https://www.tallahassee.com/story/life/2021/02/27/who-shot-jfk-final-report-rubys-dog-ask-judge-smith/6834592002/
On Monday, September 25, 2023 at 10:47:18 PM UTC-7, wrote:
https://www.tallahassee.com/story/life/2021/02/27/who-shot-jfk-final-report-rubys-dog-ask-judge-smith/6834592002/
Did Ruby usually carry a gun with him?
On Monday, September 25, 2023 at 10:47:18 PM UTC-7, wrote:
https://www.tallahassee.com/story/life/2021/02/27/who-shot-jfk-final-report-rubys-dog-ask-judge-smith/6834592002/
Did Ruby usually carry a gun with him?
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 1:48:16 AM UTC-4, gggg gggg wrote:
On Monday, September 25, 2023 at 10:47:18 PM UTC-7, wrote:
https://www.tallahassee.com/story/life/2021/02/27/who-shot-jfk-final-report-rubys-dog-ask-judge-smith/6834592002/
Did Ruby usually carry a gun with him?Yes and the cops knew he carried. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/WH_Vol20_55-cops-knew-he-carried.gif
Ruby showed up in the parking garage at the last minute
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 5:12:27?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 1:48:16?AM UTC-4, gggg gggg wrote:
On Monday, September 25, 2023 at 10:47:18?PM UTC-7, wrote:Yes and the cops knew he carried.
https://www.tallahassee.com/story/life/2021/02/27/who-shot-jfk-final-report-rubys-dog-ask-judge-smith/6834592002/
Did Ruby usually carry a gun with him?
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/WH_Vol20_55-cops-knew-he-carried.gif
Some cops knew he carried which doesn't mean all cops knew he carried.
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 8:08:55?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 7:39:02?AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote: >>>Ruby showed up in the parking garage at the last minuteThis is where Gil resorts to speculation since there is no evidence of that.
That's bullshit. The cops waited for him to get into position before they brought Oswald down.
And the man who was the "lookout" for Ruby was Lt., Woodrow Wiggins.
Wiggins had known Jack Ruby for years, ( 12 H 393 ) and would have been able to tell them when Ruby was in the basement.
Sunday, November 24th was his first day back to work after his own two days off and placed him in the jail office covering for that supervisors day off. ( 12 H 389 )
Not only did his assignment in the jail office allow Wiggins to know where Oswald was in the building, it put Wiggins in the perfect position of checking the adjacent basement to see if Ruby was there.
That's why they transferred Oswald on Sunday.
In his testimony, Wiggins admitted that although he had no role in the transfer and did not take part in securing it, he was in and out of the basement looking it over. ( 12 H 390 )
Looking it over for what ? Or should I say, for whom ?
He was never asked.
already on their way down when the call was made.Wiggins testified that he received a call from upstairs saying they were bringing Oswald down and as soon as he hung up, he noticed the indicator lights on the elevator showing it was on its way. ( 12 H 391 ) This would imply that Fritz et al were
the cars ready. ( Dallas Police Box 5, pg. 307 )But the report of Lt. T.L. Baker said that prior to leaving the office, Fritz told a Detective named Baker to call the jail office. During that conversation, Wiggins said all was clear and Baker told him they were leaving with Oswald and to have
This report indicates that Wiggins told them, all was clear BEFORE they left Fritzs office and well enough in advance to move the cars into position. It blows away Wiggins account of the call being made as they were on their way.
BTW, neither Lt. Baker nor Detective Baker were called to testify.
he was sure if he did answer him, he told them that they were ready. ( 12 H 392 )Wiggins also testified that once they got off the elevator, Fritz asked him again, are they ready ? at which time he stepped out of the door and into the corridor first. He said that although he could not remember whether or not he answered Fritz,
I suggest that Wiggins went out the door and into the basement, saw Ruby and told Fritz they were ready.
But they werent ready, as the cars were not yet in position. So the "ready" signal could not have been meant for the transfer.
he ( Leavelle ) was, surprised when I walked to the door and the car was not in the spot it should have been. ( 13 H 17 )Wiggins didnt have the cars ready, as evident in the video of Oswalds murder. Sgt. James Leavelle testified that, we were given to understand that the car would be across the passageway. He added that Capt. Fritz said, Everything is all set, but
for his detectives to bring Oswald into the basement.In spite of the car not being in position for the transfer, Fritz, instead of delaying Oswalds advance into the basement until the car was in position, came into the basement, looked to his left ( in Jack Rubys direction ) and turned back and nodded
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mRn-nipHQg
More:
https://gil-jesus.com/the-framing-and-murder-of-lee-harvey-oswald/
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 7:39:02 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote: >Ruby showed up in the parking garage at the last minute
That's bullshit. The cops waited for him to get into position before they brought Oswald down.
And the man who was the "lookout" for Ruby was Lt., Woodrow Wiggins.
Wiggins “had known Jack Ruby for years”, ( 12 H 393 ) and would have been able to tell them when Ruby was in the basement.
Sunday, November 24th was his first day back to work after his own two days off and placed him in the jail office covering for that supervisor’s day off. ( 12 H 389 )
Not only did his assignment in the jail office allow Wiggins to know where Oswald was in the building, it put Wiggins in the perfect position of checking the adjacent basement to see if Ruby was there.
That's why they transferred Oswald on Sunday.
In his testimony, Wiggins admitted that although he had no role in the transfer and did not take part in securing it, he “was in and out of the basement looking it over.” ( 12 H 390 )
Looking it over for what ? Or should I say, for whom ?
He was never asked.
Wiggins testified that he received a call from upstairs saying they were bringing Oswald down and as soon as he hung up, he noticed the indicator lights on the elevator showing it was on its way. ( 12 H 391 ) This would imply that Fritz et al werealready on their way down when the call was made.
But the report of Lt. T.L. Baker said that prior to leaving the office, Fritz told a Detective named Baker to call the jail office. During that conversation, Wiggins “said all was clear” and Baker told him they were “leaving with Oswald and tohave the cars ready.” ( Dallas Police Box 5, pg. 307 )
This report indicates that Wiggins told them, “all was clear” BEFORE they left Fritz’s office and well enough in advance to move the cars into position. It blows away Wiggins’ account of the call being made as they were on their way.
BTW, neither Lt. Baker nor Detective Baker were called to testify.
Wiggins also testified that once they got off the elevator, Fritz asked him again, “are they ready ?” at which time he stepped out of the door and into the corridor first. He said that although he “could not remember whether or not he answeredFritz”, he was sure if he did answer him, he told them that they were ready. ( 12 H 392 )
I suggest that Wiggins went out the door and into the basement, saw Ruby and told Fritz “they” were ready.
But they weren’t ready, as the cars were not yet in position. So the "ready" signal could not have been meant for the transfer.
Wiggins didn’t have the cars ready, as evident in the video of Oswald’s murder. Sgt. James Leavelle testified that, “we were given to understand that the car would be across the passageway”. He added that Capt. Fritz said, “Everything is allset”, but he ( Leavelle ) was, “surprised when I walked to the door and the car was not in the spot it should have been.” ( 13 H 17 )
In spite of the car not being in position for the transfer, Fritz, instead of delaying Oswald’s advance into the basement until the car was in position, came into the basement, looked to his left ( in Jack Ruby’s direction ) and turned back andnodded for his detectives to bring Oswald into the basement.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mRn-nipHQg
More:
https://gil-jesus.com/the-framing-and-murder-of-lee-harvey-oswald/
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 04:39:01 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 5:12:27?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 1:48:16?AM UTC-4, gggg gggg wrote:
On Monday, September 25, 2023 at 10:47:18?PM UTC-7, wrote:Yes and the cops knew he carried.
https://www.tallahassee.com/story/life/2021/02/27/who-shot-jfk-final-report-rubys-dog-ask-judge-smith/6834592002/
Did Ruby usually carry a gun with him?
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/WH_Vol20_55-cops-knew-he-carried.gif
Some cops knew he carried which doesn't mean all cops knew he carried. You're clearly a moron who can't read - as Gil said nothing about "allcops knew he carried"
But this is what you morons **NEED** to do - intentionally
misrepresent what critics state - because you cannot refute what we
actually say.
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 10:19:23 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 8:08:55?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:that you're a liar.
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 7:39:02?AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote: >>>Ruby showed up in the parking garage at the last minuteThis is where Gil resorts to speculation since there is no evidence of that. When you have to lie to make a point, the only point you've made is
That's bullshit. The cops waited for him to get into position before they brought Oswald down.
already on their way down when the call was made.Logical fallacy deleted.And the man who was the "lookout" for Ruby was Lt., Woodrow Wiggins. Logical fallacy deleted.
Wiggins “had known Jack Ruby for years”, ( 12 H 393 ) and would have been able to tell them when Ruby was in the basement.
Logical fallacy deleted.Sunday, November 24th was his first day back to work after his own two days off and placed him in the jail office covering for that supervisor’s day off. ( 12 H 389 )
Logical fallacy deleted.Not only did his assignment in the jail office allow Wiggins to know where Oswald was in the building, it put Wiggins in the perfect position of checking the adjacent basement to see if Ruby was there.
Logical fallacy deleted.That's why they transferred Oswald on Sunday.
Logical fallacy deleted.In his testimony, Wiggins admitted that although he had no role in the transfer and did not take part in securing it, he “was in and out of the basement looking it over.” ( 12 H 390 )
Logical fallacy deleted.Looking it over for what ? Or should I say, for whom ?
He was never asked.
Wiggins testified that he received a call from upstairs saying they were bringing Oswald down and as soon as he hung up, he noticed the indicator lights on the elevator showing it was on its way. ( 12 H 391 ) This would imply that Fritz et al were
Logical fallacy deleted.have the cars ready.” ( Dallas Police Box 5, pg. 307 )
But the report of Lt. T.L. Baker said that prior to leaving the office, Fritz told a Detective named Baker to call the jail office. During that conversation, Wiggins “said all was clear” and Baker told him they were “leaving with Oswald and to
Fritz”, he was sure if he did answer him, he told them that they were ready. ( 12 H 392 )Logical fallacy deleted.
This report indicates that Wiggins told them, “all was clear” BEFORE they left Fritz’s office and well enough in advance to move the cars into position. It blows away Wiggins’ account of the call being made as they were on their way.
BTW, neither Lt. Baker nor Detective Baker were called to testify.
Wiggins also testified that once they got off the elevator, Fritz asked him again, “are they ready ?” at which time he stepped out of the door and into the corridor first. He said that although he “could not remember whether or not he answered
all set”, but he ( Leavelle ) was, “surprised when I walked to the door and the car was not in the spot it should have been.” ( 13 H 17 )Logical fallacy deleted.
I suggest that Wiggins went out the door and into the basement, saw Ruby and told Fritz “they” were ready.
Logical fallacy deleted.But they weren’t ready, as the cars were not yet in position. So the "ready" signal could not have been meant for the transfer.
Wiggins didn’t have the cars ready, as evident in the video of Oswald’s murder. Sgt. James Leavelle testified that, “we were given to understand that the car would be across the passageway”. He added that Capt. Fritz said, “Everything is
Logical fallacy deleted.nodded for his detectives to bring Oswald into the basement.
In spite of the car not being in position for the transfer, Fritz, instead of delaying Oswald’s advance into the basement until the car was in position, came into the basement, looked to his left ( in Jack Ruby’s direction ) and turned back and
Logical fallacy deleted.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mRn-nipHQg
More:
https://gil-jesus.com/the-framing-and-murder-of-lee-harvey-oswald/
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 107:43:10 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 12,209 |
| Messages: | 5,335,499 |
