On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 4:48:27 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 04:00:33 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus <gjj...@aol.com>
wrote:

On Feb 16, 4:09?pm, Bud <sirsl...@fast.net> wrote:

? There is witness who said she saw Oswald shortly after the shooting
in a t-shirt. There is a witness who said Oswald was working in a t-
shirt that day.

Then how do the brown shirt fibers get onto the rifle and transferred
to the bag if Oswald shot Kennedy in his T-shirt ?

My reasoning would tell me by the brown shirt being in contact with the rifle and then the rifle in contact with the bag.

Always willing to help the less fortunate with their reasoning.

(Which is what you're implying )

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 14:01:28 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:

My reasoning would...

Be to answer a question, then deny it.

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 04:00:33 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus <gjjmail@aol.com>
wrote:

On Feb 16, 4:09?pm, Bud <sirsl...@fast.net> wrote:

? There is witness who said she saw Oswald shortly after the shooting
in a t-shirt. There is a witness who said Oswald was working in a t-
shirt that day.

Then how do the brown shirt fibers get onto the rifle and transferred
to the bag if Oswald shot Kennedy in his T-shirt ?

(Which is what you're implying )

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 14:21:05 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:

<snicker> Swampy the Troll.

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 5:11:08 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 14:01:28 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:

My reasoning would...

Be to answer a question, then deny it.

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

<snicker> Swampy the Troll.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)