In an endnote in his book "Reclaiming History", Vincent Bugliosi wrote
this:
"Fritz writes, “Claims 2nd Floor Coke when Off [Officer] came
in, to 1st fl had lunch, out with Bill Shelley in front. Left wk
[work] opinion nothing be done that day.” "
Greg,
The "commas" added by Mr. Bugliosi are necessary (and they are not
deceiving in the slightest way).
In an endnote in his book "Reclaiming History", Vincent Bugliosi wrote >this:
"Fritz writes, “Claims 2nd Floor Coke when Off [Officer] came
in, to 1st fl had lunch, out with Bill Shelley in front. Left wk
[work] opinion nothing be done that day.†"
Greg,
The "commas" added by Mr. Bugliosi are necessary (and they are not >deceiving in the slightest way).
When you change a quote by even so much as a comma, you are indeed
changing the quote, and it *IS* deceitful.
On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 14:49:11 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.
It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)
So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 297 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 120:01:08 |
Calls: | 6,662 |
Files: | 12,210 |
Messages: | 5,334,422 |