Where's the question on this case that critics can't answer?
It doesn't exist.
Where's the question on this case that believers can't answer?
POSTED EVERY SINGLE DAY IN A MULTITUDE OF FORMS!!!
This is all a lurker needs to recognize to figure out who's got the
truth of the matter.
No need to delve into the minutia of the evidence... just see that
Gil, David, and I ask questions daily that believers run from... and
that believers are unable to post a question we can't answer.
Here's a freebie for you kooks... I won't even demand you answer a
question first - because I've already proven you won't.
******************************************************************
ASK ANY QUESTION RELATED TO THE ASSASSINATION OF JFK ON 11/22/63 THAT
YOU THINK I CAN'T ANSWER. ******************************************************************
You won't be able to. In fact, I predict you won't even try.
(No need for me to prove that you can't answer the questions critics
pose, you prove that every day.)
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 10:42:07?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
Where's the question on this case that critics can't answer?
You are simply lying, you`ve ducked dozens, perhaps hundreds of question asked of you here.
It doesn't exist.
Where's the question on this case that believers can't answer?
POSTED EVERY SINGLE DAY IN A MULTITUDE OF FORMS!!!
This is all a lurker needs to recognize to figure out who's got the
truth of the matter.
No need to delve into the minutia of the evidence... just see that
Gil, David, and I ask questions daily that believers run from... and
that believers are unable to post a question we can't answer.
Here's a freebie for you kooks... I won't even demand you answer a
question first - because I've already proven you won't.
******************************************************************
ASK ANY QUESTION RELATED TO THE ASSASSINATION OF JFK ON 11/22/63 THAT
YOU THINK I CAN'T ANSWER.
******************************************************************
You won't be able to. In fact, I predict you won't even try.
(No need for me to prove that you can't answer the questions critics
pose, you prove that every day.)
On Thu, 21 Sep 2023 10:36:49 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 10:42:07?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
Where's the question on this case that critics can't answer?
You are simply lying, you`ve ducked dozens, perhaps hundreds of question asked of you here.Well, Chickenshit had his chance, and just lied and ran.
Made an
empty claim with no citation - which *HE* himself asserts is a lie.
Back to the questions that Chickenshit runs from...
It doesn't exist.
Where's the question on this case that believers can't answer?
POSTED EVERY SINGLE DAY IN A MULTITUDE OF FORMS!!!
This is all a lurker needs to recognize to figure out who's got the
truth of the matter.
No need to delve into the minutia of the evidence... just see that
Gil, David, and I ask questions daily that believers run from... and
that believers are unable to post a question we can't answer.
Here's a freebie for you kooks... I won't even demand you answer a
question first - because I've already proven you won't.
******************************************************************
ASK ANY QUESTION RELATED TO THE ASSASSINATION OF JFK ON 11/22/63 THAT
YOU THINK I CAN'T ANSWER.
******************************************************************
You won't be able to. In fact, I predict you won't even try.
(No need for me to prove that you can't answer the questions critics
pose, you prove that every day.)
Where's the question on this case that critics can't answer?
It doesn't exist.
Where's the question on this case that believers can't answer?
POSTED EVERY SINGLE DAY IN A MULTITUDE OF FORMS!!!
This is all a lurker needs to recognize to figure out who's got the
truth of the matter.
No need to delve into the minutia of the evidence... just see that
Gil, David, and I ask questions daily that believers run from... and
that believers are unable to post a question we can't answer.
Here's a freebie for you kooks... I won't even demand you answer a
question first - because I've already proven you won't.
******************************************************************
ASK ANY QUESTION RELATED TO THE ASSASSINATION OF JFK ON 11/22/63 THAT
YOU THINK I CAN'T ANSWER. ******************************************************************
You won't be able to. In fact, I predict you won't even try.
(No need for me to prove that you can't answer the questions critics
pose, you prove that every day.)
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 9:42:07?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
Where's the question on this case that critics can't answer?
It doesn't exist.
Where's the question on this case that believers can't answer?
POSTED EVERY SINGLE DAY IN A MULTITUDE OF FORMS!!!
This is all a lurker needs to recognize to figure out who's got the
truth of the matter.
No need to delve into the minutia of the evidence... just see that
Gil, David, and I ask questions daily that believers run from... and
that believers are unable to post a question we can't answer.
Here's a freebie for you kooks... I won't even demand you answer a
question first - because I've already proven you won't.
******************************************************************
ASK ANY QUESTION RELATED TO THE ASSASSINATION OF JFK ON 11/22/63 THAT
YOU THINK I CAN'T ANSWER.
******************************************************************
You won't be able to. In fact, I predict you won't even try.
I'll try.
Why not answer the questions embedded in your Magnum Opus?
The Challenge - Part 1 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/x4n7Di-GBd8/_WbEfALeAAAJ >The Challenge - Part 2 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/WVBtmUQkx6c/9ZdyxAPeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 1 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/y0hdkKgWvtI/3uukYgXeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 2 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/jSfe1BrGfJc/SOXAOQbeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 2a >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/kGfZPR4C-Lw/AlnRq1HeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 3 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/IShoUFao5OU/VuYGWFTeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 3a >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/JFuasrnWRqA/l1vih03eAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 4 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/LRMeWBFE1ug/bfjGTAbeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 5 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/S1ddVKc3Jj4/IESJbFPeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 6 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/b5ODl3yA4uk/g77N-UreAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 7 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/rwmZjz92YC8/P-9Mn07eAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 8 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c6e29olW6XA/Os29-FveAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 9 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/ixNqGISHbrU/gd06wVHeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 10 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/3Di6kuseb2Q/aHbAQmLeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 11 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/sYEyPH0A_eI/IH-UZgbeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 11a >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/aGduj6uaGUk/3eDp513eAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 11b >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8rAmKZBOCiY/yCELq27eAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 12 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/OnrH5R6ryHE/stjdfgbeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 12a >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/J0A8N12PPHU/CcxpiU7eAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 13 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8hD-q0gTa_c/Co3ZJE7eAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 14 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/lsaXwhPRbEg/hZ7ZmEveAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 15 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UA86YdJXEgY/JhG8o0reAAAJ >My Scenario - The Conclusion >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UWfco_sGxYw/yApSPFXeAAAJ
(No need for me to prove that you can't answer the questions critics
pose, you prove that every day.)
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 9:42:07 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
Where's the question on this case that critics can't answer?
It doesn't exist.
Where's the question on this case that believers can't answer?
POSTED EVERY SINGLE DAY IN A MULTITUDE OF FORMS!!!
This is all a lurker needs to recognize to figure out who's got the
truth of the matter.
No need to delve into the minutia of the evidence... just see that
Gil, David, and I ask questions daily that believers run from... and
that believers are unable to post a question we can't answer.
Here's a freebie for you kooks... I won't even demand you answer a question first - because I've already proven you won't.
******************************************************************
ASK ANY QUESTION RELATED TO THE ASSASSINATION OF JFK ON 11/22/63 THAT
YOU THINK I CAN'T ANSWER. ******************************************************************
You won't be able to. In fact, I predict you won't even try.I'll try. Why not answer the questions embedded in your Magnum Opus?
The Challenge - Part 1 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/x4n7Di-GBd8/_WbEfALeAAAJ The Challenge - Part 2 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/WVBtmUQkx6c/9ZdyxAPeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 1 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/y0hdkKgWvtI/3uukYgXeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 2 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/jSfe1BrGfJc/SOXAOQbeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 2a https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/kGfZPR4C-Lw/AlnRq1HeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 3 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/IShoUFao5OU/VuYGWFTeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 3a https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/JFuasrnWRqA/l1vih03eAAAJ My Scenario - Part 4 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/LRMeWBFE1ug/bfjGTAbeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 5 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/S1ddVKc3Jj4/IESJbFPeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 6 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/b5ODl3yA4uk/g77N-UreAAAJ My Scenario - Part 7 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/rwmZjz92YC8/P-9Mn07eAAAJ My Scenario - Part 8 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c6e29olW6XA/Os29-FveAAAJ My Scenario - Part 9 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/ixNqGISHbrU/gd06wVHeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 10 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/3Di6kuseb2Q/aHbAQmLeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 11 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/sYEyPH0A_eI/IH-UZgbeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 11a https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/aGduj6uaGUk/3eDp513eAAAJ My Scenario - Part 11b https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8rAmKZBOCiY/yCELq27eAAAJ My Scenario - Part 12 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/OnrH5R6ryHE/stjdfgbeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 12a https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/J0A8N12PPHU/CcxpiU7eAAAJ My Scenario - Part 13 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8hD-q0gTa_c/Co3ZJE7eAAAJ My Scenario - Part 14 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/lsaXwhPRbEg/hZ7ZmEveAAAJ My Scenario - Part 15 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UA86YdJXEgY/JhG8o0reAAAJ My Scenario - The Conclusion https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UWfco_sGxYw/yApSPFXeAAAJ
(No need for me to prove that you can't answer the questions critics
pose, you prove that every day.)
On Thu, 21 Sep 2023 15:10:29 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 9:42:07?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
Where's the question on this case that critics can't answer?
It doesn't exist.
Where's the question on this case that believers can't answer?
POSTED EVERY SINGLE DAY IN A MULTITUDE OF FORMS!!!
This is all a lurker needs to recognize to figure out who's got the
truth of the matter.
No need to delve into the minutia of the evidence... just see that
Gil, David, and I ask questions daily that believers run from... and
that believers are unable to post a question we can't answer.
Here's a freebie for you kooks... I won't even demand you answer a
question first - because I've already proven you won't.
******************************************************************
ASK ANY QUESTION RELATED TO THE ASSASSINATION OF JFK ON 11/22/63 THAT
YOU THINK I CAN'T ANSWER.
******************************************************************
You won't be able to. In fact, I predict you won't even try.
I'll try.
No coward, this isn't a try. You're asking *ME* to ask the
question...
this is YOUR burden.
So no, you've not even tried... as I predicted...
Why not answer the questions embedded in your Magnum Opus?
Pick one, coward!!!
If I pick, you'll whine... no reason for me to carry YOUR burden!
The Challenge - Part 1 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/x4n7Di-GBd8/_WbEfALeAAAJ >The Challenge - Part 2 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/WVBtmUQkx6c/9ZdyxAPeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 1 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/y0hdkKgWvtI/3uukYgXeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 2 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/jSfe1BrGfJc/SOXAOQbeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 2a >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/kGfZPR4C-Lw/AlnRq1HeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 3 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/IShoUFao5OU/VuYGWFTeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 3a >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/JFuasrnWRqA/l1vih03eAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 4 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/LRMeWBFE1ug/bfjGTAbeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 5 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/S1ddVKc3Jj4/IESJbFPeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 6 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/b5ODl3yA4uk/g77N-UreAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 7 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/rwmZjz92YC8/P-9Mn07eAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 8 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c6e29olW6XA/Os29-FveAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 9 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/ixNqGISHbrU/gd06wVHeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 10 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/3Di6kuseb2Q/aHbAQmLeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 11 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/sYEyPH0A_eI/IH-UZgbeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 11a >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/aGduj6uaGUk/3eDp513eAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 11b >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8rAmKZBOCiY/yCELq27eAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 12 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/OnrH5R6ryHE/stjdfgbeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 12a >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/J0A8N12PPHU/CcxpiU7eAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 13 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8hD-q0gTa_c/Co3ZJE7eAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 14 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/lsaXwhPRbEg/hZ7ZmEveAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 15 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UA86YdJXEgY/JhG8o0reAAAJ >My Scenario - The Conclusion >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UWfco_sGxYw/yApSPFXeAAAJ >>
(No need for me to prove that you can't answer the questions critics
pose, you prove that every day.)
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 5:32:42?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 21 Sep 2023 15:10:29 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 9:42:07?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
Where's the question on this case that critics can't answer?
It doesn't exist.
Where's the question on this case that believers can't answer?
POSTED EVERY SINGLE DAY IN A MULTITUDE OF FORMS!!!
This is all a lurker needs to recognize to figure out who's got the
truth of the matter.
No need to delve into the minutia of the evidence... just see that
Gil, David, and I ask questions daily that believers run from... and
that believers are unable to post a question we can't answer.
Here's a freebie for you kooks... I won't even demand you answer a
question first - because I've already proven you won't.
******************************************************************
ASK ANY QUESTION RELATED TO THE ASSASSINATION OF JFK ON 11/22/63 THAT
YOU THINK I CAN'T ANSWER.
******************************************************************
You won't be able to. In fact, I predict you won't even try.
I'll try.
No coward, this isn't a try. You're asking *ME* to ask the
question...
Er, no...
this is YOUR burden.
So no, you've not even tried... as I predicted...
Why not answer the questions embedded in your Magnum Opus?
Pick one, coward!!!
Okay. In your Magnum Opus, you write in Part 1, "At least three
shooters fired multiple weapons from at least three different
directions, striking the President three times, and striking Connally
at least twice, and probably three times. Clearly a conspiracy. Oswald
was not a shooter. Period."
My question is this: Why hasn't Team Oswald ran any tests to replicate what you allege?
The WC ran tests
and so did the HSCA
Private parties have ran computer simulations
reconstructed the shooting sequence, and so on.
Why are you allowed to make the allegation as fact
when you've provided no specific claim or tests that would confirm
your hypothesis?
In other words, why is the bar set so low for you, when you are the
one making the claim?
If I pick, you'll whine... no reason for me to carry YOUR burden!
The Challenge - Part 1 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/x4n7Di-GBd8/_WbEfALeAAAJ >>>The Challenge - Part 2 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/WVBtmUQkx6c/9ZdyxAPeAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 1 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/y0hdkKgWvtI/3uukYgXeAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 2 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/jSfe1BrGfJc/SOXAOQbeAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 2a >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/kGfZPR4C-Lw/AlnRq1HeAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 3 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/IShoUFao5OU/VuYGWFTeAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 3a >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/JFuasrnWRqA/l1vih03eAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 4 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/LRMeWBFE1ug/bfjGTAbeAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 5 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/S1ddVKc3Jj4/IESJbFPeAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 6 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/b5ODl3yA4uk/g77N-UreAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 7 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/rwmZjz92YC8/P-9Mn07eAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 8 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c6e29olW6XA/Os29-FveAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 9 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/ixNqGISHbrU/gd06wVHeAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 10 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/3Di6kuseb2Q/aHbAQmLeAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 11 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/sYEyPH0A_eI/IH-UZgbeAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 11a >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/aGduj6uaGUk/3eDp513eAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 11b >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8rAmKZBOCiY/yCELq27eAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 12 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/OnrH5R6ryHE/stjdfgbeAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 12a >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/J0A8N12PPHU/CcxpiU7eAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 13 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8hD-q0gTa_c/Co3ZJE7eAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 14 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/lsaXwhPRbEg/hZ7ZmEveAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 15 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UA86YdJXEgY/JhG8o0reAAAJ >>>My Scenario - The Conclusion >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UWfco_sGxYw/yApSPFXeAAAJ >>>>
(No need for me to prove that you can't answer the questions critics
pose, you prove that every day.)
On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:17:49 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 5:32:42?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 21 Sep 2023 15:10:29 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 9:42:07?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>> Where's the question on this case that critics can't answer?
It doesn't exist.
Where's the question on this case that believers can't answer?
POSTED EVERY SINGLE DAY IN A MULTITUDE OF FORMS!!!
This is all a lurker needs to recognize to figure out who's got the >>>> truth of the matter.
No need to delve into the minutia of the evidence... just see that
Gil, David, and I ask questions daily that believers run from... and >>>> that believers are unable to post a question we can't answer.
Here's a freebie for you kooks... I won't even demand you answer a
question first - because I've already proven you won't.
******************************************************************
ASK ANY QUESTION RELATED TO THE ASSASSINATION OF JFK ON 11/22/63 THAT >>>> YOU THINK I CAN'T ANSWER.
******************************************************************
You won't be able to. In fact, I predict you won't even try.
I'll try.
No coward, this isn't a try. You're asking *ME* to ask the
question...
Er, no...
Er yes.
You're asking ME to carry YOUR burden.
All you're doing is proving what I said... that you won't be able to,
in fact, I predict that you won't even try.
this is YOUR burden.
So no, you've not even tried... as I predicted...
Why not answer the questions embedded in your Magnum Opus?
Pick one, coward!!!
Okay. In your Magnum Opus, you write in Part 1, "At least threeNotice folks, that although Chuckles the Clown asked me to answer
shooters fired multiple weapons from at least three different
directions, striking the President three times, and striking Connally
at least twice, and probably three times. Clearly a conspiracy. Oswald
was not a shooter. Period."
questions posed in my "Magnum Opus"... he didn't quote any questions
from there.
My question is this: Why hasn't Team Oswald ran any tests to replicate what you allege?
For some of the same reasons that believers have never conducted any
tests. Of course, you have ADDITIONAL reasons you refuse to do any
tests... they would prove you wrong.
ROTFLMAO!!!! You failed.
The WC ran tests
And buried the inconvenient ones...
and so did the HSCA
Nothing that comes to mind... do you have any citations???
Private parties have ran computer simulationsNot a test.
reconstructed the shooting sequence, and so on.Not a test.
Why are you allowed to make the allegation as factBecause I can support it with actual citations to evidence.
when you've provided no specific claim or tests that would confirmYou've produced **NOTHING** that supports your non-existent scenario.
your hypothesis?
In other words, why is the bar set so low for you, when you are theWhen you have to lie to make a point, the only point you've made is
one making the claim?
that you're a liar.
If I pick, you'll whine... no reason for me to carry YOUR burden!
The Challenge - Part 1 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/x4n7Di-GBd8/_WbEfALeAAAJ
The Challenge - Part 2 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/WVBtmUQkx6c/9ZdyxAPeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 1 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/y0hdkKgWvtI/3uukYgXeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/jSfe1BrGfJc/SOXAOQbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2a >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/kGfZPR4C-Lw/AlnRq1HeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/IShoUFao5OU/VuYGWFTeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3a >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/JFuasrnWRqA/l1vih03eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 4 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/LRMeWBFE1ug/bfjGTAbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 5 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/S1ddVKc3Jj4/IESJbFPeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 6 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/b5ODl3yA4uk/g77N-UreAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 7 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/rwmZjz92YC8/P-9Mn07eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 8 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c6e29olW6XA/Os29-FveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 9 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/ixNqGISHbrU/gd06wVHeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 10 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/3Di6kuseb2Q/aHbAQmLeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/sYEyPH0A_eI/IH-UZgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11a >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/aGduj6uaGUk/3eDp513eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11b >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8rAmKZBOCiY/yCELq27eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/OnrH5R6ryHE/stjdfgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12a >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/J0A8N12PPHU/CcxpiU7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 13 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8hD-q0gTa_c/Co3ZJE7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 14 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/lsaXwhPRbEg/hZ7ZmEveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 15 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UA86YdJXEgY/JhG8o0reAAAJ
My Scenario - The Conclusion >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UWfco_sGxYw/yApSPFXeAAAJ
(No need for me to prove that you can't answer the questions critics >>>> pose, you prove that every day.)
On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 12:38:52 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:17:49 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 5:32:42?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 21 Sep 2023 15:10:29 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 9:42:07?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>> Where's the question on this case that critics can't answer?
It doesn't exist.
Where's the question on this case that believers can't answer?
POSTED EVERY SINGLE DAY IN A MULTITUDE OF FORMS!!!
This is all a lurker needs to recognize to figure out who's got the >>>> truth of the matter.
No need to delve into the minutia of the evidence... just see that >>>> Gil, David, and I ask questions daily that believers run from... and >>>> that believers are unable to post a question we can't answer.
Here's a freebie for you kooks... I won't even demand you answer a >>>> question first - because I've already proven you won't.
****************************************************************** >>>> ASK ANY QUESTION RELATED TO THE ASSASSINATION OF JFK ON 11/22/63 THAT >>>> YOU THINK I CAN'T ANSWER.
****************************************************************** >>>>
You won't be able to. In fact, I predict you won't even try.
I'll try.
No coward, this isn't a try. You're asking *ME* to ask the
question...
Er, no...
Er yes.
You're asking ME to carry YOUR burden.
All you're doing is proving what I said... that you won't be able to,
in fact, I predict that you won't even try.
this is YOUR burden.
So no, you've not even tried... as I predicted...
Why not answer the questions embedded in your Magnum Opus?
Pick one, coward!!!
Okay. In your Magnum Opus, you write in Part 1, "At least threeNotice folks, that although Chuckles the Clown asked me to answer questions posed in my "Magnum Opus"... he didn't quote any questions
shooters fired multiple weapons from at least three different directions, striking the President three times, and striking Connally
at least twice, and probably three times. Clearly a conspiracy. Oswald was not a shooter. Period."
from there.
My question is this: Why hasn't Team Oswald ran any tests to replicate what you allege?
For some of the same reasons that believers have never conducted any tests. Of course, you have ADDITIONAL reasons you refuse to do any tests... they would prove you wrong.So the reason Team Oswald hasn't run tests is because the Oswald Alone side has never ran tests? Is that your answer?
ROTFLMAO!!!! You failed.
The WC ran tests
And buried the inconvenient ones...
and so did the HSCA
Nothing that comes to mind... do you have any citations???
Private parties have ran computer simulationsNot a test.
reconstructed the shooting sequence, and so on.Not a test.
Why are you allowed to make the allegation as factBecause I can support it with actual citations to evidence.
when you've provided no specific claim or tests that would confirmYou've produced **NOTHING** that supports your non-existent scenario.
your hypothesis?
In other words, why is the bar set so low for you, when you are theWhen you have to lie to make a point, the only point you've made is
one making the claim?
that you're a liar.
If I pick, you'll whine... no reason for me to carry YOUR burden! >>>The Challenge - Part 1 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/x4n7Di-GBd8/_WbEfALeAAAJ
The Challenge - Part 2 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/WVBtmUQkx6c/9ZdyxAPeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 1 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/y0hdkKgWvtI/3uukYgXeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/jSfe1BrGfJc/SOXAOQbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2a >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/kGfZPR4C-Lw/AlnRq1HeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/IShoUFao5OU/VuYGWFTeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3a >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/JFuasrnWRqA/l1vih03eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 4 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/LRMeWBFE1ug/bfjGTAbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 5 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/S1ddVKc3Jj4/IESJbFPeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 6 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/b5ODl3yA4uk/g77N-UreAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 7 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/rwmZjz92YC8/P-9Mn07eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 8 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c6e29olW6XA/Os29-FveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 9 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/ixNqGISHbrU/gd06wVHeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 10 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/3Di6kuseb2Q/aHbAQmLeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/sYEyPH0A_eI/IH-UZgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11a >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/aGduj6uaGUk/3eDp513eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11b >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8rAmKZBOCiY/yCELq27eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/OnrH5R6ryHE/stjdfgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12a >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/J0A8N12PPHU/CcxpiU7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 13 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8hD-q0gTa_c/Co3ZJE7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 14 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/lsaXwhPRbEg/hZ7ZmEveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 15 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UA86YdJXEgY/JhG8o0reAAAJ
My Scenario - The Conclusion >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UWfco_sGxYw/yApSPFXeAAAJ
(No need for me to prove that you can't answer the questions critics >>>> pose, you prove that every day.)
On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 2:01:16 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 12:38:52 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
Not even true. Posner ran tests. Alvarez ran tests. Lattimer ran tests.For some of the same reasons that believers have never conducted any tests. Of course, you have ADDITIONAL reasons you refuse to do any tests... they would prove you wrong.So the reason Team Oswald hasn't run tests is because the Oswald Alone side has never ran tests? Is that your answer?
For some of the same reasons that believers have never conducted any
tests. Of course, you have ADDITIONAL reasons you refuse to do any
tests... they would prove you wrong.
So the reason Team Oswald hasn't run tests is...
Some of the best tests were conducted by the father/son ballistic experts Luke and Michael
Haag. The showed that the path taken by the single bullet was not only possible but to be
expected.
On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 13:31:56 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
Some of the best tests were conducted by the father/son ballistic experts Luke and MichaelThe expert testimony refutes this.
Haag. The showed that the path taken by the single bullet was not only possible but to be
expected.
You lose.
On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 11:01:14 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
For some of the same reasons that believers have never conducted any
tests. Of course, you have ADDITIONAL reasons you refuse to do any
tests... they would prove you wrong.
So the reason Team Oswald hasn't run tests is...
For the same reasons that believers have never conducted any tests.
Despite the fact that you lied about the question - it was indeed
answered.
Completely and credibly.
You lose.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 297 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 120:31:54 |
Calls: | 6,662 |
Files: | 12,210 |
Messages: | 5,334,424 |