In article <
lh64n5d67vrqnpsjbh95gl443vuka4u8lj@4ax.com>, John McAdams
says...
On 9 Feb 2010 13:12:57 -0800, Ben Holmes <admin@burningknife.com>
wrote:
In article <4b71ad5a.3697816265@news.supernews.com>, John McAdams says...
On 1 Feb 2010 06:02:17 -0800, Ben Holmes <admin@burningknife.com>
wrote:
38. "... but there is no evidence that an "A. J. Hidell" existed." (WCR 292)
"Because Oswald's use of this pseudonym became known quickly after the >>>>assassination, investigations were conducted with regard to persons using the
name Hidell or names similar to it." (WCR 313)
"Hidell was a favorite alias used by Oswald on a number of occasions. Diligent
search has failed to reveal any person in Dallas or New Orleans by that name."
(WCR 645)
But the actual evidence shows otherwise:
"I, John Rene Heindel, 812 Belleville Street, New Orleans, Louisiana, being >>>>first duly sworn, depose and say: ...While in the Marine Corps, I was often >>>>referred to as "Hidell"--pronounced so as to rhyme with "Rydell" rather than
"Fidel." This was a nickname and not merely an inadvertent mispronunciation. It
is possible that Oswald might have heard me being called by this name; indeed he
may himself have called me "Hidell." However, I have no specific recollection of
his either using or hearing this name." (8H 318)
If a LNT'er wishes to argue that the staff was unaware of this deposition, >>>>they'll need to face this:
Mr. JENNER. Do you remember a marine by the name of John Heindel?
Mr. POWERS. No, sir.
Mr. JENNER. Sometimes called Hidell? This is Atsugi now.
Mr. POWERS. No. (8H 288)
The WCR once again, simply lied. And although John R. Heindel was known from a
Secret Service investigation conducted in New Orleans from 22Nov - 2Dec; (See
CE3119 pg 12) no other research has been presented... presumably, the FBI, >>>>Secret Service, and WC simply declined to investigate Heindel.
Perhaps you can explain how this matters?
Of course one can speculate that "Hidell" was really Oswald's
corruption of "Heindel."
But maybe it was a corruption of his hero "Fidel."
How does it matter?
Notice that here John has accepted the proof that the WC was well
aware that an actual "Hidell" existed... yet blatantly lied about that
fact... and so John is really asking: "Why does it matter that the WC
simply lied about their own evidence?"
When you have to ask that question - you're simply showing that the
truth doesn't matter to you at all.
.John
Denying the evidence is typical of the LNT'er crowd...
Translation: I have no idea why this would in sinister to even the
slightest degree, but I'm going to huff and puff about it.
You like to pretend that you don't understand these issues... you
understand all too well.
Oswald frequently used the alias "Alex Hidell." Where that came from
is speculation. But it doesn't really matter where it came from.
What matters, John; is that the WC had a habit of lying about their
own evidence.
And you can't provide a reasonable, non-conspiratorial explanation
why.
.John
McAdams never did respond to this... he was like Huckster in that
regard, simply up and disappear when he had no credible argument to
make... or faced evidence he can't explain.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)