I see that the price for all five of Doug Horne's volumes of pure
fantasy has gone up recently at Amazon.com. A person now has to shell
out $125 to get all five volumes of Mr. Horne's invented tripe. A
ridiculous sum to pay for a batch of fables that would probably
embarrass even Aesop.

I wonder if anyone in Mr. Horne's camp has ever bothered asking
themselves this question (re: Dr. James J. Humes):

If Dr. Humes had been the type of vile, despicable conspirator that
Mr. Horne says he was, then why on Earth would Humes have ADMITTED to
burning ANY autopsy documents when he testified in front of the Warren >Commission and the HSCA and the ARRB?

The fact that Humes ADMITTED to burning various autopsy documents in
his home fireplace is virtual proof, right there, that Humes HAD
NOTHING TO HIDE with respect to any of his testimony in front of the >above-named Governmental committees.

It couldn't be more obvious, via just plain ol' common sense, that
when Humes admitted (three times) to burning some of the autopsy
materials, it means that such "burning" was definitely NOT DONE TO
CONCEAL ANYTHING CONSPIRATORIAL IN NATURE. Otherwise, Humes would have
kept his mouth shut about destroying stuff in his fireplace.

Common sense can go a long way in the JFK investigation. It's just too
bad that very few conspiracy theorists possess very much of that human
trait. Because if they did, they would also be asking themselves:

If JFK was shot from different locations in Dealey Plaza, then how in
the world did the so-called conspirators expect to possibly frame JUST
ONE SINGLE PATSY NAMED LEE HARVEY OSWALD for the President's murder?

It's food for Horne-battling thought anyway. Isn't it?

Anyone see any actual facts or citation in this word-vomit?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 13:59:34 -0700, Ben Holmes
<Admin@ConspiracyJFKForum.com> wrote:

I see that the price for all five of Doug Horne's volumes of pure
fantasy has gone up recently at Amazon.com. A person now has to shell
out $125 to get all five volumes of Mr. Horne's invented tripe. A >>ridiculous sum to pay for a batch of fables that would probably
embarrass even Aesop.

I wonder if anyone in Mr. Horne's camp has ever bothered asking
themselves this question (re: Dr. James J. Humes):

If Dr. Humes had been the type of vile, despicable conspirator that
Mr. Horne says he was, then why on Earth would Humes have ADMITTED to >>burning ANY autopsy documents when he testified in front of the Warren >>Commission and the HSCA and the ARRB?

The fact that Humes ADMITTED to burning various autopsy documents in
his home fireplace is virtual proof, right there, that Humes HAD
NOTHING TO HIDE with respect to any of his testimony in front of the >>above-named Governmental committees.

It couldn't be more obvious, via just plain ol' common sense, that
when Humes admitted (three times) to burning some of the autopsy
materials, it means that such "burning" was definitely NOT DONE TO
CONCEAL ANYTHING CONSPIRATORIAL IN NATURE. Otherwise, Humes would have
kept his mouth shut about destroying stuff in his fireplace.

Common sense can go a long way in the JFK investigation. It's just too
bad that very few conspiracy theorists possess very much of that human >>trait. Because if they did, they would also be asking themselves:

If JFK was shot from different locations in Dealey Plaza, then how in
the world did the so-called conspirators expect to possibly frame JUST
ONE SINGLE PATSY NAMED LEE HARVEY OSWALD for the President's murder?

It's food for Horne-battling thought anyway. Isn't it?

Anyone see any actual facts or citation in this word-vomit?

Nobody could... or nobody could admit to it...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)