• Re: Evidence Of Other Bullets and/or Missed Shots

    From gggg gggg@21:1/5 to All on Sun Sep 10 00:38:50 2023
    On Wednesday, May 8, 2013 at 8:15:21 PM UTC-7, curtjester1 wrote:
    Evidence of Extra Bullets and/or Missed Shots


    http://michaelgriffith1.tripod.com/extras.htm


    As the limousine passed the front steps of the Texas School Book
    Depository,
    five witnesses saw a bullet strike the pavement on Elm Street near the
    left
    front of the car; it kicked up a cloud of dust and bits of concrete in
    the
    direction of the car (Michael Griffith, "Extra Bullets and Missed
    Shots in
    Dealey Plaza"; Weisberg, Whitewash, 187-89).

    Royce Skelton was a railroad worker watching the motorcade from atop
    the triple
    underpass. He told the Warren Commission, "I saw a bullet, or I guess
    it was a
    bullet -- I take for granted it was -- hit in the left front of the President's
    car on the cement, and when it did, the smoke carried with it -- away
    from the
    building. . . . on the pavement -- you know, pavement when it is hit
    with a hard
    object, it will scatter -- it will spread" (6 H 238).

    Dallas policeman Starvis Ellis was riding a motorcycle about 100 feet
    in front
    of the President's limousine. When the shooting began, Ellis turned
    the
    limousine a nd saw debris fly up, presumably from this same bullet
    strike (John
    S. Craig, "The Guns of Dealey Plaza"). Mrs. Virginia Baker also saw
    it; she
    believed the shots came from in front of the car by the triple
    underpass (7 H
    508-10).

    One shot missed the limousine and struck a spot in the grass just
    south of Elm
    Street, about 350 feet from the Book Depository. Officer J. W. Foster
    was
    standing on top of the triple underpass, and had a clear view of Elm;
    he saw
    the bullet strike the turf. He reported this to a superior, and was instructed
    to guard the area (Shaw and Harris, 72-75. Journalists and bystanders
    were kept
    away from the area. This could be the first shot that missed,
    although, again,
    it would have to have been a truly terrible shot.

    Wayne and Edna Hartman were near Dealey Plaza when the shots rang out.
    They ran
    through the Plaza and encountered a policeman on the grassy knoll.
    Edna Hartman
    later recalled to Jim Marrs , "He pointed to some bushes near the
    railroad tracks
    on the north side of the street and said that's where the shots came
    from. . . .
    Then I noticed these two parallel marks on the ground that looked like mounds
    made by a mole. I asked, 'What are these, mole hills?' and the
    policeman said,
    'Oh no, ma'am, that's where the bullets struck the ground'" (Marrs, Crossfire,
    315-16). Photographer Hugh Betzner noticed "police officers and some
    men in
    plain clothes . . . digging around in the dirt as if they were looking
    for a
    bullet" (19 H 467-6.

    Photographers Jim Murray and Bill Allen took a famous sequence of
    pictures
    showing Deputy Sheriff E. R. "Buddy" Walthers (in civilian clothes)
    and
    watching a blond-haired man he believed to be an FBI agent point at
    the dug-out
    spot on the ground just off Elm Street, bend over, scoop something up
    from the
    turf, then put the item in his pocket. Police Chief Jesse Curry said
    the man was
    FBI, but he didn't know his name; some have identified him as FBI
    Special Agent
    Robert Barrett . . . The photographs have been widely published.
    Murray also
    photographed the hole that was left in the turf after the scene had
    been
    cleared; this photograph ran in the following day's Fort Worth Star- Telegram,
    captioned, "One of the rifle bullets fired by the murderer of
    President Kennedy
    lies in the grass across Elm Street . . ." The Dallas Times-Herald
    reported in
    reference to the hole in the grass, "Dallas Police Lt. J. C. Day of
    the crime
    lab estimated the distance from the sixth-floor window . . . to the
    spot where
    one of the bullets was recovered at 100 yards."


    Richard Randolph Carr . . . heard four shots fired, the last three of
    which he
    believed came from behind the wooden stockade fence on the grassy
    knoll. He saw
    a bullet strike the turf opp osite the knoll where it "knocked a bunch
    of grass
    up." Judging from the mark on the grass, Carr said the bullet had
    been
    traveling in a southeast direction from the knoll toward the Criminal
    Courts
    building at Elm and Houston (Shaw trial transcript; HSCA volumes;
    Craig).

    Richard Dudman wrote in the December 21, 1963, New Republic: "On the
    say the
    President was shot I happened to learn of a possible fifth [bullet]. A
    group of
    police officers were examining the area at the side of the street
    where the
    President was hit, and a police inspector told me they had just found another
    bullet in the grass."

    The Warren Commission took Buddy Walthers' word that it wasn't a
    bullet or
    bullet fragment.

    There was another bullet strike only about three to five feet from
    this one,
    but it wasn't noticed right away. Dealey Plaza witness John Martin discovered
    it two and a half hours after the shooting, and quickly informed a policeman, < BR>"you better get your boss down here to check this
    thing out, because that will
    show you where the bullet came from" (Griffith; Trask, 573). The mark
    very
    clearly does not point back to the Texas School Book Depository; it
    appears to
    have struck from the direction of the County Records Building, where a
    30.06
    bullet shell was found later (Griffith; Trask, 573).

    Jim Murray took a number of photographs of police officers examining
    the spot,
    including identifications officer Lt. Carl Day, who spent some time at
    this
    spot with his crime lab kit (Trask). Because of the close proximity of
    the
    strikes, it is possible that a bullet struck the manhole and bounced
    into the
    grass, but given the high visibility of the grass strike and the
    reasonably
    deep gouge in the turf, it's unlikely.

    Another bullet struck the sidewalk along the north side of Elm Street.
    It
    apparently was first discovered a day or two later by Dallas resident
    Eugene
    Aldredge -- a gash about four inches long and a quarter of an inch
    deep.
    Aldredge didn't report it to anyone, assuming it had not gone
    unnoticed by the
    authorities. At least one photograph of it was taken; it is pictured
    on several
    books, including Groden's The Killing of the President, 40. After the
    Warren
    Report came out, Aldredge was shocked not to see the missed bullet
    mentioned and
    notified the FBI (Weisberg, Never Again, 383-390). The FBI located it
    and wrote
    up a report describing it as approximately four inches long, a half
    inch wide,
    and a "dug out" appearance. Dallas Morning News reporter Carl Freund
    also
    identified the mark as a bullet strike. Groden notes that the gash
    lines up with
    the southwest sixth floor TSBD window; Harrison Livingstone notes it
    also lines
    up with the south storm drain by the triple underpass (Griffith; Livingstone,
    High Treason 2).

    There are numerous reports of other missed shots; some bullet s have
    even been
    found in Dealey Plaza, literally years after the assassination. In
    1975, a
    maintenance man named Morgan found a 30.06 shell on the roof of the
    County
    Records Building, which is about half a block south of the Book
    Depository. The
    casing has an odd crimp in its neck, suggesting it may have been fired
    from a
    sabot, a device used to fire a smaller caliber bullet out of a large
    caliber
    weapon. This is useful for criminals, as the caliber, type, and brand
    of the
    recovered bullet cannot be linked with their gun (Marrs, Crossfire,
    317). The
    shell had been hidden underneath a lip of roofing tar, and was
    greatly
    deteriorated from exposure to moisture; it had obviously been there a
    while.

    A fired but intact bullet was found on the top of the Massey Roofing
    Co.
    building on Elm Street, about eight blocks from the TSBD, by Richard Haythorne
    in 1967. No official study was made until the HSCA pronounced it a
    jacketed,
    soft-p oint .30 caliber bullet consistent with Remington-Peters
    ammunition; it
    had not been fired from the 6.5 caliber Mannlicher-Carcano (7 HSCA
    357; Carol
    Hewett, "Silencers, Sniper Rifles & the CIA"; Craig).

    In 1974, Dallas resident Richard Lester swept Dealey Plaza with a
    metal
    detector, and discovered a fragment -- the base portion of a bullet --
    500
    yards southwest of the TSBD and 61 paces east of the triple underpass.
    Later he
    turned it over to the FBI, and it was studied by the House Select
    Committee on
    Assassinations in 1978. They found that the fragment was from a 6.5 mm bullet,
    but that it had not been fired from the alleged "Oswald" Mannlicher- Carcano: its
    rifling pattern was different (Associated Press, January 5, 1978; 7
    HSCA 395;
    Hewett). A whole, unfired .45 caliber bullet was found in 1976 by Hal
    Luster by
    the concrete retaining wall on the knoll (Dallas Morning News,
    December 23, 1978).

    In the summer of 1966 , an intact bullet was found lodged in the roof
    of a
    building at 1615 Stemmons Freeway by William Barbee. The building was
    about a
    quarter mile away from the Texas School Book Depository -- within
    rifle range
    -- in the direction that Oswald had allegedly fired. The FBI
    identified the
    bullet as a .30 caliber full metal jacketed military bullet; its
    rifling
    pattern of four grooves, right hand twist is consistent with
    ammunition of US
    manufacture. This is the type of bullet the CIA used with their
    silenced M-1
    .30 caliber carbine rifles; civilians were not allowed to purchase
    them until
    the middle of 1963, and full metal jacketed bullets are illegal for
    use in
    hunting (Hewett, citing FBI Doc. #62-109060-5898).

    Two spent Remington .222 bullet casings were found in Dealey Plaza by
    John
    Rademacher, about eighty feet apart, one on each end of the concrete
    pergola
    that stands midway between the Texas School Book Depository and the
    triple
    underpass. One was just to the east, while the other was just west of
    it,
    between the pergola and the wooden stockade fence on the grassy knoll.
    One of
    the casings has strange indentations which appear to be teeth marks on
    it.

    Carol Hewett also notes, "The HSCA makes passing reference to the
    'Walder'
    bullet that was also submitted for testing; the author could find no
    other
    mention of this particular item of evidence" (citing 7 HSCA 157).
    Hewett also
    references "the report from a top FBI administrator, Alan Belmont, to
    Clyde
    Tolson, Hoover's second in command, in which Belmont on the night of November
    22nd advises that a bullet has been found lodged behind the
    President's ear"
    (citing FBI Doc. #62-109060-1431), consistent with the Sibert-O'Neill evidence
    envelope that was supposed to contain a "missile," not a fragment or fragments.


    Is there any evidence that there were once more bullets or fragments
    than are
    now in th e record?

    In Arlen Specter's published questioning of the autopsy pathologists,
    he makes
    repeated references to a file originally designated CD 371, then
    renamed as it
    was entered into evidence. Specter introduces Commission Exhibit 397, stating
    it is the identical file previously marked CD 371 "for our internal purposes"
    (2 H 323). Researcher Harold Weisberg was the first person to notice
    that CE
    397 seemed to be missing several items, so he went to the National
    Archives to
    inspect the CD 371. He found some interesting differences between the 'identical' files (Weisberg, Post Mortem, 251). One notable document
    is a list
    of eleven items written by Secret Service officer Robert I . Bouck,
    head of the
    Protective Research Section, on Treasury Department letterhead, dated November
    26, 1963. It acknowledges receipt of eleven items from Admiral George
    G.
    Burkley, who had been John F. Kennedy's personal physician, and who
    took
    posses sion (not necessarily in a legal manner) of a number of the
    autopsy
    records. The seventh item on the list reads, "One receipt from FBI for
    a
    missile recovered during the examination of the body."

    A missile is a bullet. It is not a bullet fragment; a fragment is a
    piece of a
    ruptured missile. Numerous minute fragments were recovered from the President's
    body during the autopsy. Not a single receipt for a fragment or
    fragments is
    listed on this document; they were transferred separately. This is a
    receipt for
    an intact bullet recovered from John F. Kennedy's body; it appeared in
    print for
    the first time in Weisberg's 1975 book, Post Mortem, 527.

    Researcher Anna-Marie Kuhns-Walko turned up some interesting items at
    the
    National Archives in 1996: photographs (several) labeled as being of a bullet
    "removed from President Kennedy's body." It is not one of the tiny
    fragments
    that have been part of the record for thirty-five years. No other information
    is available: no photographer listed; no indication of when it was recovered;
    or what part of the body it came from; or if it was recovered at
    Parkland,
    Bethesda, or elsewhere. Just several photos of a bullet "removed from President
    Kennedy's body" that no one's ever seen before.

    Anna-Marie also discovered an empty envelope, originally marked,
    "Shell 7.5
    found in Dealey Plaza 11/22/63. This would be an expended cartridge
    found
    somewhere in Dealey Plaza, presumably not far from where it was fired;
    and
    regardless of where in Dealey Plaza it was found (which the envelope
    doesn't
    state), it's a 7.5 caliber, not a 6.5 caliber like the Mannlicher-
    Carcano. No
    one outside a very select circle, apparently, ever heard of this item before.
    Why is the envelope empty? Written right after the previously quoted description: "DETERMINED OF NO VALUE AND DESTROYED."

    ********************************************************
    *************

    The above post was snipped to the relevant paragraphs dealing with
    evidence for
    more than 3 bullets. I invite everyone to Google and read the original
    if
    interested. There's more material in the original - and I snipped out
    some good
    stuff that simply wasn't relevant to this post.

    Clearly *some* of the snippets above could easily be referring to the
    *same*
    bullet - simply at different perspective by different eyewitnesses.
    And some of
    the snippets above could easily have had *no* relevance to 11/22/63.
    But the WC
    ignored and ran from such evidence with a determination that can only
    lead
    thoughtful people to the conclusion that they had already made up
    their minds.

    The point I might make here is... where did the WC deal with all of
    this
    evidence? Can anyone point to *ANY* attempt by the WC to explain away
    this
    massive amount of evidence for more than three bullets? Examine the
    evidence at
    all? Ask the FBI for clarification?
    _________________
    Justice is like the hawk. Sometimes it must go hooded.[/quote]

    (2023 Youtube upload):

    "JFK Assassination : A Bullet Found - Sheriff Buddy Walthers"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From gggg gggg@21:1/5 to All on Mon Sep 11 23:35:44 2023
    On Wednesday, May 8, 2013 at 8:15:21 PM UTC-7, curtjester1 wrote:
    Evidence of Extra Bullets and/or Missed Shots


    http://michaelgriffith1.tripod.com/extras.htm


    As the limousine passed the front steps of the Texas School Book
    Depository,
    five witnesses saw a bullet strike the pavement on Elm Street near the
    left
    front of the car; it kicked up a cloud of dust and bits of concrete in
    the
    direction of the car (Michael Griffith, "Extra Bullets and Missed
    Shots in
    Dealey Plaza"; Weisberg, Whitewash, 187-89).

    Royce Skelton was a railroad worker watching the motorcade from atop
    the triple
    underpass. He told the Warren Commission, "I saw a bullet, or I guess
    it was a
    bullet -- I take for granted it was -- hit in the left front of the President's
    car on the cement, and when it did, the smoke carried with it -- away
    from the
    building. . . . on the pavement -- you know, pavement when it is hit
    with a hard
    object, it will scatter -- it will spread" (6 H 238).

    Dallas policeman Starvis Ellis was riding a motorcycle about 100 feet
    in front
    of the President's limousine. When the shooting began, Ellis turned
    the
    limousine a nd saw debris fly up, presumably from this same bullet
    strike (John
    S. Craig, "The Guns of Dealey Plaza"). Mrs. Virginia Baker also saw
    it; she
    believed the shots came from in front of the car by the triple
    underpass (7 H
    508-10).

    One shot missed the limousine and struck a spot in the grass just
    south of Elm
    Street, about 350 feet from the Book Depository. Officer J. W. Foster
    was
    standing on top of the triple underpass, and had a clear view of Elm;
    he saw
    the bullet strike the turf. He reported this to a superior, and was instructed
    to guard the area (Shaw and Harris, 72-75. Journalists and bystanders
    were kept
    away from the area. This could be the first shot that missed,
    although, again,
    it would have to have been a truly terrible shot.

    Wayne and Edna Hartman were near Dealey Plaza when the shots rang out.
    They ran
    through the Plaza and encountered a policeman on the grassy knoll.
    Edna Hartman
    later recalled to Jim Marrs , "He pointed to some bushes near the
    railroad tracks
    on the north side of the street and said that's where the shots came
    from. . . .
    Then I noticed these two parallel marks on the ground that looked like mounds
    made by a mole. I asked, 'What are these, mole hills?' and the
    policeman said,
    'Oh no, ma'am, that's where the bullets struck the ground'" (Marrs, Crossfire,
    315-16). Photographer Hugh Betzner noticed "police officers and some
    men in
    plain clothes . . . digging around in the dirt as if they were looking
    for a
    bullet" (19 H 467-6.

    Photographers Jim Murray and Bill Allen took a famous sequence of
    pictures
    showing Deputy Sheriff E. R. "Buddy" Walthers (in civilian clothes)
    and
    watching a blond-haired man he believed to be an FBI agent point at
    the dug-out
    spot on the ground just off Elm Street, bend over, scoop something up
    from the
    turf, then put the item in his pocket. Police Chief Jesse Curry said
    the man was
    FBI, but he didn't know his name; some have identified him as FBI
    Special Agent
    Robert Barrett . . . The photographs have been widely published.
    Murray also
    photographed the hole that was left in the turf after the scene had
    been
    cleared; this photograph ran in the following day's Fort Worth Star- Telegram,
    captioned, "One of the rifle bullets fired by the murderer of
    President Kennedy
    lies in the grass across Elm Street . . ." The Dallas Times-Herald
    reported in
    reference to the hole in the grass, "Dallas Police Lt. J. C. Day of
    the crime
    lab estimated the distance from the sixth-floor window . . . to the
    spot where
    one of the bullets was recovered at 100 yards."


    Richard Randolph Carr . . . heard four shots fired, the last three of
    which he
    believed came from behind the wooden stockade fence on the grassy
    knoll. He saw
    a bullet strike the turf opp osite the knoll where it "knocked a bunch
    of grass
    up." Judging from the mark on the grass, Carr said the bullet had
    been
    traveling in a southeast direction from the knoll toward the Criminal
    Courts
    building at Elm and Houston (Shaw trial transcript; HSCA volumes;
    Craig).

    Richard Dudman wrote in the December 21, 1963, New Republic: "On the
    say the
    President was shot I happened to learn of a possible fifth [bullet]. A
    group of
    police officers were examining the area at the side of the street
    where the
    President was hit, and a police inspector told me they had just found another
    bullet in the grass."

    The Warren Commission took Buddy Walthers' word that it wasn't a
    bullet or
    bullet fragment.

    There was another bullet strike only about three to five feet from
    this one,
    but it wasn't noticed right away. Dealey Plaza witness John Martin discovered
    it two and a half hours after the shooting, and quickly informed a policeman, < BR>"you better get your boss down here to check this
    thing out, because that will
    show you where the bullet came from" (Griffith; Trask, 573). The mark
    very
    clearly does not point back to the Texas School Book Depository; it
    appears to
    have struck from the direction of the County Records Building, where a
    30.06
    bullet shell was found later (Griffith; Trask, 573).

    Jim Murray took a number of photographs of police officers examining
    the spot,
    including identifications officer Lt. Carl Day, who spent some time at
    this
    spot with his crime lab kit (Trask). Because of the close proximity of
    the
    strikes, it is possible that a bullet struck the manhole and bounced
    into the
    grass, but given the high visibility of the grass strike and the
    reasonably
    deep gouge in the turf, it's unlikely.

    Another bullet struck the sidewalk along the north side of Elm Street.
    It
    apparently was first discovered a day or two later by Dallas resident
    Eugene
    Aldredge -- a gash about four inches long and a quarter of an inch
    deep.
    Aldredge didn't report it to anyone, assuming it had not gone
    unnoticed by the
    authorities. At least one photograph of it was taken; it is pictured
    on several
    books, including Groden's The Killing of the President, 40. After the
    Warren
    Report came out, Aldredge was shocked not to see the missed bullet
    mentioned and
    notified the FBI (Weisberg, Never Again, 383-390). The FBI located it
    and wrote
    up a report describing it as approximately four inches long, a half
    inch wide,
    and a "dug out" appearance. Dallas Morning News reporter Carl Freund
    also
    identified the mark as a bullet strike. Groden notes that the gash
    lines up with
    the southwest sixth floor TSBD window; Harrison Livingstone notes it
    also lines
    up with the south storm drain by the triple underpass (Griffith; Livingstone,
    High Treason 2).

    There are numerous reports of other missed shots; some bullet s have
    even been
    found in Dealey Plaza, literally years after the assassination. In
    1975, a
    maintenance man named Morgan found a 30.06 shell on the roof of the
    County
    Records Building, which is about half a block south of the Book
    Depository. The
    casing has an odd crimp in its neck, suggesting it may have been fired
    from a
    sabot, a device used to fire a smaller caliber bullet out of a large
    caliber
    weapon. This is useful for criminals, as the caliber, type, and brand
    of the
    recovered bullet cannot be linked with their gun (Marrs, Crossfire,
    317). The
    shell had been hidden underneath a lip of roofing tar, and was
    greatly
    deteriorated from exposure to moisture; it had obviously been there a
    while.

    A fired but intact bullet was found on the top of the Massey Roofing
    Co.
    building on Elm Street, about eight blocks from the TSBD, by Richard Haythorne
    in 1967. No official study was made until the HSCA pronounced it a
    jacketed,
    soft-p oint .30 caliber bullet consistent with Remington-Peters
    ammunition; it
    had not been fired from the 6.5 caliber Mannlicher-Carcano (7 HSCA
    357; Carol
    Hewett, "Silencers, Sniper Rifles & the CIA"; Craig).

    In 1974, Dallas resident Richard Lester swept Dealey Plaza with a
    metal
    detector, and discovered a fragment -- the base portion of a bullet --
    500
    yards southwest of the TSBD and 61 paces east of the triple underpass.
    Later he
    turned it over to the FBI, and it was studied by the House Select
    Committee on
    Assassinations in 1978. They found that the fragment was from a 6.5 mm bullet,
    but that it had not been fired from the alleged "Oswald" Mannlicher- Carcano: its
    rifling pattern was different (Associated Press, January 5, 1978; 7
    HSCA 395;
    Hewett). A whole, unfired .45 caliber bullet was found in 1976 by Hal
    Luster by
    the concrete retaining wall on the knoll (Dallas Morning News,
    December 23, 1978).

    In the summer of 1966 , an intact bullet was found lodged in the roof
    of a
    building at 1615 Stemmons Freeway by William Barbee. The building was
    about a
    quarter mile away from the Texas School Book Depository -- within
    rifle range
    -- in the direction that Oswald had allegedly fired. The FBI
    identified the
    bullet as a .30 caliber full metal jacketed military bullet; its
    rifling
    pattern of four grooves, right hand twist is consistent with
    ammunition of US
    manufacture. This is the type of bullet the CIA used with their
    silenced M-1
    .30 caliber carbine rifles; civilians were not allowed to purchase
    them until
    the middle of 1963, and full metal jacketed bullets are illegal for
    use in
    hunting (Hewett, citing FBI Doc. #62-109060-5898).

    Two spent Remington .222 bullet casings were found in Dealey Plaza by
    John
    Rademacher, about eighty feet apart, one on each end of the concrete
    pergola
    that stands midway between the Texas School Book Depository and the
    triple
    underpass. One was just to the east, while the other was just west of
    it,
    between the pergola and the wooden stockade fence on the grassy knoll.
    One of
    the casings has strange indentations which appear to be teeth marks on
    it.

    Carol Hewett also notes, "The HSCA makes passing reference to the
    'Walder'
    bullet that was also submitted for testing; the author could find no
    other
    mention of this particular item of evidence" (citing 7 HSCA 157).
    Hewett also
    references "the report from a top FBI administrator, Alan Belmont, to
    Clyde
    Tolson, Hoover's second in command, in which Belmont on the night of November
    22nd advises that a bullet has been found lodged behind the
    President's ear"
    (citing FBI Doc. #62-109060-1431), consistent with the Sibert-O'Neill evidence
    envelope that was supposed to contain a "missile," not a fragment or fragments.


    Is there any evidence that there were once more bullets or fragments
    than are
    now in th e record?

    In Arlen Specter's published questioning of the autopsy pathologists,
    he makes
    repeated references to a file originally designated CD 371, then
    renamed as it
    was entered into evidence. Specter introduces Commission Exhibit 397, stating
    it is the identical file previously marked CD 371 "for our internal purposes"
    (2 H 323). Researcher Harold Weisberg was the first person to notice
    that CE
    397 seemed to be missing several items, so he went to the National
    Archives to
    inspect the CD 371. He found some interesting differences between the 'identical' files (Weisberg, Post Mortem, 251). One notable document
    is a list
    of eleven items written by Secret Service officer Robert I . Bouck,
    head of the
    Protective Research Section, on Treasury Department letterhead, dated November
    26, 1963. It acknowledges receipt of eleven items from Admiral George
    G.
    Burkley, who had been John F. Kennedy's personal physician, and who
    took
    posses sion (not necessarily in a legal manner) of a number of the
    autopsy
    records. The seventh item on the list reads, "One receipt from FBI for
    a
    missile recovered during the examination of the body."

    A missile is a bullet. It is not a bullet fragment; a fragment is a
    piece of a
    ruptured missile. Numerous minute fragments were recovered from the President's
    body during the autopsy. Not a single receipt for a fragment or
    fragments is
    listed on this document; they were transferred separately. This is a
    receipt for
    an intact bullet recovered from John F. Kennedy's body; it appeared in
    print for
    the first time in Weisberg's 1975 book, Post Mortem, 527.

    Researcher Anna-Marie Kuhns-Walko turned up some interesting items at
    the
    National Archives in 1996: photographs (several) labeled as being of a bullet
    "removed from President Kennedy's body." It is not one of the tiny
    fragments
    that have been part of the record for thirty-five years. No other information
    is available: no photographer listed; no indication of when it was recovered;
    or what part of the body it came from; or if it was recovered at
    Parkland,
    Bethesda, or elsewhere. Just several photos of a bullet "removed from President
    Kennedy's body" that no one's ever seen before.

    Anna-Marie also discovered an empty envelope, originally marked,
    "Shell 7.5
    found in Dealey Plaza 11/22/63. This would be an expended cartridge
    found
    somewhere in Dealey Plaza, presumably not far from where it was fired;
    and
    regardless of where in Dealey Plaza it was found (which the envelope
    doesn't
    state), it's a 7.5 caliber, not a 6.5 caliber like the Mannlicher-
    Carcano. No
    one outside a very select circle, apparently, ever heard of this item before.
    Why is the envelope empty? Written right after the previously quoted description: "DETERMINED OF NO VALUE AND DESTROYED."

    ********************************************************
    *************

    The above post was snipped to the relevant paragraphs dealing with
    evidence for
    more than 3 bullets. I invite everyone to Google and read the original
    if
    interested. There's more material in the original - and I snipped out
    some good
    stuff that simply wasn't relevant to this post.

    Clearly *some* of the snippets above could easily be referring to the
    *same*
    bullet - simply at different perspective by different eyewitnesses.
    And some of
    the snippets above could easily have had *no* relevance to 11/22/63.
    But the WC
    ignored and ran from such evidence with a determination that can only
    lead
    thoughtful people to the conclusion that they had already made up
    their minds.

    The point I might make here is... where did the WC deal with all of
    this
    evidence? Can anyone point to *ANY* attempt by the WC to explain away
    this
    massive amount of evidence for more than three bullets? Examine the
    evidence at
    all? Ask the FBI for clarification?
    _________________
    Justice is like the hawk. Sometimes it must go hooded.[/quote]

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Nc6z7tbVQ4E

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From gggg gggg@21:1/5 to All on Wed Sep 13 21:21:02 2023
    On Wednesday, May 8, 2013 at 8:15:21 PM UTC-7, curtjester1 wrote:
    Evidence of Extra Bullets and/or Missed Shots


    http://michaelgriffith1.tripod.com/extras.htm


    As the limousine passed the front steps of the Texas School Book
    Depository,
    five witnesses saw a bullet strike the pavement on Elm Street near the
    left
    front of the car; it kicked up a cloud of dust and bits of concrete in
    the
    direction of the car (Michael Griffith, "Extra Bullets and Missed
    Shots in
    Dealey Plaza"; Weisberg, Whitewash, 187-89).

    Royce Skelton was a railroad worker watching the motorcade from atop
    the triple
    underpass. He told the Warren Commission, "I saw a bullet, or I guess
    it was a
    bullet -- I take for granted it was -- hit in the left front of the President's
    car on the cement, and when it did, the smoke carried with it -- away
    from the
    building. . . . on the pavement -- you know, pavement when it is hit
    with a hard
    object, it will scatter -- it will spread" (6 H 238).

    Dallas policeman Starvis Ellis was riding a motorcycle about 100 feet
    in front
    of the President's limousine. When the shooting began, Ellis turned
    the
    limousine a nd saw debris fly up, presumably from this same bullet
    strike (John
    S. Craig, "The Guns of Dealey Plaza"). Mrs. Virginia Baker also saw
    it; she
    believed the shots came from in front of the car by the triple
    underpass (7 H
    508-10).

    One shot missed the limousine and struck a spot in the grass just
    south of Elm
    Street, about 350 feet from the Book Depository. Officer J. W. Foster
    was
    standing on top of the triple underpass, and had a clear view of Elm;
    he saw
    the bullet strike the turf. He reported this to a superior, and was instructed
    to guard the area (Shaw and Harris, 72-75. Journalists and bystanders
    were kept
    away from the area. This could be the first shot that missed,
    although, again,
    it would have to have been a truly terrible shot.

    Wayne and Edna Hartman were near Dealey Plaza when the shots rang out.
    They ran
    through the Plaza and encountered a policeman on the grassy knoll.
    Edna Hartman
    later recalled to Jim Marrs , "He pointed to some bushes near the
    railroad tracks
    on the north side of the street and said that's where the shots came
    from. . . .
    Then I noticed these two parallel marks on the ground that looked like mounds
    made by a mole. I asked, 'What are these, mole hills?' and the
    policeman said,
    'Oh no, ma'am, that's where the bullets struck the ground'" (Marrs, Crossfire,
    315-16). Photographer Hugh Betzner noticed "police officers and some
    men in
    plain clothes . . . digging around in the dirt as if they were looking
    for a
    bullet" (19 H 467-6.

    Photographers Jim Murray and Bill Allen took a famous sequence of
    pictures
    showing Deputy Sheriff E. R. "Buddy" Walthers (in civilian clothes)
    and
    watching a blond-haired man he believed to be an FBI agent point at
    the dug-out
    spot on the ground just off Elm Street, bend over, scoop something up
    from the
    turf, then put the item in his pocket. Police Chief Jesse Curry said
    the man was
    FBI, but he didn't know his name; some have identified him as FBI
    Special Agent
    Robert Barrett . . . The photographs have been widely published.
    Murray also
    photographed the hole that was left in the turf after the scene had
    been
    cleared; this photograph ran in the following day's Fort Worth Star- Telegram,
    captioned, "One of the rifle bullets fired by the murderer of
    President Kennedy
    lies in the grass across Elm Street . . ." The Dallas Times-Herald
    reported in
    reference to the hole in the grass, "Dallas Police Lt. J. C. Day of
    the crime
    lab estimated the distance from the sixth-floor window . . . to the
    spot where
    one of the bullets was recovered at 100 yards."


    Richard Randolph Carr . . . heard four shots fired, the last three of
    which he
    believed came from behind the wooden stockade fence on the grassy
    knoll. He saw
    a bullet strike the turf opp osite the knoll where it "knocked a bunch
    of grass
    up." Judging from the mark on the grass, Carr said the bullet had
    been
    traveling in a southeast direction from the knoll toward the Criminal
    Courts
    building at Elm and Houston (Shaw trial transcript; HSCA volumes;
    Craig).

    Richard Dudman wrote in the December 21, 1963, New Republic: "On the
    say the
    President was shot I happened to learn of a possible fifth [bullet]. A
    group of
    police officers were examining the area at the side of the street
    where the
    President was hit, and a police inspector told me they had just found another
    bullet in the grass."

    The Warren Commission took Buddy Walthers' word that it wasn't a
    bullet or
    bullet fragment.

    There was another bullet strike only about three to five feet from
    this one,
    but it wasn't noticed right away. Dealey Plaza witness John Martin discovered
    it two and a half hours after the shooting, and quickly informed a policeman, < BR>"you better get your boss down here to check this
    thing out, because that will
    show you where the bullet came from" (Griffith; Trask, 573). The mark
    very
    clearly does not point back to the Texas School Book Depository; it
    appears to
    have struck from the direction of the County Records Building, where a
    30.06
    bullet shell was found later (Griffith; Trask, 573).

    Jim Murray took a number of photographs of police officers examining
    the spot,
    including identifications officer Lt. Carl Day, who spent some time at
    this
    spot with his crime lab kit (Trask). Because of the close proximity of
    the
    strikes, it is possible that a bullet struck the manhole and bounced
    into the
    grass, but given the high visibility of the grass strike and the
    reasonably
    deep gouge in the turf, it's unlikely.

    Another bullet struck the sidewalk along the north side of Elm Street.
    It
    apparently was first discovered a day or two later by Dallas resident
    Eugene
    Aldredge -- a gash about four inches long and a quarter of an inch
    deep.
    Aldredge didn't report it to anyone, assuming it had not gone
    unnoticed by the
    authorities. At least one photograph of it was taken; it is pictured
    on several
    books, including Groden's The Killing of the President, 40. After the
    Warren
    Report came out, Aldredge was shocked not to see the missed bullet
    mentioned and
    notified the FBI (Weisberg, Never Again, 383-390). The FBI located it
    and wrote
    up a report describing it as approximately four inches long, a half
    inch wide,
    and a "dug out" appearance. Dallas Morning News reporter Carl Freund
    also
    identified the mark as a bullet strike. Groden notes that the gash
    lines up with
    the southwest sixth floor TSBD window; Harrison Livingstone notes it
    also lines
    up with the south storm drain by the triple underpass (Griffith; Livingstone,
    High Treason 2).

    There are numerous reports of other missed shots; some bullet s have
    even been
    found in Dealey Plaza, literally years after the assassination. In
    1975, a
    maintenance man named Morgan found a 30.06 shell on the roof of the
    County
    Records Building, which is about half a block south of the Book
    Depository. The
    casing has an odd crimp in its neck, suggesting it may have been fired
    from a
    sabot, a device used to fire a smaller caliber bullet out of a large
    caliber
    weapon. This is useful for criminals, as the caliber, type, and brand
    of the
    recovered bullet cannot be linked with their gun (Marrs, Crossfire,
    317). The
    shell had been hidden underneath a lip of roofing tar, and was
    greatly
    deteriorated from exposure to moisture; it had obviously been there a
    while.

    A fired but intact bullet was found on the top of the Massey Roofing
    Co.
    building on Elm Street, about eight blocks from the TSBD, by Richard Haythorne
    in 1967. No official study was made until the HSCA pronounced it a
    jacketed,
    soft-p oint .30 caliber bullet consistent with Remington-Peters
    ammunition; it
    had not been fired from the 6.5 caliber Mannlicher-Carcano (7 HSCA
    357; Carol
    Hewett, "Silencers, Sniper Rifles & the CIA"; Craig).

    In 1974, Dallas resident Richard Lester swept Dealey Plaza with a
    metal
    detector, and discovered a fragment -- the base portion of a bullet --
    500
    yards southwest of the TSBD and 61 paces east of the triple underpass.
    Later he
    turned it over to the FBI, and it was studied by the House Select
    Committee on
    Assassinations in 1978. They found that the fragment was from a 6.5 mm bullet,
    but that it had not been fired from the alleged "Oswald" Mannlicher- Carcano: its
    rifling pattern was different (Associated Press, January 5, 1978; 7
    HSCA 395;
    Hewett). A whole, unfired .45 caliber bullet was found in 1976 by Hal
    Luster by
    the concrete retaining wall on the knoll (Dallas Morning News,
    December 23, 1978).

    In the summer of 1966 , an intact bullet was found lodged in the roof
    of a
    building at 1615 Stemmons Freeway by William Barbee. The building was
    about a
    quarter mile away from the Texas School Book Depository -- within
    rifle range
    -- in the direction that Oswald had allegedly fired. The FBI
    identified the
    bullet as a .30 caliber full metal jacketed military bullet; its
    rifling
    pattern of four grooves, right hand twist is consistent with
    ammunition of US
    manufacture. This is the type of bullet the CIA used with their
    silenced M-1
    .30 caliber carbine rifles; civilians were not allowed to purchase
    them until
    the middle of 1963, and full metal jacketed bullets are illegal for
    use in
    hunting (Hewett, citing FBI Doc. #62-109060-5898).

    Two spent Remington .222 bullet casings were found in Dealey Plaza by
    John
    Rademacher, about eighty feet apart, one on each end of the concrete
    pergola
    that stands midway between the Texas School Book Depository and the
    triple
    underpass. One was just to the east, while the other was just west of
    it,
    between the pergola and the wooden stockade fence on the grassy knoll.
    One of
    the casings has strange indentations which appear to be teeth marks on
    it.

    Carol Hewett also notes, "The HSCA makes passing reference to the
    'Walder'
    bullet that was also submitted for testing; the author could find no
    other
    mention of this particular item of evidence" (citing 7 HSCA 157).
    Hewett also
    references "the report from a top FBI administrator, Alan Belmont, to
    Clyde
    Tolson, Hoover's second in command, in which Belmont on the night of November
    22nd advises that a bullet has been found lodged behind the
    President's ear"
    (citing FBI Doc. #62-109060-1431), consistent with the Sibert-O'Neill evidence
    envelope that was supposed to contain a "missile," not a fragment or fragments.


    Is there any evidence that there were once more bullets or fragments
    than are
    now in th e record?

    In Arlen Specter's published questioning of the autopsy pathologists,
    he makes
    repeated references to a file originally designated CD 371, then
    renamed as it
    was entered into evidence. Specter introduces Commission Exhibit 397, stating
    it is the identical file previously marked CD 371 "for our internal purposes"
    (2 H 323). Researcher Harold Weisberg was the first person to notice
    that CE
    397 seemed to be missing several items, so he went to the National
    Archives to
    inspect the CD 371. He found some interesting differences between the 'identical' files (Weisberg, Post Mortem, 251). One notable document
    is a list
    of eleven items written by Secret Service officer Robert I . Bouck,
    head of the
    Protective Research Section, on Treasury Department letterhead, dated November
    26, 1963. It acknowledges receipt of eleven items from Admiral George
    G.
    Burkley, who had been John F. Kennedy's personal physician, and who
    took
    posses sion (not necessarily in a legal manner) of a number of the
    autopsy
    records. The seventh item on the list reads, "One receipt from FBI for
    a
    missile recovered during the examination of the body."

    A missile is a bullet. It is not a bullet fragment; a fragment is a
    piece of a
    ruptured missile. Numerous minute fragments were recovered from the President's
    body during the autopsy. Not a single receipt for a fragment or
    fragments is
    listed on this document; they were transferred separately. This is a
    receipt for
    an intact bullet recovered from John F. Kennedy's body; it appeared in
    print for
    the first time in Weisberg's 1975 book, Post Mortem, 527.

    Researcher Anna-Marie Kuhns-Walko turned up some interesting items at
    the
    National Archives in 1996: photographs (several) labeled as being of a bullet
    "removed from President Kennedy's body." It is not one of the tiny
    fragments
    that have been part of the record for thirty-five years. No other information
    is available: no photographer listed; no indication of when it was recovered;
    or what part of the body it came from; or if it was recovered at
    Parkland,
    Bethesda, or elsewhere. Just several photos of a bullet "removed from President
    Kennedy's body" that no one's ever seen before.

    Anna-Marie also discovered an empty envelope, originally marked,
    "Shell 7.5
    found in Dealey Plaza 11/22/63. This would be an expended cartridge
    found
    somewhere in Dealey Plaza, presumably not far from where it was fired;
    and
    regardless of where in Dealey Plaza it was found (which the envelope
    doesn't
    state), it's a 7.5 caliber, not a 6.5 caliber like the Mannlicher-
    Carcano. No
    one outside a very select circle, apparently, ever heard of this item before.
    Why is the envelope empty? Written right after the previously quoted description: "DETERMINED OF NO VALUE AND DESTROYED."

    ********************************************************
    *************

    The above post was snipped to the relevant paragraphs dealing with
    evidence for
    more than 3 bullets. I invite everyone to Google and read the original
    if
    interested. There's more material in the original - and I snipped out
    some good
    stuff that simply wasn't relevant to this post.

    Clearly *some* of the snippets above could easily be referring to the
    *same*
    bullet - simply at different perspective by different eyewitnesses.
    And some of
    the snippets above could easily have had *no* relevance to 11/22/63.
    But the WC
    ignored and ran from such evidence with a determination that can only
    lead
    thoughtful people to the conclusion that they had already made up
    their minds.

    The point I might make here is... where did the WC deal with all of
    this
    evidence? Can anyone point to *ANY* attempt by the WC to explain away
    this
    massive amount of evidence for more than three bullets? Examine the
    evidence at
    all? Ask the FBI for clarification?
    _________________
    Justice is like the hawk. Sometimes it must go hooded.[/quote]

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/ZoJbOFqc6Iw

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From gggg gggg@21:1/5 to gggg gggg on Wed Sep 13 21:25:58 2023
    On Wednesday, September 13, 2023 at 9:21:04 PM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 8, 2013 at 8:15:21 PM UTC-7, curtjester1 wrote:
    Evidence of Extra Bullets and/or Missed Shots


    http://michaelgriffith1.tripod.com/extras.htm


    As the limousine passed the front steps of the Texas School Book Depository,
    five witnesses saw a bullet strike the pavement on Elm Street near the left
    front of the car; it kicked up a cloud of dust and bits of concrete in
    the
    direction of the car (Michael Griffith, "Extra Bullets and Missed
    Shots in
    Dealey Plaza"; Weisberg, Whitewash, 187-89).

    Royce Skelton was a railroad worker watching the motorcade from atop
    the triple
    underpass. He told the Warren Commission, "I saw a bullet, or I guess
    it was a
    bullet -- I take for granted it was -- hit in the left front of the President's
    car on the cement, and when it did, the smoke carried with it -- away
    from the
    building. . . . on the pavement -- you know, pavement when it is hit
    with a hard
    object, it will scatter -- it will spread" (6 H 238).

    Dallas policeman Starvis Ellis was riding a motorcycle about 100 feet
    in front
    of the President's limousine. When the shooting began, Ellis turned
    the
    limousine a nd saw debris fly up, presumably from this same bullet
    strike (John
    S. Craig, "The Guns of Dealey Plaza"). Mrs. Virginia Baker also saw
    it; she
    believed the shots came from in front of the car by the triple
    underpass (7 H
    508-10).

    One shot missed the limousine and struck a spot in the grass just
    south of Elm
    Street, about 350 feet from the Book Depository. Officer J. W. Foster
    was
    standing on top of the triple underpass, and had a clear view of Elm;
    he saw
    the bullet strike the turf. He reported this to a superior, and was instructed
    to guard the area (Shaw and Harris, 72-75. Journalists and bystanders
    were kept
    away from the area. This could be the first shot that missed,
    although, again,
    it would have to have been a truly terrible shot.

    Wayne and Edna Hartman were near Dealey Plaza when the shots rang out. They ran
    through the Plaza and encountered a policeman on the grassy knoll.
    Edna Hartman
    later recalled to Jim Marrs , "He pointed to some bushes near the
    railroad tracks
    on the north side of the street and said that's where the shots came
    from. . . .
    Then I noticed these two parallel marks on the ground that looked like mounds
    made by a mole. I asked, 'What are these, mole hills?' and the
    policeman said,
    'Oh no, ma'am, that's where the bullets struck the ground'" (Marrs, Crossfire,
    315-16). Photographer Hugh Betzner noticed "police officers and some
    men in
    plain clothes . . . digging around in the dirt as if they were looking
    for a
    bullet" (19 H 467-6.

    Photographers Jim Murray and Bill Allen took a famous sequence of
    pictures
    showing Deputy Sheriff E. R. "Buddy" Walthers (in civilian clothes)
    and
    watching a blond-haired man he believed to be an FBI agent point at
    the dug-out
    spot on the ground just off Elm Street, bend over, scoop something up
    from the
    turf, then put the item in his pocket. Police Chief Jesse Curry said
    the man was
    FBI, but he didn't know his name; some have identified him as FBI
    Special Agent
    Robert Barrett . . . The photographs have been widely published.
    Murray also
    photographed the hole that was left in the turf after the scene had
    been
    cleared; this photograph ran in the following day's Fort Worth Star- Telegram,
    captioned, "One of the rifle bullets fired by the murderer of
    President Kennedy
    lies in the grass across Elm Street . . ." The Dallas Times-Herald reported in
    reference to the hole in the grass, "Dallas Police Lt. J. C. Day of
    the crime
    lab estimated the distance from the sixth-floor window . . . to the
    spot where
    one of the bullets was recovered at 100 yards."


    Richard Randolph Carr . . . heard four shots fired, the last three of which he
    believed came from behind the wooden stockade fence on the grassy
    knoll. He saw
    a bullet strike the turf opp osite the knoll where it "knocked a bunch
    of grass
    up." Judging from the mark on the grass, Carr said the bullet had
    been
    traveling in a southeast direction from the knoll toward the Criminal Courts
    building at Elm and Houston (Shaw trial transcript; HSCA volumes;
    Craig).

    Richard Dudman wrote in the December 21, 1963, New Republic: "On the
    say the
    President was shot I happened to learn of a possible fifth [bullet]. A group of
    police officers were examining the area at the side of the street
    where the
    President was hit, and a police inspector told me they had just found another
    bullet in the grass."

    The Warren Commission took Buddy Walthers' word that it wasn't a
    bullet or
    bullet fragment.

    There was another bullet strike only about three to five feet from
    this one,
    but it wasn't noticed right away. Dealey Plaza witness John Martin discovered
    it two and a half hours after the shooting, and quickly informed a policeman, < BR>"you better get your boss down here to check this
    thing out, because that will
    show you where the bullet came from" (Griffith; Trask, 573). The mark
    very
    clearly does not point back to the Texas School Book Depository; it appears to
    have struck from the direction of the County Records Building, where a 30.06
    bullet shell was found later (Griffith; Trask, 573).

    Jim Murray took a number of photographs of police officers examining
    the spot,
    including identifications officer Lt. Carl Day, who spent some time at this
    spot with his crime lab kit (Trask). Because of the close proximity of
    the
    strikes, it is possible that a bullet struck the manhole and bounced
    into the
    grass, but given the high visibility of the grass strike and the reasonably
    deep gouge in the turf, it's unlikely.

    Another bullet struck the sidewalk along the north side of Elm Street.
    It
    apparently was first discovered a day or two later by Dallas resident Eugene
    Aldredge -- a gash about four inches long and a quarter of an inch
    deep.
    Aldredge didn't report it to anyone, assuming it had not gone
    unnoticed by the
    authorities. At least one photograph of it was taken; it is pictured
    on several
    books, including Groden's The Killing of the President, 40. After the Warren
    Report came out, Aldredge was shocked not to see the missed bullet mentioned and
    notified the FBI (Weisberg, Never Again, 383-390). The FBI located it
    and wrote
    up a report describing it as approximately four inches long, a half
    inch wide,
    and a "dug out" appearance. Dallas Morning News reporter Carl Freund
    also
    identified the mark as a bullet strike. Groden notes that the gash
    lines up with
    the southwest sixth floor TSBD window; Harrison Livingstone notes it
    also lines
    up with the south storm drain by the triple underpass (Griffith; Livingstone,
    High Treason 2).

    There are numerous reports of other missed shots; some bullet s have
    even been
    found in Dealey Plaza, literally years after the assassination. In
    1975, a
    maintenance man named Morgan found a 30.06 shell on the roof of the
    County
    Records Building, which is about half a block south of the Book Depository. The
    casing has an odd crimp in its neck, suggesting it may have been fired from a
    sabot, a device used to fire a smaller caliber bullet out of a large caliber
    weapon. This is useful for criminals, as the caliber, type, and brand
    of the
    recovered bullet cannot be linked with their gun (Marrs, Crossfire,
    317). The
    shell had been hidden underneath a lip of roofing tar, and was
    greatly
    deteriorated from exposure to moisture; it had obviously been there a while.

    A fired but intact bullet was found on the top of the Massey Roofing
    Co.
    building on Elm Street, about eight blocks from the TSBD, by Richard Haythorne
    in 1967. No official study was made until the HSCA pronounced it a jacketed,
    soft-p oint .30 caliber bullet consistent with Remington-Peters ammunition; it
    had not been fired from the 6.5 caliber Mannlicher-Carcano (7 HSCA
    357; Carol
    Hewett, "Silencers, Sniper Rifles & the CIA"; Craig).

    In 1974, Dallas resident Richard Lester swept Dealey Plaza with a
    metal
    detector, and discovered a fragment -- the base portion of a bullet --
    500
    yards southwest of the TSBD and 61 paces east of the triple underpass. Later he
    turned it over to the FBI, and it was studied by the House Select Committee on
    Assassinations in 1978. They found that the fragment was from a 6.5 mm bullet,
    but that it had not been fired from the alleged "Oswald" Mannlicher- Carcano: its
    rifling pattern was different (Associated Press, January 5, 1978; 7
    HSCA 395;
    Hewett). A whole, unfired .45 caliber bullet was found in 1976 by Hal Luster by
    the concrete retaining wall on the knoll (Dallas Morning News,
    December 23, 1978).

    In the summer of 1966 , an intact bullet was found lodged in the roof
    of a
    building at 1615 Stemmons Freeway by William Barbee. The building was about a
    quarter mile away from the Texas School Book Depository -- within
    rifle range
    -- in the direction that Oswald had allegedly fired. The FBI
    identified the
    bullet as a .30 caliber full metal jacketed military bullet; its
    rifling
    pattern of four grooves, right hand twist is consistent with
    ammunition of US
    manufacture. This is the type of bullet the CIA used with their
    silenced M-1
    .30 caliber carbine rifles; civilians were not allowed to purchase
    them until
    the middle of 1963, and full metal jacketed bullets are illegal for
    use in
    hunting (Hewett, citing FBI Doc. #62-109060-5898).

    Two spent Remington .222 bullet casings were found in Dealey Plaza by
    John
    Rademacher, about eighty feet apart, one on each end of the concrete pergola
    that stands midway between the Texas School Book Depository and the
    triple
    underpass. One was just to the east, while the other was just west of
    it,
    between the pergola and the wooden stockade fence on the grassy knoll.
    One of
    the casings has strange indentations which appear to be teeth marks on
    it.

    Carol Hewett also notes, "The HSCA makes passing reference to the
    'Walder'
    bullet that was also submitted for testing; the author could find no
    other
    mention of this particular item of evidence" (citing 7 HSCA 157).
    Hewett also
    references "the report from a top FBI administrator, Alan Belmont, to Clyde
    Tolson, Hoover's second in command, in which Belmont on the night of November
    22nd advises that a bullet has been found lodged behind the
    President's ear"
    (citing FBI Doc. #62-109060-1431), consistent with the Sibert-O'Neill evidence
    envelope that was supposed to contain a "missile," not a fragment or fragments.


    Is there any evidence that there were once more bullets or fragments
    than are
    now in th e record?

    In Arlen Specter's published questioning of the autopsy pathologists,
    he makes
    repeated references to a file originally designated CD 371, then
    renamed as it
    was entered into evidence. Specter introduces Commission Exhibit 397, stating
    it is the identical file previously marked CD 371 "for our internal purposes"
    (2 H 323). Researcher Harold Weisberg was the first person to notice
    that CE
    397 seemed to be missing several items, so he went to the National Archives to
    inspect the CD 371. He found some interesting differences between the 'identical' files (Weisberg, Post Mortem, 251). One notable document
    is a list
    of eleven items written by Secret Service officer Robert I . Bouck,
    head of the
    Protective Research Section, on Treasury Department letterhead, dated November
    26, 1963. It acknowledges receipt of eleven items from Admiral George
    G.
    Burkley, who had been John F. Kennedy's personal physician, and who
    took
    posses sion (not necessarily in a legal manner) of a number of the
    autopsy
    records. The seventh item on the list reads, "One receipt from FBI for
    a
    missile recovered during the examination of the body."

    A missile is a bullet. It is not a bullet fragment; a fragment is a
    piece of a
    ruptured missile. Numerous minute fragments were recovered from the President's
    body during the autopsy. Not a single receipt for a fragment or
    fragments is
    listed on this document; they were transferred separately. This is a receipt for
    an intact bullet recovered from John F. Kennedy's body; it appeared in print for
    the first time in Weisberg's 1975 book, Post Mortem, 527.

    Researcher Anna-Marie Kuhns-Walko turned up some interesting items at
    the
    National Archives in 1996: photographs (several) labeled as being of a bullet
    "removed from President Kennedy's body." It is not one of the tiny fragments
    that have been part of the record for thirty-five years. No other information
    is available: no photographer listed; no indication of when it was recovered;
    or what part of the body it came from; or if it was recovered at
    Parkland,
    Bethesda, or elsewhere. Just several photos of a bullet "removed from President
    Kennedy's body" that no one's ever seen before.

    Anna-Marie also discovered an empty envelope, originally marked,
    "Shell 7.5
    found in Dealey Plaza 11/22/63. This would be an expended cartridge
    found
    somewhere in Dealey Plaza, presumably not far from where it was fired;
    and
    regardless of where in Dealey Plaza it was found (which the envelope doesn't
    state), it's a 7.5 caliber, not a 6.5 caliber like the Mannlicher- Carcano. No
    one outside a very select circle, apparently, ever heard of this item before.
    Why is the envelope empty? Written right after the previously quoted description: "DETERMINED OF NO VALUE AND DESTROYED."

    ********************************************************
    *************

    The above post was snipped to the relevant paragraphs dealing with evidence for
    more than 3 bullets. I invite everyone to Google and read the original
    if
    interested. There's more material in the original - and I snipped out
    some good
    stuff that simply wasn't relevant to this post.

    Clearly *some* of the snippets above could easily be referring to the *same*
    bullet - simply at different perspective by different eyewitnesses.
    And some of
    the snippets above could easily have had *no* relevance to 11/22/63.
    But the WC
    ignored and ran from such evidence with a determination that can only
    lead
    thoughtful people to the conclusion that they had already made up
    their minds.

    The point I might make here is... where did the WC deal with all of
    this
    evidence? Can anyone point to *ANY* attempt by the WC to explain away
    this
    massive amount of evidence for more than three bullets? Examine the evidence at
    all? Ask the FBI for clarification?
    _________________
    Justice is like the hawk. Sometimes it must go hooded.[/quote]
    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/ZoJbOFqc6Iw

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/iPXgu_fPxa0

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)