• Steve Whined... But Never Got Anywhere...

    From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Mon Aug 21 13:46:20 2023
    Of course none from the conspiracy nuthouse EVER says what DID happen
    because they know that if they step into that trap their theories will
    never coincide with the evidence.

    Multiple assassins shot at the occupants of the limo. There's little
    doubt that JFK was their target. Steve can't show how that doesn't
    coincide with the evidence.

    And he never will

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Mon Aug 21 14:46:48 2023
    On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 4:46:23 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    Of course none from the conspiracy nuthouse EVER says what DID happen >because they know that if they step into that trap their theories will >never coincide with the evidence.

    Multiple assassins shot at the occupants of the limo.

    Only one.

    See how that works?

    There's little
    doubt that JFK was their target. Steve can't show how that doesn't
    coincide with the evidence.

    Ben avoids the trap by not saying anything.

    And he never will

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Mon Aug 21 14:49:56 2023
    On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 14:46:48 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:


    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Mon Aug 21 15:36:25 2023
    On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 5:49:59 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 14:46:48 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
    wrote:


    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    https://youtu.be/j5U40Vwjxtg

    Not bad, actually.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Mon Aug 21 15:51:40 2023
    On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 15:36:25 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:


    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chuck Schuyler@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Mon Aug 21 17:10:57 2023
    On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 3:46:23 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    Of course none from the conspiracy nuthouse EVER says what DID happen >because they know that if they step into that trap their theories will >never coincide with the evidence.

    Multiple assassins shot at the occupants of the limo. There's little
    doubt that JFK was their target.


    But there is a small doubt, in Ben's mind. Ben keeps the door open just a crack that his "multiple assassins" in Dealey Plaza had a different target in mind other than JFK.

    Good grief.

    If I ever update the Benny Tracker series, this is going on the list.

    As Trump would say, "Sad!"


    Steve can't show how that doesn't
    coincide with the evidence.

    And he never will

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Chuck Schuyler on Mon Aug 21 18:09:01 2023
    On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 8:10:59 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
    On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 3:46:23 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    Of course none from the conspiracy nuthouse EVER says what DID happen >because they know that if they step into that trap their theories will >never coincide with the evidence.

    Multiple assassins shot at the occupants of the limo. There's little
    doubt that JFK was their target.
    But there is a small doubt, in Ben's mind. Ben keeps the door open just a crack that his "multiple assassins" in Dealey Plaza had a different target in mind other than JFK.

    Good grief.

    If I ever update the Benny Tracker series, this is going on the list.

    As Trump would say, "Sad!"

    Sadder still, after nearly sixty years, Ben has narrowed it down to something this specific...

    "Multiple assassins shot at the occupants of the limo."

    Nine whole words. The WC should have just said "Oswald shot some people in the limo from his workplace." and outdid him by a word. Just left it at that.

    Steve can't show how that doesn't
    coincide with the evidence.

    And he never will

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to chuckschuyler123@gmail.com on Tue Aug 22 06:40:58 2023
    On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 17:10:57 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <chuckschuyler123@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 3:46:23?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    Of course none from the conspiracy nuthouse EVER says what DID happen
    because they know that if they step into that trap their theories will
    never coincide with the evidence.

    Multiple assassins shot at the occupants of the limo. There's little
    doubt that JFK was their target.


    But there is a small doubt, in Ben's mind.


    There you go molesting Chickenshit's grandmother again...


    Steve can't show how that doesn't
    coincide with the evidence.

    And he never will

    And now we know that Chuckles never will either...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Tue Aug 22 06:41:59 2023
    On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 18:09:01 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:


    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Healy@21:1/5 to Chuck Schuyler on Tue Aug 22 11:24:15 2023
    On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 5:10:59 PM UTC-7, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
    On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 3:46:23 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    Of course none from the conspiracy nuthouse EVER says what DID happen >because they know that if they step into that trap their theories will >never coincide with the evidence.

    Multiple assassins shot at the occupants of the limo. There's little
    doubt that JFK was their target.
    But there is a small doubt, in Ben's mind. Ben keeps the door open just a crack that his "multiple assassins" in Dealey Plaza had a different target in mind other than JFK.

    Good grief.

    If I ever update the Benny Tracker series, this is going on the list.

    As Trump would say, "Sad!"

    Trumpet and his fav representative Frau Marge Cloven HOOF-dah are now negotiating side by side cells in Atlanta for the summer season -- there is hope they'll settle their paternity case soon, thus to romp amongst the red clay and pine trees, a Georgia
    wonder...

    Now get back on JFK assassination case evidence point -- and pssst, update what? you can't even do your drivers license fer christsakes much let alone handle Ben Holmes...and need we remind you, there's a few of us that have been around here long before
    you sold your soul to .john mcmadman... we know your bullshit...

    Steve can't show how that doesn't
    coincide with the evidence.

    And he never will

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chuck Schuyler@21:1/5 to David Healy on Tue Aug 22 11:40:53 2023
    On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 1:24:18 PM UTC-5, David Healy wrote:
    On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 5:10:59 PM UTC-7, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
    On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 3:46:23 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    Of course none from the conspiracy nuthouse EVER says what DID happen >because they know that if they step into that trap their theories will >never coincide with the evidence.

    Multiple assassins shot at the occupants of the limo. There's little doubt that JFK was their target.
    But there is a small doubt, in Ben's mind. Ben keeps the door open just a crack that his "multiple assassins" in Dealey Plaza had a different target in mind other than JFK.

    Good grief.

    If I ever update the Benny Tracker series, this is going on the list.

    As Trump would say, "Sad!"
    Trumpet and his fav representative Frau Marge Cloven HOOF-dah are now negotiating side by side cells in Atlanta for the summer season -- there is hope they'll settle their paternity case soon, thus to romp amongst the red clay and pine trees, a Georgia
    wonder...

    Now get back on JFK assassination case evidence point -- and pssst, update what? you can't even do your drivers license fer christsakes much let alone handle Ben Holmes...and need we remind you, there's a few of us that have been around here long
    before you sold your soul to .john mcmadman... we know your bullshit...

    You're barely intelligible.

    Your pal Ben isn't even 100% sure JFK was the target on 11/22/63.

    You've repeatedly claimed JFK's middle name is Francis.

    You confuse Tom Rossley--ostensibly a friend of yours--with Tom Lowry, aka cdddraftsman, poster who hounded you for years with cruel pornographic memes.

    You fancy yourself as some sort of insightful researcher when, in fact, you're a laughingstock even among your fellow JFK Truthers. No one on your side responds to you or cites any of your "research" that "proved" the Z film was supposedly faked or
    altered or whatever. The saner CT researchers like Bark Junkkarinen thought you were full of shit. Speaking for the few "sane" CT researchers who were trying to narrow down what happened that day, she said about you, "We [the CT community as a whole] got
    your number a long time ago."

    You're an old kook, Healey. We've had your number for years.



    Steve can't show how that doesn't
    coincide with the evidence.

    And he never will

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to chuckschuyler123@gmail.com on Tue Aug 22 11:53:21 2023
    On Tue, 22 Aug 2023 11:40:53 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <chuckschuyler123@gmail.com> wrote:

    Your pal Ben isn't even ...

    I AM sure that you're molesting your own grandmother.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Healy@21:1/5 to Chuck Schuyler on Wed Aug 23 19:59:36 2023
    On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 11:40:55 AM UTC-7, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
    On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 1:24:18 PM UTC-5, David Healy wrote:
    On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 5:10:59 PM UTC-7, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
    On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 3:46:23 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    Of course none from the conspiracy nuthouse EVER says what DID happen >because they know that if they step into that trap their theories will
    never coincide with the evidence.

    Multiple assassins shot at the occupants of the limo. There's little doubt that JFK was their target.
    But there is a small doubt, in Ben's mind. Ben keeps the door open just a crack that his "multiple assassins" in Dealey Plaza had a different target in mind other than JFK.

    Good grief.

    If I ever update the Benny Tracker series, this is going on the list.

    As Trump would say, "Sad!"
    Trumpet and his fav representative Frau Marge Cloven HOOF-dah are now negotiating side by side cells in Atlanta for the summer season -- there is hope they'll settle their paternity case soon, thus to romp amongst the red clay and pine trees, a
    Georgia wonder...

    Now get back on JFK assassination case evidence point -- and pssst, update what? you can't even do your drivers license fer christsakes much let alone handle Ben Holmes...and need we remind you, there's a few of us that have been around here long
    before you sold your soul to .john mcmadman... we know your bullshit...
    You're barely intelligible.

    Your pal Ben isn't even 100% sure JFK was the target on 11/22/63.

    You've repeatedly claimed JFK's middle name is Francis.

    You confuse Tom Rossley--ostensibly a friend of yours--with Tom Lowry, aka cdddraftsman, poster who hounded you for years with cruel pornographic memes.

    You fancy yourself as some sort of insightful researcher when, in fact, you're a laughingstock even among your fellow JFK Truthers. No one on your side responds to you or cites any of your "research" that "proved" the Z film was supposedly faked or
    altered or whatever. The saner CT researchers like Bark Junkkarinen thought you were full of shit. Speaking for the few "sane" CT researchers who were trying to narrow down what happened that day, she said about you, "We [the CT community as a whole] got
    your number a long time ago."


    good, you do understand clearly...

    You're an old kook, Healey. We've had your number for years.

    what the real story is about is simple, toots: the JFK assassination fervor would subside by the 70's during that quest to save the conservative, white, american flag (some call it stealing from the poor), the Federalist Society continues building its
    conservative judgeship juggernaut quietly in the background, keeping the south of the Mason Dixon Line racial angst warm on the backburner, mentally challenged Ronal the Raygun shows his deep felt concern for the working stiff and the unions, then we get
    an Uncle Tom who wants a little "white stuff AND to be rich," then that damn Al Gore's internet showed up.... and you thought your job was done... the final chapter for me and I am tired... made peace with my reckoning, you? That's HEALY you old ass
    kisser you... ya always gotta' try to be something you ain't... Now THAT is sad!

    Steve can't show how that doesn't
    coincide with the evidence.

    And he never will

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)