Larsen wrote:


" I wonder why Bart chose such an awful version of the Darnell/Wiegman frame for the cover of his book. I have a hard time even making out a face on it. I never had that problem when studying the frames before. "


Don't play dumb Sandy...We both know Kamp chose the worst Wiegman image of Prayer Man exactly because he knows the best images will refute his bullshit Prayer Man claim and show that Prayer Man isn't Oswald...

James Gordon is a hypocritical asshole because he made up a rule that only the best images could be used when he was absuing me on the Education Forum...Apparently that stupid horse's ass and power-abusing cheat Gordon has forgotten that specifically
made-up rule and allowed Kamp's intentionally low quality image to be posted...It just goes to show what a weasel Kamp is...

There is no doubt that Davidson's clear frame from the Wiegman film is the best available image of Prayer Man and it undoubtedly shows Sarah Stanton's chubby-cheeked face on Prayer Man...Sandy already knows the answer why Kamp didn't use Davidson because
Kamp was aware that it showed Prayer Man was Stanton so he dishonestly avoided it...Kamp operates in the shadows of deceit and his book cover is no exception...When I tried to show Davidson's proof on the Education Forum in 2016 Gordon made up false
rules violations against me and banned me for life...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 12:12:37 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:



Nobody answered Sandy Larsen's question "Why did Bart Kamp use such a poor image of Prayer Man on his book cover when there were so many better ones available?"...Jim D came in and hijacked the thread and no one answered Larsen...

That's how the Prayer Man hijackers operate on Gordon's dirty forum...They get to choose which evidence points they answer and which they don't...If you go to the Education Forum and point-out that it isn't honest to leave that question unanswered only
then will the moderation become involved and do so against the person who rightfully asks the question, with Gordon making up some lie about how they violated the site rules...Larsen is a god-damned moderator for fuck's sake...Larsen tolerates that
question being ignored, and forsakes his duty as a moderator to demand an answer to that question for rigor's sake, because he knows what the deal is and knows it is forbidden to point-out Kamp's obvious dishonesty...The forum is avoiding the correct
answer that Kamp used the poorest image because the best image (Davidson) all too clearly shows that Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...Kamp is kept safe by that criminal piece of shit Gordon who will violate his own best image rule to make sure anyone who
exposes Kamp's fraud is banned...The best image rule only applies to me...When Kamp violates it, and uses the worst image possible to cover-up his deceit that's OK with Gordon because the rules only apply to people whom that criminal piece of shit Gordon
is trying to fuck over...

Notice that none of those dirty motherfuckers respond to this or Larsen's original post...And Larsen meekly yields...

I guess Larsen "Plays By The Rules"...

Why don't we ask the sincere and honest Jim DiEugenio to answer that question?...

Rotten Double Standard...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 10:59:44 AM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:

On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 12:12:37 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:

Odisio Answered Larsen:


" The answer to your original question about why Bart chose the image he did for the cover is in the title of the book, Sandy.

It would be important if the figure in Darnell and Wiegman can be identified as Oswald. If accepted that indeed would destroy the WR. But the research into Oswald's innocence, particularly by Bart's stupendous effort as laid out in the book, does not
depend solely on that. Hence the title. The book is about more than the fuzzy picture on the cover.

The evidence disputing the WR, it seems to me, has recently been accelerating in pace. Latest example is the talk to be given at Duquesne U in November about the probability of two head shots, close together, not one.

Bart's book has added a lot to that effort even if it can be definitely shown someone else is Prayerman. "



It is clear to any honest intelligent observer that Odisio is a con man and propagandist and doesn't really believe in the Prayer Man theory...It is clear from Odisio's last sentence that he knows there is proof that disproves Prayer Man as Oswald and
Odisio is just Kamp's personal PR man at the expense of good research...These assholes have ingratiated their way right in to the forefront of JFK research...

These assholes have taken over the JFK research internet so when they finally admit Prayer Man has been proven to be Sarah Stanton they'll continue to hijack the JFK internet and provide their own mealy-mouthed self-explanation, like Odisio does here,
and pretend all the dirty business they have perpetrated never happened or they didn't harm good researchers with their dirty bullying and corruption...Bart can be stupidly wrong, could have harassed good researchers with gutter attacks, could have
ignored credible proof, and could have led the credible research community on an embarrassing fool's goose chase - but, hey - Odisio says Bart is still all right and owes no one nothing...The good researchers they destroyed and removed from the research
community are going to remain banned and destroyed by the way...And the assholes who banned them are still going to remain in power...They do a good imitation of the dishonest mainstream media they hypocritically criticize so much...

One thing we know for sure is Bart didn't choose Davidson's latest enhancement of Stanton's scoop neckline in Darnell...And he didn't choose it because he knew it exposed his bullshit theory that he is stupid enough to still be pushing even when it is
crashed and burning right in front of him...Bart Kamp is one crazy, stupid son of a bitch...

The clique allows Odisio to pretend that Davidson didn't just come out with final conclusive evidence that Prayer Man is Stanton...The Education Forum under Gordon, the man who said we must use the best images or be banned for life, somehow didn't manage
to post Davidson's scoop neck line best image...Something "moderator" Larsen will never ask Odisio about...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 5:45:10 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:

On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 10:59:44 AM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:

On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 12:12:37 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:

Sandy Larsen wrote:

"The only harm filtering does is that excessive filtering can created false images.... like seeing images in clouds. That's what happened to one of our forum members, whose name I don't recall. He sees a lovely woman's face. And then there's Duncan, who
see's a Frankenstein woman with fake buttons on her fake coat."

Sandy is mocking sound evidence of Prayer Man being Sarah Stanton and doing it as an administrator...Gun-shy Chris Davidson allows Mr Larsen to trollishly mock his serious discovery in an idiotic way...Larsen is trusted as administrator to deal in a
serious way that recognizes credible evidence, yet he makes the entry of juvenile person of low intelligence as a moderator and site representative and Davidson lets him...

The evidence Mr Larsen is ridiculing is some of the most sound technical evidence involved with the issue and it was competently produced by Mr Davidson...It is Mr Larsen's duty as moderator to reflect that and promote it, but because Mr Larsen is a pro
Prayer Man plant on a heavily pro Prayer Man-biased site it gets juvenile mockery instead in order to keep the Prayer Man claim alive with the help of a corrupted extra player on the field...

First of all, there was no "filtering" involved with Davidson's discovery...This just goes to show what a fool Larsen is...He is pretending to high brow with technical expertise but he doesn't have the first clue of what he is talking about - which is
typical for the Prayer Man issue...All Davidson did was adjust for contrast and brightness...The clearly-seen woman's face that Larsen is in denial of is true to what is on the original Wiegman celluloid despite Larsen's crude attempt to discredit it...
Larsen is so full of bias, and so drunken on his own power as moderator, that he fails to realize Davidson is backed by the firmest science and rigor on the subject, as would be proven by obtaining the original film and applying Davidson's process to it..
.Larsen is too incompetent to realize that once Davidson's woman's face can be replicated from the original Wiegman film it is hard photo science proof that his previous enhancement is legitimate...It is hard proof that Davidson's woman's face is a real
and existing thing on the original Wiegman Film and cannot be dismissed as stupidly as Larsen attempts...

Davidson's enhancement of the clear Wiegman frame is proof that Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...This would be resoundingly shown if Davidson's enhancement ever received sound scientific Peer Review...Because I am being prevented from confronting Larsen and
asking him to answer my replication of Davidson from the original Wiegman Film argument, this issue is being kept from the credible Peer Review Larsen is in contempt of as a moderator...I would also demand that Larsen answer how Davidson's woman's face
has exact symmetry between its eyes, nose, and mouth and is located on Prayer Man's body where a face would be...These are sound photo science points that deserve more than Larsen's idiocy that demeans real intelligent photo analysis rigor...Larsen needs
to be made to answer the fact that Davidson's face is peering downward in to the purse she is holding up in her hands in front of her face...This is photo science behavioral reinforcing evidence that proves the image is real and therefore deserves a
competent respectful answer instead of Larsen's idiotic mockery...Larsen is in contempt of the fact that as soon as Davidson was ever sent for review to a credible photo analysis expert that it would be validated and deemed legitimate and therefore
proven to show Sarah Stanton's obvious female face that Larsen is obviously desperate to deny...Chris Davidson betrays his own work by refusing to defend it against those like Larsen who stupidly deny it...Larsen moderates backwards in an anti-
intellectual manner...He shows contempt for good evidence and moderates backwards in a dumbing-down manner that attacks sound science and a high scientific standard of proof...Larsen is reducing it to the idiotic and violating his trust as moderator...He
fails his obligation to recognize the correct science in Davidson's offering and promote it towards its correct conclusion...The Davidson enhancement shows Sarah Stanton's chubby-cheeked face peering down in to her purse in Wiegman and proves that Prayer
Man is Stanton...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)