On Saturday, April 20, 2019 at 9:59:51 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 17:18:41 -0700 (PDT), chucksch...@gmail.com
wrote:

Here's one that has stumped Ben before, and will continue to stump him:

Which for former Marine led a "better" post-Marine Corps life?

Charles Whitman, or...

Lee Harvey Oswald?

I'll answer the question just as soon as you cite the previous post
where this question was asked.

I can't answer it before dealing with your lie... I don't want to
encourage you in your lying.

You will either produce the citation where this question was asked
before, and "I was stumped"... or you'll admit that you lied.

Then I'll answer the question.

A refusal to CITE the prior asking of this question will be your
public announcement that you're a liar.

I rather meanly included You in the list prior, which even you don't deserve...

Chuckles is a liar, but now that Huckster disappears for weeks at a
time, Steven refuses to debate, Corbutt is frightened of debate, and
David Von Penis avidly reads everything I write, then refuses to
answer ini THIS forum... and Chickenshit has decided to follow
Corbutt, you're the only one left.

Would you like to explain WHY you lied about me not answering a
question?

Would you like to tell everyone here the truth - that *YOU* have
repeatedly run from my questions?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, August 16, 2023 at 11:16:35 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

Chuckles is a liar, but now that Huckster disappears for weeks at a
time, Steven refuses to debate, Corbutt is frightened of debate, and
David Von Penis avidly reads everything I write, then refuses to
answer ini THIS forum... and Chickenshit has decided to follow
Corbutt, you're the only one left.

Would you like to explain WHY you lied about me not answering a
question?

Would you like to tell everyone here the truth - that *YOU* have
repeatedly run from my questions?

They're all liars.
When you support a lie, you have to lie to support it.
A reasonable person, when faced with facts to the contrary, will always consider those facts.
These people are not reasonable people.

They have THEIR truth and they're happy with that.
What they don't realize is that there is only ONE TRUTH and one cannot find the truth as long as one only hears one side of the story.
But they're happy in their world of lone gunmen, magic bullets, corrupt police and government coverup.

The government didn't lie, it told ITS truth.
And for millions of peple who couldn't think for themselves, it became THEIR truth as well.
And anyone who questioned the government was vilified from the outset by its allies in the media.

Just like today.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 7:55:13 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:

On Wednesday, August 16, 2023 at 11:16:35 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

Chuckles is a liar, but now that Huckster disappears for weeks at a
time, Steven refuses to debate, Corbutt is frightened of debate, and
David Von Penis avidly reads everything I write, then refuses to
answer ini THIS forum... and Chickenshit has decided to follow
Corbutt, you're the only one left.

Would you like to explain WHY you lied about me not answering a
question?

Would you like to tell everyone here the truth - that *YOU* have repeatedly run from my questions?

They're all liars.
When you support a lie, you have to lie to support it.
A reasonable person, when faced with facts to the contrary, will always consider those facts.
These people are not reasonable people.

Gil, your problem is that you look at facts and then draw illogical conclusions from them. The
facts don't prove what you claim they do.

They have THEIR truth and they're happy with that.

Since there is only one truth, why would we spend decades looking for another?

What they don't realize is that there is only ONE TRUTH and one cannot find the truth as long as one only hears one side of the story.

I've been hearing both sides of the story for decades. I figured out a long time ago only one side
makes any sense. HINT: It's not your side.

But they're happy in their world of lone gunmen, magic bullets, corrupt police and government coverup.

There is ample evidence of a lone gunman. There is no evidence of magic bullets, corrupt police,
or a government cover up as it pertains to he assassination of JFK. There is no denying that
there are corrupt police and governments do engage in cover ups. There's just no evidence of
it in the investigation of the JFK assassination.

The government didn't lie, it told ITS truth.

It told the only truth regarding the assassination of JFK. Governments lie and engage in coverups
when it is in the interest of the people in power to do so. The evidence indicates the assassination
was the work of one man and no one in government had any reason to cover that up.

And for millions of peple who couldn't think for themselves, it became THEIR truth as well.
And anyone who questioned the government was vilified from the outset by its allies in the media.

Just like today.

Your arguments would be more compelling if they were accompanied by compelling evidence.
You are sorely lacking in that department.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 08:36:40 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett <geowright1963@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 7:55:13?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:

On Wednesday, August 16, 2023 at 11:16:35?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

Chuckles is a liar, but now that Huckster disappears for weeks at a
time, Steven refuses to debate, Corbutt is frightened of debate, and
David Von Penis avidly reads everything I write, then refuses to
answer ini THIS forum... and Chickenshit has decided to follow
Corbutt, you're the only one left.

Would you like to explain WHY you lied about me not answering a
question?

Would you like to tell everyone here the truth - that *YOU* have
repeatedly run from my questions?

Clearly, Corbutt didn't want to address this...

They're all liars.
When you support a lie, you have to lie to support it.
A reasonable person, when faced with facts to the contrary, will always consider those facts.
These people are not reasonable people.

Gil, your problem is that you look at facts and then draw illogical conclusions from them. The
facts don't prove what you claim they do.

Logical fallacies like this simply show that *YOU* know you don't have
a case.

They have THEIR truth and they're happy with that.

Since there is only one truth, why would we spend decades looking for another?

Begging the question.

What they don't realize is that there is only ONE TRUTH and one cannot find the truth as long as one only hears one side of the story.

I've been hearing both sides of the story for decades. I figured out a long time ago only one side
makes any sense. HINT: It's not your side.

Hint: You're a coward and a liar.

But they're happy in their world of lone gunmen, magic bullets, corrupt police and government coverup.

There is ample evidence of a lone gunman. There is no evidence of magic bullets, corrupt police,
or a government cover up as it pertains to he assassination of JFK.

And as I stated above, you're both a coward and a liar.

The government didn't lie, it told ITS truth.

It told the only truth regarding the assassination of JFK. Governments lie and engage in coverups
when it is in the interest of the people in power to do so. The evidence indicates the assassination
was the work of one man and no one in government had any reason to cover that up.

And yet, thousands upon thousands of documents have been classified by
this government who claims only one nutcase did it.

You can't explain this fact.

That makes *YOU* the nutcase.

And for millions of peple who couldn't think for themselves, it became THEIR truth as well.
And anyone who questioned the government was vilified from the outset by its allies in the media.

Just like today.

Your arguments would be more compelling if they were accompanied by compelling evidence.

The volumes of evidence compiled by the WC. The testimony taken.

You are sorely lacking in that department.

Says the coward who can't post his scenario.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 08:36:55 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett <geowright1963@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 7:55:13?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:

On Wednesday, August 16, 2023 at 11:16:35?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

Chuckles is a liar, but now that Huckster disappears for weeks at a
time, Steven refuses to debate, Corbutt is frightened of debate, and
David Von Penis avidly reads everything I write, then refuses to
answer ini THIS forum... and Chickenshit has decided to follow
Corbutt, you're the only one left.

Would you like to explain WHY you lied about me not answering a
question?

Would you like to tell everyone here the truth - that *YOU* have
repeatedly run from my questions?

Clearly, Corbutt didn't want to address this...

They're all liars.
When you support a lie, you have to lie to support it.
A reasonable person, when faced with facts to the contrary, will always consider those facts.
These people are not reasonable people.

Gil, your problem is that you look at facts and then draw illogical conclusions from them. The
facts don't prove what you claim they do.

Logical fallacies like this simply show that *YOU* know you don't have
a case.

They have THEIR truth and they're happy with that.

Since there is only one truth, why would we spend decades looking for another?

Begging the question.

What they don't realize is that there is only ONE TRUTH and one cannot find the truth as long as one only hears one side of the story.

I've been hearing both sides of the story for decades. I figured out a long time ago only one side
makes any sense. HINT: It's not your side.

Hint: You're a coward and a liar.

But they're happy in their world of lone gunmen, magic bullets, corrupt police and government coverup.

There is ample evidence of a lone gunman. There is no evidence of magic bullets, corrupt police,
or a government cover up as it pertains to he assassination of JFK.

And as I stated above, you're both a coward and a liar.

The government didn't lie, it told ITS truth.

It told the only truth regarding the assassination of JFK. Governments lie and engage in coverups
when it is in the interest of the people in power to do so. The evidence indicates the assassination
was the work of one man and no one in government had any reason to cover that up.

And yet, thousands upon thousands of documents have been classified by
this government who claims only one nutcase did it.

You can't explain this fact.

That makes *YOU* the nutcase.

And for millions of peple who couldn't think for themselves, it became THEIR truth as well.
And anyone who questioned the government was vilified from the outset by its allies in the media.

Just like today.

Your arguments would be more compelling if they were accompanied by compelling evidence.

The volumes of evidence compiled by the WC. The testimony taken.

You are sorely lacking in that department.

Says the coward who can't post his scenario.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, August 16, 2023 at 10:16:35 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Saturday, April 20, 2019 at 9:59:51 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 17:18:41 -0700 (PDT), chucksch...@gmail.com
wrote:

Here's one that has stumped Ben before, and will continue to stump him: >>>
Which for former Marine led a "better" post-Marine Corps life?

Charles Whitman, or...

Lee Harvey Oswald?

I'll answer the question just as soon as you cite the previous post
where this question was asked.

I can't answer it before dealing with your lie... I don't want to
encourage you in your lying.

You will either produce the citation where this question was asked
before, and "I was stumped"... or you'll admit that you lied.

Then I'll answer the question.

A refusal to CITE the prior asking of this question will be your
public announcement that you're a liar.

I rather meanly included You in the list prior, which even you don't deserve...

Chuckles is a liar, but now that Huckster disappears for weeks at a
time, Steven refuses to debate, Corbutt is frightened of debate, and
David Von Penis avidly reads everything I write, then refuses to
answer ini THIS forum... and Chickenshit has decided to follow
Corbutt, you're the only one left.

Would you like to explain WHY you lied about me not answering a
question?

Would you like to tell everyone here the truth - that *YOU* have
repeatedly run from my questions?

Here you go.

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/ppIGEZwaEqk/m/iZBXjsX6AgAJ

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 09:41:22 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <chuckschuyler123@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wednesday, August 16, 2023 at 10:16:35?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Saturday, April 20, 2019 at 9:59:51 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 17:18:41 -0700 (PDT), chucksch...@gmail.com
wrote:

Here's one that has stumped Ben before, and will continue to stump him: >>>>>
Which for former Marine led a "better" post-Marine Corps life?

Charles Whitman, or...

Lee Harvey Oswald?

I'll answer the question just as soon as you cite the previous post
where this question was asked.

I can't answer it before dealing with your lie... I don't want to
encourage you in your lying.

You will either produce the citation where this question was asked
before, and "I was stumped"... or you'll admit that you lied.

Then I'll answer the question.

A refusal to CITE the prior asking of this question will be your
public announcement that you're a liar.

I rather meanly included You in the list prior, which even you don't deserve...

Chuckles is a liar, but now that Huckster disappears for weeks at a
time, Steven refuses to debate, Corbutt is frightened of debate, and
David Von Penis avidly reads everything I write, then refuses to
answer ini THIS forum... and Chickenshit has decided to follow
Corbutt, you're the only one left.

Would you like to explain WHY you lied about me not answering a
question?

Would you like to tell everyone here the truth - that *YOU* have
repeatedly run from my questions?

Here you go.

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/ppIGEZwaEqk/m/iZBXjsX6AgAJ

Your cite goes nowhere... Would you like to tell everyone here the
truth - that *YOU* have repeatedly run from my questions?

(And did so again RIGHT HERE!)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 12:09:58 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 09:41:22 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wednesday, August 16, 2023 at 10:16:35?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Saturday, April 20, 2019 at 9:59:51 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 17:18:41 -0700 (PDT), chucksch...@gmail.com
wrote:

Here's one that has stumped Ben before, and will continue to stump him: >>>>>
Which for former Marine led a "better" post-Marine Corps life?

Charles Whitman, or...

Lee Harvey Oswald?

I'll answer the question just as soon as you cite the previous post >>>> where this question was asked.

I can't answer it before dealing with your lie... I don't want to
encourage you in your lying.

You will either produce the citation where this question was asked
before, and "I was stumped"... or you'll admit that you lied.

Then I'll answer the question.

A refusal to CITE the prior asking of this question will be your
public announcement that you're a liar.

I rather meanly included You in the list prior, which even you don't deserve...

Chuckles is a liar, but now that Huckster disappears for weeks at a
time, Steven refuses to debate, Corbutt is frightened of debate, and
David Von Penis avidly reads everything I write, then refuses to
answer ini THIS forum... and Chickenshit has decided to follow
Corbutt, you're the only one left.

Would you like to explain WHY you lied about me not answering a
question?

Would you like to tell everyone here the truth - that *YOU* have
repeatedly run from my questions?

Here you go.

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/ppIGEZwaEqk/m/iZBXjsX6AgAJ Your cite goes nowhere... Would you like to tell everyone here the

truth - that *YOU* have repeatedly run from my questions?
(And did so again RIGHT HERE!)

Upon what narrow strip of turf are you claiming your hollow victory upon this time, oh slimy one.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 12:04:08 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <chuckschuyler123@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 12:09:58?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 09:41:22 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wednesday, August 16, 2023 at 10:16:35?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>On Saturday, April 20, 2019 at 9:59:51 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 17:18:41 -0700 (PDT), chucksch...@gmail.com
wrote:

Here's one that has stumped Ben before, and will continue to stump him: >>>>>>>
Which for former Marine led a "better" post-Marine Corps life?

Charles Whitman, or...

Lee Harvey Oswald?

I'll answer the question just as soon as you cite the previous post >>>>>> where this question was asked.

I can't answer it before dealing with your lie... I don't want to
encourage you in your lying.

You will either produce the citation where this question was asked >>>>>> before, and "I was stumped"... or you'll admit that you lied.

Then I'll answer the question.

A refusal to CITE the prior asking of this question will be your
public announcement that you're a liar.

I rather meanly included You in the list prior, which even you don't deserve...

Chuckles is a liar, but now that Huckster disappears for weeks at a
time, Steven refuses to debate, Corbutt is frightened of debate, and
David Von Penis avidly reads everything I write, then refuses to
answer ini THIS forum... and Chickenshit has decided to follow
Corbutt, you're the only one left.

Would you like to explain WHY you lied about me not answering a
question?

Would you like to tell everyone here the truth - that *YOU* have
repeatedly run from my questions?

Here you go.

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/ppIGEZwaEqk/m/iZBXjsX6AgAJ >>

Your cite goes nowhere... Would you like to tell everyone here the
truth - that *YOU* have repeatedly run from my questions?
(And did so again RIGHT HERE!)

Logical fallacy deleted.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)