A golden oldie from Gil...

....in an interview on December 1, 1963, with agents of the FBI,
Frazier had marked the point on the back seat of his car which he
believed was where the bag reached when it was laid on the seat with
one edge against the door. The distance between the point on the seat
and the door was 27 inches. (REPORT, Chapter 4, page 134 )

At that same time, Linnie Mae Randle estimated the size of the package
at 27 inches. (CE 2008 )

During her WC testimony, Randle again estimated the length of the bag
at 28 1/2 inches. ( 2 H 250 )

Frazier gave a sworn affidavit that said the package was 2 feet long.
He also gave testimony saying the same thing ( 2 H 226 )

Frazier told the FBI that the bag in evidence was too long. ( 2 H
240 )

Mrs. Randle said, when shown the paper bag, that the bag she saw
Oswald carrying "wasn't that long, I mean it was folded down at the
top as I told you. It definitely wasn't that long."

(REPORT, Chapter 4, page 134 )

SO WHAT DID THE WC CONCLUDE FROM THESE WITNESSES WHOSE ESTIMATIONS
WERE SO CONSISTENT AND CORROBORATED EACH OTHER ? ?

The Commission has weighed the visual recollection of Frazier and Mrs.
Randle against the evidence here presented that the bag Oswald carried contained the assassination weapon and has concluded that Frazier and
Randle are mistaken as to the length of the bag.

(ibid.)

IOW, since the witnesses' testimony did not support Oswald's bringing
the bag that they had in evidence to work that day, the witnesses were
simply "mistaken".

************************************************************
And, although Gil didn't mention it, the WC claimed to be weighing the
evidence that the bag contained the rifle. What evidence???

I daresay that not a *SINGLE* believer will produce **ANY** evidence
that the "bag" ever contained the rifle.

The WC simply lied.

And the proof is simple - the silence of believers when asked to
produce this alleged "evidence."

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)