"When Rowland testified before the Commission on March 10, 1964, he
claimed for the first time to have seen another person on the sixth
floor." (WCR 251)

What's amusing about this lie, is that the Warren Commission itself,
ON THE SAME PAGE(!!), demonstrates that it lied.

"The only possible corroboration for Rowland's story is found in the
testimony of Roger D. Craig, a deputy sheriff of Dallas Country, whose testimony on other aspects of the case has been discussed in chapter
IV. Craig claimed that about 10 minutes after the assassination he
talked to a young couple, Mr. and Mrs. Rowland, "...and the boy said
he saw two men on the sixth floor..." (WCR 251)

Now, either Mr. Rowland was, for the first time, telling someone that
he saw two people on the sixth floor on March 10th, 1964, or he was
doing so just 10 minutes after the assassination on November 22nd,
1963. They both cannot be true.

In their efforts to discredit eyewitnesses who had damaging testimony
to offer - the Warren Commission would *ALWAYS* either ignore their
testimony, refuse to take their testimony, lie about their testimony,
or discredit their testimony.

But no-one can dispute that in this case, the Warren Commission Report
itself demonstrated that they lied.

Corbutt can't answer, so he refuses to try... Huckster reads these,
and realizes that there's nothing he can refute, so he runs like the
yellow coward he is too.

This lie is just so blatant and obvious, that only a moron (or coward)
would not publicly state that there's a proven lie here.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 07:14:01 -0700, Ben Holmes
<Admin@ConspiracyJFKForum.com> wrote:

"When Rowland testified before the Commission on March 10, 1964, he
claimed for the first time to have seen another person on the sixth
floor." (WCR 251)

What's amusing about this lie, is that the Warren Commission itself,
ON THE SAME PAGE(!!), demonstrates that it lied.

"The only possible corroboration for Rowland's story is found in the >testimony of Roger D. Craig, a deputy sheriff of Dallas Country, whose >testimony on other aspects of the case has been discussed in chapter
IV. Craig claimed that about 10 minutes after the assassination he
talked to a young couple, Mr. and Mrs. Rowland, "...and the boy said
he saw two men on the sixth floor..." (WCR 251)

Now, either Mr. Rowland was, for the first time, telling someone that
he saw two people on the sixth floor on March 10th, 1964, or he was
doing so just 10 minutes after the assassination on November 22nd,
1963. They both cannot be true.

In their efforts to discredit eyewitnesses who had damaging testimony
to offer - the Warren Commission would *ALWAYS* either ignore their >testimony, refuse to take their testimony, lie about their testimony,
or discredit their testimony.

But no-one can dispute that in this case, the Warren Commission Report
itself demonstrated that they lied.

Corbutt can't answer, so he refuses to try... Huckster reads these,
and realizes that there's nothing he can refute, so he runs like the
yellow coward he is too.

This lie is just so blatant and obvious, that only a moron (or coward)
would not publicly state that there's a proven lie here.

This one post, all by itself, proves that the WCR lied. And yet,
there's not a single believer honest enough to acknowledge this, or
refute it.

Huckster's cowardice is particularly amusing!!!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)