• Why did Ruby take off his dark glasses just before he shot Oswald?

    From gggg gggg@21:1/5 to All on Mon Aug 28 21:44:44 2023
    Ruby waiting wearing dark glasses:

    http://kennedy-photos.blogspot.com/2013/09/kennedy-gallery-350.html

    Glasses in his left pocket when he shot O.:

    http://jfk-assassination-as-it-happened.blogspot.com/2012/03/lee-harvey-oswald-has-been-shot.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From gggg gggg@21:1/5 to gggg gggg on Mon Aug 28 22:04:13 2023
    On Monday, August 28, 2023 at 9:44:55 PM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:
    Ruby waiting wearing dark glasses:

    http://kennedy-photos.blogspot.com/2013/09/kennedy-gallery-350.html

    Glasses in his left pocket when he shot O.:

    http://jfk-assassination-as-it-happened.blogspot.com/2012/03/lee-harvey-oswald-has-been-shot.html

    Also, at the moment that O. was shot, aren't his hands rather far apart if he was supposed to have been handcuffed?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From gggg gggg@21:1/5 to gggg gggg on Mon Aug 28 22:08:20 2023
    On Monday, August 28, 2023 at 9:44:55 PM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:
    Ruby waiting wearing dark glasses:

    http://kennedy-photos.blogspot.com/2013/09/kennedy-gallery-350.html

    Glasses in his left pocket when he shot O.:

    http://jfk-assassination-as-it-happened.blogspot.com/2012/03/lee-harvey-oswald-has-been-shot.html

    Also, at the moment that O. was shot, weren't his hands rather far apart if he was supposed to have been handcuffed?:

    http://jfk-assassination-as-it-happened.blogspot.com/2012/03/lee-harvey-oswald-has-been-shot.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sky Throne 19efppp@21:1/5 to gggg gggg on Mon Aug 28 23:00:16 2023
    On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 1:08:23 AM UTC-4, gggg gggg wrote:
    On Monday, August 28, 2023 at 9:44:55 PM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:
    Ruby waiting wearing dark glasses:

    http://kennedy-photos.blogspot.com/2013/09/kennedy-gallery-350.html

    Glasses in his left pocket when he shot O.:

    http://jfk-assassination-as-it-happened.blogspot.com/2012/03/lee-harvey-oswald-has-been-shot.html
    Also, at the moment that O. was shot, weren't his hands rather far apart if he was supposed to have been handcuffed?:

    http://jfk-assassination-as-it-happened.blogspot.com/2012/03/lee-harvey-oswald-has-been-shot.html

    Ruby is not seen wearing the glasses at all in the basement. This is clear when you watch the film that frame comes from. Oswald's right hand was cuffed to Leavelle's left hand, leaving Oswald's left hand free.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Corbett@21:1/5 to gggg gggg on Tue Aug 29 02:04:22 2023
    On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 12:44:55 AM UTC-4, gggg gggg wrote:
    Ruby waiting wearing dark glasses:

    http://kennedy-photos.blogspot.com/2013/09/kennedy-gallery-350.html

    Glasses in his left pocket when he shot O.:

    http://jfk-assassination-as-it-happened.blogspot.com/2012/03/lee-harvey-oswald-has-been-shot.html

    Uh, could it be he came out of bright sunshine into a dark basement?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to geowright1963@gmail.com on Wed Aug 30 07:54:43 2023
    On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 02:04:22 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett <geowright1963@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 12:44:55?AM UTC-4, gggg gggg wrote:
    Ruby waiting wearing dark glasses:

    http://kennedy-photos.blogspot.com/2013/09/kennedy-gallery-350.html

    Glasses in his left pocket when he shot O.:

    http://jfk-assassination-as-it-happened.blogspot.com/2012/03/lee-harvey-oswald-has-been-shot.html

    Uh, could it be he came out of bright sunshine into a dark basement?

    More speculation...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From gggg gggg@21:1/5 to All on Sat Sep 9 03:07:57 2023
    On Monday, August 28, 2023 at 9:44:55 PM UTC-7, wrote:
    Ruby waiting wearing dark glasses:

    http://kennedy-photos.blogspot.com/2013/09/kennedy-gallery-350.html

    Glasses in his left pocket when he shot O.:

    http://jfk-assassination-as-it-happened.blogspot.com/2012/03/lee-harvey-oswald-has-been-shot.html

    If Ruby had kept his glasses on, wouldn't he have been less recognizable?

    And if he kept a little distance between himself and Oswald and kept the gun in his pocket and fired it from his pocket, couldn't he have turned around quickly and run out of that place?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Corbett@21:1/5 to gggg gggg on Sat Sep 9 06:33:02 2023
    On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 6:07:59 AM UTC-4, gggg gggg wrote:
    On Monday, August 28, 2023 at 9:44:55 PM UTC-7, wrote:
    Ruby waiting wearing dark glasses:

    http://kennedy-photos.blogspot.com/2013/09/kennedy-gallery-350.html

    Glasses in his left pocket when he shot O.:

    http://jfk-assassination-as-it-happened.blogspot.com/2012/03/lee-harvey-oswald-has-been-shot.html
    If Ruby had kept his glasses on, wouldn't he have been less recognizable?

    As if that would have mattered? He was apprehended immediately.

    And if he kept a little distance between himself and Oswald and kept the gun in his pocket and fired it from his pocket, couldn't he have turned around quickly and run out of that place?

    Not a chance.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From gggg gggg@21:1/5 to All on Sat Sep 9 12:56:49 2023
    On Monday, August 28, 2023 at 9:44:55 PM UTC-7, wrote:
    Ruby waiting wearing dark glasses:

    http://kennedy-photos.blogspot.com/2013/09/kennedy-gallery-350.html

    Glasses in his left pocket when he shot O.:

    http://jfk-assassination-as-it-happened.blogspot.com/2012/03/lee-harvey-oswald-has-been-shot.html

    Am I the only one who finds it kind of suspicious that after Ruby was pounced on by all those men, there seems to be no photos of him being led away from the shooting site?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Corbett@21:1/5 to gggg gggg on Sat Sep 9 13:29:29 2023
    On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 3:56:52 PM UTC-4, gggg gggg wrote:
    On Monday, August 28, 2023 at 9:44:55 PM UTC-7, wrote:
    Ruby waiting wearing dark glasses:

    http://kennedy-photos.blogspot.com/2013/09/kennedy-gallery-350.html

    Glasses in his left pocket when he shot O.:

    http://jfk-assassination-as-it-happened.blogspot.com/2012/03/lee-harvey-oswald-has-been-shot.html
    Am I the only one who finds it kind of suspicious that after Ruby was pounced on by all those men, there seems to be no photos of him being led away from the shooting site?

    Apparently.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sky Throne 19efppp@21:1/5 to gggg gggg on Sat Sep 9 13:29:19 2023
    On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 3:56:52 PM UTC-4, gggg gggg wrote:
    On Monday, August 28, 2023 at 9:44:55 PM UTC-7, wrote:
    Ruby waiting wearing dark glasses:

    http://kennedy-photos.blogspot.com/2013/09/kennedy-gallery-350.html

    Glasses in his left pocket when he shot O.:

    http://jfk-assassination-as-it-happened.blogspot.com/2012/03/lee-harvey-oswald-has-been-shot.html
    Am I the only one who finds it kind of suspicious that after Ruby was pounced on by all those men, there seems to be no photos of him being led away from the shooting site?

    Are you trying to say that James Bookhout shot Harvey Lee Oswald?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to gggg gggg on Sat Sep 9 13:37:20 2023
    On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 3:56:52 PM UTC-4, gggg gggg wrote:
    On Monday, August 28, 2023 at 9:44:55 PM UTC-7, wrote:
    Ruby waiting wearing dark glasses:

    http://kennedy-photos.blogspot.com/2013/09/kennedy-gallery-350.html

    Glasses in his left pocket when he shot O.:

    http://jfk-assassination-as-it-happened.blogspot.com/2012/03/lee-harvey-oswald-has-been-shot.html
    Am I the only one who finds it kind of suspicious that after Ruby was pounced on by all those men, there seems to be no photos of him being led away from the shooting site?

    Probably not.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to gggg gggg on Sat Sep 9 13:39:35 2023
    On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 6:07:59 AM UTC-4, gggg gggg wrote:
    On Monday, August 28, 2023 at 9:44:55 PM UTC-7, wrote:
    Ruby waiting wearing dark glasses:

    http://kennedy-photos.blogspot.com/2013/09/kennedy-gallery-350.html

    Glasses in his left pocket when he shot O.:

    http://jfk-assassination-as-it-happened.blogspot.com/2012/03/lee-harvey-oswald-has-been-shot.html
    If Ruby had kept his glasses on, wouldn't he have been less recognizable?

    Worked for Superman.

    And if he kept a little distance between himself and Oswald and kept the gun in his pocket and fired it from his pocket, couldn't he have turned around quickly and run out of that place?

    Had he parked a unicorn nearby he might have leapt upon it and made good his escape.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Corbett@21:1/5 to Bud on Sat Sep 9 14:28:38 2023
    On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:39:37 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
    On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 6:07:59 AM UTC-4, gggg gggg wrote:
    On Monday, August 28, 2023 at 9:44:55 PM UTC-7, wrote:
    Ruby waiting wearing dark glasses:

    http://kennedy-photos.blogspot.com/2013/09/kennedy-gallery-350.html

    Glasses in his left pocket when he shot O.:

    http://jfk-assassination-as-it-happened.blogspot.com/2012/03/lee-harvey-oswald-has-been-shot.html
    If Ruby had kept his glasses on, wouldn't he have been less recognizable?
    Worked for Superman.
    And if he kept a little distance between himself and Oswald and kept the gun in his pocket and fired it from his pocket, couldn't he have turned around quickly and run out of that place?
    Had he parked a unicorn nearby he might have leapt upon it and made good his escape.

    A magic carpet would have been my choice.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to geowright1963@gmail.com on Mon Sep 11 08:08:55 2023
    On Sat, 9 Sep 2023 06:33:02 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
    <geowright1963@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 6:07:59?AM UTC-4, gggg gggg wrote:
    On Monday, August 28, 2023 at 9:44:55?PM UTC-7, wrote:
    Ruby waiting wearing dark glasses:

    http://kennedy-photos.blogspot.com/2013/09/kennedy-gallery-350.html

    Glasses in his left pocket when he shot O.:

    http://jfk-assassination-as-it-happened.blogspot.com/2012/03/lee-harvey-oswald-has-been-shot.html
    If Ruby had kept his glasses on, wouldn't he have been less recognizable?

    As if that would have mattered? He was apprehended immediately.

    And if he kept a little distance between himself and Oswald and kept the gun in his pocket and fired it from his pocket, couldn't he have turned around quickly and run out of that place?

    Not a chance.

    **THIS** is the sort of kooky nonsense that believers prefer to deal
    with.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Mon Sep 11 08:08:55 2023
    On Sat, 9 Sep 2023 13:39:35 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:


    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From gggg gggg@21:1/5 to John Corbett on Fri Sep 15 09:06:42 2023
    On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 1:29:31 PM UTC-7, John Corbett wrote:
    On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 3:56:52 PM UTC-4, gggg gggg wrote:
    On Monday, August 28, 2023 at 9:44:55 PM UTC-7, wrote:
    Ruby waiting wearing dark glasses:

    http://kennedy-photos.blogspot.com/2013/09/kennedy-gallery-350.html

    Glasses in his left pocket when he shot O.:

    http://jfk-assassination-as-it-happened.blogspot.com/2012/03/lee-harvey-oswald-has-been-shot.html
    Am I the only one who finds it kind of suspicious that after Ruby was pounced on by all those men, there seems to be no photos of him being led away from the shooting site?
    Apparently.

    If it's true that a bag was put over Ruby's head after he was pounced on, is that a normal procedure?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Fri Sep 15 11:38:05 2023
    On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 11:09:05 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Sat, 9 Sep 2023 14:28:38 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
    <geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:


    A magic carpet would have been my choice.
    Believers always reach for the magical...

    Add "mocking" to the list of things you don`t understand.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Fri Sep 15 11:44:32 2023
    On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 11:38:05 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    Adding Bugliosi to the things you don't understand:

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Fri Sep 15 11:45:38 2023
    On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 2:44:35 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 11:38:05 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
    wrote:

    Adding Bugliosi to the things you don't understand:

    You`re struggling with him, not me.

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Fri Sep 15 11:46:45 2023
    On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 11:45:38 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:


    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)