On Saturday, December 2, 2023 at 11:57:15?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Saturday, December 2, 2023 at 11:08:01?AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
Why is it you can't name a single forensic medical examiner who believes theBecause no forensic medical examiner saw the wound before the tracheostomy was done.
medical evidence indicates JFK was struck by a bullet from the front or the >>> side?
Neither the original autopsy team nor the FPP panel got to see the wound before the tracheostomy incision was made and
they were able to unanimously conclude ...
Now it's my turn:
1. Name one person who saw the throat wound BEFORE the tracheostomy was done and described it conclusively as an exit wound.
No qualified medical examiner saw the wound before the incision was made.
2. Tells us why the Dallas doctors were not qualified to identify an entrance wound.
Because that is not what they were trained to do.
On Sunday, December 3, 2023 at 4:10:08?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Saturday, December 2, 2023 at 4:19:10?PM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
And where is the "large irregular defect" in that occipital region depicted in this autopsy photo ?
"If you answer questions with questions....you're a Lone Nutter." ------- Giltardo
Why is it you can't name a single forensic medical examiner who believes the >medical evidence indicates JFK was struck by a bullet from the front or the >side? Notice I am asking for medical evidence. Not an interpretation of the >Z-film.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 297 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 107:15:00 |
Calls: | 6,662 |
Calls today: | 4 |
Files: | 12,209 |
Messages: | 5,335,482 |