1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. ALT.CONSPIRACY.JFK

  • How To Stump A Believer...

    From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Mon Aug 21 13:14:01 2023
    You just post facts, then force them to publicly acknowledge the
    truthfulness of that fact.

    As I did with Chickenshit.


    Now that Chickenshit has admitted that Bugliosi said that it was this
    "oval" shape that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT,

    That wasn`t what I was doing, but I`ll go along with your pretending that it was.


    Sadly, when they go back and deny what they said, you just have to go
    back and force them to answer the question again.

    Chickenshit even *knows* what the next fact I'm going to force him to
    publicly acknowledge - so I predict he'll dance and try to wriggle
    away again...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Mon Aug 21 13:15:28 2023
    On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 4:14:06 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    You just post facts, then force them to publicly acknowledge the truthfulness of that fact.

    You`re delusional.

    As I did with Chickenshit.


    Now that Chickenshit has admitted that Bugliosi said that it was this
    "oval" shape that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT,

    That wasn`t what I was doing, but I`ll go along with your pretending that it was.


    Sadly, when they go back and deny what they said, you just have to go
    back and force them to answer the question again.

    Chickenshit even *knows* what the next fact I'm going to force him to publicly acknowledge - so I predict he'll dance and try to wriggle
    away again...

    I know you are going to use this to hide behind, that`s what I know.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Mon Aug 21 13:20:35 2023
    On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 13:15:28 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 4:14:06?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    You just post facts, then force them to publicly acknowledge the
    truthfulness of that fact.

    You`re ...

    Logical fallacy deleted.


    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it.

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Mon Aug 21 13:26:32 2023
    On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 13:15:28 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 4:14:06?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    You just post facts, then force them to publicly acknowledge the
    truthfulness of that fact.

    You`re ...

    Logical fallacy deleted.


    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Winout immediately denying it)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BT George@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Tue Aug 22 14:29:14 2023
    On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 3:14:06 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    You just post facts, then force them to publicly acknowledge the truthfulness of that fact.

    As I did with Chickenshit.


    Now that Chickenshit has admitted that Bugliosi said that it was this
    "oval" shape that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT,

    That wasn`t what I was doing, but I`ll go along with your pretending that it was.


    Sadly, when they go back and deny what they said, you just have to go
    back and force them to answer the question again.

    Chickenshit even *knows* what the next fact I'm going to force him to publicly acknowledge - so I predict he'll dance and try to wriggle
    away again...

    ...Or--and FAR more likely...you just ask the typically logic-challenged and nonsensical questions common to the CT mindset. This will stump in the same way as explaining the logic inherent in a self-contradiction tends to stump.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)