You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.

Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue? As
Chuckles likes to say:

EVERY

SINGLE

TIME!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 14 Sep 2023 14:24:36 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:


So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 4:17:00 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.

I`ve shown this to be true.

Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

Why do you insist on quoting out of context?

You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

I`ve shown this to be true.

Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

Why do you say I haven`t?

Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

Why did you run from my responses on these issues?

As
Chuckles likes to say:

EVERY

SINGLE

TIME!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)