of these shots also hit Connally.
And then avoided saying where the third shot ended up.
This is what the trolls interpret it to mean.
But as usual, their interpretation is wrong.
The FBI gave a total number of shots fired, then broke them down:
3 shots fired
2 hit Kennedy
1 wounded Connally
-----------------------------------
That totals 3.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/page-1.png
No mention of a missed shot or a bullet splitting or any other nonsense.
3 shots,
2 hit the President,
1 wounded the governor
3 shots
The trolls claim that this doesn't preclude the SBT. It most certainly does.
These trolls time and time again misinterpret what the evidence says.
As far as Corbett goes, every time he posts something, you can believe it's a lie, especially when he doesn't back it up with evidence.
On Sunday, October 8, 2023 at 11:31:30 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
< more bullshit comments that were deleted >
The final word on what the FBI Summary Report said comes from J.Edgar Hoover himself.
In this phone call to LBJ, Hoover describes specifically what shot did what. His description confirms what I said they reported in their Summary Report and is in direct conflict with the Single Bullet Theory.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/hoover-to-lbj-3-shots-3-hits.mp4
Corbett, Bud and Chuckles can suck it.
The FBI Report of 12/9/63 did definitely determine (incorrectly, of course) that each of the 3 bullets fired by Oswald hit a victim (either JFK or Connally). This FBI conclusion is confirmed on Page 18 of the 12/9/63 FBI Report [linked below], whichsays (incorrectly, of course) that the bullet which entered Kennedy's upper back had "no point of exit"....
https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=10402#relPageId=25
The silly FBI men (as of early December 1963 at any rate) evidently hadn't even bothered to read the official JFK Autopsy Report, which says, plain as day, that the bullet that entered JFK's back "made its exit" at the front of the neck.
I talk about the various errors in the FBI Report here:
http://jfk-archives.blo
On Saturday, October 7, 2023 at 12:53:37?AM UTC-4, David Von Pein wrote:says (incorrectly, of course) that the bullet which entered Kennedy's upper back had "no point of exit"....
The FBI Report of 12/9/63 did definitely determine (incorrectly, of course) that each of the 3 bullets fired by Oswald hit a victim (either JFK or Connally). This FBI conclusion is confirmed on Page 18 of the 12/9/63 FBI Report [linked below], which
https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=10402#relPageId=25
The silly FBI men (as of early December 1963 at any rate) evidently hadn't even bothered to read the official JFK Autopsy Report, which says, plain as day, that the bullet that entered JFK's back "made its exit" at the front of the neck.
I talk about the various errors in the FBI Report here:
http://jfk-archives.blo
My comments were directed at the link Gil provided
Corroborated by the FBI https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/page-1.png
and specifically at the passage he highlighted.
I made it a point not to dispute the fact the FBI's initial conclusions were that the men were hit
by separate shots because I knew they were.
I was merely pointing out to Gil that his highlighted
passage was perfectly compatible with the SBT.
If the FBI Summary Report is accepted, there is no such thing as an
SBT - Corbutt can't seem to understand that simple fact.
And since he was terrified of having to defend Bugliosi, and ran away,
he pretends he doesn't need to answer me.
But his lies are posted for all to see, AND NOT ONE SINGLE BELIEVER
DARES TO TRY TO DEFEND CORBUTT'S LIE.
On Sunday, October 8, 2023 at 11:31:30?PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
< more bullshit comments that were deleted >
The final word on what the FBI Summary Report said comes from J.Edgar Hoover himself.
In this phone call to LBJ, Hoover describes specifically what shot did what. >His description confirms what I said they reported in their Summary Report and is in direct conflict with the Single Bullet Theory.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/hoover-to-lbj-3-shots-3-hits.mp4
Corbett, Bud and Chuckles can suck it.
On Monday, October 9, 2023 at 4:29:40?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Sunday, October 8, 2023 at 11:31:30?PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
< more bullshit comments that were deleted >
The final word on what the FBI Summary Report said comes from J.Edgar Hoover himself.
In this phone call to LBJ, Hoover describes specifically what shot did what. >> His description confirms what I said they reported in their Summary Report and is in direct conflict with the Single Bullet Theory.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/hoover-to-lbj-3-shots-3-hits.mp4
Corbett, Bud and Chuckles can suck it.
On Sunday, October 8, 2023 at 11:31:30 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
< more bullshit comments that were deleted >
The final word on what the FBI Summary Report said comes from J.Edgar Hoover himself.
In this phone call to LBJ, Hoover describes specifically what shot did what. His description confirms what I said they reported in their Summary Report and is in direct conflict with the Single Bullet Theory.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/hoover-to-lbj-3-shots-3-hits.mp4
Corbett, Bud and Chuckles can suck it.
On Monday, October 9, 2023 at 5:29:40?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Sunday, October 8, 2023 at 11:31:30?PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
< more bullshit comments that were deleted >
The final word on what the FBI Summary Report said comes from J.Edgar Hoover himself.
In this phone call to LBJ, Hoover describes specifically what shot did what. >> His description confirms what I said they reported in their Summary Report and is in direct conflict with the Single Bullet Theory.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/hoover-to-lbj-3-shots-3-hits.mp4
Corbett, Bud and Chuckles can suck it.
Gil, this isn't about the FBI Summary Report.
On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 02:29:37 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
<gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, October 8, 2023 at 11:31:30?PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
< more bullshit comments that were deleted >
The final word on what the FBI Summary Report said comes from J.Edgar Hoover himself.
In this phone call to LBJ, Hoover describes specifically what shot did what.
His description confirms what I said they reported in their Summary Report and is in direct conflict with the Single Bullet Theory.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/hoover-to-lbj-3-shots-3-hits.mp4
Corbett, Bud and Chuckles can suck it.
Let's not forget Huckster, who's reading all this, and remaining
silent like the coward he is...
On Monday, October 9, 2023 at 9:16:37 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 02:29:37 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
<gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, October 8, 2023 at 11:31:30?PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
< more bullshit comments that were deleted >
The final word on what the FBI Summary Report said comes from J.Edgar Hoover himself.
In this phone call to LBJ, Hoover describes specifically what shot did what.
His description confirms what I said they reported in their Summary Report and is in direct conflict with the Single Bullet Theory.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/hoover-to-lbj-3-shots-3-hits.mp4
Corbett, Bud and Chuckles can suck it.
Let's not forget Huckster, who's reading all this, and remainingOr maybe just bored of your petty snit fits.
silent like the coward he is...
On Monday, October 9, 2023 at 1:46:09?PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Monday, October 9, 2023 at 9:16:37?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 02:29:37 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
<gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, October 8, 2023 at 11:31:30?PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote: >>>>< more bullshit comments that were deleted >
The final word on what the FBI Summary Report said comes from J.Edgar Hoover himself.
In this phone call to LBJ, Hoover describes specifically what shot did what.
His description confirms what I said they reported in their Summary Report and is in direct conflict with the Single Bullet Theory.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/hoover-to-lbj-3-shots-3-hits.mp4
Corbett, Bud and Chuckles can suck it.
Let's not forget Huckster, who's reading all this, and remaining
silent like the coward he is...
On Monday, October 9, 2023 at 9:16:37?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 02:29:37 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
<gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, October 8, 2023 at 11:31:30?PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
< more bullshit comments that were deleted >
The final word on what the FBI Summary Report said comes from J.Edgar Hoover himself.
In this phone call to LBJ, Hoover describes specifically what shot did what. >>>His description confirms what I said they reported in their Summary Report and is in direct conflict with the Single Bullet Theory.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/hoover-to-lbj-3-shots-3-hits.mp4
Corbett, Bud and Chuckles can suck it.
Let's not forget Huckster, who's reading all this, and remaining
silent like the coward he is...
Or maybe ...
On Monday, October 9, 2023 at 4:57:53?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 10:46:07 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, October 9, 2023 at 9:16:37?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 02:29:37 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
<gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, October 8, 2023 at 11:31:30?PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote: >>>>>< more bullshit comments that were deleted >
The final word on what the FBI Summary Report said comes from J.Edgar Hoover himself.
In this phone call to LBJ, Hoover describes specifically what shot did what.
His description confirms what I said they reported in their Summary Report and is in direct conflict with the Single Bullet Theory.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/hoover-to-lbj-3-shots-3-hits.mp4
Corbett, Bud and Chuckles can suck it.
Let's not forget Huckster, who's reading all this, and remaining
silent like the coward he is...
Or maybe ...
Sorry stupid, no speculation allowed.
On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 10:46:07 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, October 9, 2023 at 9:16:37?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 02:29:37 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
<gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, October 8, 2023 at 11:31:30?PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote: >>>< more bullshit comments that were deleted >
The final word on what the FBI Summary Report said comes from J.Edgar Hoover himself.
In this phone call to LBJ, Hoover describes specifically what shot did what.
His description confirms what I said they reported in their Summary Report and is in direct conflict with the Single Bullet Theory.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/hoover-to-lbj-3-shots-3-hits.mp4
Corbett, Bud and Chuckles can suck it.
Let's not forget Huckster, who's reading all this, and remaining
silent like the coward he is...
Or maybe ...
Sorry stupid, no speculation allowed.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 297 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 105:20:10 |
Calls: | 6,660 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 12,209 |
Messages: | 5,335,313 |