"One employee, Jack Dougherty, believed that he saw Oswald coming toWhen the Lone Nutters believe the lies and repeat the lies, they become as much of a liar as the original liar ( WC ) .
work, but he does not remember that Oswald had anything in his hands
as he entered the door." (WCR 133)
Let's examine the actual testimony to see if the Warren Commission accurately rendered it:
Mr. BALL - Did you see him come in the door?
Mr. DOUGHERTY - Yes; I saw him when he first come in the door--yes.
Mr. BALL - Did he have anything in his hands or arms?
Mr. DOUGHERTY - Well, not that I could see of.
...
Mr. BALL - Do you recall him having anything in his hand?
Mr. DOUGHERTY - Well, I didn't see anything, if he did.
Mr. BALL - Did you pay enough attention to him, you think, that you
would remember whether he did or didn't?
Mr. DOUGHERTY - Well, I believe I can---yes, sir---I'll put it this
way; I didn't see anything in his hands at the time.
Mr. BALL - In other words, your memory is definite on that is it?
Mr. DOUGHERTY - Yes, sir.
Mr. BALL - In other words, you would say positively he had nothing in
his hands?
Mr. DOUGHERTY - I would say that---yes, sir.
Mr. BALL - Or, are you guessing?
Mr. DOUGHERTY - I don't think so.
If you believed the Warren Commission, you'd think that Dougherty just "believed" he'd seen Oswald coming to work, when Dougherty wasn't
unsure at all. He was quite definite on that point, and the Warren Commission simply lied.
If you believed the Warren Commission, you'd think that Dougherty
simply didn't remember if Oswald had anything in his hands, yet the testimony shows that he was quite positive on that fact... again, the
Warren Commission simply lied in order to present their case.
When does the truth need lies to support it?
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 10:07:46?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
"One employee, Jack Dougherty, believed that he saw Oswald coming to
work, but he does not remember that Oswald had anything in his hands
as he entered the door." (WCR 133)
Let's examine the actual testimony to see if the Warren Commission
accurately rendered it:
Mr. BALL - Did you see him come in the door?
Mr. DOUGHERTY - Yes; I saw him when he first come in the door--yes.
Mr. BALL - Did he have anything in his hands or arms?
Mr. DOUGHERTY - Well, not that I could see of.
...
Mr. BALL - Do you recall him having anything in his hand?
Mr. DOUGHERTY - Well, I didn't see anything, if he did.
Mr. BALL - Did you pay enough attention to him, you think, that you
would remember whether he did or didn't?
Mr. DOUGHERTY - Well, I believe I can---yes, sir---I'll put it this
way; I didn't see anything in his hands at the time.
Mr. BALL - In other words, your memory is definite on that is it?
Mr. DOUGHERTY - Yes, sir.
Mr. BALL - In other words, you would say positively he had nothing in
his hands?
Mr. DOUGHERTY - I would say that---yes, sir.
Mr. BALL - Or, are you guessing?
Mr. DOUGHERTY - I don't think so.
If you believed the Warren Commission, you'd think that Dougherty just
"believed" he'd seen Oswald coming to work, when Dougherty wasn't
unsure at all. He was quite definite on that point, and the Warren
Commission simply lied.
If you believed the Warren Commission, you'd think that Dougherty
simply didn't remember if Oswald had anything in his hands, yet the
testimony shows that he was quite positive on that fact... again, the
Warren Commission simply lied in order to present their case.
When does the truth need lies to support it?
When the Lone Nutters believe the lies and repeat the lies, they become as much of a liar as the original liar ( WC ) .
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 10:07:46 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
"One employee, Jack Dougherty, believed that he saw Oswald coming to
work, but he does not remember that Oswald had anything in his hands
as he entered the door." (WCR 133)
Let's examine the actual testimony to see if the Warren Commission accurately rendered it:
Mr. BALL - Did you see him come in the door?
Mr. DOUGHERTY - Yes; I saw him when he first come in the door--yes.
Mr. BALL - Did he have anything in his hands or arms?
Mr. DOUGHERTY - Well, not that I could see of.
...
Mr. BALL - Do you recall him having anything in his hand?
Mr. DOUGHERTY - Well, I didn't see anything, if he did.
Mr. BALL - Did you pay enough attention to him, you think, that you
would remember whether he did or didn't?
Mr. DOUGHERTY - Well, I believe I can---yes, sir---I'll put it this
way; I didn't see anything in his hands at the time.
Mr. BALL - In other words, your memory is definite on that is it?
Mr. DOUGHERTY - Yes, sir.
Mr. BALL - In other words, you would say positively he had nothing in
his hands?
Mr. DOUGHERTY - I would say that---yes, sir.
Mr. BALL - Or, are you guessing?
Mr. DOUGHERTY - I don't think so.
If you believed the Warren Commission, you'd think that Dougherty just "believed" he'd seen Oswald coming to work, when Dougherty wasn't
unsure at all. He was quite definite on that point, and the Warren Commission simply lied.
If you believed the Warren Commission, you'd think that Dougherty
simply didn't remember if Oswald had anything in his hands, yet the testimony shows that he was quite positive on that fact... again, the Warren Commission simply lied in order to present their case.
When does the truth need lies to support it?When the Lone Nutters believe the lies and repeat the lies, they become as much of a liar as the original liar ( WC ) .
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 10:48:14?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 10:07:46?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
"One employee, Jack Dougherty, believed that he saw Oswald coming to
work, but he does not remember that Oswald had anything in his hands
as he entered the door." (WCR 133)
Let's examine the actual testimony to see if the Warren Commission
accurately rendered it:
Mr. BALL - Did you see him come in the door?
Mr. DOUGHERTY - Yes; I saw him when he first come in the door--yes.
Mr. BALL - Did he have anything in his hands or arms?
Mr. DOUGHERTY - Well, not that I could see of.
...
Mr. BALL - Do you recall him having anything in his hand?
Mr. DOUGHERTY - Well, I didn't see anything, if he did.
Mr. BALL - Did you pay enough attention to him, you think, that you
would remember whether he did or didn't?
Mr. DOUGHERTY - Well, I believe I can---yes, sir---I'll put it this
way; I didn't see anything in his hands at the time.
Mr. BALL - In other words, your memory is definite on that is it?
Mr. DOUGHERTY - Yes, sir.
Mr. BALL - In other words, you would say positively he had nothing in
his hands?
Mr. DOUGHERTY - I would say that---yes, sir.
Mr. BALL - Or, are you guessing?
Mr. DOUGHERTY - I don't think so.
If you believed the Warren Commission, you'd think that Dougherty just
"believed" he'd seen Oswald coming to work, when Dougherty wasn't
unsure at all. He was quite definite on that point, and the Warren
Commission simply lied.
If you believed the Warren Commission, you'd think that Dougherty
simply didn't remember if Oswald had anything in his hands, yet the
testimony shows that he was quite positive on that fact... again, the
Warren Commission simply lied in order to present their case.
When does the truth need lies to support it?
When the Lone Nutters believe the lies and repeat the lies, they become as much of a liar as the original liar ( WC ) .
The lies are all coming from the voices in your head.
If Corbutt was smarter, like Huckster ... he'd refuse to prove to the
world that he read this by not responding.
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 11:27:11 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
If Corbutt was smarter, like Huckster ... he'd refuse to prove to the world that he read this by not responding.He can't help but respond. He's addicted to this newsgroup.
This is all he has. This is his life.
Don't let him fool you, he's reading everybody's posts.
He can't help it.
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 11:27:11?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
If Corbutt was smarter, like Huckster ... he'd refuse to prove to the
world that he read this by not responding.
He can't help but respond. He's addicted to this newsgroup.
This is all he has. This is his life.
Don't let him fool you, he's reading everybody's posts.
He can't help it.
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 2:28:55?PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 11:27:11?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
He can't help but respond. He's addicted to this newsgroup.
If Corbutt was smarter, like Huckster ... he'd refuse to prove to the
world that he read this by not responding.
This is all he has. This is his life.
Don't let him fool you, he's reading everybody's posts.
He can't help it.
You are as prolific a poster as I am and unlike you, this is the only group I participate in. I have
also gone many months without posting anything.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 100:23:25 |
| Calls: | 6,659 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,208 |
| Messages: | 5,334,753 |