• David Von Penis - Liar Extraordinaire!

    From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Mon Sep 18 13:25:34 2023
    Von Penis made this claim:

    As I've pointed out to this aggregation in the past, the Tippit case
    provides us with the best possible COMBINATION of evidence that you
    could ever hope to have in which to prove the guilt of the real killer
    (which was Lee Harvey Oswald, of course)

    But, as Greg Doudna pointed out:

    "In not a single instance in the published record—whether in the
    Warren Commission report or exhibits or in any other venue—are any of
    the four evidence shells Q74, Q75, Q76, and Q77 (supposedly the four
    shells ejected from the Tippit killer's revolver found at the scene of
    the crime) identified under oath by an officer who originally marked
    them, on the basis of identification of his mark, as the shell he
    marked."

    It seems quite clear that Von Penis doesn't know what evidence one
    would hope for in a murder case.

    Von Penis refused to address the above post - but *DID* post this in
    the same thread:

    It's a proven LIE to say that none of the 4 Tippit shells were ever
    IDed by any of the officers. But I'm sure Ben Holmes is ready to
    ignore the following proof....

    Sadly, Von Penis can't quote me or anyone else making the assertion he
    claimed someone had said. And completely fails to address the
    original post quoted above.

    David Von Penis is a liar... it's just that simple.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From alt.conspiracy.jfk@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Tue Sep 19 01:51:52 2023
    On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 4:37:59 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    Von Penis made this claim:

    As I've pointed out to this aggregation in the past, the Tippit case provides us with the best possible COMBINATION of evidence that you
    could ever hope to have in which to prove the guilt of the real killer (which was Lee Harvey Oswald, of course)

    But, as Greg Doudna pointed out:

    "In not a single instance in the published record—whether in the
    Warren Commission report or exhibits or in any other venue—are any of
    the four evidence shells Q74, Q75, Q76, and Q77 (supposedly the four
    shells ejected from the Tippit killer's revolver found at the scene of
    the crime) identified under oath by an officer who originally marked
    them, on the basis of identification of his mark, as the shell he
    marked."

    It seems quite clear that Von Penis doesn't know what evidence one
    would hope for in a murder case.

    Von Penis refused to address the above post - but *DID* post this in
    the same thread:

    It's a proven LIE to say that none of the 4 Tippit shells were ever
    IDed by any of the officers. But I'm sure Ben Holmes is ready to
    ignore the following proof....

    Sadly, Von Penis can't quote me or anyone else making the assertion he claimed someone had said. And completely fails to address the
    original post quoted above.

    David Von Penis is a liar... it's just that simple.

    They're all liars

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Tue Sep 19 02:07:10 2023
    On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 4:37:59 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    Von Penis made this claim:

    As I've pointed out to this aggregation in the past, the Tippit case provides us with the best possible COMBINATION of evidence that you
    could ever hope to have in which to prove the guilt of the real killer (which was Lee Harvey Oswald, of course)

    But, as Greg Doudna pointed out:

    "In not a single instance in the published record—whether in the
    Warren Commission report or exhibits or in any other venue—are any of
    the four evidence shells Q74, Q75, Q76, and Q77 (supposedly the four
    shells ejected from the Tippit killer's revolver found at the scene of
    the crime) identified under oath by an officer who originally marked
    them, on the basis of identification of his mark, as the shell he
    marked."

    It seems quite clear that Von Penis doesn't know what evidence one
    would hope for in a murder case.

    Von Penis refused to address the above post - but *DID* post this in
    the same thread:

    It's a proven LIE to say that none of the 4 Tippit shells were ever
    IDed by any of the officers. But I'm sure Ben Holmes is ready to
    ignore the following proof....

    Sadly, Von Penis can't quote me or anyone else making the assertion he claimed someone had said. And completely fails to address the
    original post quoted above.

    David Von Penis is a liar... it's just that simple.

    They're all liars, deceivers and haters.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Tue Sep 19 02:33:45 2023
    On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 4:37:59 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    Von Penis made this claim:

    As I've pointed out to this aggregation in the past, the Tippit case provides us with the best possible COMBINATION of evidence that you
    could ever hope to have in which to prove the guilt of the real killer (which was Lee Harvey Oswald, of course)

    But, as Greg Doudna pointed out:

    "In not a single instance in the published record—whether in the
    Warren Commission report or exhibits or in any other venue—are any of
    the four evidence shells Q74, Q75, Q76, and Q77 (supposedly the four
    shells ejected from the Tippit killer's revolver found at the scene of
    the crime) identified under oath by an officer who originally marked
    them, on the basis of identification of his mark, as the shell he
    marked."

    It seems quite clear that Von Penis doesn't know what evidence one
    would hope for in a murder case.

    Von Penis refused to address the above post - but *DID* post this in
    the same thread:

    It's a proven LIE to say that none of the 4 Tippit shells were ever
    IDed by any of the officers. But I'm sure Ben Holmes is ready to
    ignore the following proof....

    Sadly, Von Penis can't quote me or anyone else making the assertion he claimed someone had said. And completely fails to address the
    original post quoted above.

    David Von Penis is a liar... it's just that simple.

    They're all liars, deceivers and haters.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to gjjmail1202@gmail.com on Tue Sep 19 07:05:45 2023
    On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 02:33:45 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
    <gjjmail1202@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 4:37:59?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    Von Penis made this claim:

    As I've pointed out to this aggregation in the past, the Tippit case
    provides us with the best possible COMBINATION of evidence that you
    could ever hope to have in which to prove the guilt of the real killer
    (which was Lee Harvey Oswald, of course)

    But, as Greg Doudna pointed out:

    "In not a single instance in the published record—whether in the
    Warren Commission report or exhibits or in any other venue—are any of
    the four evidence shells Q74, Q75, Q76, and Q77 (supposedly the four
    shells ejected from the Tippit killer's revolver found at the scene of
    the crime) identified under oath by an officer who originally marked
    them, on the basis of identification of his mark, as the shell he
    marked."

    It seems quite clear that Von Penis doesn't know what evidence one
    would hope for in a murder case.

    Von Penis refused to address the above post - but *DID* post this in
    the same thread:

    It's a proven LIE to say that none of the 4 Tippit shells were ever
    IDed by any of the officers. But I'm sure Ben Holmes is ready to
    ignore the following proof....

    Sadly, Von Penis can't quote me or anyone else making the assertion he
    claimed someone had said. And completely fails to address the
    original post quoted above.

    David Von Penis is a liar... it's just that simple.

    They're all liars, deceivers and haters.

    And as you can clearly see - cowards too! They don't want to try to
    defend their proven dishonesty. Von Penis will never answer this
    post, because he's simply too much a coward to do so.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)