1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. ALT.CONSPIRACY.JFK

  • The PROVEN Cowardice Of Every Single Believer...

    From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Wed Sep 20 15:59:42 2023
    I hear the argument that they don't have to make their case, because
    this is a "conspiracy" forum. But the censored forum clearly was
    not... and yet believers STILL couldn't make their case.

    There's no forum anywhere online where WCR believers support their
    faith.

    And that tells us two things:

    1. The WCR *CANNOT* be defended...

    2. Every single WCR believer is a coward.

    The *ONLY* way this conclusion can be refuted is to either defend the
    WCR right here - or cite where it's done in a forum somewhere online.

    Watch folks - as the cowardice continues!!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Wed Sep 20 16:44:51 2023
    On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 16:41:35 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:


    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Wed Sep 20 16:41:35 2023
    On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 6:59:48 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    I hear the argument that they don't have to make their case, because
    this is a "conspiracy" forum.

    And you absolutely hate this because it is true, and you hate the truth.

    But the censored forum clearly was
    not... and yet believers STILL couldn't make their case.

    The case is available online, it was made decades ago.

    There's no forum anywhere online where WCR believers support their
    faith.

    A lot of historical realities have no forum devoted to them.

    And that tells us two things:

    Ben is going to show what a poor thinker he is, watch...

    1. The WCR *CANNOT* be defended...

    Against what?

    2. Every single WCR believer is a coward.

    More likely you are delusional, trying to live some sort of heroic fantasy.

    The *ONLY* way this conclusion can be refuted is to either defend the
    WCR right here - or cite where it's done in a forum somewhere online.

    <snicker> Ben never tires of trying to coerce people to play his crooked games.

    These things have been shown to my satisfaction. Who care whether it has been shown to the satisfaction of idiots?

    Watch folks - as the cowardice continues!!!

    Yours is nonstop. You refuse to look at information correctly because you are afraid of what that might mean, that you have been a fool for decades. Better to believe the problem lies with other folks rather than take ownership of your own mental
    illness.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to Bud on Thu Sep 21 03:09:05 2023
    On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 7:41:37 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
    These things have been shown to my satisfaction. Who care whether it has been shown to the satisfaction of idiots?

    Apparently you do because you're in here every day.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to gjjmail1202@gmail.com on Thu Sep 21 07:16:43 2023
    On Thu, 21 Sep 2023 03:09:05 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
    <gjjmail1202@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 7:41:37?PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
    These things have been shown to my satisfaction. Who care whether it has been shown to the satisfaction of idiots?

    Apparently you do because you're in here every day.

    He whines that most of America are idiots, and never stops to think of
    the impliications of that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to Admin@ConspiracyJFKForum.com on Thu Sep 21 08:50:16 2023
    On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 15:59:42 -0700, Ben Holmes
    <Admin@ConspiracyJFKForum.com> wrote:

    I hear the argument that they don't have to make their case, because
    this is a "conspiracy" forum. But the censored forum clearly was
    not... and yet believers STILL couldn't make their case.

    There's no forum anywhere online where WCR believers support their
    faith.

    And that tells us two things:

    1. The WCR *CANNOT* be defended...

    2. Every single WCR believer is a coward.

    The *ONLY* way this conclusion can be refuted is to either defend the
    WCR right here - or cite where it's done in a forum somewhere online.

    Watch folks - as the cowardice continues!!!

    Notice folks, that not a *SINGLE* believer was able to refute the
    simple truth I posted above.

    When critics post the truth... believers run...

    EVERY

    SINGLE

    TIME!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Thu Sep 21 10:32:34 2023
    On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 6:09:07 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 7:41:37 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
    These things have been shown to my satisfaction. Who care whether it has been shown to the satisfaction of idiots?
    Apparently you do because you're in here every day.

    Make the case how one thing necessarily means the other.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Thu Sep 21 10:33:39 2023
    On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 10:19:55 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Thu, 21 Sep 2023 03:09:05 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
    <gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 7:41:37?PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
    These things have been shown to my satisfaction. Who care whether it has been shown to the satisfaction of idiots?

    Apparently you do because you're in here every day.
    He whines that most of America are idiots, and never stops to think of
    the impliications of that.

    Such as?

    Some day you might be man enough to actually say something.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Thu Sep 21 10:34:35 2023
    On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 11:50:23 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 15:59:42 -0700, Ben Holmes <Ad...@ConspiracyJFKForum.com> wrote:

    I hear the argument that they don't have to make their case, because
    this is a "conspiracy" forum. But the censored forum clearly was
    not... and yet believers STILL couldn't make their case.

    There's no forum anywhere online where WCR believers support their
    faith.

    And that tells us two things:

    1. The WCR *CANNOT* be defended...

    2. Every single WCR believer is a coward.

    The *ONLY* way this conclusion can be refuted is to either defend the
    WCR right here - or cite where it's done in a forum somewhere online.

    Watch folks - as the cowardice continues!!!
    Notice folks, that not a *SINGLE* believer was able to refute the
    simple truth I posted above.

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/BoFHiLS1HdU/m/nb6JpS9kAQAJ

    When critics post the truth... believers run...

    EVERY

    SINGLE

    TIME!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Thu Sep 21 10:39:42 2023
    On Thu, 21 Sep 2023 10:33:39 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:


    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Thu Sep 21 10:40:19 2023
    On Thu, 21 Sep 2023 10:34:35 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:


    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)