From a memorandum written by Albert Jenner to Lee Rankin on April
20th, 1964:
**************************
"Delivered herewith are three preliminary memoranda prepared by John
Ely at my request made in late February or early March.
My purpose was to obtain a chronology based on these existing data in
our files of the background facts -- life, school, places of
residence, etc -- of Mrs Oswald, her several marriages, her husbands
and her three children and, in particular, Lee Harvey Oswald, from the
time she married Edward John Pic, Jr., in the fall of 1929, to the
time Lee Harvey Oswald entered military service in October, 1956.
...
On the whole, Mr. Ely's memoranda present a good over-all picture of
the course of events involving the Oswalds up to the time of Lee
Harvey Oswald's entry into the military service Our depositions and >examination of records and other data disclose that there are details
in Mr. Ely's memoranda which will require material alteration and, in
some instances, omission."
...
**************************
Let me repeat that last sentence one more time... regarding the
historical details of Oswald and his family: "...THERE ARE DETAILS ...
WHICH WILL REQUIRE MATERIAL ALTERATION AND, IN SOME INSTANCES,
OMISSION."
Now, since believers *FREQUENTLY* claim that Mark Lane is a "liar"
based on the claim that he *omitted* something - can believers now
admit that the Warren Commission lied?
On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 07:37:58 -0700, Ben Holmes <Ad...@ConspiracyJFKForum.com> wrote:
From a memorandum written by Albert Jenner to Lee Rankin on April
20th, 1964:
**************************
"Delivered herewith are three preliminary memoranda prepared by John
Ely at my request made in late February or early March.
My purpose was to obtain a chronology based on these existing data in
our files of the background facts -- life, school, places of
residence, etc -- of Mrs Oswald, her several marriages, her husbands
and her three children and, in particular, Lee Harvey Oswald, from the >time she married Edward John Pic, Jr., in the fall of 1929, to the
time Lee Harvey Oswald entered military service in October, 1956.
...
On the whole, Mr. Ely's memoranda present a good over-all picture of
the course of events involving the Oswalds up to the time of Lee
Harvey Oswald's entry into the military service Our depositions and >examination of records and other data disclose that there are details
in Mr. Ely's memoranda which will require material alteration and, in
some instances, omission."
...
**************************
Let me repeat that last sentence one more time... regarding the
historical details of Oswald and his family: "...THERE ARE DETAILS ... >WHICH WILL REQUIRE MATERIAL ALTERATION AND, IN SOME INSTANCES,
OMISSION."
Now, since believers *FREQUENTLY* claim that Mark Lane is a "liar"Dead silence from the proven cowards...
based on the claim that he *omitted* something - can believers now
admit that the Warren Commission lied?
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 10:08:58?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 07:37:58 -0700, Ben Holmes
<Ad...@ConspiracyJFKForum.com> wrote:
From a memorandum written by Albert Jenner to Lee Rankin on April
20th, 1964:
**************************
"Delivered herewith are three preliminary memoranda prepared by John
Ely at my request made in late February or early March.
My purpose was to obtain a chronology based on these existing data in
our files of the background facts -- life, school, places of
residence, etc -- of Mrs Oswald, her several marriages, her husbands
and her three children and, in particular, Lee Harvey Oswald, from the >>>time she married Edward John Pic, Jr., in the fall of 1929, to the
time Lee Harvey Oswald entered military service in October, 1956.
...
On the whole, Mr. Ely's memoranda present a good over-all picture of
the course of events involving the Oswalds up to the time of Lee
Harvey Oswald's entry into the military service Our depositions and >>>examination of records and other data disclose that there are details
in Mr. Ely's memoranda which will require material alteration and, in >>>some instances, omission."
...
**************************
Let me repeat that last sentence one more time... regarding the >>>historical details of Oswald and his family: "...THERE ARE DETAILS ... >>>WHICH WILL REQUIRE MATERIAL ALTERATION AND, IN SOME INSTANCES,
OMISSION."
Now, since believers *FREQUENTLY* claim that Mark Lane is a "liar"
based on the claim that he *omitted* something - can believers now
admit that the Warren Commission lied?
Dead silence from the proven cowards...
Your hobby point fringe reset was discussed here just two years ago:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/vzBJGmaBs1s/m/BaxBsl04CQAJ
You were asked specifically by Hank to provide the complete memorandum.
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 21:04:16 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 10:08:58?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 07:37:58 -0700, Ben Holmes
<Ad...@ConspiracyJFKForum.com> wrote:
From a memorandum written by Albert Jenner to Lee Rankin on April >>>20th, 1964:
**************************
"Delivered herewith are three preliminary memoranda prepared by John >>>Ely at my request made in late February or early March.
My purpose was to obtain a chronology based on these existing data in >>>our files of the background facts -- life, school, places of >>>residence, etc -- of Mrs Oswald, her several marriages, her husbands >>>and her three children and, in particular, Lee Harvey Oswald, from the >>>time she married Edward John Pic, Jr., in the fall of 1929, to the >>>time Lee Harvey Oswald entered military service in October, 1956.
...
On the whole, Mr. Ely's memoranda present a good over-all picture of >>>the course of events involving the Oswalds up to the time of Lee >>>Harvey Oswald's entry into the military service Our depositions and >>>examination of records and other data disclose that there are details >>>in Mr. Ely's memoranda which will require material alteration and, in >>>some instances, omission."
...
**************************
Let me repeat that last sentence one more time... regarding the >>>historical details of Oswald and his family: "...THERE ARE DETAILS ... >>>WHICH WILL REQUIRE MATERIAL ALTERATION AND, IN SOME INSTANCES, >>>OMISSION."
Now, since believers *FREQUENTLY* claim that Mark Lane is a "liar" >>>based on the claim that he *omitted* something - can believers now >>>admit that the Warren Commission lied?
Dead silence from the proven cowards...
Your hobby point fringe reset was discussed here just two years ago:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/vzBJGmaBs1s/m/BaxBsl04CQAJ
You were asked specifically by Hank to provide the complete memorandum.
Nope... Not an answer. Chuckles joins the rest of the cowards!!
On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 8:42:13?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 21:04:16 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 10:08:58?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 07:37:58 -0700, Ben Holmes
<Ad...@ConspiracyJFKForum.com> wrote:
From a memorandum written by Albert Jenner to Lee Rankin on April >>>>>20th, 1964:
**************************
"Delivered herewith are three preliminary memoranda prepared by John >>>>>Ely at my request made in late February or early March.
My purpose was to obtain a chronology based on these existing data in >>>>>our files of the background facts -- life, school, places of >>>>>residence, etc -- of Mrs Oswald, her several marriages, her husbands >>>>>and her three children and, in particular, Lee Harvey Oswald, from the >>>>>time she married Edward John Pic, Jr., in the fall of 1929, to the >>>>>time Lee Harvey Oswald entered military service in October, 1956.
...
On the whole, Mr. Ely's memoranda present a good over-all picture of >>>>>the course of events involving the Oswalds up to the time of Lee >>>>>Harvey Oswald's entry into the military service Our depositions and >>>>>examination of records and other data disclose that there are details >>>>>in Mr. Ely's memoranda which will require material alteration and, in >>>>>some instances, omission."
...
**************************
Let me repeat that last sentence one more time... regarding the >>>>>historical details of Oswald and his family: "...THERE ARE DETAILS ... >>>>>WHICH WILL REQUIRE MATERIAL ALTERATION AND, IN SOME INSTANCES, >>>>>OMISSION."
Now, since believers *FREQUENTLY* claim that Mark Lane is a "liar" >>>>>based on the claim that he *omitted* something - can believers now >>>>>admit that the Warren Commission lied?
Dead silence from the proven cowards...
Your hobby point fringe reset was discussed here just two years ago:
You were asked specifically by Hank to provide the complete memorandum.https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/vzBJGmaBs1s/m/BaxBsl04CQAJ >>>
Nope... Not an answer. Chuckles joins the rest of the cowards!!
Not answered to your satisfaction?
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 119:27:05 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,210 |
| Messages: | 5,334,369 |