https://www.cleveland.com/nation/2023/09/ex-secret-service-agent-greater-clevelander-upends-key-kennedy-assassination-theory-as-he-breaks-60-years-of-silence.htmlthat the central thesis of the Warren Report, the single-bullet theory, is wrong.
I've never been a reader of US News and if this article is representative of the
kind of stories the publish, that's a good thing. Feel free to read the entire >article if you want. I will focus on this on paragraph?
If what he says is true, which I tend to believe, it is likely to reopen the question of a second shooter, if not even more, Robenalt told The Times. If the bullet we know as the magic or pristine bullet stopped in President Kennedys back, it means
This moron knows zilch about firearms if he thinks a bullet would stop in >JFK's back and even less than zilch if he thinks it would then just fall out. A
full metal jacket bullet is not going to be stopped just inches into soft tissue.
A bullet fired from a high powered rifle is going to easily pass through a human
body. A bullet would have to be extremely underpowered to make such a
shallow penetration into JFK's back. Such an underpowered bullet would
have to be traveling extremely slowly to only make a shallow penetration.
A bullet traveling that slowly could never hit the intended target because >gravity would cause a severe drop in the bullet's trajectory.
I used to have this same conversation with a poster who went by the
screen name "mainframetech" over and McAdams board. He never could
understand that a bullet with any kind of velocity is going to make a much >deeper penetration than shallow entry into JFK's back. A very slow bullet >could not possible reach the target. For comparison, the .38 Special round >Ruby fired into Oswald's abdomen and near point blank, ripped all the way >through his midsection and bugled out his right side without breaking the >skin. A Carcano bullet has almost double the muzzle velocity of a .38
Special and has a full metal jacket which means it has much greater >penetrating power. You would have to be a real putz to think a Carcano
bullet could have "stopped in President Kennedy's back".
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 11:25:43 -0700 (PDT), John Corbettit means that the central thesis of the Warren Report, the single-bullet theory, is wrong.”
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
https://www.cleveland.com/nation/2023/09/ex-secret-service-agent-greater-clevelander-upends-key-kennedy-assassination-theory-as-he-breaks-60-years-of-silence.html
I've never been a reader of US News and if this article is representative of the
kind of stories the publish, that's a good thing. Feel free to read the entire
article if you want. I will focus on this on paragraph?
“If what he says is true, which I tend to believe, it is likely to reopen the question of a second shooter, if not even more,” Robenalt told The Times. “If the bullet we know as the magic or pristine bullet stopped in President Kennedy’s back,
This moron knows zilch about firearms if he thinks a bullet would stop in >JFK's back and even less than zilch if he thinks it would then just fall out. A
full metal jacket bullet is not going to be stopped just inches into soft tissue.
A bullet fired from a high powered rifle is going to easily pass through a human
body. A bullet would have to be extremely underpowered to make such a >shallow penetration into JFK's back. Such an underpowered bullet would >have to be traveling extremely slowly to only make a shallow penetration. >A bullet traveling that slowly could never hit the intended target because >gravity would cause a severe drop in the bullet's trajectory.
I used to have this same conversation with a poster who went by theCuriously, you posted no evidence. no citations to evidence, no
screen name "mainframetech" over and McAdams board. He never could >understand that a bullet with any kind of velocity is going to make a much >deeper penetration than shallow entry into JFK's back. A very slow bullet >could not possible reach the target. For comparison, the .38 Special round >Ruby fired into Oswald's abdomen and near point blank, ripped all the way >through his midsection and bugled out his right side without breaking the >skin. A Carcano bullet has almost double the muzzle velocity of a .38 >Special and has a full metal jacket which means it has much greater >penetrating power. You would have to be a real putz to think a Carcano >bullet could have "stopped in President Kennedy's back".
documents, no testimony, no exhibits, no witness videos.
Only comments. We gain nothing from the above.
Which makes who exactly the fool?
On Wednesday, September 13, 2023 at 1:30:31?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:means that the central thesis of the Warren Report, the single-bullet theory, is wrong.
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 11:25:43 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
https://www.cleveland.com/nation/2023/09/ex-secret-service-agent-greater-clevelander-upends-key-kennedy-assassination-theory-as-he-breaks-60-years-of-silence.html
I've never been a reader of US News and if this article is representative of the
kind of stories the publish, that's a good thing. Feel free to read the entire
article if you want. I will focus on this on paragraph?
If what he says is true, which I tend to believe, it is likely to reopen the question of a second shooter, if not even more, Robenalt told The Times. If the bullet we know as the magic or pristine bullet stopped in President Kennedys back, it
Curiously, you posted no evidence. no citations to evidence, no
This moron knows zilch about firearms if he thinks a bullet would stop in >>>JFK's back and even less than zilch if he thinks it would then just fall out. A
full metal jacket bullet is not going to be stopped just inches into soft tissue.
A bullet fired from a high powered rifle is going to easily pass through a human
body. A bullet would have to be extremely underpowered to make such a >>>shallow penetration into JFK's back. Such an underpowered bullet would >>>have to be traveling extremely slowly to only make a shallow penetration. >>>A bullet traveling that slowly could never hit the intended target because >>>gravity would cause a severe drop in the bullet's trajectory.
I used to have this same conversation with a poster who went by the >>>screen name "mainframetech" over and McAdams board. He never could >>>understand that a bullet with any kind of velocity is going to make a much >>>deeper penetration than shallow entry into JFK's back. A very slow bullet >>>could not possible reach the target. For comparison, the .38 Special round >>>Ruby fired into Oswald's abdomen and near point blank, ripped all the way >>>through his midsection and bugled out his right side without breaking the >>>skin. A Carcano bullet has almost double the muzzle velocity of a .38 >>>Special and has a full metal jacket which means it has much greater >>>penetrating power. You would have to be a real putz to think a Carcano >>>bullet could have "stopped in President Kennedy's back".
documents, no testimony, no exhibits, no witness videos.
Only comments. We gain nothing from the above.
Which makes who exactly the fool?
You.
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 11:25:43 -0700 (PDT), John Corbettit means that the central thesis of the Warren Report, the single-bullet theory, is wrong.”
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
https://www.cleveland.com/nation/2023/09/ex-secret-service-agent-greater-clevelander-upends-key-kennedy-assassination-theory-as-he-breaks-60-years-of-silence.html
I've never been a reader of US News and if this article is representative of the
kind of stories the publish, that's a good thing. Feel free to read the entire
article if you want. I will focus on this on paragraph?
“If what he says is true, which I tend to believe, it is likely to reopen the question of a second shooter, if not even more,” Robenalt told The Times. “If the bullet we know as the magic or pristine bullet stopped in President Kennedy’s back,
This moron knows zilch about firearms if he thinks a bullet would stop in >JFK's back and even less than zilch if he thinks it would then just fall out. A
full metal jacket bullet is not going to be stopped just inches into soft tissue.
A bullet fired from a high powered rifle is going to easily pass through a human
body. A bullet would have to be extremely underpowered to make such a >shallow penetration into JFK's back. Such an underpowered bullet would >have to be traveling extremely slowly to only make a shallow penetration. >A bullet traveling that slowly could never hit the intended target because >gravity would cause a severe drop in the bullet's trajectory.
I used to have this same conversation with a poster who went by theCuriously, you posted no evidence. no citations to evidence, no
screen name "mainframetech" over and McAdams board. He never could >understand that a bullet with any kind of velocity is going to make a much >deeper penetration than shallow entry into JFK's back. A very slow bullet >could not possible reach the target. For comparison, the .38 Special round >Ruby fired into Oswald's abdomen and near point blank, ripped all the way >through his midsection and bugled out his right side without breaking the >skin. A Carcano bullet has almost double the muzzle velocity of a .38 >Special and has a full metal jacket which means it has much greater >penetrating power. You would have to be a real putz to think a Carcano >bullet could have "stopped in President Kennedy's back".
documents, no testimony, no exhibits, no witness videos.
Only comments. We gain nothing from the above.
Which makes who exactly the fool?
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 15:12:45 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
Apply reason to this:
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.
It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)
So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.
Or you can run...
As believers do...
EVERY
SINGLE
TIME!
The crackpots hate when people apply reason to information.
On Wednesday, September 13, 2023 at 6:12:47 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
The crackpots hate when people apply reason to information.Says the guy who gets his "expert" opinions from online forums and internet bulletin boards.
The guy who claims the "gunsack" was 41 inches.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/33a9MbNPYEg
That's his way to "reason".
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 117:00:10 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,209 |
| Messages: | 5,334,234 |