On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 13:46:01 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <
chuckschuyler123@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, August 23, 2023 at 3:34:07?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
If there was a coverup after the fact ( and we have all kinds of
evidence that there was ), then a conspiracy existed.
Another non sequitur.
Not at all. You'll be unable to show this.
For example, the CIA could've have withheld from the Warren
Commission knowledge they buried or ignored about Oswald's Mexico City
visit or their interest in Oswald in some form, with Oswald alone
responsible for 11/22/63.
No-one cares about matters that quite obviously bear on National
Security.
Now, explain why the NAA results were buried.
Tell us why the medical testimony was classified.
Indeed, tell us why the HSCA simply LIED about the medical testimony.
It doesn't matter who you believe was involved in the murder.
Because if there was no conspiracy, then there was no need for a
coverup.
The coverup IS the proof that a conspiracy to kill JFK existed.
Begged. Circular.
Fix your arguments by removing the logical fallacies.
Killing you wouldn't be legal.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)