• Mother Jones on MOFO Mark Lane (Hearse Chasing Clown!)

    From Tim Brennan@21:1/5 to All on Fri Sep 15 02:42:09 2023
    Hi All,

    This one is ALWAYS worth a repost:

    http://www.jfk-online.com/mark-lane-the-left%27s-leading-hearse-chaser.pdf

    Mother Jones SAVAGES Mark Lane, courtesy of the Harold Weisberg online collection.

    Oh the IRONY!

    Say, anybody know if the Bob Katz who wrote this is related to Steve Katz?

    Steve Katz is currently the PUBLISHER of MJ, as I understand it.

    Sure be FUNNY if he was Bob's son or something similar!

    Cheerful Regards,

    Tim Brennan
    Sydney, Australia
    *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

    *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
    neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
    Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

    And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head... http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

    X marks the spot where Mark (Hearse Chaser) Lane LIED!!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to Tim Brennan on Fri Sep 15 03:06:46 2023
    On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 5:42:11 AM UTC-4, Tim Brennan wrote:
    *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
    neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
    Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

    And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head... http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

    X marks the spot where Mark (Hearse Chaser) Lane LIED!!!

    No, "X" marks the spot where rifleman Miller hit the head area using the iron sights.
    It's marked right on the board : "X= iron sight" https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/miller-both-attempts.jpg

    Lane is correct that not one of the three military experts hit the head area using the SCOPE.
    https://gil-jesus.com/the-rifle-tests/

    This is what happens when you don't know the evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to gjjmail1202@gmail.com on Fri Sep 15 07:13:45 2023
    On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 03:06:46 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
    <gjjmail1202@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 5:42:11?AM UTC-4, Tim Brennan wrote:
    *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
    neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
    Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

    And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
    http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

    X marks the spot where Mark (Hearse Chaser) Lane LIED!!!

    No, "X" marks the spot where rifleman Miller hit the head area using the iron sights.
    It's marked right on the board : "X= iron sight" >https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/miller-both-attempts.jpg

    Lane is correct that not one of the three military experts hit the head area using the SCOPE.
    https://gil-jesus.com/the-rifle-tests/

    This is what happens when you don't know the evidence.

    This troll has been corrected on this multiple times... he can't
    learn.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Sat Sep 16 04:54:30 2023
    On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 10:13:51 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 03:06:46 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
    <gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:

    No, "X" marks the spot where rifleman Miller hit the head area using the iron sights.
    It's marked right on the board : "X= iron sight" >https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/miller-both-attempts.jpg

    Lane is correct that not one of the three military experts hit the head area using the SCOPE.
    https://gil-jesus.com/the-rifle-tests/

    This is what happens when you don't know the evidence.
    This troll has been corrected on this multiple times... he can't
    learn.

    If he keeps repeating the same thing over, after repeatedly being shown evidence to the contrary,
    then he's either a disinformation agent or a liar.

    I've always been leery of foreigners who support the Warren Commission.
    Why would they do that ?
    Not their country.
    Not their President.

    For example, I don't give two shits who killed Aldo Morro, Yitzhak Rabin or Anwar Sadat.
    Not my country.
    Not my leader.

    I can see foreigners doubting the Warren Commission, but supporting them ?

    Their haste to discount any evidence to the contrary shows that they're not just impartial, interested parties.
    They take an active role in support of the Commission and have no problem insulting Commission critics.
    Their rabid and unyielding support of the Warren Commission has me wondering, what's their stake in all of this ?
    Who is pulling their strings ?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Corbett@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Sat Sep 16 05:59:44 2023
    On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 7:54:32 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 10:13:51 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 03:06:46 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
    <gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:

    No, "X" marks the spot where rifleman Miller hit the head area using the iron sights.
    It's marked right on the board : "X= iron sight" >https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/miller-both-attempts.jpg

    Lane is correct that not one of the three military experts hit the head area using the SCOPE.
    https://gil-jesus.com/the-rifle-tests/

    This is what happens when you don't know the evidence.
    This troll has been corrected on this multiple times... he can't
    learn.
    If he keeps repeating the same thing over, after repeatedly being shown evidence to the contrary,
    then he's either a disinformation agent or a liar.

    I've always been leery of foreigners who support the Warren Commission.
    Why would they do that ?
    Not their country.
    Not their President.

    For example, I don't give two shits who killed Aldo Morro, Yitzhak Rabin or Anwar Sadat.
    Not my country.
    Not my leader.

    I can see foreigners doubting the Warren Commission, but supporting them ?

    Gil's double standars on display. He must be a Democrat.

    Their haste to discount any evidence to the contrary shows that they're not just impartial, interested parties.

    There is no evidence that anyone except Oswald took part in the assassination.

    They take an active role in support of the Commission and have no problem insulting Commission critics.

    Why should they have a problem with that. It's very easy to do. They make such inviting targets.

    Their rabid and unyielding support of the Warren Commission has me wondering, what's their stake in all of this ?
    Who is pulling their strings ?

    But you welcome foreign critics of the WCR.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Brennan@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Sat Sep 16 09:08:44 2023
    On Friday, 15 September 2023 at 20:06:47 UTC+10, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 5:42:11 AM UTC-4, Tim Brennan wrote:
    *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
    neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
    Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

    And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head... http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

    X marks the spot where Mark (Hearse Chaser) Lane LIED!!!
    No, "X" marks the spot where rifleman Miller hit the head area using the iron sights.
    It's marked right on the board : "X= iron sight" https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/miller-both-attempts.jpg

    Lane is correct that not one of the three military experts hit the head area using the SCOPE.
    https://gil-jesus.com/the-rifle-tests/

    This is what happens when you don't know the evidence.

    Hi Gil,

    But I DO know the evidence Gilly!

    I seem to remember that you raised this point a number of months ago.

    That's when you thought I was SAFELY off the scene, Gilly.

    Oh, what a HEROIC figure you cut! Not...

    Hank Sienzant cut you to shreds, as I recall.

    I have TWO copies of Rush To Judgment.

    One is a Penguin paperback and the other a Thunder's Mouth reprint.

    NOWHERE does Lane distinguish between scope shots or iron sights.

    If you think he did then cite it, pal. I double dog DARE YOU!

    I say you can't and neither can your sidekick, *Yellow Pants* Holmes.

    Lane is a PROVEN serial liar in the JFK assassination matter.

    Wear it like a crown of thorns, Bald Goose!

    I certainly won't be changing my sig block on account of YOU!

    Or ur two bit, PROVEN liar, mate, Benny *Yellow Pants* Holmes!

    KUTGW Gilly! We need the laffs!

    LMFAO@U Regards,

    Tim Brennan
    Sydney, Australia
    *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

    *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
    neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
    Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

    And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head... http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

    X marks the spot where Mark Lane LIED!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Sat Sep 16 09:38:54 2023
    On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 7:54:32 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 10:13:51 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 03:06:46 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
    <gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:

    No, "X" marks the spot where rifleman Miller hit the head area using the iron sights.
    It's marked right on the board : "X= iron sight" >https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/miller-both-attempts.jpg

    Lane is correct that not one of the three military experts hit the head area using the SCOPE.
    https://gil-jesus.com/the-rifle-tests/

    This is what happens when you don't know the evidence.
    This troll has been corrected on this multiple times... he can't
    learn.
    If he keeps repeating the same thing over, after repeatedly being shown evidence to the contrary,
    then he's either a disinformation agent or a liar.

    I've always been leery of foreigners who support the Warren Commission.
    Why would they do that ?
    Not their country.
    Not their President.

    Gil is attempting to wrap his stupidity in the flag.

    The nationality of the people pointing out your stupidity isn`t the problem, your stupidity is.

    For example, I don't give two shits who killed Aldo Morro, Yitzhak Rabin or Anwar Sadat.
    Not my country.
    Not my leader.

    I can see foreigners doubting the Warren Commission, but supporting them ?

    Their haste to discount any evidence to the contrary shows that they're not just impartial, interested parties.
    They take an active role in support of the Commission and have no problem insulting Commission critics.
    Their rabid and unyielding support of the Warren Commission has me wondering, what's their stake in all of this ?
    Who is pulling their strings ?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Corbett@21:1/5 to Bud on Sat Sep 16 10:28:38 2023
    On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 12:38:56 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
    On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 7:54:32 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 10:13:51 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 03:06:46 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
    <gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:

    No, "X" marks the spot where rifleman Miller hit the head area using the iron sights.
    It's marked right on the board : "X= iron sight" >https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/miller-both-attempts.jpg

    Lane is correct that not one of the three military experts hit the head area using the SCOPE.
    https://gil-jesus.com/the-rifle-tests/

    This is what happens when you don't know the evidence.
    This troll has been corrected on this multiple times... he can't
    learn.
    If he keeps repeating the same thing over, after repeatedly being shown evidence to the contrary,
    then he's either a disinformation agent or a liar.

    I've always been leery of foreigners who support the Warren Commission. Why would they do that ?
    Not their country.
    Not their President.
    Gil is attempting to wrap his stupidity in the flag.

    The nationality of the people pointing out your stupidity isn`t the problem, your stupidity is.

    I like when Gil goes into his Baghdad Bob mode and boasts that he is winning these arguments.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Brennan@21:1/5 to Bud on Sat Sep 16 20:32:06 2023
    On Sunday, 17 September 2023 at 02:38:56 UTC+10, Bud wrote:
    On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 7:54:32 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 10:13:51 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 03:06:46 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
    <gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:

    No, "X" marks the spot where rifleman Miller hit the head area using the iron sights.
    It's marked right on the board : "X= iron sight" >https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/miller-both-attempts.jpg

    Lane is correct that not one of the three military experts hit the head area using the SCOPE.
    https://gil-jesus.com/the-rifle-tests/

    This is what happens when you don't know the evidence.
    This troll has been corrected on this multiple times... he can't
    learn.
    If he keeps repeating the same thing over, after repeatedly being shown evidence to the contrary,
    then he's either a disinformation agent or a liar.

    I've always been leery of foreigners who support the Warren Commission. Why would they do that ?
    Not their country.
    Not their President.
    Gil is attempting to wrap his stupidity in the flag.

    The nationality of the people pointing out your stupidity isn`t the problem, your stupidity is.
    For example, I don't give two shits who killed Aldo Morro, Yitzhak Rabin or Anwar Sadat.
    Not my country.
    Not my leader.

    I can see foreigners doubting the Warren Commission, but supporting them ?

    Their haste to discount any evidence to the contrary shows that they're not just impartial, interested parties.
    They take an active role in support of the Commission and have no problem insulting Commission critics.
    Their rabid and unyielding support of the Warren Commission has me wondering, what's their stake in all of this ?
    Who is pulling their strings ?

    Hi Bud,

    LOL! Yeah, RIGHT! RIGHT ON!

    So according to Gilly's logic, no American person should ever investigate the *Jack The Ripper* mystery,

    According to the Gilly dictate, no American person should look into the Titanic disaster!

    I mean, that was a UK ship! So no need for an American person to look there, hey?!

    I DO remember the late, and possibly rather unlamented, Tom (tomnln) Rossley proposing such a scenario.

    Gil has hit absolute ROCK BOTTOM in teaming up with Ben (Yellow Pants) Holmes, in my view.

    Friendly Regards,

    Tim Brennan
    Sydney, Australia
    *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

    *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
    neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
    Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

    And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head... http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

    X marks the spot where Mark Lane LIED!!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sky Throne 19efppp@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Sun Sep 17 01:59:31 2023
    On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 7:54:32 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 10:13:51 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 03:06:46 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
    <gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:

    No, "X" marks the spot where rifleman Miller hit the head area using the iron sights.
    It's marked right on the board : "X= iron sight" >https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/miller-both-attempts.jpg

    Lane is correct that not one of the three military experts hit the head area using the SCOPE.
    https://gil-jesus.com/the-rifle-tests/

    This is what happens when you don't know the evidence.
    This troll has been corrected on this multiple times... he can't
    learn.
    If he keeps repeating the same thing over, after repeatedly being shown evidence to the contrary,
    then he's either a disinformation agent or a liar.

    I've always been leery of foreigners who support the Warren Commission.
    Why would they do that ?
    Not their country.
    Not their President.

    For example, I don't give two shits who killed Aldo Morro, Yitzhak Rabin or Anwar Sadat.
    Not my country.
    Not my leader.

    I can see foreigners doubting the Warren Commission, but supporting them ?

    Their haste to discount any evidence to the contrary shows that they're not just impartial, interested parties.
    They take an active role in support of the Commission and have no problem insulting Commission critics.
    Their rabid and unyielding support of the Warren Commission has me wondering, what's their stake in all of this ?
    Who is pulling their strings ?

    The US is, and has been for a long time, a worldwide empire. It pretends otherwise, but it's "foreign" subjects know better. And those foreign subjects, the ones who benefit from imperial policies, will tend to support the Official Imperial Story. It's
    just the same with the domestic population. Whoever loves the Empire supports the Empire against all perceived enemies, foreign or domestic. Moo.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Tim Brennan on Sun Sep 17 06:28:11 2023
    On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 11:32:08 PM UTC-4, Tim Brennan wrote:
    On Sunday, 17 September 2023 at 02:38:56 UTC+10, Bud wrote:
    On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 7:54:32 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 10:13:51 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 03:06:46 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus <gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:

    No, "X" marks the spot where rifleman Miller hit the head area using the iron sights.
    It's marked right on the board : "X= iron sight" >https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/miller-both-attempts.jpg

    Lane is correct that not one of the three military experts hit the head area using the SCOPE.
    https://gil-jesus.com/the-rifle-tests/

    This is what happens when you don't know the evidence.
    This troll has been corrected on this multiple times... he can't learn.
    If he keeps repeating the same thing over, after repeatedly being shown evidence to the contrary,
    then he's either a disinformation agent or a liar.

    I've always been leery of foreigners who support the Warren Commission. Why would they do that ?
    Not their country.
    Not their President.
    Gil is attempting to wrap his stupidity in the flag.

    The nationality of the people pointing out your stupidity isn`t the problem, your stupidity is.
    For example, I don't give two shits who killed Aldo Morro, Yitzhak Rabin or Anwar Sadat.
    Not my country.
    Not my leader.

    I can see foreigners doubting the Warren Commission, but supporting them ?

    Their haste to discount any evidence to the contrary shows that they're not just impartial, interested parties.
    They take an active role in support of the Commission and have no problem insulting Commission critics.
    Their rabid and unyielding support of the Warren Commission has me wondering, what's their stake in all of this ?
    Who is pulling their strings ?
    Hi Bud,

    LOL! Yeah, RIGHT! RIGHT ON!

    So according to Gilly's logic, no American person should ever investigate the *Jack The Ripper* mystery,

    According to the Gilly dictate, no American person should look into the Titanic disaster!

    I mean, that was a UK ship! So no need for an American person to look there, hey?!

    Hey Tim, good to see you back around!

    Yes, JFK was supposedly the leader of the free world, his death would effect everyone in the free world.

    I DO remember the late, and possibly rather unlamented, Tom (tomnln) Rossley proposing such a scenario.

    Gil has hit absolute ROCK BOTTOM in teaming up with Ben (Yellow Pants) Holmes, in my view.

    Gil is as dumb as a stump, in my view.

    Friendly Regards,
    Tim Brennan
    Sydney, Australia
    *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
    *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
    neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
    Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

    And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head... http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm
    X marks the spot where Mark Lane LIED!!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Corbett@21:1/5 to Bud on Sun Sep 17 08:49:48 2023
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 9:28:13 AM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
    On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 11:32:08 PM UTC-4, Tim Brennan wrote:
    On Sunday, 17 September 2023 at 02:38:56 UTC+10, Bud wrote:
    On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 7:54:32 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 10:13:51 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 03:06:46 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus <gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:

    No, "X" marks the spot where rifleman Miller hit the head area using the iron sights.
    It's marked right on the board : "X= iron sight" >https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/miller-both-attempts.jpg

    Lane is correct that not one of the three military experts hit the head area using the SCOPE.
    https://gil-jesus.com/the-rifle-tests/

    This is what happens when you don't know the evidence.
    This troll has been corrected on this multiple times... he can't learn.
    If he keeps repeating the same thing over, after repeatedly being shown evidence to the contrary,
    then he's either a disinformation agent or a liar.

    I've always been leery of foreigners who support the Warren Commission.
    Why would they do that ?
    Not their country.
    Not their President.
    Gil is attempting to wrap his stupidity in the flag.

    The nationality of the people pointing out your stupidity isn`t the problem, your stupidity is.
    For example, I don't give two shits who killed Aldo Morro, Yitzhak Rabin or Anwar Sadat.
    Not my country.
    Not my leader.

    I can see foreigners doubting the Warren Commission, but supporting them ?

    Their haste to discount any evidence to the contrary shows that they're not just impartial, interested parties.
    They take an active role in support of the Commission and have no problem insulting Commission critics.
    Their rabid and unyielding support of the Warren Commission has me wondering, what's their stake in all of this ?
    Who is pulling their strings ?
    Hi Bud,

    LOL! Yeah, RIGHT! RIGHT ON!

    So according to Gilly's logic, no American person should ever investigate the *Jack The Ripper* mystery,

    According to the Gilly dictate, no American person should look into the Titanic disaster!

    I mean, that was a UK ship! So no need for an American person to look there, hey?!
    Hey Tim, good to see you back around!

    Yes, JFK was supposedly the leader of the free world, his death would effect everyone in the free world.
    I DO remember the late, and possibly rather unlamented, Tom (tomnln) Rossley proposing such a scenario.

    Gil has hit absolute ROCK BOTTOM in teaming up with Ben (Yellow Pants) Holmes, in my view.
    Gil is as dumb as a stump, in my view.

    You just insulted stumps. You owe them an apology.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to geowright1963@gmail.com on Mon Sep 18 06:52:56 2023
    On Sat, 16 Sep 2023 05:59:44 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett <geowright1963@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 7:54:32?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 10:13:51?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 03:06:46 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
    <gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:

    No, "X" marks the spot where rifleman Miller hit the head area using the iron sights.
    It's marked right on the board : "X= iron sight" >>>>https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/miller-both-attempts.jpg >>>>
    Lane is correct that not one of the three military experts hit the head area using the SCOPE.
    https://gil-jesus.com/the-rifle-tests/

    This is what happens when you don't know the evidence.
    This troll has been corrected on this multiple times... he can't
    learn.
    If he keeps repeating the same thing over, after repeatedly being shown evidence to the contrary,
    then he's either a disinformation agent or a liar.

    I've always been leery of foreigners who support the Warren Commission.
    Why would they do that ?
    Not their country.
    Not their President.

    For example, I don't give two shits who killed Aldo Morro, Yitzhak Rabin or Anwar Sadat.
    Not my country.
    Not my leader.

    I can see foreigners doubting the Warren Commission, but supporting them ?

    Gil's ...

    Logical fallacies deleted.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to gjjmail1202@gmail.com on Mon Sep 18 06:52:56 2023
    On Sat, 16 Sep 2023 04:54:30 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
    <gjjmail1202@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 10:13:51?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 03:06:46 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
    <gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:

    No, "X" marks the spot where rifleman Miller hit the head area using the iron sights.
    It's marked right on the board : "X= iron sight" >>>https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/miller-both-attempts.jpg >>>
    Lane is correct that not one of the three military experts hit the head area using the SCOPE.
    https://gil-jesus.com/the-rifle-tests/

    This is what happens when you don't know the evidence.
    This troll has been corrected on this multiple times... he can't
    learn.

    If he keeps repeating the same thing over, after repeatedly being shown evidence to the contrary,
    then he's either a disinformation agent or a liar.

    I've always been leery of foreigners who support the Warren Commission.
    Why would they do that ?
    Not their country.
    Not their President.

    For example, I don't give two shits who killed Aldo Morro, Yitzhak Rabin or Anwar Sadat.
    Not my country.
    Not my leader.

    I can see foreigners doubting the Warren Commission, but supporting them ?

    Their haste to discount any evidence to the contrary shows that they're not just impartial, interested parties.
    They take an active role in support of the Commission and have no problem insulting Commission critics.
    Their rabid and unyielding support of the Warren Commission has me wondering, what's their stake in all of this ?
    Who is pulling their strings ?


    Who cares about their motivation if they have to lie about the
    evidence?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Mon Sep 18 06:52:56 2023
    On Sun, 17 Sep 2023 06:28:11 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:


    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Healy@21:1/5 to Bud on Mon Sep 18 18:33:02 2023
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 6:28:13 AM UTC-7, Bud wrote:
    On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 11:32:08 PM UTC-4, Tim Brennan wrote:
    On Sunday, 17 September 2023 at 02:38:56 UTC+10, Bud wrote:
    On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 7:54:32 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 10:13:51 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 03:06:46 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus <gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:

    No, "X" marks the spot where rifleman Miller hit the head area using the iron sights.
    It's marked right on the board : "X= iron sight" >https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/miller-both-attempts.jpg

    Lane is correct that not one of the three military experts hit the head area using the SCOPE.
    https://gil-jesus.com/the-rifle-tests/

    This is what happens when you don't know the evidence.
    This troll has been corrected on this multiple times... he can't learn.
    If he keeps repeating the same thing over, after repeatedly being shown evidence to the contrary,
    then he's either a disinformation agent or a liar.

    I've always been leery of foreigners who support the Warren Commission.
    Why would they do that ?
    Not their country.
    Not their President.
    Gil is attempting to wrap his stupidity in the flag.

    The nationality of the people pointing out your stupidity isn`t the problem, your stupidity is.
    For example, I don't give two shits who killed Aldo Morro, Yitzhak Rabin or Anwar Sadat.
    Not my country.
    Not my leader.

    I can see foreigners doubting the Warren Commission, but supporting them ?

    Their haste to discount any evidence to the contrary shows that they're not just impartial, interested parties.
    They take an active role in support of the Commission and have no problem insulting Commission critics.
    Their rabid and unyielding support of the Warren Commission has me wondering, what's their stake in all of this ?
    Who is pulling their strings ?
    Hi Bud,

    LOL! Yeah, RIGHT! RIGHT ON!

    So according to Gilly's logic, no American person should ever investigate the *Jack The Ripper* mystery,

    According to the Gilly dictate, no American person should look into the Titanic disaster!

    I mean, that was a UK ship! So no need for an American person to look there, hey?!
    Hey Tim, good to see you back around!

    Yes, JFK was supposedly the leader of the free world, his death would effect everyone in the free world.
    I DO remember the late, and possibly rather unlamented, Tom (tomnln) Rossley proposing such a scenario.

    Gil has hit absolute ROCK BOTTOM in teaming up with Ben (Yellow Pants) Holmes, in my view.
    Gil is as dumb as a stump, in my view.
    Friendly Regards,
    Tim Brennan
    Sydney, Australia
    *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
    *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
    neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
    Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

    And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head... http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm
    X marks the spot where Mark Lane LIED!!!

    sit Bud, we know you flagged Fats down in some 2penny whorehouse in Indiana -- he's been pedaling his ass all over the place this summer, some .john benefit grift.... You sorry asses should be ashamed...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Healy@21:1/5 to Tim Brennan on Mon Sep 18 18:29:43 2023
    On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 9:08:46 AM UTC-7, Tim Brennan wrote:
    On Friday, 15 September 2023 at 20:06:47 UTC+10, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 5:42:11 AM UTC-4, Tim Brennan wrote:
    *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
    neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
    Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

    And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head... http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

    X marks the spot where Mark (Hearse Chaser) Lane LIED!!!
    No, "X" marks the spot where rifleman Miller hit the head area using the iron sights.
    It's marked right on the board : "X= iron sight" https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/miller-both-attempts.jpg

    Lane is correct that not one of the three military experts hit the head area using the SCOPE.
    https://gil-jesus.com/the-rifle-tests/

    This is what happens when you don't know the evidence.
    Hi Gil,

    But I DO know the evidence Gilly!

    I seem to remember that you raised this point a number of months ago.

    That's when you thought I was SAFELY off the scene, Gilly.

    Oh, what a HEROIC figure you cut! Not...

    Hank Sienzant cut you to shreds, as I recall.

    I have TWO copies of Rush To Judgment.

    One is a Penguin paperback and the other a Thunder's Mouth reprint.

    NOWHERE does Lane distinguish between scope shots or iron sights.

    If you think he did then cite it, pal. I double dog DARE YOU!

    I say you can't and neither can your sidekick, *Yellow Pants* Holmes.

    Lane is a PROVEN serial liar in the JFK assassination matter.

    Wear it like a crown of thorns, Bald Goose!

    I certainly won't be changing my sig block on account of YOU!

    Or ur two bit, PROVEN liar, mate, Benny *Yellow Pants* Holmes!

    KUTGW Gilly! We need the laffs!

    LMFAO@U Regards,
    Tim Brennan
    Sydney, Australia
    *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
    *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
    neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
    Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

    And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head... http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm
    X marks the spot where Mark Lane LIED!

    well hi there tootsie roll.... fired up that old Aussie re-mailer again, eh? Say, are you still a janitor at that Uppah Nu Yawk Junior College in Ithaca?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Hank Sienzant@21:1/5 to Tim Brennan on Mon Sep 18 20:43:03 2023
    On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 12:08:46 PM UTC-4, Tim Brennan wrote:
    On Friday, 15 September 2023 at 20:06:47 UTC+10, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 5:42:11 AM UTC-4, Tim Brennan wrote:
    *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
    neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
    Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

    And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head... http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

    X marks the spot where Mark (Hearse Chaser) Lane LIED!!!
    No, "X" marks the spot where rifleman Miller hit the head area using the iron sights.
    It's marked right on the board : "X= iron sight" https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/miller-both-attempts.jpg

    Lane is correct that not one of the three military experts hit the head area using the SCOPE.
    https://gil-jesus.com/the-rifle-tests/

    This is what happens when you don't know the evidence.
    Hi Gil,

    But I DO know the evidence Gilly!

    I seem to remember that you raised this point a number of months ago.

    That's when you thought I was SAFELY off the scene, Gilly.

    Oh, what a HEROIC figure you cut! Not...

    Hank Sienzant cut you to shreds, as I recall.

    I think you are thinking of here:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/tbLAHDM2pgM/m/gF_epWafCwAJ https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/tbLAHDM2pgM/m/HD7mKTajCwAJ

    And

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/Qn-5gbxPI8I/m/D0SPWCstBwAJ https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/Qn-5gbxPI8I/m/LyInL18tBwAJ https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/Qn-5gbxPI8I/m/DgqOuNHUCgAJ https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/Qn-5gbxPI8I/m/NiUfx0fpCwAJ


    I have TWO copies of Rush To Judgment.

    One is a Penguin paperback and the other a Thunder's Mouth reprint.

    NOWHERE does Lane distinguish between scope shots or iron sights.

    If you think he did then cite it, pal. I double dog DARE YOU!

    I say you can't and neither can your sidekick, *Yellow Pants* Holmes.

    Lane is a PROVEN serial liar in the JFK assassination matter.

    Wear it like a crown of thorns, Bald Goose!

    I certainly won't be changing my sig block on account of YOU!

    Or ur two bit, PROVEN liar, mate, Benny *Yellow Pants* Holmes!

    KUTGW Gilly! We need the laffs!

    LMFAO@U Regards,
    Tim Brennan
    Sydney, Australia
    *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
    *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
    neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
    Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

    And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head... http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm
    X marks the spot where Mark Lane LIED!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Tue Sep 19 07:05:33 2023
    On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 20:43:03 -0700 (PDT), Hank Sienzant
    <hsienzant@aol.com> wrote:

    Ah! Huckster reappears...

    Only to run again:

    You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
    description of the *location* of the large head wound.

    Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
    paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

    You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

    Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

    Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)