Amusingly, even one of the Warren Commission staffers admitted that
they'd lied in their report.

"When the drafts of our final Report were presented for the
Commissioners to review, their deference to Governor Connally was so
great that they directed a revision in a major conclusion of the
Commission that resulted in AN OUTRIGHT MISSTATEMENT OF FACT. This
revision involved the single bullet theory; you will find it on page
19 of the Report, Conclusion No. 3." - David Belin, "You Are The
Jury", pg 347

Belin recognized, as many do; that the SBT is *ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY*
(Belin's words!) to the Warren Commission's theory. Without the SBT,
conspiracy is *PROVEN*

That the Warren Commission lied on much of the evidence is something
I've shown time and time again - but here we have an actual Warren
Commission Staff lawyer admitting that the Warren Commission
*KNOWINGLY* published a lie.

So... who was lying?

David Belin?

Or the Warren Commission?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 21 Sep 2023 07:28:05 -0700, Ben Holmes
<Admin@ConspiracyJFKForum.com> wrote:

Amusingly, even one of the Warren Commission staffers admitted that
they'd lied in their report.

"When the drafts of our final Report were presented for the
Commissioners to review, their deference to Governor Connally was so
great that they directed a revision in a major conclusion of the
Commission that resulted in AN OUTRIGHT MISSTATEMENT OF FACT. This
revision involved the single bullet theory; you will find it on page
19 of the Report, Conclusion No. 3." - David Belin, "You Are The
Jury", pg 347

Belin recognized, as many do; that the SBT is *ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY*
(Belin's words!) to the Warren Commission's theory. Without the SBT, >conspiracy is *PROVEN*

That the Warren Commission lied on much of the evidence is something
I've shown time and time again - but here we have an actual Warren
Commission Staff lawyer admitting that the Warren Commission
*KNOWINGLY* published a lie.

So... who was lying?

David Belin?

Or the Warren Commission?

Huckster read this - and promptly turned tail and ran away to his safe
place.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

From a memorandum written by Albert Jenner to Lee Rankin on April
20th, 1964:

**************************
"Delivered herewith are three preliminary memoranda prepared by John
Ely at my request made in late February or early March.

My purpose was to obtain a chronology based on these existing data in
our files of the background facts -- life, school, places of
residence, etc -- of Mrs Oswald, her several marriages, her husbands
and her three children and, in particular, Lee Harvey Oswald, from the
time she married Edward John Pic, Jr., in the fall of 1929, to the
time Lee Harvey Oswald entered military service in October, 1956.
...
On the whole, Mr. Ely's memoranda present a good over-all picture of
the course of events involving the Oswalds up to the time of Lee
Harvey Oswald's entry into the military service Our depositions and
examination of records and other data disclose that there are details
in Mr. Ely's memoranda which will require material alteration and, in
some instances, omission."
...
**************************

Let me repeat that last sentence one more time... regarding the
historical details of Oswald and his family: "...THERE ARE DETAILS ...
WHICH WILL REQUIRE MATERIAL ALTERATION AND, IN SOME INSTANCES,
OMISSION."

Now, since believers *FREQUENTLY* claim that Mark Lane is a "liar"
based on the claim that he *omitted* something - can believers now
admit that the Warren Commission lied?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)