Bartender says "What are you having, Gil?"
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.
It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)
So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 7:48:41 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.
It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)
So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.Bud likes to refer to people as "stumps", but the truth is that the only stump here is Bud.
Bud is too stupid to realize that I punked him in that "virus" post.
You're stupid enough to think you did. You are a legend in your own mind.
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 10:46:36 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:stay around to help the police, to tell them where he was and what he heard. The same Oswald who was in a movie theater and who tried to shoot the police who questioned him. Yes, he thinks Bud reacted just like Oswald did.>
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 7:39:25 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 7:48:41 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.
It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)
When I posted to Bud in response saying that he (Bud) didn't have the ability to hack the google groups system in order to change people's names - and only conspiracists names - I got this in return.You're stupid enough to think you did. You are a legend in your own mind.So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.Bud likes to refer to people as "stumps", but the truth is that the only stump here is Bud.
Bud is too stupid to realize that I punked him in that "virus" post.
"Wrong professor.
I think he has the ability to change the names of anyone, but chooses to target only the conspiracy theorists.
This where he fucked up.
He never did it to someone on your side, proving it wasn't a Google glitch.
He's full of shit and so are you.
Class dismissed. "
But see? He was only joking, it was a trap. He was showing us that Bud reacted like Oswald did and that somehow helps exonerates Oswald. You know the same Oswald who left the scene of the crime immediately after the shooting? The same Oswald who didn't
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 7:39:25 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:When I posted to Bud in response saying that he (Bud) didn't have the ability to hack the google groups system in order to change people's names - and only conspiracists names - I got this in return.
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 7:48:41 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.
It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)
You're stupid enough to think you did. You are a legend in your own mind.So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.Bud likes to refer to people as "stumps", but the truth is that the only stump here is Bud.
Bud is too stupid to realize that I punked him in that "virus" post.
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 7:39:25?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 7:48:41?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knowsBud likes to refer to people as "stumps", but the truth is that the only stump here is Bud.
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.
It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)
So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.
Bud is too stupid to realize that I punked him in that "virus" post.
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 7:48:41 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.
It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)
So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.Bud likes to refer to people as "stumps", but the truth is that the only stump here is Bud.
Bud is too stupid to realize that I punked him in that "virus" post.
I wanted to show the world how someone would react to being wrongly accused of something they didn't do.
And Bud reacted exactly the same way Lee Harvey Oswald reacted.
He denied everything.
He said it was ridiculous.
He said it was crazy.
His reaction was exactly as described in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKGp4WNZ7us
So tell us Bud, how does it feel to be Lee Harvey Oswald ?
How does it feel to be outsmarted by a "stump" ?
ROFLMAO
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 7:39:25 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:If you had acted like Oswald you would have fled the newsgroup. Went to see a movie after picking up a revolver and loading it and getting 10 extra bullets. Not stay around. His analogy just exposed the problems with his client's actions.
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 7:48:41 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.
It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)
Hardly.So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.Bud likes to refer to people as "stumps", but the truth is that the only stump here is Bud.
Bud is too stupid to realize that I punked him in that "virus" post.You`re lying, of course. You actually thought I had given you a virus, and now that I pointed out how stupid that was you are backtracking.
I wanted to show the world how someone would react to being wrongly accused of something they didn't do.Like when you accused the cops of executing that Mexican? Were you "punking" me then, too?
And Bud reacted exactly the same way Lee Harvey Oswald reacted.I see Oswald in front of a bunch of newsmen, having the chance to explain things. I see him in contact with his family member, with the opportunity to explain things. He offered nothing because he was guilty and had nothing.
He denied everything.Nobody reacts like Oswald did in that situation except guilty people.
He said it was ridiculous.
He said it was crazy.
His reaction was exactly as described in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKGp4WNZ7us
So tell us Bud, how does it feel to be Lee Harvey Oswald ?You`re an idiot. You could be used as a gauge for ideas, if you embrace them they must be wrong.
How does it feel to be outsmarted by a "stump" ?Couldn`t I just claim I knew what you were up to and wanted you to make this response? Wouldn`t that be as meaningless as your claims here?
ROFLMAO
If you had acted like Oswald...
On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 10:52:09 -0700 (PDT), Steven Galbraith <stevemg...@yahoo.com> wrote:
If you had acted like Oswald...
Speculation isn't evidence.
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 10:46:36 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
You're stupid enough to think you did. You are a legend in your own mind.I guess Ben must have taken another dump, cuz here you are.
No, I'm in YOUR mind. I'm in YOUR head.
You wait here every day for me to post, like a stalker.
You think every new poster is me.
You have Gil Jesus Derangement Syndrome. ( GJDS )
When I don't post for a few days, you cry, "Where's Gil " ?
I'm a nemesis you can't live without.
Meanwhile, I'm sitting here laughing my ass off.
You know who's entertained by you and your pals ? Me.
I'm amazed at the level of stupidity, ignorance and gullibility of you all. Even the so-called, "professor".
Not only did Bud react just like Oswald reacted, your group was once again exposed as the gullible braindead who believe everything they're told.
Here's a question for you and you Lone Nut Cementheads:
If you had been wrongly accused of killing the President, how would you have responded ?
I'll bet you would have responded just like Oswald and just like Bud.
You would have emphatically denied the charges.
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 12:03:20 PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 10:46:36 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
You're stupid enough to think you did. You are a legend in your own mind.I guess Ben must have taken another dump, cuz here you are.
No, I'm in YOUR mind. I'm in YOUR head.
You wait here every day for me to post, like a stalker.
You think every new poster is me.
You have Gil Jesus Derangement Syndrome. ( GJDS )
This is why I hang around here. CTs are always good for at least one belly laugh a day. This one
did the trick.
When I don't post for a few days, you cry, "Where's Gil " ?I don't recall ever writing that. I don't recall ever thinking that. I have noted when you bail out of
I'm a nemesis you can't live without.
a thread when another of your lame arguments has been refuted and you have no rebuttal.
I have one or two occasions asked where Yellowpanties is because he has a routine where he
disappears on weekends and then reappears on Mondays to swamp post. In that regard he has
something in common with Oswald. Oswald broke his routine when he went to the Paine house
on a Thursday night which was noteworthy. It was also noteworthy when Yellowpanties didn't
take his usual Monday morning dump. Since I no longer respond to his childish posts, I no
longer find that to be noteworthy. IOW, I don't give a shit.
Meanwhile, I'm sitting here laughing my ass off.Sine you're all ass, that's quite an accomplishment.
You know who's entertained by you and your pals ? Me.Not surprising an idiot like you would think the intelligent people are the idiots.
I'm amazed at the level of stupidity, ignorance and gullibility of you all.
Even the so-called, "professor".
Not only did Bud react just like Oswald reacted, your group was once again exposed as the gullible braindead who believe everything they're told.
No we believe things that are believable and backed up by credible evidence. You on the other
hand believe in myths based on assumptions, speculation, and imagination.
Here's a question for you and you Lone Nut Cementheads:Having never been wrongly accused of killing a President, I can only speculate since your
If you had been wrongly accused of killing the President, how would you have responded ?
question calls for speculation. I believe I would deny it. I speculate I would deny it if I had killed
a President, so my denial is not an indication of whether I had or had not killed a President.
I'll bet you would have responded just like Oswald and just like Bud.Yes I would, whether the charges were or were not true. I don't think it makes a lot of sense
You would have emphatically denied the charges.
to judge a person's guilt or innocence based on whether they deny the charges against them.
Even if they do so emphatically. For some strange reason, you find it probative that Oswald
denied his guilt.
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 12:03:20?PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 10:46:36?AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote: >>> You're stupid enough to think you did. You are a legend in your own mind. >> I guess Ben must have taken another dump, cuz here you are.
No, I'm in YOUR mind. I'm in YOUR head.
You wait here every day for me to post, like a stalker.
You think every new poster is me.
You have Gil Jesus Derangement Syndrome. ( GJDS )
When I don't post for a few days, you cry, "Where's Gil " ?
I'm a nemesis you can't live without.
I don't recall ever writing that. I don't recall ever thinking that.
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 7:48:41 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.
It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)
So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.Bud likes to refer to people as "stumps", but the truth is that the only stump here is Bud.
Bud is too stupid to realize that I punked him in that "virus" post.
I wanted to show the world how someone would react to being wrongly accused of something they didn't do.
And Bud reacted exactly the same way Lee Harvey Oswald reacted.
He denied everything.
He said it was ridiculous.
He said it was crazy.
His reaction was exactly as described in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKGp4WNZ7us
So tell us Bud, how does it feel to be Lee Harvey Oswald ?
How does it feel to be outsmarted by a "stump" ?
ROFLMAO
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 7:39:25 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 7:48:41 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.
It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)
So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.Bud likes to refer to people as "stumps", but the truth is that the only stump here is Bud.
Bud is too stupid to realize that I punked him in that "virus" post.
I wanted to show the world how someone would react to being wrongly accused of something they didn't do.
And Bud reacted exactly the same way Lee Harvey Oswald reacted.
He denied everything.Hello? Anybody home?
He said it was ridiculous.
He said it was crazy.
Both the innocent and the guilty typically deny everything.
You cannot tell anything about Oswald’s guilt or innocence because of his denials.
Need I remind you that Ted Bundy denied everything as well?
Until his execution was approaching, then he suddenly wanted to confess, but he needed more time to do it right and bring closure to the dead girls families.
His reaction was exactly as described in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKGp4WNZ7us
So tell us Bud, how does it feel to be Lee Harvey Oswald ?You admit Bud was innocent and falsely charged by you. You still need to establish Oswald was innocent, not just assert it and repeat it.
How does it feel to be outsmarted by a "stump" ?
ROFLMAO
On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 15:07:39 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 12:03:20?PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
When I don't post for a few days, you cry, "Where's Gil " ?
I'm a nemesis you can't live without.
I don't recall ever writing that. I don't recall ever thinking that. https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/BI_ZOaLh-30/m/29tla-YeCQAJ
Getting so old that you can't remember...
WHAT A MORON!!!
On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 15:07:39 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 12:03:20?PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
When I don't post for a few days, you cry, "Where's Gil " ?
I'm a nemesis you can't live without.
I don't recall ever writing that. I don't recall ever thinking that. https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/BI_ZOaLh-30/m/29tla-YeCQAJ
Getting so old that you can't remember...
WHAT A MORON!!!
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 6:43:41 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 15:07:39 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett <geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 12:03:20?PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote: >>
When I don't post for a few days, you cry, "Where's Gil " ?
I'm a nemesis you can't live without.
I don't recall ever writing that. I don't recall ever thinking that. https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/BI_ZOaLh-30/m/29tla-YeCQAJ
Getting so old that you can't remember...
WHAT A MORON!!!He couldn't remember a post from a little over a month ago ?
He's a liar to boot.
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 5:03:42 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 6:43:41 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 15:07:39 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett <geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 12:03:20?PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote: >>
When I don't post for a few days, you cry, "Where's Gil " ?
I'm a nemesis you can't live without.
I don't recall ever writing that. I don't recall ever thinking that. https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/BI_ZOaLh-30/m/29tla-YeCQAJ
Getting so old that you can't remember...
OK. That's one for you. I had forgotten that one. BFD.WHAT A MORON!!!He couldn't remember a post from a little over a month ago ?
He's a liar to boot.
Yes. Bud really is too stupid to be able to hack Google. He's a Nutter, after all, and not a particularly bright Nutter. I think all eventually will agree that your Drooling Little Buddy is as "innocent" as a box of rocks.
It never ceases to amaze me that Moron Corbett can't remember anything he said a month ago, like his promise that he was done with his haunting of the Nut House.
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 12:35:56 AM UTC-4, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
Yes. Bud really is too stupid to be able to hack Google. He's a Nutter, after all, and not a particularly bright Nutter. I think all eventually will agree that your Drooling Little Buddy is as "innocent" as a box of rocks.He also also has an intense hatred for Mexicans.
If he calls you a Mexican, that's supposed to be an insult, even if you're white and Portuguese.
That's what he calls "reasoning" and the world calls speculation. Speculation is another way of saying you're guessing.
Bud does that a lot ( as do the rest of the Lone Nutters ) and that's why they're wrong so often.
And they never learn, they keep on speculating because they have to.
They have their own truth and it's unshakable:
The Warren Commission concluded Oswald was guilty. Nothing else matters.
No amount of physical evidence to the contrary can change that.
No amount of witness testimony to the contrary can change that.
No amount of evidence tampering can change that.
No amount of evidence of police corruption can change that.
No amount of mishandling evidence can change that.
No amount of evidence of witness harassment can change that.
A reasonable and prudent person would balk for the above reasons.
But these people are not reasonable and prudent.
They have their own truth and anyone who doesn't agree with it is a "conspiracy kook".
He's a troll. He has no credibility.
Everything he says is a lie.
He can't help it. He's a pathological liar.
His lies have been exposed by Ben and me time and time again.
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 5:40:23?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 12:35:56?AM UTC-4, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
Yes. Bud really is too stupid to be able to hack Google. He's a Nutter, after all, and not a particularly bright Nutter. I think all eventually will agree that your Drooling Little Buddy is as "innocent" as a box of rocks.He also also has an intense hatred for Mexicans.
If he calls you a Mexican, that's supposed to be an insult, even if you're white and Portuguese.
That's what he calls "reasoning" and the world calls speculation.
Speculation is another way of saying you're guessing.
Bud does that a lot ( as do the rest of the Lone Nutters ) and that's why they're wrong so often.
And they never learn, they keep on speculating because they have to.
Speculation is a belief reached in lieu of evidence.
There is ample evidence that tells us Oswald
was the assassin.
There is none that he had even a single accomplice.
They have their own truth and it's unshakable:
The Warren Commission concluded Oswald was guilty. Nothing else matters.
No amount of physical evidence to the contrary can change that.
There is no physical evidence to the contrary.
No amount of witness testimony to the contrary can change that.
Witnesses can be and often are wrong. It is not surprising that there would be witnesses that
contradict the truth.
No amount of evidence tampering can change that.
There is no evidence of tampering, only speculation.
No amount of evidence of police corruption can change that.
No one denies SOME police are corrupt. The pertinent question is whether there was any
corruption in the investigation of the assassination. No evidence of such exists.
No amount of mishandling evidence can change that.
No amount of evidence of witness harassment can change that.
Empty claims of such.
A reasonable and prudent person would balk for the above reasons.
But these people are not reasonable and prudent.
They have their own truth and anyone who doesn't agree with it is a "conspiracy kook".
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 6:43:41?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 15:07:39 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 12:03:20?PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/BI_ZOaLh-30/m/29tla-YeCQAJ >>
When I don't post for a few days, you cry, "Where's Gil " ?
I'm a nemesis you can't live without.
I don't recall ever writing that. I don't recall ever thinking that.
Getting so old that you can't remember...
WHAT A MORON!!!
He couldn't remember a post from a little over a month ago ?
He's a liar to boot.
On Thu, 21 Sep 2023 02:56:34 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 5:40:23?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:Logical fallacy deleted.
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 12:35:56?AM UTC-4, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
Yes. Bud really is too stupid to be able to hack Google. He's a Nutter, after all, and not a particularly bright Nutter. I think all eventually will agree that your Drooling Little Buddy is as "innocent" as a box of rocks.He also also has an intense hatred for Mexicans.
If he calls you a Mexican, that's supposed to be an insult, even if you're white and Portuguese.
That's what he calls "reasoning" and the world calls speculation.
Speculation is another way of saying you're guessing.
Bud does that a lot ( as do the rest of the Lone Nutters ) and that's why they're wrong so often.
And they never learn, they keep on speculating because they have to.
Speculation is a belief reached in lieu of evidence.Indeed true. One wonders why believers CONSTANTLY speculate...
There is ample evidence that tells us OswaldThis is an empty claiim made without any citation to evidence
was the assassin.
supporting it... Chickenshit poiints out that this is a lie.
There is none that he had even a single accomplice.This is simply a lie on your part. A lie you will NEVER support...
They have their own truth and it's unshakable:
The Warren Commission concluded Oswald was guilty. Nothing else matters. Logical fallacies deleted.
No amount of physical evidence to the contrary can change that.
There is no physical evidence to the contrary.None that the WC was honest enough to deal with, true.
But the NAA proves the WC and you a liar.
No amount of witness testimony to the contrary can change that.
Witnesses can be and often are wrong. It is not surprising that there would be witnesses thatBut, in this case, that's EVERY SINGLE EYEWITNESS. You can't name a
contradict the truth.
*SINGLE* eyewitness you believe completely in their contemporary
statements & testimony. This is devastating to your honesty & faith.
No amount of evidence tampering can change that.
There is no evidence of tampering, only speculation.Another blatant lie on your part.
https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Essay_-_Proof_the_FBI_Changed_Documents_and_Vincent_Bugliosi_Was_Wrong.html
No amount of evidence of police corruption can change that.
No one denies SOME police are corrupt. The pertinent question is whether there was anyAgain, you're simply lying.
corruption in the investigation of the assassination. No evidence of such exists.
Logical fallacy deleted.No amount of mishandling evidence can change that.
No amount of evidence of witness harassment can change that.
Empty claims of such.Such a BLATANT lie!
Logical fallacy deleted.A reasonable and prudent person would balk for the above reasons.
Logical fallacy deleted.But these people are not reasonable and prudent.
Logical fallacy deleted.They have their own truth and anyone who doesn't agree with it is a "conspiracy kook".
Isn't it amusing how sad it is when you strip beliievers of their lies
& logical fallacies?
On Thu, 21 Sep 2023 02:17:25 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 5:03:42?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 6:43:41?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>> On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 15:07:39 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:He couldn't remember a post from a little over a month ago ?
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 12:03:20?PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote: >>>>>https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/BI_ZOaLh-30/m/29tla-YeCQAJ
When I don't post for a few days, you cry, "Where's Gil " ?
I'm a nemesis you can't live without.
I don't recall ever writing that. I don't recall ever thinking that.
Getting so old that you can't remember...
WHAT A MORON!!!
He's a liar to boot.
OK. That's one for you. I had forgotten that one. BFD.If you can forget your own post from such a recent past, your
reasoning ability is quite flawed indeed.
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 10:19:56 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 21 Sep 2023 02:56:34 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett <geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 5:40:23?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:Logical fallacy deleted.
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 12:35:56?AM UTC-4, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
Yes. Bud really is too stupid to be able to hack Google. He's a Nutter, after all, and not a particularly bright Nutter. I think all eventually will agree that your Drooling Little Buddy is as "innocent" as a box of rocks.He also also has an intense hatred for Mexicans.
If he calls you a Mexican, that's supposed to be an insult, even if you're white and Portuguese.
That's what he calls "reasoning" and the world calls speculation.
Speculation is another way of saying you're guessing.
Bud does that a lot ( as do the rest of the Lone Nutters ) and that's why they're wrong so often.
And they never learn, they keep on speculating because they have to.
Speculation is a belief reached in lieu of evidence.Indeed true. One wonders why believers CONSTANTLY speculate...
There is ample evidence that tells us OswaldThis is an empty claiim made without any citation to evidence
was the assassin.
supporting it... Chickenshit poiints out that this is a lie.
There is none that he had even a single accomplice.This is simply a lie on your part. A lie you will NEVER support...
Logical fallacies deleted.They have their own truth and it's unshakable:
The Warren Commission concluded Oswald was guilty. Nothing else matters.
No amount of physical evidence to the contrary can change that.
There is no physical evidence to the contrary.None that the WC was honest enough to deal with, true.
But the NAA proves the WC and you a liar.Ben was almost man enough to make an actual argument here. Almost.
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 1:38:19?PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 10:19:56?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 21 Sep 2023 02:56:34 -0700 (PDT), John CorbettBen was almost man enough to make an actual argument here. Almost.
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 5:40:23?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:Logical fallacy deleted.
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 12:35:56?AM UTC-4, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
Yes. Bud really is too stupid to be able to hack Google. He's a Nutter, after all, and not a particularly bright Nutter. I think all eventually will agree that your Drooling Little Buddy is as "innocent" as a box of rocks.He also also has an intense hatred for Mexicans.
If he calls you a Mexican, that's supposed to be an insult, even if you're white and Portuguese.
That's what he calls "reasoning" and the world calls speculation.
Speculation is another way of saying you're guessing.
Indeed true. One wonders why believers CONSTANTLY speculate...Bud does that a lot ( as do the rest of the Lone Nutters ) and that's why they're wrong so often.
And they never learn, they keep on speculating because they have to.
Speculation is a belief reached in lieu of evidence.
There is ample evidence that tells us OswaldThis is an empty claiim made without any citation to evidence
was the assassin.
supporting it... Chickenshit poiints out that this is a lie.
There is none that he had even a single accomplice.This is simply a lie on your part. A lie you will NEVER support...
None that the WC was honest enough to deal with, true.They have their own truth and it's unshakable:
The Warren Commission concluded Oswald was guilty. Nothing else matters. >>> Logical fallacies deleted.
No amount of physical evidence to the contrary can change that.
There is no physical evidence to the contrary.
But the NAA proves the WC and you a liar.
The point he was trying to make is a lie.
The truth is the WC put very little probative value in
the NAA results.
The presence of barium and antimony on Oswald's cheek cast was not
deemed significant at all.
From Appendix 10, page 562:rifle cartridge cases and the revolver cartridge cases. 96 Since barium and antimony were present in both the rifle and the revolver cartridge cases, their presence on the casts were not evidence that Oswald had fired the rifle. Moreover, the presence on
"The paraffin casts of Oswald's hands and right cheek were also examined by neutron-activation analyses at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Barium and antimony were found to be present on both surfaces of all the casts and also in residues from the
Nothing in the above conclusion is a lie...
It is an example of looking at the correct things correctly
Bartender says "What are you having, Gil?"
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 8:22:43 AM UTC+10, Bud wrote:
Bartender says "What are you having, Gil?"
A MoFo, a cunt, and their best Bud walk into a bar.
Bartender says, "what'll it be Cunt?"
Bud says, I'll have a Shirley Temple... and put it in a doity glass.
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 10:56:05 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 8:22:43 AM UTC+10, Bud wrote:
Bartender says "What are you having, Gil?"
A MoFo, a cunt, and their best Bud walk into a bar.
Bartender says, "what'll it be Cunt?"
Bud says, I'll have a Shirley Temple... and put it in a doity glass.I'm not surprised this mental midget uses as a screenname a slang word for marijuana.
From some of the shit he posts, it's evident that he must be high half the time.
On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 7:45:50 PM UTC+10, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 10:56:05 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 8:22:43 AM UTC+10, Bud wrote:
Bartender says "What are you having, Gil?"
A MoFo, a cunt, and their best Bud walk into a bar.
Bartender says, "what'll it be Cunt?"
As an outsider I may be misreading it, but his post to me, looked borderline racist.Bud says, I'll have a Shirley Temple... and put it in a doity glass.I'm not surprised this mental midget uses as a screenname a slang word for marijuana.
From some of the shit he posts, it's evident that he must be high half the time.
On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 9:07:53 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 7:45:50 PM UTC+10, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 10:56:05 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 8:22:43 AM UTC+10, Bud wrote:
Bartender says "What are you having, Gil?"
A MoFo, a cunt, and their best Bud walk into a bar.
Bartender says, "what'll it be Cunt?"
We need a wall to keep Gil`s people from crossing our borderline.As an outsider I may be misreading it, but his post to me, looked borderline racist.Bud says, I'll have a Shirley Temple... and put it in a doity glass.I'm not surprised this mental midget uses as a screenname a slang word for marijuana.
From some of the shit he posts, it's evident that he must be high half the time.
As an outsider I may be misreading it, but his post to me, looked borderline racist.
Yeah. I'm sure. You'd fuckin curl up and die without Taco Bell.
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 11:12:42 AM UTC+10, Bud wrote:
On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 9:07:53 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 7:45:50 PM UTC+10, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 10:56:05 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 8:22:43 AM UTC+10, Bud wrote:
Bartender says "What are you having, Gil?"
A MoFo, a cunt, and their best Bud walk into a bar.
Bartender says, "what'll it be Cunt?"
Yeah. I'm sure. You'd fuckin curl up and die without Taco Bell.We need a wall to keep Gil`s people from crossing our borderline.As an outsider I may be misreading it, but his post to me, looked borderline racist.Bud says, I'll have a Shirley Temple... and put it in a doity glass.I'm not surprised this mental midget uses as a screenname a slang word for marijuana.
From some of the shit he posts, it's evident that he must be high half the time.
On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 9:07:53 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
As an outsider I may be misreading it, but his post to me, looked borderline racist."BUD" is a racist.
He's made it clear many times in the past that he hates Mexicans.
When he calls you a Mexican, it's meant to be an insult.
These assholes don't realize that their insults only affect me if I value their opinions.
On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 10:53:21 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
Yeah. I'm sure. You'd fuckin curl up and die without Taco Bell.Rumor has it that his was the voice of the Chihuahua on the commerical, but when the Mexicans raised a stink because they were offended and the ad campaign was cancelled, he lost his job.
That why he hates Mexicans. They got him fired.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8sZ1DWsAHE
YO QUIERO TACO BELL
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 6:10:01 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 10:53:21 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:I`m still pissed they cancelled Speedy Gonzales.
Yeah. I'm sure. You'd fuckin curl up and die without Taco Bell.Rumor has it that his was the voice of the Chihuahua on the commerical, but when the Mexicans raised a stink because they were offended and the ad campaign was cancelled, he lost his job.
That why he hates Mexicans. They got him fired.
'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8sZ1DWsAHE
YO QUIERO TACO BELL
On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 10:53:21 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 11:12:42 AM UTC+10, Bud wrote:
On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 9:07:53 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 7:45:50 PM UTC+10, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 10:56:05 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 8:22:43 AM UTC+10, Bud wrote:
Bartender says "What are you having, Gil?"
A MoFo, a cunt, and their best Bud walk into a bar.
Bartender says, "what'll it be Cunt?"
I`ve never tried it. Not even once.Yeah. I'm sure. You'd fuckin curl up and die without Taco Bell.We need a wall to keep Gil`s people from crossing our borderline.As an outsider I may be misreading it, but his post to me, looked borderline racist.Bud says, I'll have a Shirley Temple... and put it in a doity glass.I'm not surprised this mental midget uses as a screenname a slang word for marijuana.
From some of the shit he posts, it's evident that he must be high half the time.
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 8:51:37 PM UTC+10, Bud wrote:
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 6:10:01 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:You only miss Slowpoke Rodriguez.
On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 10:53:21 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:I`m still pissed they cancelled Speedy Gonzales.
Yeah. I'm sure. You'd fuckin curl up and die without Taco Bell.Rumor has it that his was the voice of the Chihuahua on the commerical, but when the Mexicans raised a stink because they were offended and the ad campaign was cancelled, he lost his job.
That why he hates Mexicans. They got him fired.
'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8sZ1DWsAHE
YO QUIERO TACO BELL
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 8:51:37 PM UTC+10, Bud wrote:
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 6:10:01 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:You only miss Slowpoke Rodriguez.
On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 10:53:21 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:I`m still pissed they cancelled Speedy Gonzales.
Yeah. I'm sure. You'd fuckin curl up and die without Taco Bell.Rumor has it that his was the voice of the Chihuahua on the commerical, but when the Mexicans raised a stink because they were offended and the ad campaign was cancelled, he lost his job.
That why he hates Mexicans. They got him fired.
'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8sZ1DWsAHE
YO QUIERO TACO BELL
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 10:11:07 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 8:51:37 PM UTC+10, Bud wrote:"He pack a gon."
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 6:10:01 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:You only miss Slowpoke Rodriguez.
On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 10:53:21 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:I`m still pissed they cancelled Speedy Gonzales.
Yeah. I'm sure. You'd fuckin curl up and die without Taco Bell.Rumor has it that his was the voice of the Chihuahua on the commerical, but when the Mexicans raised a stink because they were offended and the ad campaign was cancelled, he lost his job.
That why he hates Mexicans. They got him fired.
'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8sZ1DWsAHE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYi_hq2p1Ac
YO QUIERO TACO BELL
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 11:27:26 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:This is Corbett "looking at the right things correctly."
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 10:11:07 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 8:51:37 PM UTC+10, Bud wrote:"He pack a gon."
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 6:10:01 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:You only miss Slowpoke Rodriguez.
On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 10:53:21 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:I`m still pissed they cancelled Speedy Gonzales.
Yeah. I'm sure. You'd fuckin curl up and die without Taco Bell.Rumor has it that his was the voice of the Chihuahua on the commerical, but when the Mexicans raised a stink because they were offended and the ad campaign was cancelled, he lost his job.
That why he hates Mexicans. They got him fired.
'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8sZ1DWsAHE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYi_hq2p1Ac
I vaguely remember Speedy Gonzalez and don't remember Slowpoke Rodriguez at all but IYO QUIERO TACO BELL
never realized they were part of the Looney Tunes lineup.
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 11:27:26 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 10:11:07 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 8:51:37 PM UTC+10, Bud wrote:"He pack a gon."
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 6:10:01 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:You only miss Slowpoke Rodriguez.
On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 10:53:21 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:I`m still pissed they cancelled Speedy Gonzales.
Yeah. I'm sure. You'd fuckin curl up and die without Taco Bell.Rumor has it that his was the voice of the Chihuahua on the commerical, but when the Mexicans raised a stink because they were offended and the ad campaign was cancelled, he lost his job.
That why he hates Mexicans. They got him fired.
'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8sZ1DWsAHE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYi_hq2p1Ac
I vaguely remember Speedy Gonzalez and don't remember Slowpoke Rodriguez at all but IYO QUIERO TACO BELL
never realized they were part of the Looney Tunes lineup.
I vaguely remember Speedy Gonzalez and don't remember Slowpoke Rodriguez at all but I
never realized they were part of the Looney Tunes lineup.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 126:25:52 |
| Calls: | 6,663 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,212 |
| Messages: | 5,334,956 |