... doesn`t know a clipboard from a rifle.
...doesn`t know the...
...doesn`t know the...
...doesn`t know the ...
..doesn`t know the difference between a measured wound and a wound where the size is estimated.
... doesn`t know a clipboard from a rifle.
On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 5:24:15?PM UTC-5, Bud wrote:
..doesn`t know the difference between a measured wound and a wound where the size is estimated.
...doesn't even know for certain whether or not JFK was the assassination target.
On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 3:47:51?PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
... doesn`t know a clipboard from a rifle.
The only trolls here are the ones who post .....
No citations
No documents
No testimony
No exhibits
No witness videos
They do no research of their own, preferring to take the lazy way out
and fall back on the conclusions of the Warren Commission Report.
You can gain NO KNOWLEDGE from their posts.
What they DO post are comments, speculation, opinion and ( when that
doesn't work ) insults. They see themselves as guardians of the truth
against those crazy "conspiracy theorists".
They argue that because a conspiracy can't be proven, then none
existed.
Does that mean that if a murder is unsolved, the victim was never
murdered ? You'll have to ask them, that's their thought process.
They have little or no knowledge of police procedures, like the proper
way to conduct a lineup, the proper way to handle evidence, the proper
way to interrogate a prisoner and the proper way to protect a
prosecution case by protecting a suspect's Constitutional rights.
And yet they'll argue and insult those of us who are knowledgeable of such things.
They have little or no knowledge of the 26 volumes of testimony and
exhibits that they so religiously support. Most of them haven't even
read them.
They have little or no knowledge of how "southern justice" worked in
the 1960s. How innocent black men never made it to trial and how
all-white grand juries refused to indict guilty white men who killed them ( like
Medgar Evers' murderer Byron DeLa Beckwith ).
They have little or no knowledge of the history of the Kennedy >Administration, the powerful enemies he made with his personal
behavior and his political policies.
They have little or no knowledge of the atmosphere in the city of
Dallas at the time of the assassination. That the President was warned
not to go to Dallas or "they" would kill him there, begs the question,
"how did all of these people know Lee Harvey Oswald was going to kill
the President" ?
But not having knowledge is not enough. Even when shown evidence
casting doubt on Oswald's guilt, they ignore it.
They ignore evidence that Oswald was seen on the first floor so soon
after the shooting, that he couldn't have possibly come from the sixth >floor..
https://gil-jesus.com/oswald-on-the-first-floor/
They ignore evidence that the paper "gunsack" was made by the Dallas
Police on the afternoon of the assassination. >https://gil-jesus.com/the-bag-job/
They ignore the evidence that the fillers in the police lineups were
chosen in such a way as to make Oswald the only choice a witness could
make.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-police-lineups/
They ignore the evidence that the scope on the rifle was so defective
that it was impossible to hit anything you aimed at. >https://gil-jesus.com/the-rifle-tests/
They ignore the evidence that Dr. Humes LIED about the location of the
back wound.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-back-wound/
They ignore the evidence that no human being, Oswald or anyone else,
could have completely fled the Walker shooting in the TWO SECONDS the
FBI said it took for Walter Kirk Coleman to reach the fence. >https://gil-jesus.com/the-witness/
They ignore the evidence that the FBI lied in its reports. >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODXoISgU-0M
They ignore evidence that the Tippit witnesses were unreliable. >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-7ud5FWiR0
They ignore evidence that the limo agents LIED about how they
responded when the shooting started. >https://gil-jesus.com/the-agents-in-the-limo/
They ignore evidence that witnesses were intimidated by the FBI. >https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
All of this evidence of prosecutorial misconduct and unethical police >procedures is ignored and accepted as proper by those who don't know
any better.
Their response ? "You're not looking at the evidence correctly".
But they fail to reveal how many ways there are to look at evidence or which one is the right way.
But this misconduct and lack of ethics does not happen in a proper and professional police
investigation. This is what happens when you are collecting evidence
against one suspect and one suspect only.
In short, this is exactly how you frame an innocent person.
And in here lies the proof of Oswald's innocence: the conduct of the Dallas Police and FBI.
How the handled Oswald.
How they handled the evidence.
How they handled the witnesses.
In short, the Lone Nut trolls in this newsgroup are not here to debate >evidence because they don't know the evidence. They're not here to
learn the truth because they've been systematicly brainwashed by a
government with a history of lying to its people.
And speaking of things they don't know about, they don't even know
they've been brainwashed. They come in here time and time again and
their lack of knowledge of the evidence only leads them to embarrass >themselves.
They admittedly come in here for their own entertanment. Like the internet bullies they are,
they come in here to laugh at people they believe are below them.
You'll gain no knowledge from their posts.
Stay away from a foolish man; you will gain no knowledge from his
speech. ( Proverbs 14:7 )
On Wednesday, August 23, 2023 at 10:45:24?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 3:47:51?PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
... doesn`t know a clipboard from a rifle.
The only trolls here are the ones who post .....
No citations
No documents
No testimony
No exhibits
No witness videos
You're delusional. Everyone here has posted links to citations,
documents, testimony, exhibits, and videos. Everyone. This includes
Oswald Aloners and CTs.
They do no research of their own, preferring to take the lazy way out
and fall back on the conclusions of the Warren Commission Report.
You can gain NO KNOWLEDGE from their posts.
What they DO post are comments, speculation, opinion and ( when that
doesn't work ) insults.
They see themselves as guardians of the truth
against those crazy "conspiracy theorists".
You don't have a conspiracy theory, remember?
They argue that because a conspiracy can't be proven, then none
existed.
Um, no.
Does that mean that if a murder is unsolved, the victim was never
murdered ? You'll have to ask them, that's their thought process.
They have little or no knowledge of police procedures, like the proper
way to conduct a lineup, the proper way to handle evidence, the proper
way to interrogate a prisoner and the proper way to protect a
prosecution case by protecting a suspect's Constitutional rights.
And yet they'll argue and insult those of us who are knowledgeable of such things.
They have little or no knowledge of the 26 volumes of testimony and
exhibits that they so religiously support. Most of them haven't even
read them.
I'd say everyone here on both sides is very knowledgeable about the
actual report, the supporting volumes, etc.
They have little or no knowledge of how "southern justice" worked in
the 1960s.
How innocent black men never made it to trial and how
all-white grand juries refused to indict guilty white men who killed them ( like
Medgar Evers' murderer Byron DeLa Beckwith ).
They have little or no knowledge of the history of the Kennedy
Administration, the powerful enemies he made with his personal
behavior and his political policies.
They have little or no knowledge of the atmosphere in the city of
Dallas at the time of the assassination.
I linked...
not to go to Dallas or "they" would kill him there, begs the question,
"how did all of these people know Lee Harvey Oswald was going to kill
the President" ?
But not having knowledge is not enough. Even when shown evidence
casting doubt on Oswald's guilt, they ignore it.
Discussed. Oswald is historically guilty.
They ignore evidence that Oswald was seen on the first floor so soon
after the shooting, that he couldn't have possibly come from the sixth
floor..
https://gil-jesus.com/oswald-on-the-first-floor/
They ignore evidence that the paper "gunsack" was made by the Dallas
Police on the afternoon of the assassination.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-bag-job/
They ignore the evidence that the fillers in the police lineups were
chosen in such a way as to make Oswald the only choice a witness could
make.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-police-lineups/
They ignore the evidence that the scope on the rifle was so defective
that it was impossible to hit anything you aimed at.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-rifle-tests/
They ignore the evidence that Dr. Humes LIED about the location of the
back wound.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-back-wound/
They ignore the evidence that no human being, Oswald or anyone else,
could have completely fled the Walker shooting in the TWO SECONDS the
FBI said it took for Walter Kirk Coleman to reach the fence.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-witness/
They ignore the evidence that the FBI lied in its reports.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODXoISgU-0M
They ignore evidence that the Tippit witnesses were unreliable.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-7ud5FWiR0
They ignore evidence that the limo agents LIED about how they
responded when the shooting started.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-agents-in-the-limo/
They ignore evidence that witnesses were intimidated by the FBI.
https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
All of this evidence of prosecutorial misconduct and unethical police
procedures is ignored and accepted as proper by those who don't know
any better.
Their response ? "You're not looking at the evidence correctly".
But they fail to reveal how many ways there are to look at evidence or which one is the right way.
But this misconduct and lack of ethics does not happen in a proper and professional police
investigation. This is what happens when you are collecting evidence
against one suspect and one suspect only.
In short, this is exactly how you frame an innocent person.
And in here lies the proof of Oswald's innocence: the conduct of the Dallas Police and FBI.
How the handled Oswald.
How they handled the evidence.
How they handled the witnesses.
In short, the Lone Nut trolls in this newsgroup are not here to debate
evidence because they don't know the evidence. They're not here to
learn the truth because they've been systematicly brainwashed by a
government with a history of lying to its people.
And speaking of things they don't know about, they don't even know
they've been brainwashed. They come in here time and time again and
their lack of knowledge of the evidence only leads them to embarrass
themselves.
They admittedly come in here for their own entertanment. Like the internet bullies they are,
they come in here to laugh at people they believe are below them.
You'll gain no knowledge from their posts.
Stay away from a foolish man; you will gain no knowledge from his
speech. ( Proverbs 14:7 )
On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 3:47:51 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
... doesn`t know a clipboard from a rifle.
The only trolls here are the ones who post .....
No citations
No documents
No testimony
No exhibits
No witness videos
They do no research of their own, preferring to take the lazy way out
and fall back on the conclusions of the Warren Commission Report.
You can gain NO KNOWLEDGE from their posts.
What they DO post are comments, speculation, opinion and ( when that
doesn't work ) insults.
They see themselves as guardians of the truth
against those crazy "conspiracy theorists".
They argue that because a conspiracy can't be proven, then none
existed.
Does that mean that if a murder is unsolved, the victim was never
murdered ? You'll have to ask them, that's their thought process.
They have little or no knowledge of police procedures, like the proper
way to conduct a lineup, the proper way to handle evidence, the proper
way to interrogate a prisoner and the proper way to protect a
prosecution case by protecting a suspect's Constitutional rights.
And yet they'll argue and insult those of us who are knowledgeable of such things.
They have little or no knowledge of the 26 volumes of testimony and
exhibits that they so religiously support. Most of them haven't even
read them.
They have little or no knowledge of how "southern justice" worked in
the 1960s.
How innocent black men never made it to trial and how
all-white grand juries refused to indict guilty white men who killed them ( like
Medgar Evers' murderer Byron DeLa Beckwith ).
They have little or no knowledge of the history of the Kennedy Administration, the powerful enemies he made with his personal
behavior and his political policies.
They have little or no knowledge of the atmosphere in the city of
Dallas at the time of the assassination.
not to go to Dallas or "they" would kill him there, begs the question,
"how did all of these people know Lee Harvey Oswald was going to kill
the President" ?
But not having knowledge is not enough. Even when shown evidence
casting doubt on Oswald's guilt, they ignore it.
They ignore evidence that Oswald was seen on the first floor so soon
after the shooting, that he couldn't have possibly come from the sixth floor..
https://gil-jesus.com/oswald-on-the-first-floor/
They ignore evidence that the paper "gunsack" was made by the Dallas
Police on the afternoon of the assassination. https://gil-jesus.com/the-bag-job/
They ignore the evidence that the fillers in the police lineups were
chosen in such a way as to make Oswald the only choice a witness could
make.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-police-lineups/
They ignore the evidence that the scope on the rifle was so defective
that it was impossible to hit anything you aimed at. https://gil-jesus.com/the-rifle-tests/
They ignore the evidence that Dr. Humes LIED about the location of the
back wound.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-back-wound/
They ignore the evidence that no human being, Oswald or anyone else,
could have completely fled the Walker shooting in the TWO SECONDS the
FBI said it took for Walter Kirk Coleman to reach the fence. https://gil-jesus.com/the-witness/
They ignore the evidence that the FBI lied in its reports. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODXoISgU-0M
They ignore evidence that the Tippit witnesses were unreliable. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-7ud5FWiR0
They ignore evidence that the limo agents LIED about how they
responded when the shooting started. https://gil-jesus.com/the-agents-in-the-limo/
They ignore evidence that witnesses were intimidated by the FBI. https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
All of this evidence of prosecutorial misconduct and unethical police procedures is ignored and accepted as proper by those who don't know
any better.
Their response ? "You're not looking at the evidence correctly".
But they fail to reveal how many ways there are to look at evidence or which one is the right way.
But this misconduct and lack of ethics does not happen in a proper and professional police
investigation. This is what happens when you are collecting evidence
against one suspect and one suspect only.
In short, this is exactly how you frame an innocent person.
And in here lies the proof of Oswald's innocence: the conduct of the Dallas Police and FBI.
How the handled Oswald.
How they handled the evidence.
How they handled the witnesses.
In short, the Lone Nut trolls in this newsgroup are not here to debate evidence because they don't know the evidence. They're not here to
learn the truth because they've been systematicly brainwashed by a government with a history of lying to its people.
And speaking of things they don't know about, they don't even know
they've been brainwashed. They come in here time and time again and
their lack of knowledge of the evidence only leads them to embarrass themselves.
They admittedly come in here for their own entertanment. Like the internet bullies they are,
they come in here to laugh at people they believe are below them.
You'll gain no knowledge from their posts.
Stay away from a foolish man; you will gain no knowledge from his
speech. ( Proverbs 14:7 )
On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 09:25:24 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, August 23, 2023 at 10:45:24?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 3:47:51?PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
... doesn`t know a clipboard from a rifle.
The only trolls here are the ones who post .....
No citations
No documents
No testimony
No exhibits
No witness videos
You're delusional. Everyone here has posted links to citations,Notice folks, Chuckles proves Gil right...
documents, testimony, exhibits, and videos. Everyone. This includes
Oswald Aloners and CTs.
Logical fallacy deleted.They do no research of their own, preferring to take the lazy way out
and fall back on the conclusions of the Warren Commission Report.
Logical fallacy deleted.You can gain NO KNOWLEDGE from their posts.
Logical fallacy deleted.What they DO post are comments, speculation, opinion and ( when that
doesn't work ) insults.
Logical fallacy deleted.They see themselves as guardians of the truth
against those crazy "conspiracy theorists".
You don't have a conspiracy theory, remember?You refuse to offer one, remember?
They argue that because a conspiracy can't be proven, then none
existed.
Um, no.Um, yes.
Logical fallacy deleted.Does that mean that if a murder is unsolved, the victim was never
murdered ? You'll have to ask them, that's their thought process.
Logical fallacy deleted.They have little or no knowledge of police procedures, like the proper
way to conduct a lineup, the proper way to handle evidence, the proper
way to interrogate a prisoner and the proper way to protect a
prosecution case by protecting a suspect's Constitutional rights.
And yet they'll argue and insult those of us who are knowledgeable of such things.
They have little or no knowledge of the 26 volumes of testimony and
exhibits that they so religiously support. Most of them haven't even
read them.
I'd say everyone here on both sides is very knowledgeable about theThen when you refuse to answer, you're acknowledging that the critic
actual report, the supporting volumes, etc.
has the truth.
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Your answer: dead silence.
Logical fallacy deleted.They have little or no knowledge of how "southern justice" worked in
the 1960s.
How innocent black men never made it to trial and how
all-white grand juries refused to indict guilty white men who killed them ( like
Medgar Evers' murderer Byron DeLa Beckwith ).
They have little or no knowledge of the history of the Kennedy
Administration, the powerful enemies he made with his personal
behavior and his political policies.
They have little or no knowledge of the atmosphere in the city of
Dallas at the time of the assassination.
I linked...
But failed to acknowledge.
Logical fallacy deleted.not to go to Dallas or "they" would kill him there, begs the question,
"how did all of these people know Lee Harvey Oswald was going to kill
the President" ?
But not having knowledge is not enough. Even when shown evidence
casting doubt on Oswald's guilt, they ignore it.
Discussed. Oswald is historically guilty.
You've been repeatedly corrected on this lie.
They ignore evidence that Oswald was seen on the first floor so soon
after the shooting, that he couldn't have possibly come from the sixth
floor..
https://gil-jesus.com/oswald-on-the-first-floor/
They ignore evidence that the paper "gunsack" was made by the Dallas
Police on the afternoon of the assassination.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-bag-job/
They ignore the evidence that the fillers in the police lineups were
chosen in such a way as to make Oswald the only choice a witness could
make.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-police-lineups/
They ignore the evidence that the scope on the rifle was so defective
that it was impossible to hit anything you aimed at.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-rifle-tests/
They ignore the evidence that Dr. Humes LIED about the location of the
back wound.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-back-wound/
They ignore the evidence that no human being, Oswald or anyone else,
could have completely fled the Walker shooting in the TWO SECONDS the
FBI said it took for Walter Kirk Coleman to reach the fence.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-witness/
They ignore the evidence that the FBI lied in its reports.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODXoISgU-0M
They ignore evidence that the Tippit witnesses were unreliable.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-7ud5FWiR0
They ignore evidence that the limo agents LIED about how they
responded when the shooting started.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-agents-in-the-limo/
They ignore evidence that witnesses were intimidated by the FBI.
https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
All of this evidence of prosecutorial misconduct and unethical police
procedures is ignored and accepted as proper by those who don't know
any better.
Their response ? "You're not looking at the evidence correctly".
But they fail to reveal how many ways there are to look at evidence or which one is the right way.
But this misconduct and lack of ethics does not happen in a proper and professional police
investigation. This is what happens when you are collecting evidence
against one suspect and one suspect only.
In short, this is exactly how you frame an innocent person.
And in here lies the proof of Oswald's innocence: the conduct of the Dallas Police and FBI.
How the handled Oswald.
How they handled the evidence.
How they handled the witnesses.
In short, the Lone Nut trolls in this newsgroup are not here to debate
evidence because they don't know the evidence. They're not here to
learn the truth because they've been systematicly brainwashed by a
government with a history of lying to its people.
And speaking of things they don't know about, they don't even know
they've been brainwashed. They come in here time and time again and
their lack of knowledge of the evidence only leads them to embarrass
themselves.
They admittedly come in here for their own entertanment. Like the internet bullies they are,
they come in here to laugh at people they believe are below them.
You'll gain no knowledge from their posts.
Stay away from a foolish man; you will gain no knowledge from his
speech. ( Proverbs 14:7 )
On Wednesday, August 23, 2023 at 11:45:11?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 09:25:24 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, August 23, 2023 at 10:45:24?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:Notice folks, Chuckles proves Gil right...
On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 3:47:51?PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
... doesn`t know a clipboard from a rifle.
The only trolls here are the ones who post .....
No citations
No documents
No testimony
No exhibits
No witness videos
You're delusional. Everyone here has posted links to citations,
documents, testimony, exhibits, and videos. Everyone. This includes
Oswald Aloners and CTs.
Logical fallacy deleted.They do no research of their own, preferring to take the lazy way out
and fall back on the conclusions of the Warren Commission Report.
Logical fallacy deleted.You can gain NO KNOWLEDGE from their posts.
Logical fallacy deleted.What they DO post are comments, speculation, opinion and ( when that
doesn't work ) insults.
Logical fallacy deleted.They see themselves as guardians of the truth
You refuse to offer one, remember?against those crazy "conspiracy theorists".
You don't have a conspiracy theory, remember?
Um, yes.They argue that because a conspiracy can't be proven, then none
existed.
Um, no.
Logical fallacy deleted.Does that mean that if a murder is unsolved, the victim was never
murdered ? You'll have to ask them, that's their thought process.
Logical fallacy deleted.They have little or no knowledge of police procedures, like the proper >>>> way to conduct a lineup, the proper way to handle evidence, the proper >>>> way to interrogate a prisoner and the proper way to protect a
prosecution case by protecting a suspect's Constitutional rights.
And yet they'll argue and insult those of us who are knowledgeable of such things.
Then when you refuse to answer, you're acknowledging that the criticThey have little or no knowledge of the 26 volumes of testimony and
exhibits that they so religiously support. Most of them haven't even
read them.
I'd say everyone here on both sides is very knowledgeable about the
actual report, the supporting volumes, etc.
has the truth.
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Your answer: dead silence.
Logical fallacy deleted.They have little or no knowledge of how "southern justice" worked in
the 1960s.
How innocent black men never made it to trial and how
all-white grand juries refused to indict guilty white men who killed them ( like
Medgar Evers' murderer Byron DeLa Beckwith ).
They have little or no knowledge of the history of the Kennedy
Administration, the powerful enemies he made with his personal
behavior and his political policies.
They have little or no knowledge of the atmosphere in the city of
Dallas at the time of the assassination.
I linked...
But failed to acknowledge.
Logical fallacy deleted.not to go to Dallas or "they" would kill him there, begs the question, >>>> "how did all of these people know Lee Harvey Oswald was going to kill
the President" ?
But not having knowledge is not enough. Even when shown evidence
casting doubt on Oswald's guilt, they ignore it.
Discussed. Oswald is historically guilty.
You've been repeatedly corrected on this lie.
Write the National Archives, Ben.
They ignore evidence that Oswald was seen on the first floor so soon
after the shooting, that he couldn't have possibly come from the sixth >>>> floor..
https://gil-jesus.com/oswald-on-the-first-floor/
They ignore evidence that the paper "gunsack" was made by the Dallas
Police on the afternoon of the assassination.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-bag-job/
They ignore the evidence that the fillers in the police lineups were
chosen in such a way as to make Oswald the only choice a witness could >>>> make.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-police-lineups/
They ignore the evidence that the scope on the rifle was so defective
that it was impossible to hit anything you aimed at.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-rifle-tests/
They ignore the evidence that Dr. Humes LIED about the location of the >>>> back wound.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-back-wound/
They ignore the evidence that no human being, Oswald or anyone else,
could have completely fled the Walker shooting in the TWO SECONDS the
FBI said it took for Walter Kirk Coleman to reach the fence.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-witness/
They ignore the evidence that the FBI lied in its reports.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODXoISgU-0M
They ignore evidence that the Tippit witnesses were unreliable.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-7ud5FWiR0
They ignore evidence that the limo agents LIED about how they
responded when the shooting started.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-agents-in-the-limo/
They ignore evidence that witnesses were intimidated by the FBI.
https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
All of this evidence of prosecutorial misconduct and unethical police
procedures is ignored and accepted as proper by those who don't know
any better.
Their response ? "You're not looking at the evidence correctly".
But they fail to reveal how many ways there are to look at evidence or which one is the right way.
But this misconduct and lack of ethics does not happen in a proper and professional police
investigation. This is what happens when you are collecting evidence
against one suspect and one suspect only.
In short, this is exactly how you frame an innocent person.
And in here lies the proof of Oswald's innocence: the conduct of the Dallas Police and FBI.
How the handled Oswald.
How they handled the evidence.
How they handled the witnesses.
In short, the Lone Nut trolls in this newsgroup are not here to debate >>>> evidence because they don't know the evidence. They're not here to
learn the truth because they've been systematicly brainwashed by a
government with a history of lying to its people.
And speaking of things they don't know about, they don't even know
they've been brainwashed. They come in here time and time again and
their lack of knowledge of the evidence only leads them to embarrass
themselves.
They admittedly come in here for their own entertanment. Like the internet bullies they are,
they come in here to laugh at people they believe are below them.
You'll gain no knowledge from their posts.
Stay away from a foolish man; you will gain no knowledge from his
speech. ( Proverbs 14:7 )
On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 10:06:58 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, August 23, 2023 at 11:45:11?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:Notice folks, that Chuckles immediately proves Gil right yet again by refusing to answer a question.
On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 09:25:24 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, August 23, 2023 at 10:45:24?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:Notice folks, Chuckles proves Gil right...
On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 3:47:51?PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
... doesn`t know a clipboard from a rifle.
The only trolls here are the ones who post .....
No citations
No documents
No testimony
No exhibits
No witness videos
You're delusional. Everyone here has posted links to citations,
documents, testimony, exhibits, and videos. Everyone. This includes
Oswald Aloners and CTs.
Logical fallacy deleted.They do no research of their own, preferring to take the lazy way out >>>> and fall back on the conclusions of the Warren Commission Report.
Logical fallacy deleted.You can gain NO KNOWLEDGE from their posts.
Logical fallacy deleted.What they DO post are comments, speculation, opinion and ( when that >>>> doesn't work ) insults.
Logical fallacy deleted.They see themselves as guardians of the truth
You refuse to offer one, remember?against those crazy "conspiracy theorists".
You don't have a conspiracy theory, remember?
Um, yes.They argue that because a conspiracy can't be proven, then none
existed.
Um, no.
Logical fallacy deleted.Does that mean that if a murder is unsolved, the victim was never
murdered ? You'll have to ask them, that's their thought process.
Logical fallacy deleted.They have little or no knowledge of police procedures, like the proper >>>> way to conduct a lineup, the proper way to handle evidence, the proper >>>> way to interrogate a prisoner and the proper way to protect a
prosecution case by protecting a suspect's Constitutional rights.
And yet they'll argue and insult those of us who are knowledgeable of such things.
Then when you refuse to answer, you're acknowledging that the criticThey have little or no knowledge of the 26 volumes of testimony and >>>> exhibits that they so religiously support. Most of them haven't even >>>> read them.
I'd say everyone here on both sides is very knowledgeable about the
actual report, the supporting volumes, etc.
has the truth.
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Your answer: dead silence.
Logical fallacy deleted.They have little or no knowledge of how "southern justice" worked in >>>> the 1960s.
How innocent black men never made it to trial and how
all-white grand juries refused to indict guilty white men who killed them ( like
Medgar Evers' murderer Byron DeLa Beckwith ).
They have little or no knowledge of the history of the Kennedy
Administration, the powerful enemies he made with his personal
behavior and his political policies.
They have little or no knowledge of the atmosphere in the city of
Dallas at the time of the assassination.
I linked...
But failed to acknowledge.
Logical fallacy deleted.not to go to Dallas or "they" would kill him there, begs the question, >>>> "how did all of these people know Lee Harvey Oswald was going to kill >>>> the President" ?
But not having knowledge is not enough. Even when shown evidence
casting doubt on Oswald's guilt, they ignore it.
Discussed. Oswald is historically guilty.
You've been repeatedly corrected on this lie.
Write the National Archives, Ben.
How are they going to refute the truth?
They ignore evidence that Oswald was seen on the first floor so soon >>>> after the shooting, that he couldn't have possibly come from the sixth >>>> floor..
https://gil-jesus.com/oswald-on-the-first-floor/
They ignore evidence that the paper "gunsack" was made by the Dallas >>>> Police on the afternoon of the assassination.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-bag-job/
They ignore the evidence that the fillers in the police lineups were >>>> chosen in such a way as to make Oswald the only choice a witness could >>>> make.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-police-lineups/
They ignore the evidence that the scope on the rifle was so defective >>>> that it was impossible to hit anything you aimed at.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-rifle-tests/
They ignore the evidence that Dr. Humes LIED about the location of the >>>> back wound.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-back-wound/
They ignore the evidence that no human being, Oswald or anyone else, >>>> could have completely fled the Walker shooting in the TWO SECONDS the >>>> FBI said it took for Walter Kirk Coleman to reach the fence.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-witness/
They ignore the evidence that the FBI lied in its reports.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODXoISgU-0M
They ignore evidence that the Tippit witnesses were unreliable.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-7ud5FWiR0
They ignore evidence that the limo agents LIED about how they
responded when the shooting started.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-agents-in-the-limo/
They ignore evidence that witnesses were intimidated by the FBI.
https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
All of this evidence of prosecutorial misconduct and unethical police >>>> procedures is ignored and accepted as proper by those who don't know >>>> any better.
Their response ? "You're not looking at the evidence correctly".
But they fail to reveal how many ways there are to look at evidence or which one is the right way.
But this misconduct and lack of ethics does not happen in a proper and professional police
investigation. This is what happens when you are collecting evidence >>>> against one suspect and one suspect only.
In short, this is exactly how you frame an innocent person.
And in here lies the proof of Oswald's innocence: the conduct of the Dallas Police and FBI.
How the handled Oswald.
How they handled the evidence.
How they handled the witnesses.
In short, the Lone Nut trolls in this newsgroup are not here to debate >>>> evidence because they don't know the evidence. They're not here to
learn the truth because they've been systematicly brainwashed by a
government with a history of lying to its people.
And speaking of things they don't know about, they don't even know
they've been brainwashed. They come in here time and time again and >>>> their lack of knowledge of the evidence only leads them to embarrass >>>> themselves.
They admittedly come in here for their own entertanment. Like the internet bullies they are,
they come in here to laugh at people they believe are below them.
You'll gain no knowledge from their posts.
Stay away from a foolish man; you will gain no knowledge from his
speech. ( Proverbs 14:7 )
On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 3:47:51 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
... doesn`t know a clipboard from a rifle.The only trolls here are the ones who post .....
No citations
No documents
No testimony
No exhibits
No witness videos
They do no research of their own, preferring to take the lazy way out
and fall back on the conclusions of the Warren Commission Report.
You can gain NO KNOWLEDGE from their posts.
What they DO post are comments, speculation, opinion and ( when that
doesn't work ) insults. They see themselves as guardians of the truth against those crazy "conspiracy theorists".
They argue that because a conspiracy can't be proven, then none
existed.
Does that mean that if a murder is unsolved, the victim was never
murdered ? You'll have to ask them, that's their thought process.
They have little or no knowledge of police procedures,
like the proper
way to conduct a lineup,
the proper way to handle evidence,
the proper
way to interrogate a prisoner
and the proper way to protect a
prosecution case by protecting a suspect's Constitutional rights.
And yet they'll argue and insult those of us who are knowledgeable of such things.
They have little or no knowledge of the 26 volumes of testimony and
exhibits that they so religiously support. Most of them haven't even
read them.
They have little or no knowledge of how "southern justice" worked in
the 1960s. How innocent black men never made it to trial and how
all-white grand juries refused to indict guilty white men who killed them ( like
Medgar Evers' murderer Byron DeLa Beckwith ).
They have little or no knowledge of the history of the Kennedy Administration, the powerful enemies he made with his personal
behavior and his political policies.
They have little or no knowledge of the atmosphere in the city of
Dallas at the time of the assassination. That the President was warned
not to go to Dallas or "they" would kill him there, begs the question,
"how did all of these people know Lee Harvey Oswald was going to kill
the President" ?
But not having knowledge is not enough. Even when shown evidence
casting doubt on Oswald's guilt, they ignore it.
They ignore evidence that Oswald was seen on the first floor so soon
after the shooting, that he couldn't have possibly come from the sixth floor..
https://gil-jesus.com/oswald-on-the-first-floor/
They ignore evidence that the paper "gunsack" was made by the Dallas
Police on the afternoon of the assassination. https://gil-jesus.com/the-bag-job/
They ignore the evidence that the fillers in the police lineups were
chosen in such a way as to make Oswald the only choice a witness could
make.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-police-lineups/
They ignore the evidence that the scope on the rifle was so defective
that it was impossible to hit anything you aimed at. https://gil-jesus.com/the-rifle-tests/
They ignore the evidence that Dr. Humes LIED about the location of the
back wound.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-back-wound/
They ignore the evidence that no human being, Oswald or anyone else,
could have completely fled the Walker shooting in the TWO SECONDS the
FBI said it took for Walter Kirk Coleman to reach the fence. https://gil-jesus.com/the-witness/
They ignore the evidence that the FBI lied in its reports. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODXoISgU-0M
They ignore evidence that the Tippit witnesses were unreliable. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-7ud5FWiR0
They ignore evidence that the limo agents LIED about how they
responded when the shooting started. https://gil-jesus.com/the-agents-in-the-limo/
They ignore evidence that witnesses were intimidated by the FBI. https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
All of this evidence of prosecutorial misconduct and unethical police procedures is ignored and accepted as proper by those who don't know
any better.
Their response ? "You're not looking at the evidence correctly".
But they fail to reveal how many ways there are to look at evidence or which one is the right way.
But this misconduct and lack of ethics does not happen in a proper and professional police
investigation. This is what happens when you are collecting evidence
against one suspect and one suspect only.
In short, this is exactly how you frame an innocent person.
And in here lies the proof of Oswald's innocence: the conduct of the Dallas Police and FBI.
How the handled Oswald.
How they handled the evidence.
How they handled the witnesses.
In short, the Lone Nut trolls in this newsgroup are not here to debate evidence because they don't know the evidence. They're not here to
learn the truth because they've been systematicly brainwashed by a government with a history of lying to its people.
And speaking of things they don't know about, they don't even know
they've been brainwashed. They come in here time and time again and
their lack of knowledge of the evidence only leads them to embarrass themselves.
They admittedly come in here for their own entertanment.
Like the internet bullies they are,
they come in here to laugh at people they believe are below them.
You'll gain no knowledge from their posts.
Stay away from a foolish man; you will gain no knowledge from his
speech. ( Proverbs 14:7 )
On Wednesday, August 23, 2023 at 12:19:46?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 10:06:58 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, August 23, 2023 at 11:45:11?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:Notice folks, that Chuckles immediately proves Gil right yet again by
On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 09:25:24 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, August 23, 2023 at 10:45:24?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote: >>>>>> On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 3:47:51?PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:Notice folks, Chuckles proves Gil right...
... doesn`t know a clipboard from a rifle.
The only trolls here are the ones who post .....
No citations
No documents
No testimony
No exhibits
No witness videos
You're delusional. Everyone here has posted links to citations,
documents, testimony, exhibits, and videos. Everyone. This includes
Oswald Aloners and CTs.
Logical fallacy deleted.They do no research of their own, preferring to take the lazy way out >>>>>> and fall back on the conclusions of the Warren Commission Report.
Logical fallacy deleted.You can gain NO KNOWLEDGE from their posts.
Logical fallacy deleted.What they DO post are comments, speculation, opinion and ( when that >>>>>> doesn't work ) insults.
Logical fallacy deleted.They see themselves as guardians of the truth
You refuse to offer one, remember?against those crazy "conspiracy theorists".
You don't have a conspiracy theory, remember?
Um, yes.They argue that because a conspiracy can't be proven, then none
existed.
Um, no.
Logical fallacy deleted.Does that mean that if a murder is unsolved, the victim was never
murdered ? You'll have to ask them, that's their thought process.
Logical fallacy deleted.They have little or no knowledge of police procedures, like the proper >>>>>> way to conduct a lineup, the proper way to handle evidence, the proper >>>>>> way to interrogate a prisoner and the proper way to protect a
prosecution case by protecting a suspect's Constitutional rights.
And yet they'll argue and insult those of us who are knowledgeable of such things.
Then when you refuse to answer, you're acknowledging that the criticThey have little or no knowledge of the 26 volumes of testimony and >>>>>> exhibits that they so religiously support. Most of them haven't even >>>>>> read them.
I'd say everyone here on both sides is very knowledgeable about the
actual report, the supporting volumes, etc.
has the truth.
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Your answer: dead silence.
refusing to answer a question.
Logical fallacy deleted.They have little or no knowledge of how "southern justice" worked in >>>>>> the 1960s.
How innocent black men never made it to trial and how
all-white grand juries refused to indict guilty white men who killed them ( like
Medgar Evers' murderer Byron DeLa Beckwith ).
They have little or no knowledge of the history of the Kennedy
Administration, the powerful enemies he made with his personal
behavior and his political policies.
They have little or no knowledge of the atmosphere in the city of
Dallas at the time of the assassination.
I linked...
But failed to acknowledge.
Logical fallacy deleted.not to go to Dallas or "they" would kill him there, begs the question, >>>>>> "how did all of these people know Lee Harvey Oswald was going to kill >>>>>> the President" ?
But not having knowledge is not enough. Even when shown evidence
casting doubt on Oswald's guilt, they ignore it.
Discussed. Oswald is historically guilty.
You've been repeatedly corrected on this lie.
Write the National Archives, Ben.
How are they going to refute the truth?
Non sequitur.
They ignore evidence that Oswald was seen on the first floor so soon >>>>>> after the shooting, that he couldn't have possibly come from the sixth >>>>>> floor..
https://gil-jesus.com/oswald-on-the-first-floor/
They ignore evidence that the paper "gunsack" was made by the Dallas >>>>>> Police on the afternoon of the assassination.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-bag-job/
They ignore the evidence that the fillers in the police lineups were >>>>>> chosen in such a way as to make Oswald the only choice a witness could >>>>>> make.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-police-lineups/
They ignore the evidence that the scope on the rifle was so defective >>>>>> that it was impossible to hit anything you aimed at.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-rifle-tests/
They ignore the evidence that Dr. Humes LIED about the location of the >>>>>> back wound.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-back-wound/
They ignore the evidence that no human being, Oswald or anyone else, >>>>>> could have completely fled the Walker shooting in the TWO SECONDS the >>>>>> FBI said it took for Walter Kirk Coleman to reach the fence.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-witness/
They ignore the evidence that the FBI lied in its reports.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODXoISgU-0M
They ignore evidence that the Tippit witnesses were unreliable.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-7ud5FWiR0
They ignore evidence that the limo agents LIED about how they
responded when the shooting started.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-agents-in-the-limo/
They ignore evidence that witnesses were intimidated by the FBI.
https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
All of this evidence of prosecutorial misconduct and unethical police >>>>>> procedures is ignored and accepted as proper by those who don't know >>>>>> any better.
Their response ? "You're not looking at the evidence correctly".
But they fail to reveal how many ways there are to look at evidence or which one is the right way.
But this misconduct and lack of ethics does not happen in a proper and professional police
investigation. This is what happens when you are collecting evidence >>>>>> against one suspect and one suspect only.
In short, this is exactly how you frame an innocent person.
And in here lies the proof of Oswald's innocence: the conduct of the Dallas Police and FBI.
How the handled Oswald.
How they handled the evidence.
How they handled the witnesses.
In short, the Lone Nut trolls in this newsgroup are not here to debate >>>>>> evidence because they don't know the evidence. They're not here to >>>>>> learn the truth because they've been systematicly brainwashed by a >>>>>> government with a history of lying to its people.
And speaking of things they don't know about, they don't even know >>>>>> they've been brainwashed. They come in here time and time again and >>>>>> their lack of knowledge of the evidence only leads them to embarrass >>>>>> themselves.
They admittedly come in here for their own entertanment. Like the internet bullies they are,
they come in here to laugh at people they believe are below them.
You'll gain no knowledge from their posts.
Stay away from a foolish man; you will gain no knowledge from his
speech. ( Proverbs 14:7 )
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 100:21:38 |
| Calls: | 6,659 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,208 |
| Messages: | 5,334,753 |