Seems that it's about time to post this series again... now that
Corbutt has blatantly lied and claimed that "I don't know of any LN
who hasn't recognized the conflicts between testimony and
conclusions."

Speculation. - Tippit and his killer knew each other.
Commission finding. - Investigation has revealed no evidence that
Oswald and Tippit were acquainted, had ever seen each other, or had
any mutual acquaintances. (WCR 651)

"...recalled the person now recognized as Oswald was last seen by her
in the restaurant at about 10 a.m. Wednesday, November 20, at which
time he was "nasty" and used curse words in connection with his order.
She went on to relate that Officer J.D. Tippit was in the restaurant,
as was his habit at about that time each morning, and "shot a glance
at Oswald." She said there was no indication, however, that they knew
each other. (CE 3001)

The WCR lied when stating that there was no evidence that Oswald and
Tippit had ever seen each other.

And Corbutt is now a proven liar... because he'll neither publicly
acknowledge this lie, nor cite any fellow believer who has.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 11:18:52 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

Corbutt has blatantly lied and claimed that "I don't know of any LN
who hasn't recognized the conflicts between testimony and
conclusions."

Of course Corbett is a liar. How could they recognize the conflicts when they admit they've never read the testimony ?

Back in March, I asked them if they'd read the 26 volumes. These were their answers:

BT George: No
Bud: Hell, No
Galbraith: no
Chuckles: no response
Corbett: no response
Von Pein: no response

It's all right here: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/ZzB2RgJV50A/m/aqCxHGhfAAAJ

Corbett is a pathological liar. I guess when he lied as a kid, he never got spanked.
He never lerned that there were consequences to telling lies.
So now he comes in here and gets spanked every time he lies.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 09:33:23 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
<gjjmail1202@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 11:18:52?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

Corbutt has blatantly lied and claimed that "I don't know of any LN
who hasn't recognized the conflicts between testimony and
conclusions."

Of course Corbett is a liar. How could they recognize the conflicts when they admit they've never read the testimony ?

Back in March, I asked them if they'd read the 26 volumes. These were their answers:

BT George: No
Bud: Hell, No
Galbraith: no
Chuckles: no response
Corbett: no response
Von Pein: no response

It's all right here: >https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/ZzB2RgJV50A/m/aqCxHGhfAAAJ

Corbett is a pathological liar. I guess when he lied as a kid, he never got spanked.

That's a speculation based on evidence...

He never lerned that there were consequences to telling lies.
So now he comes in here and gets spanked every time he lies.

Of course, a lack of understanding of God doesn't help either...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 12:33:25 PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:

On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 11:18:52 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

Corbutt has blatantly lied and claimed that "I don't know of any LN
who hasn't recognized the conflicts between testimony and
conclusions."

Of course Corbett is a liar. How could they recognize the conflicts when they admit they've never read the testimony ?

Back in March, I asked them if they'd read the 26 volumes. These were their answers:

BT George: No
Bud: Hell, No
Galbraith: no
Chuckles: no response
Corbett: no response
Von Pein: no response

It's all right here: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/ZzB2RgJV50A/m/aqCxHGhfAAAJ

The 26 volumes are a reference source. They are like an encyclopedia for the assassination. If
there is something you need to know, it can be looked up. It makes about as much sense to read
the 26 volumes from cover to cover as it would reading the encyclopedia from A to Z. You'd
learn a whole lot of stuff that has little relevance.

Corbett is a pathological liar. I guess when he lied as a kid, he never got spanked.
He never lerned that there were consequences to telling lies.
So now he comes in here and gets spanked every time he lies.

Gil continues to tell us about his creepy fetishes.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 09:50:20 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett <geowright1963@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 12:33:25?PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:

On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 11:18:52?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

Corbutt has blatantly lied and claimed that "I don't know of any LN
who hasn't recognized the conflicts between testimony and
conclusions."

Of course Corbett is a liar. How could they recognize the conflicts when they admit they've never read the testimony ?

Back in March, I asked them if they'd read the 26 volumes. These were their answers:

BT George: No
Bud: Hell, No
Galbraith: no
Chuckles: no response
Corbett: no response
Von Pein: no response

It's all right here:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/ZzB2RgJV50A/m/aqCxHGhfAAAJ

The 26 volumes are a reference source. They are like an encyclopedia for the assassination. If
there is something you need to know, it can be looked up. It makes about as much sense to read
the 26 volumes from cover to cover as it would reading the encyclopedia from A to Z. You'd
learn a whole lot of stuff that has little relevance.

It's amusing that Corbutt responded in this thread without a *SINGLE
WORD* about the proven lie told by the Warren Commission.

Of course, without reading the 26 volumes, you have no idea of how
many times the WCR misrepresented and outright lied about the
testimony.

Corbutt loses #1... and many more are coming.

Corbett is a pathological liar. I guess when he lied as a kid, he never got spanked.
He never lerned that there were consequences to telling lies.
So now he comes in here and gets spanked every time he lies.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 08:18:46 -0700, Ben Holmes
<Admin@ConspiracyJFKForum.com> wrote:

Seems that it's about time to post this series again... now that
Corbutt has blatantly lied and claimed that "I don't know of any LN
who hasn't recognized the conflicts between testimony and
conclusions."

Speculation. - Tippit and his killer knew each other.
Commission finding. - Investigation has revealed no evidence that
Oswald and Tippit were acquainted, had ever seen each other, or had
any mutual acquaintances. (WCR 651)

"...recalled the person now recognized as Oswald was last seen by her
in the restaurant at about 10 a.m. Wednesday, November 20, at which
time he was "nasty" and used curse words in connection with his order.
She went on to relate that Officer J.D. Tippit was in the restaurant,
as was his habit at about that time each morning, and "shot a glance
at Oswald." She said there was no indication, however, that they knew
each other. (CE 3001)

The WCR lied when stating that there was no evidence that Oswald and
Tippit had ever seen each other.

And Corbutt is now a proven liar... because he'll neither publicly >acknowledge this lie, nor cite any fellow believer who has.

Amusingly, Corbutt read this, but refuses to address it. Such AMAZING cowardice on his part.

He joins the other cowards:

Chickenshit
Chuckles
David Von Penis
Steven
Huckster Sienzant

And an untold number of killfiled trolls.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)