So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.
It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)
So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.
But he can't... he knows where this is going, and he's simply
TERRIFIED of what happens next.
So Chickenshit needs to simply ignore the questions.
Just like Huckster does - who's been running from this one for weeks
now:
************************************************************
You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.
Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?
You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.
Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?
Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?
Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.
More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.
Are you proud of yourself? ***********************************************************
Amusingly, Huckster finally decided that he'd challenge me, but was completely unaware of the Ace I held... his prior post stating that Chickenshit speaks for him. So what Chickenshit says - HUCKSTER
SIENZANT HAS TO DEFEND.
Chickenshit hopes that Huckster will continue his cowardice, because
he knows if Huckster ever told the truth, he'd be refuting
Chickenshit.
Huckster knows this too... which is why he's now claiming that he was
just being "whimsical" in his assertion.
Why does the "truth" have to be supported with lies, "whimsy," logical fallacies, and cowardice?
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.
It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)
So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.
But he can't... he knows where this is going, and he's simply
TERRIFIED of what happens next.
So Chickenshit needs to simply ignore the questions.
Just like Huckster does - who's been running from this one for weeks
now:
************************************************************
You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.
Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?
You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.
Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?
Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?
Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.
More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.
Are you proud of yourself? ***********************************************************
Amusingly, Huckster finally decided that he'd challenge me, but was completely unaware of the Ace I held... his prior post stating that Chickenshit speaks for him. So what Chickenshit says - HUCKSTER
SIENZANT HAS TO DEFEND.
Chickenshit hopes that Huckster will continue his cowardice, because
he knows if Huckster ever told the truth, he'd be refuting
Chickenshit.
Huckster knows this too... which is why he's now claiming that he was
just being "whimsical" in his assertion.
Is Hank your sock puppet or are you his?
Are you his designated representative? Do you have a contract to speak for him? Have you discussed this with him privately or are you just making this shit up on the fly? Rhetorical question. We both know the answer.
Why does the "truth" have to be supported with lies, "whimsy," logical fallacies, and cowardice?
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 11:31:49 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.
It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)
So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.
But he can't... he knows where this is going, and he's simply
TERRIFIED of what happens next.
So Chickenshit needs to simply ignore the questions.
Just like Huckster does - who's been running from this one for weeks
now:
************************************************************
You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the description of the *location* of the large head wound.
Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?
You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.
Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?
Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?
Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.
More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.
Are you proud of yourself? ***********************************************************
Amusingly, Huckster finally decided that he'd challenge me, but was completely unaware of the Ace I held... his prior post stating that Chickenshit speaks for him. So what Chickenshit says - HUCKSTERWhat a bizarre approach.
SIENZANT HAS TO DEFEND.
Chickenshit hopes that Huckster will continue his cowardice, because
he knows if Huckster ever told the truth, he'd be refuting
Chickenshit.
Huckster knows this too... which is why he's now claiming that he wasWell, let's look at a small bit of the history of that thread.
just being "whimsical" in his assertion.
Bud expanded on a point I advanced here: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/-CUVS3Ytluw/m/KVTpWwyVCQAJ SkyThrone called Bud and me a "mental midget tag team" here: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/-CUVS3Ytluw/m/vtxszCacCQAJ
Greg Parker jumped on that, asking the below of Bud: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/-CUVS3Ytluw/m/zfiyumYXAgAJ == quote ==
Is Hank your sock puppet or are you his?
Both. 8 hours a day I man the CIA disinformation desk, using a multitude of aliases, and then Bud comes in and replaces me, and then a third person fills in the other eight hours.
Are you his designated representative? Do you have a contract to speak for him? Have you discussed this with him privately or are you just making this shit up on the fly? Rhetorical question. We both know the answer.
I hereby designate Bud to speak for me.
Happy? You CTs will find every way to avoid discussing the JFK assassination, won't you?mention it?
Greg, why not just stick to the JFK assassination instead of advancing ad hominem logical fallacies about other posters on this board? You only know I was Joe Zircon because I mentioned it. If there was anything nefarious behind the name, why would I
== unquote ==impart that knowledge than discuss the reading comprehension or sensitivity or psychological makeup of anyone else on this board. But I guess not, as demonstrated above, by Greg, Don, and Sky Throne. They've got nothing better to do than discuss me at
Now, did you think I was serious when I said I worked at the CIA for 8 hours a day, and then Bud came in to replace me for the next 8 hours?
Or did you think I was whimsical when I admonished Greg to "...just stick to the JFK assassination instead of advancing ad hominem logical fallacies about other posters on this board?"
Why does the "truth" have to be supported with lies, "whimsy," logical fallacies, and cowardice?You haven't shown I supported the truth with any of the above. Begged questions all.
PS: Greg Parker bailed from the thread - apparently having run out of ad hominem - after this post of mine:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/-CUVS3Ytluw/m/xAz6e_zFAgAJ
Which included this food for thought:
== quote ==
I am constantly amazed at how frequently these knowledgeable conspiracy theorists would rather talk about me than discuss all the knowledge they've gleaned from their research into the Kennedy assassination. You would think they'd be more eager to
== unquote ==
You and David are exhibiting more of the same ... discussing me instead of sharing that all-important knowledge of the assassination conspiracy you profess to have.
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 11:31:49?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.
It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)
So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.
But he can't... he knows where this is going, and he's simply
TERRIFIED of what happens next.
So Chickenshit needs to simply ignore the questions.
Just like Huckster does - who's been running from this one for weeks
now:
************************************************************
You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.
Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?
You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.
Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?
Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?
Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.
More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.
Are you proud of yourself?
***********************************************************
Amusingly, Huckster finally decided that he'd challenge me, but was
completely unaware of the Ace I held... his prior post stating that
Chickenshit speaks for him. So what Chickenshit says - HUCKSTER
SIENZANT HAS TO DEFEND.
What a bizarre approach.
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.
It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)
So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.
But he can't... he knows where this is going, and he's simply
TERRIFIED of what happens next.
So Chickenshit needs to simply ignore the questions.
Just like Huckster does - who's been running from this one for weeks
now:
************************************************************
You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.
Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?
You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.
Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?
Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?
Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.
More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.
Are you proud of yourself? >***********************************************************
Amusingly, Huckster finally decided that he'd challenge me, but was >completely unaware of the Ace I held... his prior post stating that >Chickenshit speaks for him. So what Chickenshit says - HUCKSTER
SIENZANT HAS TO DEFEND.
Chickenshit hopes that Huckster will continue his cowardice, because
he knows if Huckster ever told the truth, he'd be refuting
Chickenshit.
Huckster knows this too... which is why he's now claiming that he was
just being "whimsical" in his assertion.
Why does the "truth" have to be supported with lies, "whimsy," logical >fallacies, and cowardice?
On Fri, 29 Sep 2023 08:31:42 -0700, Ben Holmes <Ad...@ConspiracyJFKForum.com> wrote:
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.
It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)
So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.
But he can't... he knows where this is going, and he's simply
TERRIFIED of what happens next.
So Chickenshit needs to simply ignore the questions.
Just like Huckster does - who's been running from this one for weeks
now:
************************************************************
You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the >description of the *location* of the large head wound.
Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?
You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.
Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?
Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?
Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.
More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.
Are you proud of yourself? >***********************************************************
Amusingly, Huckster finally decided that he'd challenge me, but was >completely unaware of the Ace I held... his prior post stating that >Chickenshit speaks for him. So what Chickenshit says - HUCKSTER
SIENZANT HAS TO DEFEND.
Chickenshit hopes that Huckster will continue his cowardice, because
he knows if Huckster ever told the truth, he'd be refuting
Chickenshit.
Huckster knows this too... which is why he's now claiming that he was
just being "whimsical" in his assertion.
Why does the "truth" have to be supported with lies, "whimsy," logical >fallacies, and cowardice?Both Huckster & Chickenshit jumped.
Chickenshit's pathetic attempt failed, mine succeeded marvelously.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 118:11:36 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,210 |
| Messages: | 5,334,298 |