On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 6:25:29 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 6:08:16 AM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
I know what "reason" means. I`ll give you a hint, it doesn`t mean speculation.
Then why do you speculate and call it "reason" ?
Why do you say I do?
Why do you "reason" the gunsack was 41 inches long when there's absolutely no evidence of that ?
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/33a9MbNPYEg
I provided the reasoning and support in the post where this was discussed. You offered nothing against the reasoning and support I provided in the posts where this was discussed. You ran from the points made then and now you bring the issue up as if
you rebutted my points.
Why do you "reason" that, "You don`t leave fingerprints on every surface you touch" when that's not true ?
If you touch the surface of water will you leave a fingerprint, stupid?
https://www.scienceworld.ca/resource/finding-fingerprints/#:~:text=In%20this%20activity%2C%20students%20learn,patterns%2C%20on%20everything%20we%20touch.
I provided the reasoning and support in the post where this was discussed. You offered nothing against the reasoning and support I provided in the post where this was discussed. You ran from the points made then and now you bring the issue back up as
if you rebutted my points.
Your definition of "reasoning" involves statements for which there is no evidence ( speculation ) and that are provably untrue.
No telling what an idiot means by this. Can you offer specifics?
I'm calling it speculation and that's being nice.
Someone else might call it flat out lies.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)