On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 1:51:27 PM UTC-8, donoh...@gmail.com wrote:Authorities claim she took no notes or any recording. Her publisher gave her an advance when she showed them what she had written so far. Then when asked where the book segments were the publisher denied ever seeing any of it. A cased check with the note
She wasn`t just writing an article proving The Warren Report the biggest lie in history. She was writing a book, and had been the only one allowed to interview Ruby. A journalist like herself always kept recordings and notes when they interview.
On Wednesday, August 23, 2023 at 2:00:04 AM UTC-4, gggg gggg wrote:Authorities claim she took no notes or any recording. Her publisher gave her an advance when she showed them what she had written so far. Then when asked where the book segments were the publisher denied ever seeing any of it. A cased check with the note
On Saturday, December 23, 2017 at 9:00:39 AM UTC-8, lazu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 1:51:27 PM UTC-8, donoh...@gmail.com wrote:
She wasn`t just writing an article proving The Warren Report the biggest lie in history. She was writing a book, and had been the only one allowed to interview Ruby. A journalist like herself always kept recordings and notes when they interview.
at all. Lane wiped the floor with Buckley. Lane was a great critic of the investigation, but he was extraordinarily uninterested in what actually did happen, and perhaps he was controlled opposition on that basis. There will always be critics of theWhat about this 1966 tv program?
(Youtube upload):
"Firing Line with William F. Buckley Jr.: The Warren Report: Fact or Fiction?"One could argue that "former" CIA man Buckley was simply platforming the most prominent controlled opposition figure, Mark Lane. Or one could argue that the plan had been for Lane to wither away in the heat of Buckley's brilliance, which did not happen
On Saturday, December 23, 2017 at 9:00:39 AM UTC-8, lazu...@gmail.com wrote:Authorities claim she took no notes or any recording. Her publisher gave her an advance when she showed them what she had written so far. Then when asked where the book segments were the publisher denied ever seeing any of it. A cased check with the note
On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 1:51:27 PM UTC-8, donoh...@gmail.com wrote:
She wasn`t just writing an article proving The Warren Report the biggest lie in history. She was writing a book, and had been the only one allowed to interview Ruby. A journalist like herself always kept recordings and notes when they interview.
What about this 1966 tv program?
(Youtube upload):
"Firing Line with William F. Buckley Jr.: The Warren Report: Fact or Fiction?"
On Wednesday, August 23, 2023 at 6:16:58 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:Authorities claim she took no notes or any recording. Her publisher gave her an advance when she showed them what she had written so far. Then when asked where the book segments were the publisher denied ever seeing any of it. A cased check with the
On Wednesday, August 23, 2023 at 2:00:04 AM UTC-4, gggg gggg wrote:
On Saturday, December 23, 2017 at 9:00:39 AM UTC-8, lazu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 1:51:27 PM UTC-8, donoh...@gmail.com wrote:
She wasn`t just writing an article proving The Warren Report the biggest lie in history. She was writing a book, and had been the only one allowed to interview Ruby. A journalist like herself always kept recordings and notes when they interview.
happen at all. Lane wiped the floor with Buckley. Lane was a great critic of the investigation, but he was extraordinarily uninterested in what actually did happen, and perhaps he was controlled opposition on that basis. There will always be critics ofWhat about this 1966 tv program?
(Youtube upload):
"Firing Line with William F. Buckley Jr.: The Warren Report: Fact or Fiction?"One could argue that "former" CIA man Buckley was simply platforming the most prominent controlled opposition figure, Mark Lane. Or one could argue that the plan had been for Lane to wither away in the heat of Buckley's brilliance, which did not
The Warren Commission said what happened. Accept it or reject it but there isn't another choice.
The Warren Commission said what happened. Accept it or reject it but there isn't another choice.
The irony is that on her final show Dorothy thought that the celebrity guest was Marilyn Monroe, even though Monroe had died 3 years before. Was she really that sloshed?
On Wednesday, December 20, 2017 at 6:08:46 PM UTC-8, sbha...@gmail.com wrote:Authorities claim she took no notes or any recording. Her publisher gave her an advance when she showed them what she had written so far. Then when asked where the book segments were the publisher denied ever seeing any of it. A cased check with the note
On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 1:51:27 PM UTC-8, donoh...@gmail.com wrote:
She wasn`t just writing an article proving The Warren Report the biggest lie in history. She was writing a book, and had been the only one allowed to interview Ruby. A journalist like herself always kept recordings and notes when they interview.
the Oswald backyard photos are fakes. This is the Robert Groden who in the 1993 OJ Simpson trial testified that the photo of Simpson wearing Bruno Magli shoes was a fake. (Later 30 more photos of Simpson on the same day by another photographer turned up--===
Kilgallen's interview of Ruby was a few minutes and was with a bunch of other reporters, not an "exclusive."
The rest of it is that Kilgallen was duped by various CT's an fell for them. One was Mark Lane, using much of the crap that clogs forums like this (ie. Weitzman's mistaken ID of the rifle as a Mauser). She also fell for Robert Groden's idea that the
Brennan looking in another direction (true only for earlier segments-- he is at the depository, and of course is not visible at the final shot).She conducted her own investigation of the Brennan ID of Oswald under conditions not at all like those at the TSBD, and then proceed to repeat the assertion that Brennan cannot have ID'ed Oswald at the final shot because the Zapruder film shows
She, like her husband, was barbituate pill addict and alcoholic. She slurred her way through her last episode of What's My Line? and was dead 4 hours later, of a probable accidental overdose. Nothing to see, here.
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/kilgallen.txt(Youtube upload):
"What's My Line? - Dorothy's Final Show - Joey Heatherton (Nov 7, 1965) [W/ COMMERCIALS]"
On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 1:51:27 PM UTC-8, donoh...@gmail.com wrote:Authorities claim she took no notes or any recording. Her publisher gave her an advance when she showed them what she had written so far. Then when asked where the book segments were the publisher denied ever seeing any of it. A cased check with the note
She wasn`t just writing an article proving The Warren Report the biggest lie in history. She was writing a book, and had been the only one allowed to interview Ruby. A journalist like herself always kept recordings and notes when they interview.
===the Oswald backyard photos are fakes. This is the Robert Groden who in the 1993 OJ Simpson trial testified that the photo of Simpson wearing Bruno Magli shoes was a fake. (Later 30 more photos of Simpson on the same day by another photographer turned up--
Kilgallen's interview of Ruby was a few minutes and was with a bunch of other reporters, not an "exclusive."
The rest of it is that Kilgallen was duped by various CT's an fell for them. One was Mark Lane, using much of the crap that clogs forums like this (ie. Weitzman's mistaken ID of the rifle as a Mauser). She also fell for Robert Groden's idea that the
She conducted her own investigation of the Brennan ID of Oswald under conditions not at all like those at the TSBD, and then proceed to repeat the assertion that Brennan cannot have ID'ed Oswald at the final shot because the Zapruder film shows Brennanlooking in another direction (true only for earlier segments-- he is at the depository, and of course is not visible at the final shot).
She, like her husband, was barbituate pill addict and alcoholic. She slurred her way through her last episode of What's My Line? and was dead 4 hours later, of a probable accidental overdose. Nothing to see, here.
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/kilgallen.txt
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 3:41:18 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
The irony is that on her final show Dorothy thought that the celebrity guest was Marilyn Monroe, even though Monroe had died 3 years before. Was she really that sloshed?Nonsense. Dorothy thought nothing of the kind. The name "Norma" can apply to people other than just Marilyn.
http://dvp-potpourri.blogspot.com/2014/05/whats-my-line-november-7-1965.html
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 3:24:29 AM UTC-4, gggg gggg wrote:Authorities claim she took no notes or any recording. Her publisher gave her an advance when she showed them what she had written so far. Then when asked where the book segments were the publisher denied ever seeing any of it. A cased check with the note
On Wednesday, December 20, 2017 at 6:08:46 PM UTC-8, sbha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 1:51:27 PM UTC-8, donoh...@gmail.com wrote:
She wasn`t just writing an article proving The Warren Report the biggest lie in history. She was writing a book, and had been the only one allowed to interview Ruby. A journalist like herself always kept recordings and notes when they interview.
the the Oswald backyard photos are fakes. This is the Robert Groden who in the 1993 OJ Simpson trial testified that the photo of Simpson wearing Bruno Magli shoes was a fake. (Later 30 more photos of Simpson on the same day by another photographer turned===
Kilgallen's interview of Ruby was a few minutes and was with a bunch of other reporters, not an "exclusive."
The rest of it is that Kilgallen was duped by various CT's an fell for them. One was Mark Lane, using much of the crap that clogs forums like this (ie. Weitzman's mistaken ID of the rifle as a Mauser). She also fell for Robert Groden's idea that
Brennan looking in another direction (true only for earlier segments-- he is at the depository, and of course is not visible at the final shot).She conducted her own investigation of the Brennan ID of Oswald under conditions not at all like those at the TSBD, and then proceed to repeat the assertion that Brennan cannot have ID'ed Oswald at the final shot because the Zapruder film shows
She, like her husband, was barbituate pill addict and alcoholic. She slurred her way through her last episode of What's My Line? and was dead 4 hours later, of a probable accidental overdose. Nothing to see, here.
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/kilgallen.txt(Youtube upload):
"What's My Line? - Dorothy's Final Show - Joey Heatherton (Nov 7, 1965) [W/ COMMERCIALS]"The irony is that on her final show Dorothy thought that the celebrity guest was Marilyn Monroe, even though Monroe had died 3 years before. Was she really that sloshed?
On Wednesday, December 20, 2017 at 6:08:46 PM UTC-8, sbha...@gmail.com wrote:Authorities claim she took no notes or any recording. Her publisher gave her an advance when she showed them what she had written so far. Then when asked where the book segments were the publisher denied ever seeing any of it. A cased check with the note
On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 1:51:27 PM UTC-8, donoh...@gmail.com wrote:
She wasn`t just writing an article proving The Warren Report the biggest lie in history. She was writing a book, and had been the only one allowed to interview Ruby. A journalist like herself always kept recordings and notes when they interview.
the Oswald backyard photos are fakes. This is the Robert Groden who in the 1993 OJ Simpson trial testified that the photo of Simpson wearing Bruno Magli shoes was a fake. (Later 30 more photos of Simpson on the same day by another photographer turned up--===
Kilgallen's interview of Ruby was a few minutes and was with a bunch of other reporters, not an "exclusive."
The rest of it is that Kilgallen was duped by various CT's an fell for them. One was Mark Lane, using much of the crap that clogs forums like this (ie. Weitzman's mistaken ID of the rifle as a Mauser). She also fell for Robert Groden's idea that the
Brennan looking in another direction (true only for earlier segments-- he is at the depository, and of course is not visible at the final shot).She conducted her own investigation of the Brennan ID of Oswald under conditions not at all like those at the TSBD, and then proceed to repeat the assertion that Brennan cannot have ID'ed Oswald at the final shot because the Zapruder film shows
She, like her husband, was barbituate pill addict and alcoholic. She slurred her way through her last episode of What's My Line? and was dead 4 hours later, of a probable accidental overdose. Nothing to see, here.
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/kilgallen.txt(Youtube upload):
"What's My Line? - Dorothy's Final Show - Joey Heatherton (Nov 7, 1965) [W/ COMMERCIALS]"
Good! More conspiracies!
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 12:41:18 AM UTC-7, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:Authorities claim she took no notes or any recording. Her publisher gave her an advance when she showed them what she had written so far. Then when asked where the book segments were the publisher denied ever seeing any of it. A cased check with the
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 3:24:29 AM UTC-4, gggg gggg wrote:
On Wednesday, December 20, 2017 at 6:08:46 PM UTC-8, sbha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 1:51:27 PM UTC-8, donoh...@gmail.com wrote:
She wasn`t just writing an article proving The Warren Report the biggest lie in history. She was writing a book, and had been the only one allowed to interview Ruby. A journalist like herself always kept recordings and notes when they interview.
the the Oswald backyard photos are fakes. This is the Robert Groden who in the 1993 OJ Simpson trial testified that the photo of Simpson wearing Bruno Magli shoes was a fake. (Later 30 more photos of Simpson on the same day by another photographer turned===
Kilgallen's interview of Ruby was a few minutes and was with a bunch of other reporters, not an "exclusive."
The rest of it is that Kilgallen was duped by various CT's an fell for them. One was Mark Lane, using much of the crap that clogs forums like this (ie. Weitzman's mistaken ID of the rifle as a Mauser). She also fell for Robert Groden's idea that
Brennan looking in another direction (true only for earlier segments-- he is at the depository, and of course is not visible at the final shot).She conducted her own investigation of the Brennan ID of Oswald under conditions not at all like those at the TSBD, and then proceed to repeat the assertion that Brennan cannot have ID'ed Oswald at the final shot because the Zapruder film shows
gs_lp=EgNpbWciEGtpbGdhbGxlbiBtb25yb2VI3xhQAFipF3AAeACQAQCYAeABoAGtC6oBBjExLjQuMbgBA8gBAPgBAYoCC2d3cy13aXotaW1nwgIIEAAYgAQYsQPCAggQABixAxiDAcICBRAAGIAEwgILEAAYgAQYsQMYgwHCAgYQABgFGB7CAgcQABgYGIAEwgIGEAAYCBge&sclient=imgShe, like her husband, was barbituate pill addict and alcoholic. She slurred her way through her last episode of What's My Line? and was dead 4 hours later, of a probable accidental overdose. Nothing to see, here.
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/kilgallen.txt(Youtube upload):
She had actually met Monroe:"What's My Line? - Dorothy's Final Show - Joey Heatherton (Nov 7, 1965) [W/ COMMERCIALS]"The irony is that on her final show Dorothy thought that the celebrity guest was Marilyn Monroe, even though Monroe had died 3 years before. Was she really that sloshed?
https://www.google.cm/search?q=kilgallen+monroe&sca_esv=560294702&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1366&bih=657&ei=ObTpZOycG8fikPIPuuSRuAQ&iflsig=AD69kcEAAAAAZOnCSYW9WgavTBlaBMp6WceH4YEnR1If&ved=0ahUKEwisnYbS8PmAAxVHMUQIHTpyBEcQ4dUDCAc&uact=5&oq=kilgallen+monroe&
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 12:24:29 AM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:Authorities claim she took no notes or any recording. Her publisher gave her an advance when she showed them what she had written so far. Then when asked where the book segments were the publisher denied ever seeing any of it. A cased check with the note
On Wednesday, December 20, 2017 at 6:08:46 PM UTC-8, sbha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 1:51:27 PM UTC-8, donoh...@gmail.com wrote:
She wasn`t just writing an article proving The Warren Report the biggest lie in history. She was writing a book, and had been the only one allowed to interview Ruby. A journalist like herself always kept recordings and notes when they interview.
the the Oswald backyard photos are fakes. This is the Robert Groden who in the 1993 OJ Simpson trial testified that the photo of Simpson wearing Bruno Magli shoes was a fake. (Later 30 more photos of Simpson on the same day by another photographer turned===
Kilgallen's interview of Ruby was a few minutes and was with a bunch of other reporters, not an "exclusive."
The rest of it is that Kilgallen was duped by various CT's an fell for them. One was Mark Lane, using much of the crap that clogs forums like this (ie. Weitzman's mistaken ID of the rifle as a Mauser). She also fell for Robert Groden's idea that
Brennan looking in another direction (true only for earlier segments-- he is at the depository, and of course is not visible at the final shot).She conducted her own investigation of the Brennan ID of Oswald under conditions not at all like those at the TSBD, and then proceed to repeat the assertion that Brennan cannot have ID'ed Oswald at the final shot because the Zapruder film shows
She, like her husband, was barbituate pill addict and alcoholic. She slurred her way through her last episode of What's My Line? and was dead 4 hours later, of a probable accidental overdose. Nothing to see, here.
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/kilgallen.txt(Youtube upload):
"What's My Line? - Dorothy's Final Show - Joey Heatherton (Nov 7, 1965) [W/ COMMERCIALS]"The moderator of WHAT'S MY LINE? John Daly was the son-in-law of Earl Warren whose Commission Kilgallen had criticized.
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 4:26:52 AM UTC-4, David Von Pein wrote:
Good! More conspiracies!
So, who are all of those other "Norma's" you had in mind?
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 4:33:15 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 4:26:52 AM UTC-4, David Von Pein wrote:
Good! More conspiracies!
So, who are all of those other "Norma's" you had in mind?No idea. But there obviously was at least one "Norma" that Dorothy had in mind. Because she certainly didn't just forget that MM was dead.
DVP retreats to the circular reasoning of his Nutter Retard hamster wheel. He finds it comforting!
She wasn`t just writing an article proving The Warren Report the biggest lie in history. She was writing a book, and had been the only one allowed to interview Ruby. A journalist like herself always kept recordings and notes when they interview.Authorities claim she took no notes or any recording. Her publisher gave her an advance when she showed them what she had written so far. Then when asked where the book segments were the publisher denied ever seeing any of it. A cased check with the note
On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 1:51:27 PM UTC-8, donoh...@gmail.com wrote:Authorities claim she took no notes or any recording. Her publisher gave her an advance when she showed them what she had written so far. Then when asked where the book segments were the publisher denied ever seeing any of it. A cased check with the note
She wasn`t just writing an article proving The Warren Report the biggest lie in history. She was writing a book, and had been the only one allowed to interview Ruby. A journalist like herself always kept recordings and notes when they interview.
https://history.howstuffworks.com/historical-figures/dorothy-kilgallen.htm
On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 1:51:27 PM UTC-8, donoh...@gmail.com wrote:Authorities claim she took no notes or any recording. Her publisher gave her an advance when she showed them what she had written so far. Then when asked where the book segments were the publisher denied ever seeing any of it. A cased check with the note
She wasn`t just writing an article proving The Warren Report the biggest lie in history. She was writing a book, and had been the only one allowed to interview Ruby. A journalist like herself always kept recordings and notes when they interview.
https://history.howstuffworks.com/historical-figures/dorothy-kilgallen.htm
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 10:51:49 PM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:Authorities claim she took no notes or any recording. Her publisher gave her an advance when she showed them what she had written so far. Then when asked where the book segments were the publisher denied ever seeing any of it. A cased check with the note
On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 1:51:27 PM UTC-8, donoh...@gmail.com wrote:
She wasn`t just writing an article proving The Warren Report the biggest lie in history. She was writing a book, and had been the only one allowed to interview Ruby. A journalist like herself always kept recordings and notes when they interview.
https://history.howstuffworks.com/historical-figures/dorothy-kilgallen.htm(2023 Youtube upload):
"The Suspicious Death of Dorothy Kilgallen"
On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 1:51:27 PM UTC-8, donoh...@gmail.com wrote:Authorities claim she took no notes or any recording. Her publisher gave her an advance when she showed them what she had written so far. Then when asked where the book segments were the publisher denied ever seeing any of it. A cased check with the note
She wasn`t just writing an article proving The Warren Report the biggest lie in history. She was writing a book, and had been the only one allowed to interview Ruby. A journalist like herself always kept recordings and notes when they interview.
https://history.howstuffworks.com/historical-figures/dorothy-kilgallen.htm
Dorothy's Death.....
http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2014/05/jfk-assassination-arguments-part-712.html
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 11:48:41 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 5:25:11 AM UTC-4, David Von Pein wrote:
Dorothy's Death.....
It's the conspiracy hobbyists who want to dispute the official finding that Dorothy Kilgallen'shttp://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2014/05/jfk-assassination-arguments-part-712.htmlThat's a wonderfully evidence-free analysis of Dorothy Kilgallen's death. Oh, Von Pein, you've done it again!
death was something other than an overdose. They are the ones who need to provide the
evidence.
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 5:25:11 AM UTC-4, David Von Pein wrote:
Dorothy's Death.....
http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2014/05/jfk-assassination-arguments-part-712.htmlThat's a wonderfully evidence-free analysis of Dorothy Kilgallen's death. Oh, Von Pein, you've done it again!
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 12:43:27 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 11:48:41 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 5:25:11 AM UTC-4, David Von Pein wrote:
Dorothy's Death.....
You're free to take whatever evidence-free approach you like!It's the conspiracy hobbyists who want to dispute the official finding that Dorothy Kilgallen'shttp://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2014/05/jfk-assassination-arguments-part-712.htmlThat's a wonderfully evidence-free analysis of Dorothy Kilgallen's death. Oh, Von Pein, you've done it again!
death was something other than an overdose. They are the ones who need to provide the
evidence.
That's a wonderfully evidence-free analysis of Dorothy Kilgallen's death. Oh, Von Pein, you've done it again!
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 11:48:41 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
That's a wonderfully evidence-free analysis of Dorothy Kilgallen's death. Oh, Von Pein, you've done it again!Thanks. Always happy to help the conspiracy-happy fantasists by imparting a little basic common sense.
On Sunday, August 27, 2023 at 1:51:49?AM UTC-4, gggg gggg wrote:Authorities claim she took no notes or any recording. Her publisher gave her an advance when she showed them what she had written so far. Then when asked where the book segments were the publisher denied ever seeing any of it. A cased check with the note
On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 1:51:27?PM UTC-8, donoh...@gmail.com wrote: >> > She wasn`t just writing an article proving The Warren Report the biggest lie in history. She was writing a book, and had been the only one allowed to interview Ruby. A journalist like herself always kept recordings and notes when they interview.
https://history.howstuffworks.com/historical-figures/dorothy-kilgallen.htm
It's amazing what people will write when they turn their imaginations loose.
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 5:00:54?AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
DVP retreats to the circular reasoning of his Nutter Retard hamster wheel. He finds it comforting!
It's called "logical thinking" and "reasonable inference" and "discounting things that are silly and ridiculous".
On Sunday, August 27, 2023 at 1:51:49?AM UTC-4, gggg gggg wrote:Authorities claim she took no notes or any recording. Her publisher gave her an advance when she showed them what she had written so far. Then when asked where the book segments were the publisher denied ever seeing any of it. A cased check with the note
On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 1:51:27?PM UTC-8, donoh...@gmail.com wrote: >> > She wasn`t just writing an article proving The Warren Report the biggest lie in history. She was writing a book, and had been the only one allowed to interview Ruby. A journalist like herself always kept recordings and notes when they interview.
https://history.howstuffworks.com/historical-figures/dorothy-kilgallen.htm
Id love to see the citation for this claim:
To this day television networks are forbidden to air anything that question Warren Report.
Go ahead, well wait.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 122:11:35 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,212 |
| Messages: | 5,334,551 |