• Provable Lies Of The Warren Commission - #12 - Just For Coward Corbutt

    From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Wed Sep 6 07:56:21 2023
    The only other person besides Kantor who recalled seeing Ruby at the
    hospital did not make known her observation until April 1964, had
    never seen Ruby before, allegedly saw him only briefly then, had an
    obstructed view, and was uncertain of the time. (WCR 336)

    But, let's take a look at Mrs. Tice's actual testimony - to see if the
    WC was telling the truth or not:

    Mr. GRIFFIN. How long did this man that you think was Jack Ruby, how
    long did he stand out there next to you?
    Mrs. TICE. I was standing about 3 feet from them.
    Mr. GRIFFIN. Where was he standing in relation to you. Was he in front
    of you or behind you, or off to the side, or where was he?
    Mrs. TICE. I was standing about like this, and they were standing
    there, but I was being nosey and listening.
    Mr. GRIFFIN. In other words, this man was off to the side 4 or 5 feet
    distant from you, the distance from you to me?
    Mrs. TICE. This man that I say was Jack Ruby was about 3 feet from me,
    I guess, about as far as you are from me.
    Mr. GRIFFIN. You could only see the side of his face, I take it?
    Mrs. TICE. Jack Ruby's?
    Mr. GRIFFIN. Yes. (15H 392)

    Mr. GRIFFIN. So Jack actually was a little bit in front of you?
    Mrs. TICE. Yes; I guess.
    Mr. GRIFFIN. Would you put an R where Ruby was?
    (Mrs. Tice marks.)
    Mr. GRIFFIN. Now, a man walked up to him and tapped him on the
    shoulder?
    Mrs. TICE. The man came right down this way, over this way and slapped
    him on the shoulder and asked him how he was doing.
    Mr. GRIFFIN. And at that point Jack turned around?
    Mrs. TICE. At that point Jack turned around and started talking to
    him. At the time, he was facing right toward me. (15H 394)

    The Warren Commission simply lied about Mrs. Tice's view of Ruby -
    attempting to state that it was obstructed, when the actual testimony
    shows that Ruby was just 3 feet away, and at one point, *facing* Mrs.
    Tice. The WC *cited* her testimony, so they couldn't have been unaware
    that their own evidence contradicted their assertion. Amusing that the
    WC would argue that Mrs. Tice had never seen Jack Ruby before... they
    didn't appear to be embarrassed that Brennan had never seen Oswald
    before...

    Another lie of the WC that believers can't refute... Interestingly,
    the last time I posted this - not a single believer responded. It's a
    little hard when the facts go against you, isn't it?

    Watch folks, as both Huckster and Corbutt refuse to respond. Chuckles
    doesn't know enough to respond, and Chickenshit is too much a coward
    to answer questions...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to Admin@ConspiracyJFKForum.com on Fri Sep 8 07:49:31 2023
    On Wed, 06 Sep 2023 07:56:21 -0700, Ben Holmes
    <Admin@ConspiracyJFKForum.com> wrote:

    The only other person besides Kantor who recalled seeing Ruby at the
    hospital did not make known her observation until April 1964, had
    never seen Ruby before, allegedly saw him only briefly then, had an >obstructed view, and was uncertain of the time. (WCR 336)

    But, let's take a look at Mrs. Tice's actual testimony - to see if the
    WC was telling the truth or not:

    Mr. GRIFFIN. How long did this man that you think was Jack Ruby, how
    long did he stand out there next to you?
    Mrs. TICE. I was standing about 3 feet from them.
    Mr. GRIFFIN. Where was he standing in relation to you. Was he in front
    of you or behind you, or off to the side, or where was he?
    Mrs. TICE. I was standing about like this, and they were standing
    there, but I was being nosey and listening.
    Mr. GRIFFIN. In other words, this man was off to the side 4 or 5 feet
    distant from you, the distance from you to me?
    Mrs. TICE. This man that I say was Jack Ruby was about 3 feet from me,
    I guess, about as far as you are from me.
    Mr. GRIFFIN. You could only see the side of his face, I take it?
    Mrs. TICE. Jack Ruby's?
    Mr. GRIFFIN. Yes. (15H 392)

    Mr. GRIFFIN. So Jack actually was a little bit in front of you?
    Mrs. TICE. Yes; I guess.
    Mr. GRIFFIN. Would you put an R where Ruby was?
    (Mrs. Tice marks.)
    Mr. GRIFFIN. Now, a man walked up to him and tapped him on the
    shoulder?
    Mrs. TICE. The man came right down this way, over this way and slapped
    him on the shoulder and asked him how he was doing.
    Mr. GRIFFIN. And at that point Jack turned around?
    Mrs. TICE. At that point Jack turned around and started talking to
    him. At the time, he was facing right toward me. (15H 394)

    The Warren Commission simply lied about Mrs. Tice's view of Ruby -
    attempting to state that it was obstructed, when the actual testimony
    shows that Ruby was just 3 feet away, and at one point, *facing* Mrs.
    Tice. The WC *cited* her testimony, so they couldn't have been unaware
    that their own evidence contradicted their assertion. Amusing that the
    WC would argue that Mrs. Tice had never seen Jack Ruby before... they
    didn't appear to be embarrassed that Brennan had never seen Oswald
    before...

    Another lie of the WC that believers can't refute... Interestingly,
    the last time I posted this - not a single believer responded. It's a
    little hard when the facts go against you, isn't it?

    Watch folks, as both Huckster and Corbutt refuse to respond. Chuckles >doesn't know enough to respond, and Chickenshit is too much a coward
    to answer questions...


    Another PERFECT prediction!!!

    Of course, cowardice is easy to "predict."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)