"Examination of clothing.--The clothing worn by President Kennedy on
November 22 had holes and tears which showed that a missile entered
the back of his clothing in the vicinity of his lower neck..." (WCR
91)

Most people are completely aware that this moving of the wound from
the upper back to the "lower neck" is a lie and not based on the
evidence. The clothing, which the prosectors were not allowed to
examine, does *NOT* show the bullet hole "in the vicinity of his lower
neck". This is another outright lie of the Warren Commission.

Interestingly - many LNT'ers try to avoid facing the fact that the
prosectors were not allowed to examine the clothing by either refusing
to admit such an order was given, or by asserting that the clothing
was not in the autopsy room (or close by.) Neither falsehood stands up
to the evidence.

Another way that believers avoid facing the facts just enumerated was
by confusing "prosector" with "prosecutor". I do hope that no-one
tries that one again! :)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 10:57:02 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

"Examination of clothing.--The clothing worn by President Kennedy on November 22 had holes and tears which showed that a missile entered
the back of his clothing in the vicinity of his lower neck..." (WCR
91)

Most people are completely aware that this moving of the wound from
the upper back to the "lower neck" is a lie and not based on the
evidence. The clothing, which the prosectors were not allowed to
examine, does *NOT* show the bullet hole "in the vicinity of his lower neck". This is another outright lie of the Warren Commission.

Yes it is. And the proof is here:

https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/shirt-and-coat.png

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 08:53:55 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
<gjjmail1202@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 10:57:02?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

"Examination of clothing.--The clothing worn by President Kennedy on
November 22 had holes and tears which showed that a missile entered
the back of his clothing in the vicinity of his lower neck..." (WCR
91)

Most people are completely aware that this moving of the wound from
the upper back to the "lower neck" is a lie and not based on the
evidence. The clothing, which the prosectors were not allowed to
examine, does *NOT* show the bullet hole "in the vicinity of his lower
neck". This is another outright lie of the Warren Commission.

Yes it is. And the proof is here:

https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/shirt-and-coat.png

Watch carefully, as the moron who thinks a shadow is the MC clip,
being held by nothing... can't see a hole that's not in the "vicinity
of his lower neck"

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 09:47:23 -0700, Ben Holmes
<Admin@ConspiracyJFKForum.com> wrote:

On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 08:53:55 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
<gjjmail1202@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 10:57:02?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

"Examination of clothing.--The clothing worn by President Kennedy on
November 22 had holes and tears which showed that a missile entered
the back of his clothing in the vicinity of his lower neck..." (WCR
91)

Most people are completely aware that this moving of the wound from
the upper back to the "lower neck" is a lie and not based on the
evidence. The clothing, which the prosectors were not allowed to
examine, does *NOT* show the bullet hole "in the vicinity of his lower
neck". This is another outright lie of the Warren Commission.

Yes it is. And the proof is here:

https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/shirt-and-coat.png

Watch carefully, as the moron who thinks a shadow is the MC clip,
being held by nothing... can't see a hole that's not in the "vicinity
of his lower neck"

Looks like I've been proven right. Huckster had the chance to read
this and respond - and decided to run away...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 6:38:38 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 09:47:23 -0700, Ben Holmes <Ad...@ConspiracyJFKForum.com> wrote:

On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 08:53:55 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
<gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 10:57:02?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

"Examination of clothing.--The clothing worn by President Kennedy on
November 22 had holes and tears which showed that a missile entered
the back of his clothing in the vicinity of his lower neck..." (WCR
91)

Most people are completely aware that this moving of the wound from
the upper back to the "lower neck" is a lie and not based on the
evidence. The clothing, which the prosectors were not allowed to
examine, does *NOT* show the bullet hole "in the vicinity of his lower >>> neck". This is another outright lie of the Warren Commission.

Yes it is. And the proof is here:

https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/shirt-and-coat.png

Watch carefully, as the moron who thinks a shadow is the MC clip,
being held by nothing... can't see a hole that's not in the "vicinity
of his lower neck"

Looks like I've been proven right. Huckster had the chance to read
this and respond - and decided to run away...

Ben needs more of Hank`s content to remove.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 16:50:26 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:


So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)