Can anyone give a credible reason why unanswered questions are
INVARIABLY asked by critics?
Is there any believer alive who will swap questions & answers with me?
(And since we know that believers invariably run, you'll have to
answer a question first, then I'll answer one. Questions must relate
to the JFK assassination.)
On Thu, 14 Sep 2023 08:15:57 -0700, Ben Holmes <Ad...@ConspiracyJFKForum.com> wrote:
Can anyone give a credible reason why unanswered questions are
INVARIABLY asked by critics?
Is there any believer alive who will swap questions & answers with me?
(And since we know that believers invariably run, you'll have toWell, we've had one response thus far, from Corbutt, whining that I
answer a question first, then I'll answer one. Questions must relate
to the JFK assassination.)
was seeking attention ... but no answers given.
Anyone else want to take a stab at showing their cowardice?
Or would you prefer not to answer at all, and hope no-one notices your cowardice?
Can anyone give a credible reason why unanswered questions are
INVARIABLY asked by critics?
Is there any believer alive who will swap questions & answers with me?
(And since we know that believers invariably run, you'll have to
answer a question first, then I'll answer one. Questions must relate
to the JFK assassination.)
On Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 10:16:03 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
Can anyone give a credible reason why unanswered questions are
INVARIABLY asked by critics?
Is there any believer alive who will swap questions & answers with me?
(And since we know that believers invariably run, you'll have toI would say most of them either *have* been answered--if not to *your* satisfaction---or are simply unworthy of the effort. You post a *lot* questions falling into the latter category.
answer a question first, then I'll answer one. Questions must relate
to the JFK assassination.)
On Thu, 14 Sep 2023 11:18:31 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.
It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)
So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.
And if he ever dares to answer it,
I'll answer any question of his...
Such cowardice!!!
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 116:27:02 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,209 |
| Messages: | 5,334,181 |