1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. ALT.CONSPIRACY.JFK

  • Isn't the fact that Oswald was in the theater after the assassination P

    From gggg gggg@21:1/5 to All on Wed Sep 6 15:52:37 2023
    ??????????????

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Corbett@21:1/5 to gggg gggg on Wed Sep 6 17:17:33 2023
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 6:52:39 PM UTC-4, gggg gggg wrote:
    ??????????????

    No.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From gggg gggg@21:1/5 to John Corbett on Thu Sep 7 03:21:37 2023
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 5:17:35 PM UTC-7, John Corbett wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 6:52:39 PM UTC-4, wrote:
    ??????????????

    No.

    But to end up in that theater, didn't someone have to have instructed him to meet a contact there?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Corbett@21:1/5 to gggg gggg on Thu Sep 7 05:25:31 2023
    On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 6:21:39 AM UTC-4, gggg gggg wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 5:17:35 PM UTC-7, John Corbett wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 6:52:39 PM UTC-4, wrote:
    ??????????????

    No.

    But to end up in that theater, didn't someone have to have instructed him to meet a contact there?

    Don't be silly. He ducked into the theater, without paying for a ticket, because he cops were
    searching the area for a cop killer and he knew he was the one who killed the cop. Had
    Brewer not spotted him acting suspiciously and then sneaking into the theater, he might have
    gotten away for a time.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to gggg gggg on Thu Sep 7 06:54:22 2023
    On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 6:21:39 AM UTC-4, gggg gggg wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 5:17:35 PM UTC-7, John Corbett wrote:



    The Lone Nutters are dishonestly trying to ignore that Oswald was seen trying to locate a contact by going seat to seat and that he had half a dollar bill in his pocket that was a classic espionage identification trick...


    Yes - it is proof...


    More proof is the fact the authorities covered-up Oswald's real arrival time at the Theater that was too early to be up at 10th and Patton killing Tippit...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to geowright1963@gmail.com on Thu Sep 7 07:34:28 2023
    On Thu, 7 Sep 2023 05:25:31 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
    <geowright1963@gmail.com> wrote:

    Don't be silly. He ducked into the theater, without paying for a ticket, because he cops were
    searching the area for a cop killer and he knew he was the one who killed the cop. Had
    Brewer not spotted him acting suspiciously and then sneaking into the theater, he might have
    gotten away for a time.

    One speculation right after another... and not a cite in sight...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steven Galbraith@21:1/5 to John Corbett on Thu Sep 7 08:20:08 2023
    On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 8:25:33 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
    On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 6:21:39 AM UTC-4, gggg gggg wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 5:17:35 PM UTC-7, John Corbett wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 6:52:39 PM UTC-4, wrote:
    ??????????????

    No.

    But to end up in that theater, didn't someone have to have instructed him to meet a contact there?
    Don't be silly. He ducked into the theater, without paying for a ticket, because he cops were
    searching the area for a cop killer and he knew he was the one who killed the cop. Had
    Brewer not spotted him acting suspiciously and then sneaking into the theater, he might have
    gotten away for a time.
    Just one: the supposed "torn dollar bill" mentioned above never existed. Oswald had one *half dollar* - a Franklin 50 cent piece - on him when arrested/processed. He had 87 cents in change - a 50 cent piece, 3 dimes, 1 nickel, and 2 pennies. Plus one $5
    dollar bill and eight $1 dollar bills. The "1 half dollar" was turned into a torn dollar bill by conspiracists. Here: https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth340292/m1/1/?q=Lee%20Oswald%20money

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to stevemgalbraith@yahoo.com on Thu Sep 7 08:40:06 2023
    On Thu, 7 Sep 2023 08:20:08 -0700 (PDT), Steven Galbraith <stevemgalbraith@yahoo.com> wrote:

    On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 8:25:33?AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
    On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 6:21:39?AM UTC-4, gggg gggg wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 5:17:35?PM UTC-7, John Corbett wrote: >>>> On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 6:52:39?PM UTC-4, wrote:
    ??????????????

    No.

    But to end up in that theater, didn't someone have to have instructed him to meet a contact there?

    Don't be silly. He ducked into the theater, without paying for a ticket, because he cops were
    searching the area for a cop killer and he knew he was the one who killed the cop. Had
    Brewer not spotted him acting suspiciously and then sneaking into the theater, he might have
    gotten away for a time.

    Just one: the supposed "torn dollar bill" mentioned above ...

    Where?

    Believers always like to get their pet points, and ignore anything
    else. Even if they have to blatantly lie to do it...

    And being a believer means you NEVER need to retract a proven lie
    you've told. There's no "torn dollar bill" mentioned above, or
    anywhere else in this thread.

    Steven's simply a liar, and an unrepentant one at that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to chuckschuyler123@gmail.com on Thu Sep 7 09:10:51 2023
    On Thu, 7 Sep 2023 08:49:18 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <chuckschuyler123@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 10:40:15?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Thu, 7 Sep 2023 08:20:08 -0700 (PDT), Steven Galbraith
    <stevemg...@yahoo.com> wrote:

    On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 8:25:33?AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
    On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 6:21:39?AM UTC-4, gggg gggg wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 5:17:35?PM UTC-7, John Corbett wrote: >> >>>> On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 6:52:39?PM UTC-4, wrote:
    ??????????????

    No.

    But to end up in that theater, didn't someone have to have instructed him to meet a contact there?

    Don't be silly. He ducked into the theater, without paying for a ticket, because he cops were
    searching the area for a cop killer and he knew he was the one who killed the cop. Had
    Brewer not spotted him acting suspiciously and then sneaking into the theater, he might have
    gotten away for a time.

    Just one: the supposed "torn dollar bill" mentioned above ...

    Where?

    Believers always like to get their pet points, and ignore anything
    else. Even if they have to blatantly lie to do it...

    And being a believer means you NEVER need to retract a proven lie
    you've told. There's no "torn dollar bill" mentioned above, or
    anywhere else in this thread.

    Steven's simply a liar, and an unrepentant one at that.


    Brian Doyle from this thread: "The Lone Nutters are dishonestly
    trying to ignore that Oswald was seen trying to locate a contact by
    going seat to seat and that he had half a dollar bill in his pocket
    that was a classic espionage identification trick..."

    Does Ben think the US prints HALF DOLLAR BILLS?

    ROTFLMAO!!!

    You just admitted that Steven is a liar. No "'torn dollar bill'
    mentioned above" anywhere in sight. You admit that it's in another
    thread altogether.

    And once again, you prove both your dishonest and your inability to
    reason.

    WHAT A KOOK! (All three of you...)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chuck Schuyler@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Thu Sep 7 08:49:18 2023
    On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 10:40:15 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Thu, 7 Sep 2023 08:20:08 -0700 (PDT), Steven Galbraith <stevemg...@yahoo.com> wrote:

    On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 8:25:33?AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
    On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 6:21:39?AM UTC-4, gggg gggg wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 5:17:35?PM UTC-7, John Corbett wrote: >>>> On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 6:52:39?PM UTC-4, wrote:
    ??????????????

    No.

    But to end up in that theater, didn't someone have to have instructed him to meet a contact there?

    Don't be silly. He ducked into the theater, without paying for a ticket, because he cops were
    searching the area for a cop killer and he knew he was the one who killed the cop. Had
    Brewer not spotted him acting suspiciously and then sneaking into the theater, he might have
    gotten away for a time.

    Just one: the supposed "torn dollar bill" mentioned above ...

    Where?

    Believers always like to get their pet points, and ignore anything
    else. Even if they have to blatantly lie to do it...

    And being a believer means you NEVER need to retract a proven lie
    you've told. There's no "torn dollar bill" mentioned above, or
    anywhere else in this thread.

    Steven's simply a liar, and an unrepentant one at that.


    Brian Doyle from this thread: "The Lone Nutters are dishonestly trying to ignore that Oswald was seen trying to locate a contact by going seat to seat and that he had half a dollar bill in his pocket that was a classic espionage identification trick..."

    Does Ben think the US prints HALF DOLLAR BILLS?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BT George@21:1/5 to gggg gggg on Thu Sep 7 13:51:33 2023
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 5:52:39 PM UTC-5, gggg gggg wrote:
    ??????????????

    Uhhh....yeah. You just keep right on with the...err.."thinking". ...Or whatever it is you are attempting to do!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to BT George on Thu Sep 7 13:55:20 2023
    On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 4:51:35 PM UTC-4, BT George wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 5:52:39 PM UTC-5, gggg gggg wrote:



    Ben is a fool who is running around trying to figure out the problems caused by his own dishonest blocking of posters...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From gggg gggg@21:1/5 to All on Thu Sep 7 15:34:44 2023
    On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 3:21:39 AM UTC-7, wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 5:17:35 PM UTC-7, John Corbett wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 6:52:39 PM UTC-4, wrote:
    ??????????????

    No.

    But to end up in that theater, didn't someone have to have instructed him to meet a contact there?

    And what about THIS?:

    https://groups.google.com/u/1/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/hZ2iiCWissE/m/yLbG5fQbAwAJ

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From gggg gggg@21:1/5 to Brian Doyle on Thu Sep 7 15:33:26 2023
    On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 1:55:22 PM UTC-7, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 4:51:35 PM UTC-4, BT George wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 5:52:39 PM UTC-5, gggg gggg wrote:
    Ben is a fool who is running around trying to figure out the problems caused by his own dishonest blocking of posters...

    And what about THIS?:

    https://groups.google.com/u/1/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/hZ2iiCWissE/m/yLbG5fQbAwAJ

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From gggg gggg@21:1/5 to All on Sat Sep 23 23:25:39 2023
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 3:52:39 PM UTC-7, wrote:
    ??????????????

    Isn't it possible that Oswald had been to the Texas Theater on previous occasions and had not paid BECAUSE THAT THEATER WAS USED AS A MEETING PLACE FOR SPOOKS AND THE TICKET SELLER WAS TOLD WHO THE SPOOKS WERE AND WAS INSTRUCTED TO NOT BOTHER TO CHARGE
    THEM?

    And when Oswald arrived there the last time, the ticket seller had been instructed to call the police?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Corbett@21:1/5 to gggg gggg on Sun Sep 24 04:46:46 2023
    On Sunday, September 24, 2023 at 2:25:41 AM UTC-4, gggg gggg wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 3:52:39 PM UTC-7, wrote:
    ??????????????

    Isn't it possible that Oswald had been to the Texas Theater on previous occasions and had not paid BECAUSE THAT THEATER WAS USED AS A MEETING PLACE FOR SPOOKS AND THE TICKET SELLER WAS TOLD WHO THE SPOOKS WERE AND WAS INSTRUCTED TO NOT BOTHER TO CHARGE
    THEM?

    And when Oswald arrived there the last time, the ticket seller had been instructed to call the police?

    Anything is possible if you want to rely on your imagination. If you follow the evidence, the
    possibilities become much more limited.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to geowright1963@gmail.com on Mon Sep 25 08:04:43 2023
    On Sun, 24 Sep 2023 04:46:46 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett <geowright1963@gmail.com> wrote:

    Anything is possible if you want to rely on your imagination. If you follow the evidence, the
    possibilities become much more limited.

    When are you going to address that evidence?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Hank Sienzant@21:1/5 to gggg gggg on Wed Sep 27 05:34:03 2023
    On Sunday, September 24, 2023 at 2:25:41 AM UTC-4, gggg gggg wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 3:52:39 PM UTC-7, wrote:
    ??????????????

    Isn't it possible that Oswald had been to the Texas Theater on previous occasions and had not paid BECAUSE THAT THEATER WAS USED AS A MEETING PLACE FOR SPOOKS AND THE TICKET SELLER WAS TOLD WHO THE SPOOKS WERE AND WAS INSTRUCTED TO NOT BOTHER TO CHARGE
    THEM?

    And when Oswald arrived there the last time, the ticket seller had been instructed to call the police?

    And the evidence for any this speculation is exactly what?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Wed Sep 27 06:44:51 2023
    On Wed, 27 Sep 2023 05:34:03 -0700 (PDT), Hank Sienzant
    <hsienzant@aol.com> wrote:


    You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
    description of the *location* of the large head wound.

    Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
    paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

    You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

    Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

    Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

    Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
    and exited the back of his head.

    More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.

    Are you proud of yourself?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Hank Sienzant@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Wed Sep 27 20:49:54 2023
    On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 9:44:55 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Wed, 27 Sep 2023 05:34:03 -0700 (PDT), Hank Sienzant
    <hsie...@aol.com> wrote:


    You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
    description of the *location* of the large head wound.

    Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
    paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

    You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

    Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

    Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

    Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
    and exited the back of his head.

    More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.

    Are you proud of yourself?

    Are you going to continue to falsely attribute to me something written by Google’s AI, BARD?

    Asked and answered here, Ben: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/quU-jAIMgCM/m/nrLFcg83AgAJ

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Hank Sienzant@21:1/5 to gggg gggg on Wed Sep 27 20:42:15 2023
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 6:52:39 PM UTC-4, gggg gggg wrote:
    ??????????????

    So, gggg gggg, anyone who was ever in the Texas Theatre in the history of that theatre are likewise part of a larger conspiracy?

    Or are you only talking about the people in the Texas Theatre on 11/22/63?

    Or are you limiting this being at the theatre somehow makes one part of a larger conspiracy to Oswald alone?

    If the latter, can you explain why?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Brian Doyle on Wed Sep 27 21:26:55 2023
    On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 9:54:24 AM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 6:21:39 AM UTC-4, gggg gggg wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 5:17:35 PM UTC-7, John Corbett wrote:
    The Lone Nutters are dishonestly trying to ignore that Oswald was seen trying to locate a contact by going seat to seat and that he had half a dollar bill in his pocket that was a classic espionage identification trick...

    "Hey, does anyone have the other half of this dollar?"


    Yes - it is proof...


    More proof is the fact the authorities covered-up Oswald's real arrival time at the Theater that was too early to be up at 10th and Patton killing Tippit...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NoTrueFlags Here@21:1/5 to Hank Sienzant on Wed Sep 27 23:04:32 2023
    On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 11:49:55 PM UTC-4, Hank Sienzant wrote:

    Are you going to continue to falsely attribute to me something written by Google’s AI, BARD?
    Don't be silly. AI Bard is far too respectful and logical to be mistaken for Lying Weasel Hank Sienzant.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Thu Sep 28 08:17:06 2023
    On Wed, 27 Sep 2023 20:49:54 -0700 (PDT), Hank Sienzant
    <hsienzant@aol.com> wrote:


    You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
    description of the *location* of the large head wound.

    Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
    paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

    You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

    Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

    Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

    Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
    and exited the back of his head.

    More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.

    Are you proud of yourself?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Greg Parker@21:1/5 to gggg gggg on Fri Sep 29 18:10:00 2023
    On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 8:21:39 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 5:17:35 PM UTC-7, John Corbett wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 6:52:39 PM UTC-4, wrote:
    ??????????????

    No.

    But to end up in that theater, didn't someone have to have instructed him to meet a contact there?
    No.

    Lee had given Marina $10 for new shoes. Ruth testified that she and Marina had intended to go shoe shopping in the afternoon of Nov 22. It did not happen because of the arrival of police.

    I seems to me that Oswald had organized to meet them in Oak Cliff after work where there were at least 3 shoe shops within walking distance of the TT. When he realized or was told there would no more work that day, he most likely phoned Ruth either from
    work or from Oak Cliff, to see if they could meet him earlier than planned. Ruth for her part, probably said no, that she has to stick to the original plan and suggested he go watch a movie to kill some time until they got there. She then phoned the
    cops to tell them their suspect was hiding out in the TT. According to Asst DA Jim Bowie, Postal's call was not the only one they got. And her call was to report a teenager sneaking in. That is why one or two cops came through the front and up to the
    balcony and why a separate bunch, armed to the teeth, went in through the back.

    There is a report of a cop talking to a teenager on the balcony stairs. This has been conflated with a witness (Applin) being taken out the back and taken in a squad car to go give a statement. There are two other reports of Oswald being arrested in the
    balcony. More confusion because of the two separate incidents and two separate calls.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NoTrueFlags Here@21:1/5 to Greg Parker on Fri Sep 29 21:14:11 2023
    On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 9:10:02 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 8:21:39 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 5:17:35 PM UTC-7, John Corbett wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 6:52:39 PM UTC-4, wrote:
    ??????????????

    No.

    But to end up in that theater, didn't someone have to have instructed him to meet a contact there?
    No.

    Lee had given Marina $10 for new shoes. Ruth testified that she and Marina had intended to go shoe shopping in the afternoon of Nov 22. It did not happen because of the arrival of police.

    I seems to me that Oswald had organized to meet them in Oak Cliff after work where there were at least 3 shoe shops within walking distance of the TT. When he realized or was told there would no more work that day, he most likely phoned Ruth either
    from work or from Oak Cliff, to see if they could meet him earlier than planned. Ruth for her part, probably said no, that she has to stick to the original plan and suggested he go watch a movie to kill some time until they got there. She then phoned the
    cops to tell them their suspect was hiding out in the TT. According to Asst DA Jim Bowie, Postal's call was not the only one they got. And her call was to report a teenager sneaking in. That is why one or two cops came through the front and up to the
    balcony and why a separate bunch, armed to the teeth, went in through the back.

    There is a report of a cop talking to a teenager on the balcony stairs. This has been conflated with a witness (Applin) being taken out the back and taken in a squad car to go give a statement. There are two other reports of Oswald being arrested in
    the balcony. More confusion because of the two separate incidents and two separate calls.

    Peter Dale Scott should read this.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Greg Parker@21:1/5 to NoTrueFlags Here on Sat Sep 30 17:18:01 2023
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 2:14:13 PM UTC+10, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 9:10:02 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 8:21:39 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 5:17:35 PM UTC-7, John Corbett wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 6:52:39 PM UTC-4, wrote:
    ??????????????

    No.

    But to end up in that theater, didn't someone have to have instructed him to meet a contact there?
    No.

    Lee had given Marina $10 for new shoes. Ruth testified that she and Marina had intended to go shoe shopping in the afternoon of Nov 22. It did not happen because of the arrival of police.

    I seems to me that Oswald had organized to meet them in Oak Cliff after work where there were at least 3 shoe shops within walking distance of the TT. When he realized or was told there would no more work that day, he most likely phoned Ruth either
    from work or from Oak Cliff, to see if they could meet him earlier than planned. Ruth for her part, probably said no, that she has to stick to the original plan and suggested he go watch a movie to kill some time until they got there. She then phoned the
    cops to tell them their suspect was hiding out in the TT. According to Asst DA Jim Bowie, Postal's call was not the only one they got. And her call was to report a teenager sneaking in. That is why one or two cops came through the front and up to the
    balcony and why a separate bunch, armed to the teeth, went in through the back.

    There is a report of a cop talking to a teenager on the balcony stairs. This has been conflated with a witness (Applin) being taken out the back and taken in a squad car to go give a statement. There are two other reports of Oswald being arrested in
    the balcony. More confusion because of the two separate incidents and two separate calls.
    Peter Dale Scott should read this.

    Would you like me to come around and put your nose back into it's joint?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NoTrueFlags Here@21:1/5 to Greg Parker on Sat Sep 30 23:35:39 2023
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 8:18:03 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 2:14:13 PM UTC+10, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 9:10:02 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
    On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 8:21:39 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 5:17:35 PM UTC-7, John Corbett wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 6:52:39 PM UTC-4, wrote:
    ??????????????

    No.

    But to end up in that theater, didn't someone have to have instructed him to meet a contact there?
    No.

    Lee had given Marina $10 for new shoes. Ruth testified that she and Marina had intended to go shoe shopping in the afternoon of Nov 22. It did not happen because of the arrival of police.

    I seems to me that Oswald had organized to meet them in Oak Cliff after work where there were at least 3 shoe shops within walking distance of the TT. When he realized or was told there would no more work that day, he most likely phoned Ruth either
    from work or from Oak Cliff, to see if they could meet him earlier than planned. Ruth for her part, probably said no, that she has to stick to the original plan and suggested he go watch a movie to kill some time until they got there. She then phoned the
    cops to tell them their suspect was hiding out in the TT. According to Asst DA Jim Bowie, Postal's call was not the only one they got. And her call was to report a teenager sneaking in. That is why one or two cops came through the front and up to the
    balcony and why a separate bunch, armed to the teeth, went in through the back.

    There is a report of a cop talking to a teenager on the balcony stairs. This has been conflated with a witness (Applin) being taken out the back and taken in a squad car to go give a statement. There are two other reports of Oswald being arrested
    in the balcony. More confusion because of the two separate incidents and two separate calls.
    Peter Dale Scott should read this.
    Would you like me to come around and put your nose back into it's joint?
    Well, I just meant that Scott might want to know that Oswald went to the movies because he was going to buy shoes for Junie. That's why he went to Johnny's shoe store first. He was scoping out shoes for Junie before the movie. But then when the police
    car came by, he got all spooked because he was afraid the cops might think he was robbing the shoe store. So he sneaked into the movie show to hide out in there until Ruth and Marina showed up so that they could all buy shoes together, looking like a
    family and not a shoe store thief. But when the cops came in to arrest him for robbing the shoe store, well he just had to pull his gun and try to shoot them, else he would be arrested for robbing a shoe store he didn't rob. And remember, this is 1963
    Texas. They'd hang you for robbing a shoe store, even if you didn't. Might as well go down shooting. Sir Peter Dale Scott needs to know this. He's certainly not smart enough to figure it out all by himself. Who but Greg Parker could be?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)