• Chris Davidson Ends Prayer Man Issue On MacRae's Forum

    From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to All on Wed Sep 27 12:26:16 2023
    Chris Davidson has ended the Prayer Man issue (once again) on Duncan's forum by posting an enhanced frame from Darnell that clearly shows a woman's dress neckline on Prayer Man - proving beyond a doubt that Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...

    That horizontal woman's dress "Scoop" neckline is also seen in the main Darnell Prayer Man image where you can clearly see a straight line horizontal divide between Prayer Man's skin on her breast and her dress...

    The linked image clearly shows Sarah Stanton and her woman's "scoop" neckline on her dress holding her purse up in front of her...The Prayer Man losers are of such low character and are such pathetic people that they won't admit even this undeniable
    evidence and they will continue to use their scummy control of the JFK internet through censorship to ignore this final proof...This also shows what an ass-kissing, cowardly, roaring asshole Gil Jesus is and how dishonest he is due to his dependency on
    the clique...Jim D??? :


    https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2639.2672.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to Brian Doyle on Thu Sep 28 01:52:31 2023
    On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 3:26:18 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote: >..This also shows what an ass-kissing, cowardly, roaring asshole Gil Jesus is and how dishonest he is due to his dependency on the clique...Jim D??? :


    https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2639.2672.html

    It figures. The first time you post a link and it's only accessable to members of that forum.
    Nice one, Mr. Researcher.
    You're just mad because this dishonest roaring asshole has proven you to be a liar more than once.

    First you had me in some sort of a clique at ROKC.
    Now you have me in some sort of a clique at the EF.
    All because I'M ON THE EDUCATION FORUM AND YOU'RE NOT and you're jealous.

    Now go take your medication and be a good boy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to Brian Doyle on Thu Sep 28 08:17:56 2023
    On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 3:26:18 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote: >..This also shows what an ass-kissing, cowardly, roaring asshole Gil Jesus is and how dishonest he is due to his dependency on the clique...Jim D??? :


    https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2639.2672.html

    Stop it, you're hurting my feelings.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chuck Schuyler@21:1/5 to Brian Doyle on Thu Sep 28 08:39:18 2023
    On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 2:26:18 PM UTC-5, Brian Doyle wrote:

    Chris Davidson has ended the Prayer Man issue (once again) on Duncan's forum by posting an enhanced frame from Darnell that clearly shows a woman's dress neckline on Prayer Man - proving beyond a doubt that Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...

    Now what?

    That horizontal woman's dress "Scoop" neckline is also seen in the main Darnell Prayer Man image where you can clearly see a straight line horizontal divide between Prayer Man's skin on her breast and her dress...

    The linked image clearly shows Sarah Stanton and her woman's "scoop" neckline on her dress holding her purse up in front of her...The Prayer Man losers are of such low character and are such pathetic people that they won't admit even this undeniable
    evidence and they will continue to use their scummy control of the JFK internet through censorship to ignore this final proof...This also shows what an ass-kissing, cowardly, roaring asshole Gil Jesus is and how dishonest he is due to his dependency on
    the clique...Jim D??? :


    https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2639.2672.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to Chuck Schuyler on Thu Sep 28 09:26:52 2023
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 11:39:19 AM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 2:26:18 PM UTC-5, Brian Doyle wrote:




    Now what?


    Well, I guess we can agree Gil isn't a serious researcher and, like Greg Parker, trolls when out-argued...

    Gil is trolling and gives no serious response to the evidence Davidson produced that Stanton's female dress "scoop" neckline was seen on Prayer Man in Darnell...You can see what Gil does when you provide the serious evidence he calls for...He's a piece
    of shit...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chuck Schuyler@21:1/5 to Brian Doyle on Thu Sep 28 11:00:02 2023
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 11:26:54 AM UTC-5, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 11:39:19 AM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 2:26:18 PM UTC-5, Brian Doyle wrote:

    Now what?


    Well, I guess we can agree Gil isn't a serious researcher and, like Greg Parker, trolls when out-argued...

    Gil is trolling and gives no serious response to the evidence Davidson produced that Stanton's female dress "scoop" neckline was seen on Prayer Man in Darnell...You can see what Gil does when you provide the serious evidence he calls for...He's a piece
    of shit...

    Now what? We can all agree Gil is a piece of shit, but your position--except with this sort of side issue--isn't any different than Gil's or Ben's position on the murder: JFK was assassinated by unknown snipers firing unknown caliber weapons from
    unspecified locations.

    Where do you differ from Gil or Ben?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to chuckschuyler123@gmail.com on Thu Sep 28 11:38:35 2023
    On Thu, 28 Sep 2023 11:00:02 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <chuckschuyler123@gmail.com> wrote:


    Now what? We can all agree ...

    When all you have is logical fallacies...

    You.

    Lose.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Healy@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Thu Sep 28 18:19:18 2023
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 11:38:40 AM UTC-7, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Thu, 28 Sep 2023 11:00:02 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:


    Now what? We can all agree ...

    When all you have is logical fallacies...

    You.

    Lose.

    old Chuckles da Asshat forgot about those pesky, little things...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chuck Schuyler@21:1/5 to David Healy on Thu Sep 28 19:16:25 2023
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 8:19:19 PM UTC-5, David Healy wrote:
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 11:38:40 AM UTC-7, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Thu, 28 Sep 2023 11:00:02 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:


    Now what? We can all agree ...

    When all you have is logical fallacies...

    You.

    Lose.

    old Chuckles da Asshat forgot about those pesky, little things...


    ((!!**HICCUP**!!))

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to All on Sat Sep 30 08:56:24 2023
    On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 3:26:18 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:



    As long as the so-called research community ignores Chris Davidson's dead proof of Prayer Man having a clearly-visible woman's "scoop" neckline on her dress I own that community and have defeated them even from the disadvantaged territory of banning...

    Jim DiEugenio and the research community on the Education Forum are dirty because they are pretending they are getting away with ignoring Chris Davidson's enhancement of the Darnell frame that clearly shows an issue-ending woman's dress neckline on
    Prayer Man proving Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...They are refusing to post that image on the forum because they are well aware that it refutes Prayer Man...That makes them dirty and dishonest and in contempt of the normal research practices they say they
    practice...Under that stupid son of a bitch Gordon the Education Forum is refusing to practice normal Peer Review of Davidson's enhancements from Wiegman and Darnell...Both those enhancements decisively show Sarah Stanton as being Prayer Man...This is a
    research community that is so corrupted that you can literally show them Sarah Stanton's face on Prayer Man and they will ignore it and continue to offer their garbage claims...And they protect that with credibility-destroying censorship that originates
    from a person with no research credibility...

    They are cowards and Davidson is the chip on my shoulder that none of those cowards have ever honestly come and tried to knock off...They directly depend on censorship and ignoring...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From robert johnson@21:1/5 to All on Sat Sep 30 09:31:18 2023
    THEY ARE NOT COWARDS
    THEY STAND UP TO TROLL CUNTS LIKE YOU

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to All on Sat Sep 30 10:47:40 2023
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 12:31:20 PM UTC-4, robert johnson wrote:



    Davidson's proof of a female neckline on Prayer Man's dress can be seen here:


    https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100064669963405

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NoTrueFlags Here@21:1/5 to Brian Doyle on Sat Sep 30 11:56:38 2023
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 1:47:41 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 12:31:20 PM UTC-4, robert johnson wrote:



    Davidson's proof of a female neckline on Prayer Man's dress can be seen here:


    https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100064669963405

    Maybe it's time for you to write your book about Sarah Stanton, "The Fat Lady Sings."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From robert johnson@21:1/5 to NoTrueFlags Here on Sun Oct 1 22:53:50 2023
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 7:56:40 PM UTC+1, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 1:47:41 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 12:31:20 PM UTC-4, robert johnson wrote:



    Davidson's proof of a female neckline on Prayer Man's dress can be seen here:


    https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100064669963405
    Maybe it's time for you to write your book about Sarah Stanton, "The Fat Lady Sings."


    LOLLLLLLLL

    Doyle will steal that title and run away with it!!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NoTrueFlags Here@21:1/5 to robert johnson on Mon Oct 2 00:00:58 2023
    On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 1:53:51 AM UTC-4, robert johnson wrote:
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 7:56:40 PM UTC+1, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 1:47:41 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 12:31:20 PM UTC-4, robert johnson wrote:



    Davidson's proof of a female neckline on Prayer Man's dress can be seen here:


    https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100064669963405
    Maybe it's time for you to write your book about Sarah Stanton, "The Fat Lady Sings."
    LOLLLLLLLL

    Doyle will steal that title and run away with it!!!

    I hope so! Then the Doyle and Kamp tomes will sit beside each other on the bookshelves kooks everywhere as JFK assassination classics.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to All on Mon Oct 2 06:48:33 2023
    I think Karl Kinaski is reading my stuff on Deep Politics and posting it at the Education Forum and ROKC...However Karl offers the crudest, least informational version of my evidence and is just a little above useless...I guess he's afraid of being
    banned...

    Karl posted Davidson's Scoop Neckline image on ROKC and was immediately attacked by the thugs over there with meme's of pigs etc...However the uncredible scum over on ROKC failed to answer the evidence Karl had shown...Only the overly-verbose, attention-
    seeking troll Alex Wilson answered Karl and accused him of presenting photo-shopped imagery...

    No one is honest enough to point-out that Davidson has always been a realiable source or that the Scoop Neckline shot was the second damning image Davidson has produced to refute Prayer Man and show Prayer Man is conclusively Sarah Stanton...Alex's
    failing to show Stanton's white hair in the images doesn't stop him from still going on and trying to get away with the cheap excuse of photo-shopping...

    The answer to Wilson's obvious cheap excuse is for the original Darnell film to be obtained and tested to bring out that same image on the original...The ROKC scum are avoiding discussing that once Davidson's woman's face in Wiegman and his Scoop
    Neckline in Darnell are replicated exactly on the original celluloid, that proves beyond a doubt that they are a real and existing thing in the original film and are therefore valid evidence - despite the cheap excuse-making of the ROKC trolls who will
    never admit their idiotic theory, that arose from Greg Parker and his mentally ill compulsion to revise evidence, has been refuted repeatedly...We can thank Davidson for this because he seems to be a little short in the courage department when it comes
    to standing up for his own evidence against the ROKC scum and cheats who deny it...The image is real, it isn't photo-shopped, and it does prove Prayer Man is wearing a woman's dress (which has already been shown by the uniform fabric from shoulder to
    knee on Prayer Man) that the Prayer Man idiots also ignored...What we have here is two assholes, Jim DiEugenio and James Gordon, forcing us to allow Alex Jones to win and be the spokesperson despite his being exposed repeatedly...Or Ralph Cinque
    prevailing because of corrupted moderators and alpha wolves...These people are so dishonest that it is the second time Davidson has embarrassingly refuted them - but they still don't admit it...All the ROKC scum are doing is exploiting their hijacking of
    the JFK internet to avoid admitting they've been embarrassingly refuted and Kamp is an unskilled ass with dirty supporters...The JFK research community is a bunch of idiots who refuse to admit when they've run that community's credibility on to the rocks
    with their boyish gangs...Jim DiEugenio is a dishonest fool...

    I guess the only way to deal with these assholes is an Alex Jones-like lawsuit where they aren't allowed to use that British nincompoop and crook James Gordon to censor their opposition...Some of us who have been particularly victimized by these
    profligate scum should start organizing that and make sure Jim D is prominent in that action in public exposure for his true dishonesty and general shitty-ness...Mark Knight too - just to show who the true "shit-posters" are...The Education Forum has yet
    to do honest Peer Review on Davidson because that piece of shit and crook Gordon keeps it from the forum...They don't want to admit they wasted a decade of the research community's time with one of Greg Parker's crazy evidence fantasies...

    And realize that these assholes have gotten away with ignoring that Prayer Man is a full head shorter than Frazier and matches Stanton's height exactly...Something you can't make any degenerate photo-shopping excuse over...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)