"Oswald disembarked at Le Havre on October 8. He left for England that
same day, and arrived on October 9. He told English customs officials
in Southampton that he had $700 and planned to remain in the United
Kingdom for 1 week before proceeding to a school in Switzerland. But
on the same day, he flew to Helsinki, Finland, where he registered at
the Torni Hotel; on the following day, he moved to the Klaus Kurki
Hotel." (WCR 690)
Any normal reading of that paragraph will give you the idea that
Oswald left England for Helsinki on October 9th. But once again, it's
a lie that is in provable conflict with their own evidence:
Anyone can turn to CE 946 pg 7:
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh18/html/WH_Vol18_0088b.htm
and read the stamp which states: "Embarked 10 October 1959"
But this wouldn't be good for the WC - for as they discovered, there
were no commercial flights from London to Helsinki that Oswald could
have taken in order to get to his hotel in Helsinki on the 10th. (See
CE 2677) The WC knew that the only alternative was a non-commercial
flight - such as a military flight. This wouldn't do at all - so the
simple solution of the Warren Commission? Simply lie about the day
Oswald left London...
Why does the "truth" require a lie to support it?
(And why do the trolls & LNT'ers keep running away from these posts?)
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)