• Wanda Daniel says Chris Davidson enhancement is not Sarah Stanton

    From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to All on Fri Oct 6 05:15:16 2023
    https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/the-davidson-enhancement.mp4

    GAME OVER

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chuck Schuyler@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Fri Oct 6 05:25:59 2023
    On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 7:15:18 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
    https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/the-davidson-enhancement.mp4

    GAME OVER

    Retard Gil picks on the lowest retard, Brian Doyle. Ironically, both retard Gil and retard Doyle are teammates of sorts, as they both believe Oswald was TOTALLY INNOCENT of anything on 11/22/63. Retard Doyle is just obsessed with some tempest-in-a-teapot
    argument about the identity of some person in a blurry photo. There is a pecking order in the JFK conspiracy hobby community, and poor Brian Doyle is on the bottom, just slightly ahead of Sky Throne/Flags, who thinks Oswald fired a shot at the JFK
    motorcade from the grassy knoll and then high-tailed it back inside the TSBD. Doyle is the poor runt of the JFK conspiracy hobby litter. The other hobbyists resent Doyle for "sullying" their own years of fine research they believe has proved that on 11/
    22/63, some people did something. What a bunch of nuts.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to All on Fri Oct 6 06:17:00 2023
    On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 8:15:18 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:



    Because there is no honest moderation or Peer Review on the JFK internet Gil gets away with children's games of trying to make important evidence look bad for trolling purposes...Gil is a person of lesser character and intelligence so it doesn't register
    with him what a bad thing he's doing for Conspiracy research...I sprung the Davidson enhancement on Rosa and Wanda with them having no background on it or its meaning...It is obvious to mature adults that Wanda and Rosa simply reacted to the blurry
    nature of the poor resolution photograph and said it did not look like Sarah Stanton...Gil is a liar so he wants you to think that's where it ends...

    Gil is playing children's games here because he is dishonestly ignoring that Wanda confirmed to me that Prayer Man was her grand mother Sarah and in doing so therefore confirmed that Davidson did look like Sarah...And to make matters worse, in his effort
    to screw up important Conspiracy evidence, Gil ignores that Sarah's obesity can be seen in her chubby cheeks in Davidson...Gil deals at a shallow level so he doesn't notice that once Davidson showed Prayer Man was female Kamp's own research forces Prayer
    Man to be Stanton...Gil also stupidly ignores that Wanda sent me a photo of herself holding Sarah's purse that she thought might be the one Sarah is holding in the Prayer Man photography...Gil is as dumb as he is dishonest because once Wanda admitted to
    me that Prayer Man was her grand mother therefore Davidson must look like Sarah by default and they were simply under-informed and reacting to the poor resolution...This is the conclusion mature, intelligent researchers would come to...However the
    present JFK internet has been infected by the clowns over at ROKC and boorish Jerry Springer UK-type research has been imported in to the serious JFK research realm by those jerks and we end up with disrespectful stupidity like that you see here from Gil.
    ..And you see it being used against one of the most important research discoveries in assassination history...Gil shows that JFK research is really based on trolling packs and clique membership...He doesn't give a damn about serious research and in doing
    so shows his shallow stupidity...

    Gil is intentionally seeking to misrepresent my interview with the Daniels...He is deliberately trying to misrepresent my important Conspiracy evidence and what Wanda really said...This is done to such a degree of malice and intentional harm that Gil has
    probably crossed some legal boundaries of criminal cyber bullying and harassment...Wanda fully endorses my claim that Prayer Man is Stanton but you wouldn't get that from Gil's underhanded attempt to decieve the public above...And what kind of assholes
    does the research community consist of that no one defends me and says "that's not right because he's produced a solid case that Stanton was Prayer Man and Wanda agreed"?...What kind of assholes does the research community consist of that they let this
    kind of depraved and despicable abuse happen to a good researcher and his important evidence?...

    There's no credible Peer Review or moderation on the JFK internet...Gil is the kind of guy who hits a blind-folded researcher, whose hands are tied behind his back with unfair banning and censorship, from behind...He's a good example of the "JFK Research
    Community"...Gil will run off and not answer this too like he does every time he gets out-argued...Why answer when you have a dirty clique giving you an automatic win every time?...



    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to chuckschuyler123@gmail.com on Fri Oct 6 07:55:48 2023
    On Fri, 6 Oct 2023 05:25:59 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <chuckschuyler123@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 7:15:18?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
    https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/the-davidson-enhancement.mp4

    GAME OVER

    Logical fallacy deleted.

    If logical fallacies were simply not allowed, believers wouldn't have
    much to say at all.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Fri Oct 6 08:44:48 2023
    On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 10:55:57 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Fri, 6 Oct 2023 05:25:59 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 7:15:18?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
    https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/the-davidson-enhancement.mp4

    GAME OVER
    Logical fallacy deleted.

    If logical fallacies were simply not allowed, believers wouldn't have
    much to say at all.




    Just to show how stupid Ben is he is calling me a "believer" (and Gil isn't going to correct him)...

    Please fuck off out of this thread Ben and have respect for being On-Topic...

    Gil will cut and run once again when it comes to answering for his lies...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to Brian Doyle on Fri Oct 6 09:23:53 2023
    On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 11:44:50 AM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
    Gil will cut and run once again when it comes to answering for his lies...

    I said that Wanda Daniel said the Davidson enhancement is not Sarah Stanton. The recording bears me out.
    Now prove the recording is a lie.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to Chuck Schuyler on Fri Oct 6 09:26:53 2023
    On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 8:26:01 AM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
    Retard Gil picks on the lowest retard, Brian Doyle. Ironically, both retard Gil and retard Doyle are teammates of sorts, as they both believe Oswald was TOTALLY INNOCENT of anything on 11/22/63. Retard Doyle is just obsessed with some tempest-in-a-
    teapot argument about the identity of some person in a blurry photo. There is a pecking order in the JFK conspiracy hobby community, and poor Brian Doyle is on the bottom, just slightly ahead of Sky Throne/Flags, who thinks Oswald fired a shot at the JFK
    motorcade from the grassy knoll and then high-tailed it back inside the TSBD. Doyle is the poor runt of the JFK conspiracy hobby litter. The other hobbyists resent Doyle for "sullying" their own years of fine research they believe has proved that on 11/
    22/63, some people did something. What a bunch of nuts.

    Typical asshole Chucky response.
    Nothing to provide but insults to a number of people.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Fri Oct 6 09:30:10 2023
    On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 12:23:55 PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 11:44:50 AM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:



    Gil will cut and run once again when it comes to answering for his lies...

    I said that Wanda Daniel said the Davidson enhancement is not Sarah Stanton. The recording bears me out.
    Now prove the recording is a lie.


    You're trolling Gil...

    You wouldn't get away with that in a properly moderated and Peer Reviewed research community...

    This evidence is too important for Iacoletti-type children's games...

    Wanda Daniel strongly agreed Prayer Man was Sarah Stanton whether she identified Davidson as looking like Sarah or not...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to Brian Doyle on Fri Oct 6 09:35:13 2023
    On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 12:30:13 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
    Wanda Daniel strongly agreed Prayer Man was Sarah Stanton whether she identified Davidson as looking like Sarah or not...

    Citation ?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Sat Oct 7 07:27:45 2023
    On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 12:35:15 PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 12:30:13 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:




    The source is Wanda Daniel...

    Only an unserious researcher would attack such important evidence of this level and significance...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Greg Parker@21:1/5 to Brian Doyle on Sat Oct 7 21:32:35 2023
    On Saturday, October 7, 2023 at 3:30:13 AM UTC+11, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 12:23:55 PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 11:44:50 AM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:



    Gil will cut and run once again when it comes to answering for his lies...

    I said that Wanda Daniel said the Davidson enhancement is not Sarah Stanton.
    The recording bears me out.
    Now prove the recording is a lie.
    You're trolling Gil...

    You wouldn't get away with that in a properly moderated and Peer Reviewed research community...

    This evidence is too important for Iacoletti-type children's games...

    Wanda Daniel strongly agreed Prayer Man was Sarah Stanton whether she identified Davidson as looking like Sarah or not...

    WTF? Chris Davidson looks like Sarah Stanton, a 300 pound female in a scoop neck dress and wearing a wig, who who in turn looked like a 140 pound male with receding hair?

    That's it. I'm coming over to Sanibel to inspect your wild mushrooms.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to Greg Parker on Sun Oct 8 10:41:31 2023
    On Sunday, October 8, 2023 at 12:32:37 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Saturday, October 7, 2023 at 3:30:13 AM UTC+11, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 12:23:55 PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:


    Greg trolls when cornered by evidence...

    Even though Greg lied about it he did invent the Prayer Man theory and Sean Murphy ran with it...So Greg is the source for the main bogus Prayer Man theory that is infecting the credible JFK research community...

    Greg has successfully infiltrated and neutralized the credible JFK research community with this disinformation and it has directly led to the best research being ignored and bogus research taking up all the space on JFK websites...

    Davidson doesn't help because, even though his skill has refuted the Prayer Man theory, he refuses to endorse or defend his own discoveries and has aided in their defeat through inaction...

    The posters in the current Education Forum thread have used a dirty moderator to exclude the correct evidence of Davidson's two enhancements...One of Sarah Stanton's face on Prayer Man in Wiegman, and one of a woman's Scoop Dress Neckline on Prayer Man
    in Darnell...If these images were brought to credible Peer Review they would automatically settle the issue and confirm the correct evidence that Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...The posters in the current Prayer Man thread on the Education Forum are
    consciously avoiding that Peer Review and therefore knowingly violating the rules of research under James Gordon who lies and says he is strictly enforcing those same rules of research...Honest people will notice that the posters in that thread are
    avoiding any displaying of Davidson's enhancement because they are perfectly aware of all this and do not want to introduce the evidence that refutes them...It is pure, criminal organized dishonesty that deserves no berth in the research community...

    If you read Bojzcuk's windy pseudo-analysis he forgets to mention Prayer Man's height in his false technical presentation...All the phony technical arguments Bojczuk makes are instantly cut down by observing Prayer Man's height that is more than apparent
    in all the images he analyzes (but forgets to mention the height issue)...Bojczuk would have you believe this is a matter of pixels and obtaining better images, however he is filibustering in order to distract from the fact all the images possess enough
    data to easily show that Prayer Man is a full head shorter than Buell Frazier and therefore cannot be Oswald...The Prayer Man people have used censorship to hijack the entire JFK internet in order to avoid the simple proof of Prayer Man's height that is
    more than visible in the available imagery and all the present pixels...They have hijacked the JFK internet with demands for better images when they are doing so for the dishonest purpose of avoiding admitting that the current images possess data, like
    Prayer Man's height, that more than conclusively proves Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...What I write here, if posted on the Education Forum, would end the issue and expose the false dialogue currently being forced...It is being deliberately suppressed by
    people who are perfectly aware of it but are dishonestly refusing to pass it along...The troll Greg Parker you see above is responsible and the community has chosen him and his demented trolling as their choice...

    You can't cheat the truth, which is why it is the truth, and they know who is correct here...They wouldn't censor it so hard unless they did...They know who's in charge and it isn't the trolls...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Greg Parker@21:1/5 to Brian Doyle on Sun Oct 8 16:15:25 2023
    On Monday, October 9, 2023 at 4:41:33 AM UTC+11, Brian Doyle wrote:

    Greg Parker is responsible and the community has chosen him as their choice...

    Thank you, Brian, for that acknowledgement. Our little Brian is finally growing up.

    If you keep up the growth, tomorrow I may let you fetch my beer.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to Greg Parker on Mon Oct 9 10:06:13 2023
    On Sunday, October 8, 2023 at 7:15:27 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Monday, October 9, 2023 at 4:41:33 AM UTC+11, Brian Doyle wrote:



    Greg is trolling in order to avoid the main issue that Wanda Daniel refuted his garbage Prayer Man theory that is now fatally infecting the credible research community thanks to irresponsible useful idiot researchers like Larsen and DiEugenio...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From robert johnson@21:1/5 to All on Tue Oct 10 07:29:55 2023
    DOYLE YOU RETARDED DUMB CUNT

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)