On Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 5:40:47 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

Huckster so stupid that he believes (and refuses to deny):

That the "A.B.C.D" description in the Autopsy Report refers to the
location of the bullet wound in the back of JFK's head.

Those landmarks place the wound on the right side of the head. The wound clearly visible in the z-film.

They are the landmarks to documents the location of missile wound number one, the "...large, irregular defect to the scalp and skull on the right..."

Yet is TERRIFIED of quoting the sentence that precedes that in the
Autopsy Report.

Ben is up to his usual dishonest tricks, isolating information in an attempt to win meaningless points rather than try to understand the information.

There is really no doubt about this, because further along it says..

"Clearly visible in the above described large skull defect..."

And why do you make the baseless and lyiing claim that JFK's neck
wound was dissected?

Ben can`t explain how the things observed in the autopsy could have been observed without dissection. He is a gasbag that makes a lot of noise but says nothing.

Watch, as Huckster simply runs away from his unsupported claims.

Watch as I demonstrate my ownership of Ben the Troll with his next response.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tue, 5 Sep 2023 15:02:54 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:


So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 6:04:29 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Tue, 5 Sep 2023 15:02:54 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

My pet troll played his role perfectly.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tue, 5 Sep 2023 15:10:20 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:


So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Huckster so stupid that he believes (and refuses to deny):

That the "A.B.C.D" description in the Autopsy Report refers to the
location of the bullet wound in the back of JFK's head.

Yet is TERRIFIED of quoting the sentence that precedes that in the
Autopsy Report.

And why do you make the baseless and lyiing claim that JFK's neck
wound was dissected?

Watch, as Huckster simply runs away from his unsupported claims.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tue, 05 Sep 2023 14:40:42 -0700, Ben Holmes
<Admin@ConspiracyJFKForum.com> wrote:

Huckster is so stupid that he believes (and refuses to deny):

That the "A.B.C.D" description in the Autopsy Report refers to the
location of the bullet wound in the back of JFK's head.

Yet is TERRIFIED of quoting the sentence that precedes that in the
Autopsy Report.

And why do you make the baseless and lyiing claim that JFK's neck
wound was dissected?

Watch, as Huckster simply runs away from his unsupported claims.

I predicted it, folks!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)